Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Conversation | 04/21/2008 9:22 am

Does a Little Obama 'Elitism' Go a Long Way in Politics?

Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama
AP

JOAN: What is this thing of Obama being perceived as an elitist? Is it important? Is it going to harm him? What do you think?

LIZ: I think it does harm him. And the National Review story on Michelle Obama complaining to ladies in Ohio about how could the two of them live on $500,000 a year, and how they couldn’t pay for their children’s tennis and dancing lessons, or piano lessons, or something. But, honestly, you have to admire the Obamas. They’re an upscale, young American couple. They’re a model for every downtrodden person in America. So, I think a little elitism goes a long way. I think it both helps and hurts. It’s like people having money or being rich. Well everybody wants that. The public wants the same thing. So I think it’s sort of a two-edged sword. But do I think the Obamas are intellectual elitists, probably. They’re smarter than the rest of us.

LESLEY: You come at this issue the way we come at the whole campaign now – now that we’re this deep in. And that is with certain preconceived opinions. If you like Obama, I don’t think it bothers you at all. If you don’t like Obama, it’s a huge thing. And this is why, to me – and I’ve always said this to some criticism – when it comes to the president, the most important thing the people vote on is likability. That you get down to hearing these discussions about the issues and they get so confusing. Sometimes the difference between the candidates – and this is true between Obama and Hillary Clinton – the differences on issues is so small that it’s very difficult to listen, where you can’t go back and re-read and figure out exactly who said what. And then, if they disagree, the argument goes back and forth and back and forth and you agree when this one says it and then you agree when the other one says it. You get lost. So you end up making your decision on whether you trust them, whether you’re comfortable with them, whether they convey a sense of confidence, comfortableness in their skin. And I think that Hillary Clinton runs the risk, in this particular question of whether he’s elitist, of being too heavy-handed. And I noticed the other day there was a new poll. It said that her negatives on this likability factor have gone way up as she keeps pounding away at this. It could end up where, yes, he’s painted as an elitist. But she gets hurt more than he does by it.

JOAN: Whoopi?

WHOOPI: I just think it’s the most ridiculous thing in the world. You know, it’s a phenomenon which, had both candidates been white, wouldn’t be as big an issue as it’s become, because they painted John Kennedy the same way, that he was an elitist. So now they’re saying Obama’s an elitist because he pretty much said that when this is happening and this is happening and this is happening, people cling to those things that they know best, that they’re most comfortable with. He didn’t say, "Only people in Pennsylvania." He said, "Folks who have gone through this kind of experience." He didn’t say, "Only white people." He didn’t say, "Only poor people." And it’s the same with rich white folks. They cling to what they know. All of us do it.

LESLEY: Whoopi, I think the fear the Democrats have with this issue is not because he’s a person of color. It’s because the Republicans latch onto this exact kind of argument time and again and make it work for them. As with Adlai Stevenson, with Dukakis, with Kerry, with Gore …

WHOOPI: Well, what’s the matter is the Democrats are an elitist group. That’s the truth.

320 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Ms. Dee
Wowowowowowwo!
By Ms. Dee on 04/21/2008 4:37 pm
Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
Dear Tired of Politics- My uncle (by marriage) a developer and huge Reagan fan bought the California Governor’s Mansion that had been built by the Reagans. He snickered, “Any working stiff that votes GOP votes against their own interest. Thankfully they’re easy to fool.” And here’s how the money powers do it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0DtMZgUCeY Elite means the best as in elite colleges, elite athletes, elite authors and elite presidents the world admired and loved like JFK. We used to be an elite nation. Now, as Bill Maher says, for the faith over facts crowd we are this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcz_NHAFGS0 Be sure to thank that classy guy: http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/w/b/bush_finger_flip.jpghttp://s… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kVlu3kh7DU Thank a Liberal If: http://dkosopedia.com/wiki/Thank_a_liberal
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/21/2008 5:10 pm
Patrick Curry
I disagree with Ms. Goldberg. Democrats are not elitists. I used to be a registered Democrat, and my friends and I were not elitists, we were just working people trying to raise our families. After Jimmy Carter and his failed presidency, I switched to the Republicans. I became a Reagan Republican. But I didn’t become an elitist. I was the same guy trying to make ends meet every month. Now as to the question, “Is Obama an elitist?” I would answer this “yes”. The Democrat Party is not an elitist party. But one of their candidates most certainly is. The more we know about Obama, the less we are going to like him. It is starting already.
By Patrick Curry on 04/21/2008 2:24 pm
George Zucco III
HRC isn’t behind in the polls because of her gender - the Clintons have simply maxed out their power base; given their history (and potential future) what is there to gain by supporting the Clintons yet again? Not even the Chinese are supporting them this round.
By George Zucco III on 04/21/2008 2:26 pm
PAT O
Whoopie. Whoopie. Do you know how much damage you can do with your words, for you are priviledged to have a public forum? You accuse Democrats of being elitist, and you add, “That’s the truth”. You may live in an elite world where Democrats and Republicans are elite. But, don’t make blanket statements about all Democrats or all Republicans. On The View, you or your panel blithely make remarks or give conclusions that may be skewed or downright wrong. They can be damaging to people, but,once said, they are said. Most of us don’t have a pulpit. Please think, twice, before speaking. Having stood in the Icy Idaho dawn—-along with thousands of Democrats—-waiting to hear Obama speak—-it was clear that one could not accuse this group of being elitist. It was a wonderful mix. This is a fact which the media ignores, and, instead, tries to plunk us into stereotypical categories. Obama was greeted, in Idaho, by a stadium where tiers and tiers were filled with over 14000 thousand women and men, young and old, of all economic groups. There was a preponderance of White faces, only because lots of White people happen to live in Idaho. Race was NOT an issue. By the way, we did not come because some organized group contacted us. Obama’s visit was announced in the paper, late in the week, for he was able to make the visit to the state. People appeared almost spontaneously. Representatives of the media need to get out of the studios. Be more like Edward R Morrow. Do some homework, By the way, Idaho, is either ignored by media or confused with Iowa . Both are wonderful states. But not the same states. While making clarifications, I am a women who was a pioneer in the workplace just before the Women’s Movement. According to media, pollsters, and many women, I am supposed to be a Clinton Supporter. She is a fine person, but I like and support Obama, for I believe he can be a good representive to people within the Country, and to people outside the country. Thanks, Pat.
By PAT O on 04/21/2008 2:30 pm
Maurine H
Pat - my daughter lives in Boise and went to the stadium to hear Obama speak, too. She raced home and sent an email to the whole family about the experience, saying that Boise, the supposedly ultra conservative, mostly white city, really turned out and went wild over Obama. His speech not only electrified and invigorated the crowd, it caused my daughter and thousands of others to walk the neighborhoods in support. She’s been campaigning for Obama from day one and is thrilled that so many in her community feel the same optimism from his message. By the way, she’s a Democratic and I would never label her (or Obama, either) “elitist.”
By Maurine H on 04/21/2008 3:04 pm
Deni G
I am very heartened by all the young people Obama has energized to become involved in the political system. And I wavered back and forth between Obama and Hillary. Until I heard the speech he gave after the Rev Wright noise. I was so impressed. He chose to speak to the people of the United States as though we in fact, had living brain cells and and desired honest discourse. Gawd that felt so good. Far from condescending, he spoke to directly to us. I think the fact that people were so disgusted with the stooopid questions in the last debate, underscores the fact that we are much more interested in substance than name-calling. The young people certainly appear to be! Good on ‘em!
By Deni G on 04/21/2008 4:01 pm
Ms. Dee
I just wish they’d have given the same exposure to his speeches on the economy and the war in Iraq.
By Ms. Dee on 04/21/2008 4:41 pm
Deni G
Ditto and Ditto Again!
By Deni G on 04/21/2008 6:09 pm
PAT O
Maurine H….Here’s to your daughter. This country needs her and people, of all ages, like her, her optimism, and commitment. What Obama inspired in her,with his authenticity and vision, he inspired in many of us.
By PAT O on 04/22/2008 3:10 pm
Mugsy Peabody
A ‘scuze me? HELL-o…. Miz Whoops can say any damn thing she wants to by me is okay. She speaks for Ms. Whoops, and that’s a sacred right. You don’t like what she says? So okay. Don’t listen.
By Mugsy Peabody on 04/21/2008 5:47 pm
Ms. Dee
Durn tootin’
By Ms. Dee on 04/22/2008 7:36 pm
Kel Byron
I can see what’s going on here, clearly. Can’t most of you? People accidentally mispelling words, talkin’ jive, etc. to pretend they are from the root base? get real, people. See that you are being manipulated. Just a warnin’ from some’n who nev boths to pos, nev’r. You are had.
By Kel Byron on 04/21/2008 2:44 pm
Frank Peterson
I want an elitist in the White House—look what a born again pseudo Texas asshole c- student has done to the presidency and this country. BTW Obama is elitist because of his Ivy league education but Hils is not because of her Ivy league education. Is that the way it is? Or so I have that wrong?
By Frank Peterson on 04/21/2008 2:49 pm
Lena B
Frank you came up with what I was looking for in this whole painful contorted conversation about a word that was descriptive, now turned to vague rhetoric. Thank you. I mean what are you talking about sisters? Bush is not an elitist although he was given the presidency after the criteria that Frank just mentioned? Both Obama and Clinton (both Clintons actually) had Ivy League educations-are both elitists, if not why? McCain married the heiress to a beer baron. I’m confused. Are we trying to interject the obsurd into the election?
By Lena B on 04/21/2008 3:20 pm