Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Conversation | 04/21/2008 9:22 am

Does a Little Obama 'Elitism' Go a Long Way in Politics?

Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama
AP

JOAN: What is this thing of Obama being perceived as an elitist? Is it important? Is it going to harm him? What do you think?

LIZ: I think it does harm him. And the National Review story on Michelle Obama complaining to ladies in Ohio about how could the two of them live on $500,000 a year, and how they couldn’t pay for their children’s tennis and dancing lessons, or piano lessons, or something. But, honestly, you have to admire the Obamas. They’re an upscale, young American couple. They’re a model for every downtrodden person in America. So, I think a little elitism goes a long way. I think it both helps and hurts. It’s like people having money or being rich. Well everybody wants that. The public wants the same thing. So I think it’s sort of a two-edged sword. But do I think the Obamas are intellectual elitists, probably. They’re smarter than the rest of us.

LESLEY: You come at this issue the way we come at the whole campaign now – now that we’re this deep in. And that is with certain preconceived opinions. If you like Obama, I don’t think it bothers you at all. If you don’t like Obama, it’s a huge thing. And this is why, to me – and I’ve always said this to some criticism – when it comes to the president, the most important thing the people vote on is likability. That you get down to hearing these discussions about the issues and they get so confusing. Sometimes the difference between the candidates – and this is true between Obama and Hillary Clinton – the differences on issues is so small that it’s very difficult to listen, where you can’t go back and re-read and figure out exactly who said what. And then, if they disagree, the argument goes back and forth and back and forth and you agree when this one says it and then you agree when the other one says it. You get lost. So you end up making your decision on whether you trust them, whether you’re comfortable with them, whether they convey a sense of confidence, comfortableness in their skin. And I think that Hillary Clinton runs the risk, in this particular question of whether he’s elitist, of being too heavy-handed. And I noticed the other day there was a new poll. It said that her negatives on this likability factor have gone way up as she keeps pounding away at this. It could end up where, yes, he’s painted as an elitist. But she gets hurt more than he does by it.

JOAN: Whoopi?

WHOOPI: I just think it’s the most ridiculous thing in the world. You know, it’s a phenomenon which, had both candidates been white, wouldn’t be as big an issue as it’s become, because they painted John Kennedy the same way, that he was an elitist. So now they’re saying Obama’s an elitist because he pretty much said that when this is happening and this is happening and this is happening, people cling to those things that they know best, that they’re most comfortable with. He didn’t say, "Only people in Pennsylvania." He said, "Folks who have gone through this kind of experience." He didn’t say, "Only white people." He didn’t say, "Only poor people." And it’s the same with rich white folks. They cling to what they know. All of us do it.

LESLEY: Whoopi, I think the fear the Democrats have with this issue is not because he’s a person of color. It’s because the Republicans latch onto this exact kind of argument time and again and make it work for them. As with Adlai Stevenson, with Dukakis, with Kerry, with Gore …

WHOOPI: Well, what’s the matter is the Democrats are an elitist group. That’s the truth.

320 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Dan H.
Leslie Stahl: I just want to say I read with care everything you write. Why? Because the best political interview I ever saw was a two-hour interview a decade or so ago of you by Charlie Rose on the presidency of George W. Bush. Obama snooty! You know, those people don’t know how to stay in their place (sarcasm). As the two-time Pulitizer Prizer winner Relman Morin of The AP once wrote about people in the south: “They will tell you they like the blacks as long as they stay in their place.” And it is clear their place is not to come close to being eliist. That’s reserved for certain white aristrocrats with old money.
By Dan H. on 04/29/2008 1:34 am
Dan H.
Leslie Stahl: I’m sorry I meant George H.W. Bush, not George W. Bush. I cannot imagine a two-hour interview on “W.” Well, I can but I see myself snoozing.
By Dan H. on 04/29/2008 1:36 am
miranda howe
It’s been three days since I read this conversation and I’ve been nagged to no end subsequently about how to express why it is racist to call Obama an elitist, at least in the present multicontexts. I think it goes like this: reeking by a whiff for all the world like the Third Reich’s ‘permanent solution’ sort of thing when you turn this toxic manure over, the racist nature of it is that it is so preposterous like a tossed off nothing, a bon mot, if white on white, when aimed at a person of color— which at first blush might be funnier still— it is especially and by multiples more damning because the accusations contained in the one word include many layers of neglect, abandonment, exploitation and destruction of no less than one’s community. And if said African American is elitist by default or by design, still, of course, either way it’s an index of civic failure and moral inferiority. If any one thinks that’s an exaggeration, try this on for size: Since proportionately by percentage, or any way you slice it, there are so many more poor blacks than whites, then elitist blacks bear more sin than white elitists. Now it’s also a terrible thing to say because it’s insidious. Because it’s improvable. Why? It’s everything but nonexistant! And for the darnedest reason! It’s non- existant all but because it’s ubiquitous! We all think we are IT! And, damn it, we all are! In different ways. Miranda
By miranda howe on 05/14/2008 5:20 am
Pamela Munro
A belated comment on Whoppi’s quote about the people who are doing all the talking being out of touch. In the course of my life I have met with some of those folks - and you know - they ARE isolated and out of touch but they are too arrogant to look around and find that reality out there. It’s easier for the ego to pontificate about the “little (unworthy) people” from gilded and comfy heights!
By Pamela Munro on 06/03/2008 5:56 pm
Don Larsen
Wow.
By Don Larsen on 12/10/2008 2:48 pm