Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Conversation | 04/21/2008 9:22 am

Does a Little Obama 'Elitism' Go a Long Way in Politics?

Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama
AP

JOAN: What is this thing of Obama being perceived as an elitist? Is it important? Is it going to harm him? What do you think?

LIZ: I think it does harm him. And the National Review story on Michelle Obama complaining to ladies in Ohio about how could the two of them live on $500,000 a year, and how they couldn’t pay for their children’s tennis and dancing lessons, or piano lessons, or something. But, honestly, you have to admire the Obamas. They’re an upscale, young American couple. They’re a model for every downtrodden person in America. So, I think a little elitism goes a long way. I think it both helps and hurts. It’s like people having money or being rich. Well everybody wants that. The public wants the same thing. So I think it’s sort of a two-edged sword. But do I think the Obamas are intellectual elitists, probably. They’re smarter than the rest of us.

LESLEY: You come at this issue the way we come at the whole campaign now – now that we’re this deep in. And that is with certain preconceived opinions. If you like Obama, I don’t think it bothers you at all. If you don’t like Obama, it’s a huge thing. And this is why, to me – and I’ve always said this to some criticism – when it comes to the president, the most important thing the people vote on is likability. That you get down to hearing these discussions about the issues and they get so confusing. Sometimes the difference between the candidates – and this is true between Obama and Hillary Clinton – the differences on issues is so small that it’s very difficult to listen, where you can’t go back and re-read and figure out exactly who said what. And then, if they disagree, the argument goes back and forth and back and forth and you agree when this one says it and then you agree when the other one says it. You get lost. So you end up making your decision on whether you trust them, whether you’re comfortable with them, whether they convey a sense of confidence, comfortableness in their skin. And I think that Hillary Clinton runs the risk, in this particular question of whether he’s elitist, of being too heavy-handed. And I noticed the other day there was a new poll. It said that her negatives on this likability factor have gone way up as she keeps pounding away at this. It could end up where, yes, he’s painted as an elitist. But she gets hurt more than he does by it.

JOAN: Whoopi?

WHOOPI: I just think it’s the most ridiculous thing in the world. You know, it’s a phenomenon which, had both candidates been white, wouldn’t be as big an issue as it’s become, because they painted John Kennedy the same way, that he was an elitist. So now they’re saying Obama’s an elitist because he pretty much said that when this is happening and this is happening and this is happening, people cling to those things that they know best, that they’re most comfortable with. He didn’t say, "Only people in Pennsylvania." He said, "Folks who have gone through this kind of experience." He didn’t say, "Only white people." He didn’t say, "Only poor people." And it’s the same with rich white folks. They cling to what they know. All of us do it.

LESLEY: Whoopi, I think the fear the Democrats have with this issue is not because he’s a person of color. It’s because the Republicans latch onto this exact kind of argument time and again and make it work for them. As with Adlai Stevenson, with Dukakis, with Kerry, with Gore …

WHOOPI: Well, what’s the matter is the Democrats are an elitist group. That’s the truth.

320 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Michael Salling
Go find a website more to your liking Mark. Eclectic is definitely a compliment in my book.
By Michael Salling on 04/21/2008 10:13 pm
Lady Gator
Well here I go…….I’m one of those people in a small town — Geez I’m so bitter so I fall back on my religion and my guns. All I can say, Mr. Obama is if I’m bitter it’s because your statements are enough to make me clench my teeth and say “This man isn’t good enough to wipe my dog’s ass”. I’ll start with Partial Birth Abortion — after seeing films depicting same, absolutely horrendous — and knowing he supports same — just makes me look at you in a totally different light! Second, the idea that this person who is seeking the highest office in the country, does not want to salute the American Flag — — refuses to put his hand over his heart when the Anthem is sung — and PREFERS we sing “We are the world” — and, when this same idiot says “America is the greatest country in the world” and THEN in the next breath says “We’re here to change it”. We, out here in the “boonies” care about those things. He lost me a long time ago with the “Alleluia Revival” performances — I don’t need someone to bring me to the Lord — I don’t need somebody to “change” (whatever he wants to change) just tell me just what the heck you’re talking about. Talk to me like an adult without all the crap. And the sneer — I always notice the sneer — yeah I think he’s an elitist, condensending snob who has a questionable background of hanging out and around people of questionable character. In retrospect, there’s Hillary. I’m not voting for her either. That’s all I can say. I say let the Chaos continue!!! This state of utter confusion — I’m just gonna sit out here in the sticks — go to church on Sunday and keep my guns well oiled and at the ready. I’ve had ENOUGH! How can anyone get serious about these two losers?
By Lady Gator on 04/21/2008 12:38 pm
Chuck Gable
silly stupid dems!! I truly laugh at you. OMG it’s whoopi i better run over there and ask her for her autograph OMG Have I deis and went to heaven? is that lilly tomlin oh my, my dream would come true if i get her autograph too.. (I hope you can sense the sarcasm!) Just because you can ACT, or have some money & fame I could NOT care any less about your opinions! I give as much credance to what you say as to anyone else on the stree, the cook, the baker, or even the candle stick maker. I am a concervative independant, I will not vote for any dem, because all they want is a nanny state, huge giant govt, to take care of all there needs! this is NOT what the U.S. stands for it is self reliance NOT govt. reliance. less taxes! make health care a tax write off, secure the boder once and for all. govt subsidize manufacturing in the U.S. and of course when Iraq in the next 6 month, after all we arre the strongest military in the world by far and we cannot get iraq under control the vast majority of Americans are not so upset with the wr they are upset because we are not winning, People give me 6 months and I will have Iraq war over, no matter what it takes, door to door search, drones, bombs,diploymacy, air craft carriers whatever but it will be over in 6 months and NO I do not care what china has to say, or whatever AMERICA FIRST, After all we are the most progressive Country in the world when it come to human right, freedom of religion and still yes economic oppotunity, also for good measure a bullit train from NYC to L.A. now there is a platform that could win in this country to bad, no one running this cycle has a clue they are status quo and the dems are even worse with their huge giant govt ideas PEE U!! I am not running but we’ll see in the future, well of course we are not glassed over by then, say your prayers, Ciao
By Chuck Gable on 04/21/2008 12:42 pm
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Well––it looks to me from these last blogs that we are getting some pretty silly responses and I regret this–––– which started out as such a good discussion. However––it does show where some people are coming from and it scares the hell out of me. But then––I shouldn’t be surprised.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 04/21/2008 3:42 pm
Dee Ann Viramontes
I hate to repeat myself, but are you an angry white male, by any chance, Chuck? ((joke))
By Dee Ann Viramontes on 04/21/2008 5:58 pm
Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
Chuck- Hate to give you some facts to go with that Fox Views Script. Simple picture of where the Big Governement Nanny State IS…in the pockets of Bush’s friends: http://www.truemajorityaction.org/oreos/
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/21/2008 7:31 pm
Michael Salling
Chuck, this site is for women. We men are fortunate it exists — there are lots of places to vent as you have done. Doing it here at such lengths defeats the purpose of this forum. Is your purpose to sabotage it?
By Michael Salling on 04/21/2008 10:24 pm
Lauren D
How could you decide to vote for Ralph Nader? I fell into this trap several years ago due to my disgust with the two controlling parties until I realized the following. Since 1992 when he first ran, Ralph Nader has done absolutely nothing to build a third party in between election years. He’s been endorsed by the Greens one election and the Reform Party another. Why not commit to one of these alternatives and try to build a movement to eventually enact change? He won something like almost 3% of the vote in 2000 when he ran endorsed by the Greens in several states and he only needed to build that up to 5% to get federal funding. That was achievable and yet he did nothing. If he really believes that there needs to be more competition from outside the ruling parties so that there is actual debate about topics that are rarely discussed such as defense spending, he could have continued his work in off-election years to build a third party. Two parties already control our country. Do we need two families to now accomplish the same? I’m voting Obama. I respect the man for his activism and his challenging of the American automobile industry but his record has shown he has contributed nothing in terms of challenging the two main parties.
By Lauren D on 04/21/2008 12:48 pm
Chris A. Wisc
The imperative for liberals since the 1960s was “affirmative action,” expressed in overt discrimination in hiring, promotion, and set-asides. It is more poetic justice than irony to see the Democratic Party victimized by its own designs in the case of the current election process. Rather than choosing the candidate on the basis of who offers the best plans, we have seen the two primary class beneficiaries of politically correct dogma being brought into competition with each other for the same piece of the pie. The contention now is whether race will trump gender because both candidates seem to be offering the same political line here and so many are using race or gender to make their final choice. Regardless of whether the loser sings “kumbaya” or “we shall overcome” at the convention, there will occur a sham display of “unity” after the fight is over. The damage has already been done to the Democratic Party as it was to everyone that checked the Caucasian box on their government forms. The outcome will be the same bitterness that Caucasian male victims of unconstitutional discrimination felt expressed in Democratic Party divisiveness and lost fortunes. To borrow a well worn phrase, “the chickens are coming home to roost” for the Democratic Party and it appears, at this point in time, that these two candidates will be attending the inaugural proceedings in the spectator seats.
By Chris A. Wisc on 04/21/2008 12:53 pm
Dee Ann Viramontes
Wow! Chris said it all. Need I say more? …poor angry white men, they’ve been so picked upon, enslaved really…
By Dee Ann Viramontes on 04/21/2008 6:14 pm
Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
Chris: RE: “the loser sings “kumbaya” or “we shall overcome.” McCain sings? This I have to see. If “Wisc” means your state….the how’s about grabbing some of your famous cheese to go with that whine!
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/21/2008 7:42 pm
steve bourg
This stuff is not that complicated, gals. A liberal, intellectual elitist is someone who thinks they know best how to get the govt to make peoples’ lives better, so that’s their big pitch and most libs are suckered into believing it. They are “elitist” because they’re SO darn sure that they know how to tax and spend to improve things. On the other hand, conservatives understand that govt can’t tax and spend to improve the economy. Peoples’ lives will be improved by the “invisible hand” of Adam Smith’s description of capitalism and its effects on giving people incentive to work. Right now, we’re at about 35% total taxes in our $15T economy. That’s too much. Conservatives know that they don’t have answers to control the results. They just have to lower taxes and let individuals improve our economy.
By steve bourg on 04/21/2008 12:53 pm
Dee Ann Viramontes
Steve, it’s even more simple than that. A fascist, intellectual elitist male thinks he has to explain things to “gals”. The conservatives understand how to run up huge debts, start endless wars, and cripple the econony. Modern conservatives believe in reducing our constitutional rights and crony capitalism, which has made most Americans poorer. It’s not true grass-roots capitalism that the founders believed in, its been twisted beyond recognition. They believe in bigger debts, opaque government and shrinking the middle class. Like my momma always said, “Pay attention to what people do, not what they say.” The Conservative movement is high on hysteria and low on true substance. Just one woman’s opinion.
By Dee Ann Viramontes on 04/21/2008 6:29 pm