Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Conversation | 04/21/2008 9:22 am

Does a Little Obama 'Elitism' Go a Long Way in Politics?

Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama
AP

JOAN: What is this thing of Obama being perceived as an elitist? Is it important? Is it going to harm him? What do you think?

LIZ: I think it does harm him. And the National Review story on Michelle Obama complaining to ladies in Ohio about how could the two of them live on $500,000 a year, and how they couldn’t pay for their children’s tennis and dancing lessons, or piano lessons, or something. But, honestly, you have to admire the Obamas. They’re an upscale, young American couple. They’re a model for every downtrodden person in America. So, I think a little elitism goes a long way. I think it both helps and hurts. It’s like people having money or being rich. Well everybody wants that. The public wants the same thing. So I think it’s sort of a two-edged sword. But do I think the Obamas are intellectual elitists, probably. They’re smarter than the rest of us.

LESLEY: You come at this issue the way we come at the whole campaign now – now that we’re this deep in. And that is with certain preconceived opinions. If you like Obama, I don’t think it bothers you at all. If you don’t like Obama, it’s a huge thing. And this is why, to me – and I’ve always said this to some criticism – when it comes to the president, the most important thing the people vote on is likability. That you get down to hearing these discussions about the issues and they get so confusing. Sometimes the difference between the candidates – and this is true between Obama and Hillary Clinton – the differences on issues is so small that it’s very difficult to listen, where you can’t go back and re-read and figure out exactly who said what. And then, if they disagree, the argument goes back and forth and back and forth and you agree when this one says it and then you agree when the other one says it. You get lost. So you end up making your decision on whether you trust them, whether you’re comfortable with them, whether they convey a sense of confidence, comfortableness in their skin. And I think that Hillary Clinton runs the risk, in this particular question of whether he’s elitist, of being too heavy-handed. And I noticed the other day there was a new poll. It said that her negatives on this likability factor have gone way up as she keeps pounding away at this. It could end up where, yes, he’s painted as an elitist. But she gets hurt more than he does by it.

JOAN: Whoopi?

WHOOPI: I just think it’s the most ridiculous thing in the world. You know, it’s a phenomenon which, had both candidates been white, wouldn’t be as big an issue as it’s become, because they painted John Kennedy the same way, that he was an elitist. So now they’re saying Obama’s an elitist because he pretty much said that when this is happening and this is happening and this is happening, people cling to those things that they know best, that they’re most comfortable with. He didn’t say, "Only people in Pennsylvania." He said, "Folks who have gone through this kind of experience." He didn’t say, "Only white people." He didn’t say, "Only poor people." And it’s the same with rich white folks. They cling to what they know. All of us do it.

LESLEY: Whoopi, I think the fear the Democrats have with this issue is not because he’s a person of color. It’s because the Republicans latch onto this exact kind of argument time and again and make it work for them. As with Adlai Stevenson, with Dukakis, with Kerry, with Gore …

WHOOPI: Well, what’s the matter is the Democrats are an elitist group. That’s the truth.

320 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Ms. Dee
I’m with you, Frank! Us geezers may feel like the blush is off the O’bama rose, ‘cause we’re seeing the whole thing through our “experience” with the American political process. I am so proud of these kids…our kids…the young men and women of the Twenty-first Century. Let them choose. Oh, and according to my dictionary, “fascism”: n. 1.) A philosophy or system of government that advocates or exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with an ideology of belligerent nationalism.” Pretty much sums up our current administration, wouldn’t you say? Or am I to be, as my mother often feared, the first witch to be burned at the stake in the 21st Century. Dear, oh, dear. I can hope my daughters will defend me.
By Ms. Dee on 04/21/2008 3:39 pm
Frank Peterson
Ms Dee; re the definition—they do come really close don’t they. Burned at the stake? Nah! Waterboarded by the government that you were raised to trust and respect possibly—I can’t begin to tell you how much I loathe this administration. In 1964 an entire generation of young men and women were lied to by their government and 58k+ died in that f**king war. Now another generation has been lied to again and they’re dying and killing as mine did. I find that despicable. And that the Congress of the US sits on its collective asses and allows this crap to happen is beyond despicable. Its complicity is unforgivable.
By Frank Peterson on 04/21/2008 3:56 pm
Ms. Dee
I know. Well, not like you know, but yeah. It is awful, I know. It seems there are some lessons that each new generation has to learn all by itself. Y’try and tell ‘em, but they have their own minds. I hope the Congress’ll shape up after this election. How long have we been longing for a true statesman to emerge from that august body. I hope Ron Paul will stick around. I’m sorry to Chuch Hegel go.
By Ms. Dee on 04/22/2008 7:47 pm
Maurine H
No, Frank…you’ve definitely got it right!
By Maurine H on 04/21/2008 3:58 pm
Mugsy Peabody
Frank, Frank, Frank, Frank, Frank. Bush is not a Texan He is from Kennebunkport, Maine. Not Texas. Karl Rove and them thought Texas would be a good place for him, so they imposed him on Texas. Texan he is not. Has an Ivy League education. Not that it took. But his daddy paid for one. SO yes, you’ve got that wrong. Hillary they say is arrogant, but look, friends, she has so very much to be arrogant about. As to Obama, I’m betting all hat, no cattle.
By Mugsy Peabody on 04/21/2008 5:52 pm
eleanor roche
Mugsy, Mugsy, Mugsy. I hope that entry was meant to be completely sarcastic, because some might actually believe the Karl Rove plot you invented. For the record, Bush was born in New Haven, CT while his father was attending Yale and he grew up in Midland, Texas. Just wanted to interject some facts in a blog that seems utterly devoid of them.
By eleanor roche on 04/21/2008 10:08 pm
Frank Peterson
Ms Peabody: I did say pseudo! and yes I do know where he’s from—he may have an Ivy leagque Ed but I seriously doubt that if Poppy hadn’t been Skull and Bones he would have got into Harvard. Frankly I don’t think he could hack my town’s junior college.
By Frank Peterson on 04/22/2008 6:33 am
eleanor roche
Skull and Bones is a Yale organization.
By eleanor roche on 04/22/2008 5:56 pm
beth willis
Amen on the present administration, whose leader definitely qualifies as elitist. When your daddy gets you into ivy schools, that is the epitome of elitist. I think the issue, Frank, is the Clintons didn’t get the million plus house until after they left the White House; Obamas already have that. But that’s really not the point, but rather the kind of distraction that the media would have us debating, a superficial issue at best that draws attention to personalities, and we keep falling for it. Obama’s comments about bitterness and holding on to guns and religion are as true of urban African-American neighborhoods as they are of America’s small towns. When the fighting over food begins in this country because of the economic situation driven by energy policy and foreign war, then, hopefully, we can get past personality. You don’t have to like the president, but most of the time you do have to respect him/her, present administration excepted. I do not care who likes whom; Hillary Clinton is more experienced, resilient and tested by fire. No, being the wife of the president is not the same as being the president, but living in the White House up close and personal has got to have prepared her for the schedules, the issues, the pacing, the courage under fire that are required. She has reinvented herself as a senator, stepping out as a coalescing force in the midst of chaos. Certainly more so than a bright, eloquent speaker who used his eloquence to answer,”Present” over 100 times in the Illinois State House. Everyone needs to grow up and stand up for a ticket that combines these two two candidates to use strength, experience, hope and courage to lead us to recovery and then onward to a country Michelle Obama and about half of the rest of the country can truly be proud of. I’m a 60-yesr-old white woman, and I understood what she meant. Wanting America to be the best it can be, to unite to make a better life of opportunity for our children and our children’s children is not being unpatriotic…that’s being an American. Anything less is shirking our responsibility. Hillary Clinton for President. Barack Obama for Vice-President. If he at 46 to say that is unacceptable is to cast doubt on his eloquent rhetoric. Actions, not words is what we need. Peace and grace
By beth willis on 04/21/2008 8:51 pm
Mugsy Peabody
Baci baci.
By Mugsy Peabody on 04/22/2008 3:41 am
Star Lawrence
Being in the elite is not the same as elitist to me.
By Star Lawrence on 04/22/2008 10:30 am
lynne seed
Star- very true. Baing an elitist is assuming and believing you are superior to others. Condescending.
By lynne seed on 04/23/2008 4:40 am
john smith
Having worked for the truely rich and elite and not just cheap leaders of the free world, all of the elite are very much the same. From my time as a butler to my driving days there is not one of them who understands the common man. They are all nearly ones who would say, “IF YOUR CHILDREN ARE STARVING FOR BREAD, LET THEM EAT SOME CAKE instead.” Trust me on this one. those who are elite will find away to hurt or eleminate any persn below them who is not of their station if they consider them the least threat. There are some “gentile poor” (poor elite) who’d do the same thing.
By john smith on 04/21/2008 2:50 pm
Ms. Dee
Good point. Hillary turning the “guns” in O’bama’s remark into “sporting gear” may have saved O’bama’s neck. There are people of every echelon who think your life is so worthless, they have the right to extinquish it…or, as was so exquisitely demonstrate post-Katrina, let nature take it’s course. Scary stuff.
By Ms. Dee on 04/21/2008 3:49 pm