Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Conversation | 04/21/2008 9:22 am

Does a Little Obama 'Elitism' Go a Long Way in Politics?

Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama
AP

JOAN: What is this thing of Obama being perceived as an elitist? Is it important? Is it going to harm him? What do you think?

LIZ: I think it does harm him. And the National Review story on Michelle Obama complaining to ladies in Ohio about how could the two of them live on $500,000 a year, and how they couldn’t pay for their children’s tennis and dancing lessons, or piano lessons, or something. But, honestly, you have to admire the Obamas. They’re an upscale, young American couple. They’re a model for every downtrodden person in America. So, I think a little elitism goes a long way. I think it both helps and hurts. It’s like people having money or being rich. Well everybody wants that. The public wants the same thing. So I think it’s sort of a two-edged sword. But do I think the Obamas are intellectual elitists, probably. They’re smarter than the rest of us.

LESLEY: You come at this issue the way we come at the whole campaign now – now that we’re this deep in. And that is with certain preconceived opinions. If you like Obama, I don’t think it bothers you at all. If you don’t like Obama, it’s a huge thing. And this is why, to me – and I’ve always said this to some criticism – when it comes to the president, the most important thing the people vote on is likability. That you get down to hearing these discussions about the issues and they get so confusing. Sometimes the difference between the candidates – and this is true between Obama and Hillary Clinton – the differences on issues is so small that it’s very difficult to listen, where you can’t go back and re-read and figure out exactly who said what. And then, if they disagree, the argument goes back and forth and back and forth and you agree when this one says it and then you agree when the other one says it. You get lost. So you end up making your decision on whether you trust them, whether you’re comfortable with them, whether they convey a sense of confidence, comfortableness in their skin. And I think that Hillary Clinton runs the risk, in this particular question of whether he’s elitist, of being too heavy-handed. And I noticed the other day there was a new poll. It said that her negatives on this likability factor have gone way up as she keeps pounding away at this. It could end up where, yes, he’s painted as an elitist. But she gets hurt more than he does by it.

JOAN: Whoopi?

WHOOPI: I just think it’s the most ridiculous thing in the world. You know, it’s a phenomenon which, had both candidates been white, wouldn’t be as big an issue as it’s become, because they painted John Kennedy the same way, that he was an elitist. So now they’re saying Obama’s an elitist because he pretty much said that when this is happening and this is happening and this is happening, people cling to those things that they know best, that they’re most comfortable with. He didn’t say, "Only people in Pennsylvania." He said, "Folks who have gone through this kind of experience." He didn’t say, "Only white people." He didn’t say, "Only poor people." And it’s the same with rich white folks. They cling to what they know. All of us do it.

LESLEY: Whoopi, I think the fear the Democrats have with this issue is not because he’s a person of color. It’s because the Republicans latch onto this exact kind of argument time and again and make it work for them. As with Adlai Stevenson, with Dukakis, with Kerry, with Gore …

WHOOPI: Well, what’s the matter is the Democrats are an elitist group. That’s the truth.

320 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Rita T
I will be upfront, I am a Hillary supporter. That being said, I do not like the “elitest” word because while the media and pundits dance around it, it is just another word for “uppity” that was used 40 years ago. It was wrong then, and it is wrong now. Everyone, even presidential candidates, is entitled to an opinion and I don’t think we should hammer them to death just because we don’t agree with them. Our diversity is what makes our country great.
By Rita T on 04/21/2008 2:51 pm
Star Lawrence
Elitist is not a synonym for uppity. Uppity meant didn’t know their “place.” Elitist means knows their class in life and probably you aren’t in the same class!
By Star Lawrence on 04/21/2008 5:29 pm
Marcus Gordon
I am a 22-year-old just hitting the workforce. I like to think of myself as intelligent, but then I don’t know of many people who would advertise themselves as “dumber than dirt”. The first things I see in regards to people’s online positions on these candidates are the typos and the incessant resorts to insults/cursing. Fantastic. I knew both candidates were courting young voters, but I feel confident that most voters are at an age where they can hold intelligent discourse and debates. Or at least, I FELT confident. On to the politicians involved. I can promise you there will never, ever be a politician that satisfies everyone’s desires in this country. However, I have seen so many people promising to vote for a Democrat no matter who, not on merit but on the opposing PARTY’S association with the current President. If these candidates could each simply present a single face and perspective to the entire country, so that we could get to know them, maybe the decision would be slightly easier. I have to confess, McCain is the only one who (to me) has provided one face throughout, for better or worse. Disagree if you’d like, I’m sure most of you will, but out of all the candidates I honestly believe he is the one I know best. So here’s a sad but true line from the film “Swimming with Sharks”: “Look, it’s like they say: if you’re not a rebel by the age of 20, you’ve got no heart, but if you haven’t turned establishment by 30, you’ve got no brains. Because there are no storybook romances, no fairytale endings. So before you run out and change the world, ask yourself: What do you really want?” Seriously. Before you jump on the Obama “change” bandwagon, ask yourself: what change do you exactly want? If you want a Bush removal, you’re getting it no matter what. Now focus on the issues.
By Marcus Gordon on 04/21/2008 3:02 pm
The Ole Crone The Ole Crone
Amazin’ and it saddens me. Everyone in here really over 40? Maybe the age needs to be raised. He said, she said, they said, look who did that, and more yada yada. It’s as if most of the writers haven’t a clue as to the magnitude of the problems facing us and just about everyone on the planet —bascially because of what we have or have not done. You trip on your own words of either naiveness or a need to blubber rather than investigate. One writer states voting for Nader is not an option for he’s had time to a develop a good 3rd party. I think this is the people’s job. She makes it clear she’ll vote democrat. However toward the end of her discourse she blames the ‘Welfare’ State on both the Republican and Democrat parties, of which I agree. However, I will not cast my vote with either of them, —she will. It’s that electability factor isn’t it? It must be. None of the running candidates have a proven documented record as does Mr. Nader. Or for over such a long time. So obviously it all boils down to electibility. Who can beat ‘Bush’, who this time morphs into the body of McCain? Right? This is the Holy Grail? Didn’t we do this last time also? All kinds of people who liked Mr. Nader and thought him more qualified and honest backed away from their conscience and voted for the most electible to beat George Bush. Ah yes. George Bush turned out to be the most electible didn’t he? And of course the turncoats blamed it on Mr. Nader as a spoiler, etc. and never blamed it on uncounted and withheld votes or Mr. Gore not carrying his own home state, and certainly never blamed it on the turn coats and those not voting their conscience, or voting for the person with the proven and traceable record for over the longest period of time. Ahhh speculation and statistics. Work about as well for our elections as they do for our financial market don’t they? Shouldn’t it simply be doing the right thing based on the evidence? Because of the PARTY cartel none of the party candidates will be allowed to move much. Big big money at play. The resources of the Planet at Play. The wellness of our children at stake for big money by the products produced by big money in food and technology. And possibly even the sense of even seriously recognizing these things has been burned outta us by the agri-pharms and cybernautics.
By The Ole Crone The Ole Crone on 04/21/2008 3:03 pm
Frank Peterson
Ms OC, Bush wasn’t elected. He was hand-picked the the Supreme copurt of this here land.
By Frank Peterson on 04/21/2008 4:00 pm
Deni G
Thank you!
By Deni G on 04/21/2008 4:37 pm
Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
Thank you Frank!
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/21/2008 11:24 pm
The Ole Crone The Ole Crone
I wonder what this is, this need of ours, to need a Team, and a great fear of standin’ alone?
By The Ole Crone The Ole Crone on 04/21/2008 3:06 pm
Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye
Haven’t you heard that people are heard animals…..that they agree doesn’t mean their afraid to stand alone….and if they do someone will take shots at that too.
By Buh-Bye Hillary Hillary Buh-Bye on 04/21/2008 11:37 pm
William  Trenton
Obama, Hillary, McCain does it really matter? Unfortunately it took segregationist Governor Wallace to reveal the truth that “there’s not a dime’s worth of difference between” Republicans and Democrats. The Democrats willingly went along with the War in Iraq, suspension of Habeas Corpus, detaining protesters, banning books like “America Deceived’ from Amazon, stealing private lands (Kelo decision), warrant-less wiretapping and refusing to investigate 9/11 properly. They are both guilty of treason. Write in Dr. Ron Paul and save this great nation. Last link (before Google Books bends to gov’t Will and drops the title): http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/book_detail.asp?&isbn=0-595-38523-0
By William Trenton on 04/21/2008 3:06 pm
Mary Canavan
If being tagged as an elitist is equal to being intelligent, then please bring on the intelligence we so desperately need in this country
By Mary Canavan on 04/21/2008 3:10 pm
Ms. Dee
Yes! Please!
By Ms. Dee on 04/21/2008 4:17 pm
Deni G
Me Too! Ah Ms. Dee..I seem to be following you everywhere, clapping like crazy! LOL!
By Deni G on 04/21/2008 4:54 pm
Ms. Dee
You’re swell company too.
By Ms. Dee on 04/22/2008 2:11 pm
Deni G
LOl! It seemed every time I went to post something, you were there and had already said it! After awhile I just stopped ditto-ing because it was starting to look like I was stalking you. But that nose, those eyes, that fabulous fur …what a great romp, it was!
By Deni G on 04/22/2008 2:32 pm