Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Conversation | 02/27/2008 12:12 pm

"If You Must Accept Clothing from Strangers, at Least Don’t Put it On"

© AP

Here at wOw, we wanted to poll our Contributors about the photo ofBarack Obama in tribal dress that seems to be everywhere in the mediathis week. Was it leaked? What did they think of it? And did it swaytheir opinion of the candidate in any way? To take a look at whatSheila Nevins, Judith Martin, Candice Bergen, Joan Juliet Buck, JuliaReed, Liz Smith, Jane Wagner and Joan Ganz Cooney thought, read on….and talk to us!

 

SHEILA: The only thing about Barack Obama in that dress is thathe is a size smaller than I am. I am not sure I want a president Itower over. Other than that, I thought he looked cute. I believe thisis a silly question.

JULIA: I first heard of the photo of Obama in Somali tribal dressvia a strange email on Monday afternoon from Hillary Clinton’s campaigndenying — sort of — her direct involvement in it and another from theInterfaith Alliance denouncing the Clinton campaign for having anythingto do with it. (When you cover politics, even occasionally, you are oneverybody’s email list.) Naturally, I immediately went to Drudge toview the photo. There is no question of what harm whoever circulatedthe photo meant to inflict. It is completely disingenuous for Clintonto say Obama should get over it — "why are we even talking aboutthis?" — on the grounds that she herself has been photographed in allmanner of tribal dress and everybody looks silly doing it. We are"talking about this" because she is not a black man who has beenrepeatedly accused of being a Muslim (Somalis are mostly Muslim), inmany cases by members of Hillary’s own staff. The release of that photo wasclearly meant to stir up racist sentiments and terrorist fears. BillClinton himself heavy handedly, grotesquely even, tried to stir upracial tensions before, during, and directly after the South Carolinaprimary. So far, in the email I got from the the Clinton campaign, andfrom the candidate’s own public statements, all I hear is a non-denialdenial. I have no idea if her campaign circulated the photo or not. Butthey are not above it as we know all too well from their past actions.Either way, it is adding to the Hillary implosion pile. A friend ofmine called today and said, "Instead of subjecting us all to herappearances in the debates, she should go one Dr. Phil because she isclearly coming completely apart before our eyes." And he used to be afan.

JUDITH: I saw it in the papers with a sinking heart — not forany political reason, but only because I can’t face an onslaught ofcompeting pictures of politicians looking silly in strange outfits. Onecould dig up pictures of all of them in various hats they shouldn’t bewearing, whether foreign, regional, religious, professional, or justplain comical. If I were a political adviser, my first rule would be:If you must accept clothing from strangers, at least don’t put it on.

CANDICE: Saw Barack on GMA and thought he looked fine in tribaldress. Then once again, I thought how very glad I was that I was not acandidate — otherwise that picture of me in Arab drag with my (Jewish)hubby at a little photo shop in Petra, Jordan would be slitheringaround the blogosphere on a Terrorist Trapper site.

JANE: I saw the picture on-line and then again during the recent Ohiodebate. It made me smile and wince at the same time because Baracklooks a little foolish; yet, he’s stoic and respectful. Like alldignitaries who travel to other cultures — when in Rome. It made melike him more…seeing him as more human, vulnerable, good natured. Thereare other tribal costumes that might have created a more regal, elegantand arresting appearance; unfortunately, this is not one of them. Whywasn’t the other fellow wearing a pinafore? I think he’s the one wholeaked this picture.

LIZ: I caught it on the "Drudge Report," of course. It didn’tmake me like him more or less. It was just there, like a fact. I gotthe implication, of course, that it was meant to harm him and make someMuslim connection so I disapprove of the act of it being released insuch a way. Anonymous info is always cowardly and usually harmful.

I do believe Senator Clinton when she said that she didn’t authorize it or would dosuch a naughty bad thing. She has hundreds of people working for herwho could have done it without authorization. If Mr. Obama gets thenomination, much more of this sort of thing will probably be done tothe detriment of people of good will everywhere.

JOAN BUCK: The picture of Barack Obama in tribal dress confirmed two important things to me:

1. The long process of campaigning is a sort of terrible hazing wherecandidates are forced to eat drippy pizza, and dress up as locals or asmembers of the Armed Forces, so they can be subjected to ridicule andhumiliation. The real problem is when they persist in dressing up asmembers of the Armed Forces once they are in office.

2. As all campaigns are image wars, they are played out on a symboliclevel. Obama’s first name sounds like a place where soldiers sleep, hismiddle name is the name of the man our present government deposed andhung, and his last name is one consonant away from the name of ourmortal enemy. He’s got a lot of symbolic baggage to fight against.Hillary Rodham Clinton has equally heavy baggage: a first name thatevokes something steep and arduous, a middle name that sounds likesomething schoolmasters use to beat small boys, and a last name thatalarms people because it reminds them of a presidency when we weren’tat war and the economy prospered. The fact that her last name has nothelped the sharp, unforgiving message of her first two names tells methat Obama won’t have any name problem.

Did it make me like Obama more or less? It made me want to tell him:look at the queen of England. She watches the guys dance around innative dress, but she doesn’t don the robes or apply her lips to adidgeridoo. Who do I think leaked it? Frankly, my dear, I don’t give adamn.

JOAN GANZ COONEY: I saw the picture of Obama in tribal dress in thenewspaper. I knew immediately that someone who doesn’t wish him wellhad gotten it published because it was unflattering as all the picturesof politicians in native dress always are. Also it suggested somethingunChristian. Muslim anyone? I have no idea whether the Clinton campaigndid it or someone else who wants to hurt Obama. There are many Clintonsupporters who would do it in a minute without consulting her officialcampaign. So who knows?

THE END

Read more about: Barack Obama, Politics

24 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Mary Wallace
We live in a global family and Obama was simply honoring a culture by wearing their gift. We are a racist society if we make judgements because ONE photo surfaces that we suddenly think has MEANING. The Bushes dressed in other countries’ gifts and no one said ‘boo’. So this is a sure sign that racism is alive and well, hidden in the silent reaction of the masses when they see a photo of a black man in muslim attire… On the other hand, my own kids said, ‘so what?’, when they heard about the brouhaha… ah, to be lead by the children.
By Mary Wallace on 03/08/2008 5:45 pm
Jozie Lee
Ironic that in the same week we were bombarded with the photo of Obama in native dress, a McCain supporter called him Barack Hussein Obama, and Chris Matthews’ reported a story about Obama with a picture of bin Ladan behind him. The race is getting uglier.
By Jozie Lee on 03/08/2008 9:20 pm
Riayn Lee
Actually the photo gave me some respect for the man. Here is a man who appears to be unafraid to immerse himself in a foreign culture and gain a better understanding of it. America needs a man like him as president if it is to save its declining reputation on the world stage.
By Riayn Lee on 03/09/2008 12:25 am
Rita T
Well, at least Obama wasn’t dancing about like George Bush did!
By Rita T on 03/09/2008 11:00 am
Buh- Bye
I have a nice pair of white pumps that would go nicely with that ensemble.
By Buh- Bye on 05/01/2008 1:12 pm
Fran S
I appreciate the notion that Obama was being “stoic” or embarassed by taking on the mantle of another culture. I was proud to see him be welcomed into a cultural environment that our current administration has painted with a broad, demonizing brush. The discomfort, I am afraid, is the viewers own xenophobia being projected on someone who has, I believe, a high degree of cultural competence. It telling that a Clinton surrogate banked on our national prejudices hoping that the picture would be seen as a negative, instead of recognizing that for some of us, it would make us hopeful that we could have a leader unashamed to embrace the many cultures of the world.
By Fran S on 03/09/2008 11:34 am
Helen Harberts
It would be laughable, except for the lunatic fringe in this country who run around repeating his middle name, and circulating blatantly false emails about him. I wish this type of junk imagery was beneath us. Unfortunately it isn’t. Whether it came from Clinton or some other campaign is irrelevant. The real issue in my view is why ANYONE thinks it reflects in any way on his ability to be president. It speaks poorly of us.
By Helen Harberts on 03/09/2008 12:41 pm
kat
I applaud Mr. Obama for his obvious sign of respect to his hosts in donning the native garb. It’s absolutely ridiculous for this photo to arouse such a hullabaloo. Do we not teach our children about other countries of world their dress and culture. Maybe we should send some of the media and a large group of our citizens to Disney Land or Disney World and view “It’s a small world after all”.
By kat on 03/09/2008 2:42 pm
gromyt the dog
Hmmm, so it’s okay if a Clinton supporter leaked it but not the official Clinton campaign? Interesting. And what’s with the “Christian…as far as I know” comment. Shouldn’t she have come out stronger against the Islamophobia it was meant to stir up? I lost respect for Clinton with her responses, or non-responses, to those incidents. Obama-Sebelius ‘08
By gromyt the dog on 03/10/2008 5:46 pm
C Madden
Are thre any visiting dignitaries who come here that we ask to wear Uncle Sam hats, military garb or colonial costume? I agree that if someone gives you a gift, accept it, but for heaven’s sake, don’t put it on. Yes, I thought he looked silly, as would anyone who would have donned it. Did it make me think less of him? Absolutely not. I cannot conceive of being that shallow or that naive to let such a thing sway my political convictions. This kind of campaign tactic is a given here in America, sadly. We can only hope that there are enough Americans who can distinguish between the substance and the ridiculous to make intelligent, informed and sound judgments about the candidates. It takes work to consider the track records, the voting records, the personal behaviors and the true histories of the candidates. Unfortunately, most Americans won’t do that; many will vote based on looks, spouses, a single issue or what they most recently heard or read in the media. I just wish we could find a smart, apolitical, unbiased media to go to for the facts. That is how we should judge our candidates but even then it is a crap shoot. How many of our well-loved leaders in the last twenty years have not betrayed us all in some way? If only women in this country could harness their political power and cut through all the crap and find candidates who truly embody who we want to represent us. Republican, Democrat or Independent, we women have yet to wield the economic, political or social power that we truly have in this country. What will it take for us to do that, do you think?
By C Madden on 03/12/2008 8:38 am
PlumGood bounty hunter
Answering: (Mac D:Whoever said they would like to see Ferraro better reconsider that now that she has proven herself to be racist. ) You have got to be kidding! Gerry is not a racist. She had done more in all her years of service to fight for injustice and the rights of everybody then so many others! Her comments were clearly taken out of context. Are we at that point in this campaign where entire statements are carved to extract comments so an individual can be labeled as a racist? Stay focus on issues not tearing down a descent person. Continuing to call descent and loving people (such as Gerry) racist is so very wrong; it will definitely have a negative impact NOT on Gerry but on your candidate. Stop it.
By PlumGood bounty hunter on 03/12/2008 9:21 am
Sue Brown
I saw a small picture of Obama in the tribal dress. I must have missed the under lying significants. I gave it no more thought that I do when I see people dressed in Irish costumes for St. Patrick’s Day. Unless a person dresses oddly all the time, so as to have people associate them with a particular group and their beliefs, (example; leather pants without a back side) then to vary your dress for a specific event or day is not important. If would wonder more if he were to have chosen the same clothing for a serious debate. I did not even think the costume had any more significants than if Senator Clinton or Mr. McCain had gone to a high-school band fund raising car wash in shorts and a t-shirt. I think that what you say is what is important as long as your actions are consistent with it.
By Sue Brown on 03/12/2008 11:14 am
Diane Noble
The Photo in and of itself was not important. Senator Obama should have been proud to have participated in that moment, and said so. Why does everyone get so defensive about every little thing? He had no reason to defend his actions. I rather like the fact that he honored them in such a way. The larger problem is the state of this nation: chopping itself up into teenage-like groups. If you are not a part of my group then you are less of a person. If you believe differently than I do, then I must defend myself from you, and I cannot listen to your opinion. Where does this come from? I always felt that our strength came from our willingness to debate an idea, look at it from all sides, and decide what to do from there. We are not always right as a nation, but the debate is there so we can more easily detect our missteps. If we get angry and stop listening do you think that there is strength in that? We are on a cliff at this moment and need to take a few steps back. No one is right all the time. That’s why we need each other. Stop with the anger and keep on debating
By Diane Noble on 03/12/2008 12:42 pm
Cathy F.
get barbara walters on, then you will have a success ……cathy f.
By Cathy F. on 03/12/2008 9:26 pm
Joyce Racette
Barbara Walters is a lovely, successful woman but I’m sorry, I don’t think this group of outstanding women need her presence to be successful at this website, if that is what you are referring to. They already ARE successful and my friends and I love this site. Thanks, Ladies!
By Joyce Racette on 04/11/2008 12:16 am