Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Conversation | 10/16/2008 9:15 am

Judith Martin (AKA Miss Manners) Says It's All About Greed

JUDITH: I’ve been thinking about money. I’m not so surprised at the state of the economy because, for some time, I’ve been noticing that the idea of living above one’s means is so commonplace that it inevitably led to this. People often ask me, "What is the number one etiquette problem in America?" They think I’m going to say using the wrong fork or talking on cell phones, but it’s been, for some time now, unbridled greed. Gimme, gimme, gimme.

JOAN: God bless you.

JUDITH: It is unashamed, unsubtle grabbing-at schemes to live above one’s means, at the expense of others. And people think of these techniques as normal because they’re so widespread now, like the gift registry and the cash bar at private parties or weddings. I get so many letters that start out, “I’d like to do this or that but I can’t afford it.” It might be putting on a lavish wedding or saying, “I want to give a nice anniversary party for my parents, or birthday party for my wife.” And you would think, when they go on to say, “but I can’t afford it,” they would then, if they must write me, ask, “What can I do instead?” Not at all. What they’re asking is, “How can I tell the guests that they have to pay?” or, “How can I do this by having people donate money for the wedding, for the honeymoon?” or “How can I politely tell them to give me cash?” It’s all under the guise of helping, relieving the guests of that great burden of thinking what they can do for them – by announcing it. Have you ever seen engaged couples going around with these zapping machines in stores? Zap, zap, “We want this, we want that, we want the other thing.” Not because they’re going to buy it but because they’re going to try to get someone else to buy it. The wedding industry started this, but by advising people that it was – and this really annoys me — “proper,” of course it’s highly improper to have all kinds of extras at a wedding that make it wildly expensive. And so, realizing that this is going to be a problem for some people, they now are full of ideas of how to get it from other people. They’re teaching begging.

SHEILA: I disagree with you. I don’t think that greed and living above your means is necessarily the same. "Living above your means" means sometimes reaching for the stars. Wanting more than you have is part of what propels people to go forward. I mean, wanting the biggest car in the world when you can’t afford it? Yes, that might be ridiculous. But wanting to give someone you love the best wedding in the world? I don’t think that’s greed. I think greed is the people who have too much wanting more, not the people who have too little reaching for the stars. I think the combination of greed and living above your means is not a fair equation.

JUDITH: May I just break in for a moment? Getting the money from other people to do what you cannot pay for yourself, and yet want to do now — that is what I mean.

SHEILA: But all loans are based on getting money from other people. Maybe people want someone to have that thing that they want. Maybe they want to contribute to it. Maybe it’s not polite, but it doesn’t seem to me to be greedy to want to give people you love something that perhaps you can’t afford, just for the sheer pleasure of it. You’re not saying that person’s doing that every day. If you told me that every day they lived above their means — the wedding and then the dinner and then the restaurant — then I might say OK

65 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Patrice Baldwin
Uhhh,… Well, Ellen, what I’ve got isn’t yours, so stay out of Tucson. Your soft-ish generality just doesn’t trickle down to anything practical to hang your hat on.
By Patrice Baldwin on 10/16/2008 6:10 pm
gulliver fourmyle
That is Markism—-he predicted humanity would ‘evolve’ from ‘love-of-$$$’ to appreciaton of ‘each-person’—-not apopular view here—-yet—-
By gulliver fourmyle on 12/17/2008 3:37 am
HA BIBI
I couldn’t agree more. This country is comprised of people who are adamant about living beyond their means. It use to be shameful when someone would in any way appear to keep up with the jones,’ where now, it is a blantant surmation that “By God, if the Jones’s have it, then so shall I”
By HA BIBI on 10/16/2008 9:34 am
Marjorie C.
Elaine: “By God, if the Jones’s have it, then so shall I” LOL. And mine will be better !!
By Marjorie C. on 10/16/2008 12:42 pm
HA BIBI
Hi Marjorie, LOL ain’t that the truth! And the sad thing is is that so many think they are entitled to everything, instead of getting off their duff’s and working hard like the rest of us, that do have. :)
By HA BIBI on 10/16/2008 4:05 pm
Kel Choate
I so agree— My husband and I, when we were deciding on a home to buy, we could have afforded a much more luxurious home than what we actually have (mind you, our home is very comfortable and we love it)— but we made a conscious decision to buy a home that fit our NEEDS, and that we could afford ALONE if something tragic were to happen to either one of us (that way we don’t have to worry) — We also moved OUT of town and away from all the people that we found were trying to “keep up with the Joneses” — Granted we have wonderful friends, but I guess we look at things a little differently sometimes. IT’s not just a point of view— it’s a lifestyle choice- we don’t do without, our kids have video games, we are modern, but we put family time, interaction with our children and their education, and our marriage first- not the material things in life. I would never make it on a fashion runway, but my needs are met. My husband would not be considered “successful” in the material world, but he provides for his children. I think we all need to stop and realize that you can’t take it with you— one day when we are dead and gone, we will never look back and think, “you know, I REALLY should have spent less time with my family and worked more so I could pay for a swimming pool/big screen tv/luxury car —- When I leave this place, I want to know that I invested my life wisely in my family and marriage.
By Kel Choate on 02/08/2009 1:48 pm
HA BIBI
Hi Kel, I’m not sure if you are new here at WoW but if so “A big Welcome to you” It’s sounds like you and your husband are doing everything just right, and boy oh boy are you ever right about Not taking it with you. All those “Things” that we have are blessings from God and curses if we take them out of perspective and make them more than they were intended. Hope you stay at WoW and grace us with more lovely writtings!
By HA BIBI on 02/08/2009 2:39 pm
gulliver fourmyle
Judge not, lest You be judged’—-who is to blame? the banks that dangled a carrot on a string? or those seeking a life’s goal, placed before them—-seeking the carrot? a scam depends on the target’s naiviete’—-no shortage here—-to expect the average to do otherwise is just plain—-well, you know—-
By gulliver fourmyle on 12/17/2008 3:52 am
HA BIBI
Hi Gully, Both parties had an agenda but the banks knew their commodity. I on the other hand, as a borrower, am expected to understand the full potiental of and ramifications towards what I am borrowing so that I know fully what those figures are and what it is I am expected to pay back to the lender. These people saw an offer that looked in their minds, to good to be true and when that is the sales ploy, you can pretty well assume it to be so. Therefore if they knew that regardless of the pitch, they were also well informed as to how much they would owe. I am also certain that the plow used by the lender was to offer comfort to the borrower, that their intrest rate would not rise but remain low due to the markets, thus causing a false sense of security, compounded by the fact that these borrowers were so enthralled with the idea of having a slice of that American pie, they were willing to forfiet common sense. The blame lays with those who gambled foolishly and attempted to make purchases they knew they could not afford and that is theft in my book. If you can’t pay back money you borrow, willfully knowing you can’t pay it back, that makes these that do so nothing more than theifs. Now that is not judging someone that is using discernment. I would never in a million years make large purchases without throughly researching the facts of what it is I was getting myself into, that’s just plain common sense and a built-in protection system. My greatest pet peeve is that people want to run around, rarely if ever, using their brains and when they get into a pickle, they immediately want to place the blame everywhere else, rather than where it belongs and that is on themselves. :)
By HA BIBI on 12/17/2008 10:21 am
HA BIBI
That would be ploy, LOL!
By HA BIBI on 12/17/2008 10:26 am
gulliver fourmyle
your ‘error-of-reasoning’ goes to the fact Most are not You—-it’s a tricky deal—-putting yourself in another’s shoes seems rather impossible. i’ve found there are essentially two ‘personality-types’—-Employers and Employees—-as a biz-person, and no-doubt one ‘killer’ winner—-that requires many factors—-you mention ‘brains’—-tons of research have found ‘high-achievers’ have extraordinary ‘limbic-systems’ and naturally high dopamine production—-you are born with these factors, or not—-‘confidence, reward-seeking behavior, focus, creativity, high-energy levels’ are known limbic-functions—-and tend to run in families—-sometimes ‘skipping-generations’, but usually easily found in one’s ‘family-tree’. Employees seldom become entrepreneurs, biz-founders’, etc., as they lack this either inherited bio-chemistry or simply are hit by ‘the luck of the draw’. to expect an ‘employee-type’ to have MBA skills in not realistic—-but a strong need where handling money. they don’t have it—-you do—- i’ve been up and down fiscally several times, and each ‘IRS Very Wealthy’ episode has led to the thinking you express. i’ve seen ‘solid’ biz-people, know many, who don’t have ‘cycles of wealth’, rather a smooth sail—-near all come from stable biz families—-not employees. the fact no ‘Closer’ may pull wool over Your eyes is ‘built-in’ to your personality. not everyone’s. you mention relying on ‘Faith’—-i would see these hapless home-buyers as victims of both bank ‘Closers’, and Faith that things will work-out. given those elements, and the predatory nature of Closers, i put fault, not on the buyers, rather ‘human-nature’ in a disordered world. to term these buyers as ‘thieves’ is to ignore their dreams, and more importantly to ignore those presenting a better life—-the banks—-
By gulliver fourmyle on 12/17/2008 10:21 pm
Joleen Knits
Thank you, thank you, thank you, Miss Manners. Approximately 15 years ago I received a mass-produced “invitation” from the teen-aged daughter of a close friend. The letter opened with an announcement that she had a strong desire to visit Europe, did not have have the time to find a job, and consequently did not have enough money to travel. She proposed having a party upon her return from the desired vacation. We invitees would have our lives improved by viewing her pictures and videos at this welcome home party. The cost of this “privilege” was a donation, i.e., money, funding her trip. Needless to say, I was appalled and did not contribute. Most people were so stunned that they wrote checks and gave her enough cash to fund a five week tour of Europe. Her mother was upset that I would not assist her daughter, and the friendship came to an end. By the way, this young woman has continued to expect others to pay for her life.
By Joleen Knits on 10/16/2008 9:52 am
Mommy Dearest
Dear ones, it would be so very lovely if life were so simple, all could be explained in a word, wouldn’t it? It’s all greed. It’s all this. It’s all that. Were it only that simple, dahlings, everyone would have it all figured out, wouldn’t we?
By Mommy Dearest on 10/16/2008 9:53 am
Kel Choate
Yes Dahling!!
By Kel Choate on 02/08/2009 1:49 pm
f p
Yeppers—greed and the Gordon Gecko’s of this world
By f p on 10/16/2008 10:03 am