Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Conversation | 05/20/2008 10:29 am

At a Table in So-Called Liberal NYC, Woman Announces: I’ll Never Vote for a Black Man for President

© AP
KATHLEEN: But does that woman, then, give you some explanation?

LIZ: No, she just frothed at the mouth and we all tried to ignore her because I was sitting by a very rich man who’s a big Obama supporter and I was afraid he was going to leave the table.

LESLEY: Yeah, he was pretty steamed. And I must tell you, this whole issue of whether people feel freer to express this attitude has been on my mind. I’m from Massachusetts — which is supposedly the liberal capital of the world, Ted Kennedy country — and I went home and I began to hear it in Massachusetts, of all places. Kathleen, in the polls out of West Virginia, and in what we’re seeing coming up in Kentucky, is race becoming a serious element in the vote?

KATHLEEN: I think that the problem in analyzing all of this is that some people make the assumption that because one demographic block did not vote overwhelmingly for Sen. Obama, or did not vote overwhelmingly for Sen. Clinton, that what must be under that is in one case racism, and in another case sexism. And I think there’s been a problem this year in the analysis because I know very early in the primary process people were saying that a vote for one was a vote against the other, which was simply wrong. When you looked under the polling data what you found was that there’s high favorability for both of the candidates, or in the early stages, all three of the major candidates. Now when you begin to see anger under some of the vote on each side, I think the question has shifted. And then the question there doesn’t necessarily have to be a race or gender question. The possibility is that those people, if you could reconfigure to take race or gender out, would be very much like the Robert Kennedy/Gene McCarthy supporters in 1968, where they were just extremely —

LIZ: Just as confused and split.

KATHLEEN: Yeah. I think that part of what makes it difficult to talk about this is, we don’t know when sexism and racism are under the discussion. And it’s not necessarily strong, clear evidence just because one demographic group goes one way and one goes the other, that necessarily either of those things is underlying the vote. It may well be, but I’m not sure we know that.

LESLEY: So, you’re saying, the polling is not getting at it?

KATHLEEN: Yeah. We’ve never been able to trust polling to tell us about those kinds of attitudes. In large part – and, Lesley, you put your finger on it — people who are smart enough to know that those are disapproved attitudes are also smart enough to cover up the fact that they feel them.

LIZ: Exactly. This woman the other night just didn’t give a damn.

LESLEY: Right. But I did see, around the time of West Virginia primary, that some pollsters have been trying to ask not how you feel, but how you think others feel, as a way to get at this. And then, there was the sense that there was more racism coming out of those questions.

LIZ: Well, there will always be some overt, or hidden – either way – racism in America. But I do think it has diminished. I think we’re seeing that.

LESLEY: Just by the vote itself, you mean.

LIZ: Oh, my God. I mean the enthusiasm for this man is unbelievable.

LESLEY: But not everywhere. Look at what happened in West Virginia — that vote was so incredibly lopsided; and predictions are that Kentucky is going to be the same.

LIZ: Well, wait and see …

182 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

immoddesta godessa
DOES IT MEAN NOTHIN THAT 72,000 PEOPLE [ WHITEY TIGHTY] IN PORTLAND CRAMMMED THE WATERFRONT TO SCREAM FOR THIS GUY???
By immoddesta godessa on 05/20/2008 11:39 am
T S
Hmmm…I thought that maybe that outpouring of people was because he is well-spoken, offers a sense of hope in very troubled times, carries himself in a style that is gentleman like (not back-biting or underhanded), gives speeches that center around concepts like unity, fielded the tricky Rev. Wright fiasco with dignity and in my opinion careful thought, speaks an ideology that appeals to many people and has shown a degree of finesse and wisdom in his campaign approach. Pardon my naivete, but is your post suggesting it was about his race? I guess I missed that? By the way, is there a reason why you are typing in all capital letters? My kids say that’s the equivalent of yelling in “computer speak.” There’s a song that says “You’re screaming so loudly no one can hear you.” I do wish to “hear” you so please unlock the Cap Lock…
By T S on 05/20/2008 11:53 am
immoddesta godessa
Sorry TS, No quite the opposite actually. The outpourring of interest and action on his behalf is, for me , because of the characteristics you cite ! I’m very proud of my town , it’s people, it’s politics, and hopfully PRESIDENT OBAMA!
By immoddesta godessa on 05/20/2008 2:51 pm
~ countrywoman ~
immoddesta godessa :-) And didn’t we REJOICE at our “Oregonian” 1/2 front page photo reflecting the indisputable sea of support for our candidate? Proud and then some! Appreciate your post, neighbor.
By ~ countrywoman ~ on 05/20/2008 9:24 pm
immoddesta godessa
Oh hi neighbor! I actually didn’t get to make the rallly as I had to be out of town but I am darned proud of Portland! When they say ” put up or shut up ” this city puts up B I G !!
By immoddesta godessa on 05/21/2008 6:34 am
cat  lord
GODESSA, It doesn’t mean anything ! I would vote for Colin Powell, but never for Obama!!!!!!But of course,Powell is too smart to run for president! it’s human nature to go extreme left (Obama) after 8 years of extreme right(Bush) LOL LOL
By cat lord on 05/20/2008 5:19 pm
bob mirabile
you have it correct Colin Powell any day .here is gospel from the latino civil engineers in my company .. they wont vote for Obama either there is no longer a minority Democratic franchise in the middle class. They say that the huge influx of the ‘spanish people’ is due to the fact that ‘they will work’ when others wont. Thats the overt racism I see in my company and why if Mc Cain gets a latino Veep he will waltz to the Presidency american voters say synthesis ,anthysis= thesis dems in congress + mc cain in the white house best of both worlds
By bob mirabile on 05/20/2008 5:52 pm
cat  lord
Happy to hear from you!
By cat lord on 05/20/2008 6:19 pm
DeBúrca obj
If Colin Powell is so smart, then it must mean he was too smart to be tricked into saying all those things he said supporting the bogus reasons to invade Iraq. That being the case he must have been lying about WMDs, right?
By DeBúrca obj on 05/22/2008 12:48 am
cat  lord
Correct!
By cat lord on 05/23/2008 6:55 pm
lavern reed
This race is not about a candidate it’s about the current adverse economic conditions of the American people and their families. Anyone who get side tracked for any other reason and refuse to acknowledge those suffering, in American at this time are just misguided. These races are never about the candidates as we have endured so many distractions over the years about being partisan rather than aout substance. For millions of us this is about our families and our pocket books not an individual, because the love of our families is just to important to listen to partisan politics.
By lavern reed on 05/22/2008 11:22 am
cat  lord
There is nothing wrong with “that mysterious woman” saying she wouldn’t vote for a black president! It’s her right! It’s the same as black poeple having finally the opportunity to vote for a black president.It’s all fair.This country is so hypocritical and feeling guilty, that poeple get “shocked”! Obviously, not that woman ! Maybe she liked to shock! lol
By cat lord on 05/20/2008 10:58 pm
Frannie Em
godesa One of the reasons there were 75,000 people present is because The Decemberists, a very popular band up there, had been advertising for days that they were going to give a FREE concert before Obama spoke. Which they did - they played for 45 min - and hour. FOR FREE. No one has reported this, but that is one of the reasons there were 75,000 people there. Will they all vote in the general election? Your guess is as good as mine.
By Frannie Em on 05/21/2008 3:56 pm
Frannie Em
should read 45 min to an hour
By Frannie Em on 05/21/2008 3:58 pm
cat  lord
Frannie Thanks for that information! I didnt know and i am sure a lot of people didn’t either.At the same time, it was a good pr for Obama and like you said, who knows in a general election?
By cat lord on 05/21/2008 5:21 pm