Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Conversation | 02/13/2009 9:45 am

No Longer Shocking, Hillary Clinton Must Act Fast on Israel, Pakistan

© Getty Images
JUDITH: I think because you know that the president is listening to her. That’s a very good reason for wanting to know what she thinks and what she’s saying.

MARY: Well, I’ll tell you what I think Hillary ought to do, for whatever it’s worth. Obama is surrounded by a lot of very sharp young people who haven’t been in a lot of government, whom he has deliberately collected during his campaign. So Washington, at the moment, has the professionals who have been there and who know what to do, and he has a bunch of very sharp, open-minded young people. And I would think that if I were Hillary, I’d collect some of both groups and I would try to get some new ideas, especially about what in the world to do about Pakistan. It’s our Achilles’ heel. I think that no matter what else we may work out, Pakistan could be our unsolvable problem that’s going to eat us alive.

JULIA: I agree with Mary. The first thing that Mrs. Clinton’s doing — focusing on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. If we don’t solve that, we can just forget it. Really not a whole hell of a lot has happened since James Baker was Secretary of State and we had the Madrid Peace Conference. That formula has never really been adhered to since — under the United Nations Security Council resolutions. President Clinton tried to make progress. Even George W. Bush, in 2002, called for a two-state solution. But nobody’s put it on the line and nobody’s been as tough minded with the Israelis, especially since James Baker’s day, and it was one of the reasons I voted for George H. W. Bush the second time, because it was the first time I’d seen so much progress. If Secretary of State Clinton could channel a little of that, that’d be great. And I also think that Mary’s totally right about Pakistan — and Afghanistan.

When I was in Afghanistan about four years ago, it was a literal pile of rubble. And from all reports, the infrastructure hadn’t changed much. I remember a quote from some general over there saying, “Where the road ends, the Taliban begins.” And there ain’t no roads.

34 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

f p
Pakistan is a total disaster in the making—Israel has turned out to be, thanks to us and our idiotic stance in kowtowing to them, a disaster in the region in that no peace will ever be achieved as long as we keep supplying them with guns and ammo and nukes. As for Hamas and Hizbollah they are essentially Israeli creations thanks to the 1947-49 forcible dislocation of hundreds of thousands of Arabs into refugee camps. As for Iran and Syria they are doing nothing but keeping the pressure on Hamas and Hizbollah and supplying them with arms—the whole area is insane and I frankly think it’s too late to do anything about it. As for Afghanistan—let them fight it out with the Taliban—we should not be involved. There was a time when we could have done something and effectively destroyed the Taliban but not any more thanks to BushCo’s illegitimate and unnecessary war in Iraq. If the Taliban get Pakistan’s nukes the mid-east is going to go up in total conflagration which I’m sure the evangelical loonies here in the US will see as further proof of end times and their pastors will rake in even more money. All in all a fraking mess of epic proportions that we helped create.
By f p on 02/13/2009 9:59 am
Grande Camper
I still feel Hillary can hand this job. She will find her strength and help us out of this mess.
By Grande Camper on 02/13/2009 10:04 am
f p
I wish I had your hope Debra—I’ve seen 50 yrs of terror going on in that area and no longer have any hope left for them.
By f p on 02/13/2009 10:37 am
Suzanne Frazier
Regarding the headline of this blog, and continuing the conversation we were having about Helen Thomas on another blog here at WOWOW, it is obvious from this headline question, why Helen Thomas was asking the question she asked. She wanted to know how Hilary was moving forward in Pakistan, etc……and the President kind of side stepped the issue, in a way, and didn’t mention Hilary. The President was being sensitive and subtle, and so was Helen Thomas. Now other people in the media weren’t getting it. YOU GOT IT HERE. The same question Helen Thomas was asking at the President News Conference.
By Suzanne Frazier on 02/13/2009 10:11 am
f p
Suzanne, she also wanted the Israeli nukes brought out into the open—it’s something no one in either our or their gov’t talks about openly and yet everyone knows they have them. It’s about time we talk about them.
By f p on 02/13/2009 10:16 am
Suzanne Frazier
Right! She gave him the opportunity, but it appears that he is not ready to go there yet. But we must remember he hasn’t even been in office for a month, so the man deserves a little time to get everything together. I think most people what everything done now. And it’s not going to happen that way. Thanks for your response.
By Suzanne Frazier on 02/13/2009 12:00 pm
f p
Sure :-)
By f p on 02/13/2009 12:58 pm
DeBúrca obj
I think it is such a hot button issue the President doesn’t want to just talk about it as a response to a question at a press conference. Anything he says regarding the Middle East can have ramifications and I’m sure it’s best that he make statements that are thought out and worded correctly.
By DeBúrca obj on 02/13/2009 7:05 pm
Suzanne Frazier
Yes! I would appreciate a thoughtful statement too, instead of a “off the cuff” statement to please the press. I hope we are done with that.
By Suzanne Frazier on 02/13/2009 8:06 pm
Chrome Toe
Good conversation. I get where Julia’s coming from. and agree with Mary on what Secretary Clinton should do in terms of gathering people around her and getting some new ideas. old ways and old ideas are the death knell of people who’ve been doing ANY job a long time.
By Chrome Toe on 02/13/2009 10:18 am
EKA -
Frank, as usual, has it right … in my opinion. This Israel situation may have passed the point of no return, and with the new winners in the election. Netanyahu and Livni, the hard liners are back in charge. However, Israel is still dependent on money from America, and yes, we should support the only democracy in the area, but what would happen if we told them we would suspend any aid until they dismantle the settlements in the West Bank, thus making way for a Palestinian State ? I think Hillary, and George Mitchell, are the last best hope to find some solution but it may be too late. As far as Hillary’s qualifications … I’ve always thought that she & Bill were a box set , total equals intellectually but aware that HE was the one who would be elected ( back in the old days .. the 90s ), in fact, I think he thinks SHE is the smarter one, and they worked together on every decision. It is the public that did not trust her because she was a woman. I also think we have the same thing going on now in the White House .. Barack & Michelle are a team and she has a lot f say in his decision making.
By EKA - on 02/13/2009 10:31 am
f p
Yes EKA the West Bank and the Golan Heights need to be dispossessed by Israel and they need to stop kissing butt with the radical right wing settlers and forcibly evict them—say to Mars. Until a true Palestinian state is achieved there will be no peace in the area whatsoever.
By f p on 02/13/2009 10:35 am
EKA -
Yup, unfortunately, I heard Bob Simon say “That ain’t gonna happen” We are all being held hostage by religious fervor, history and victimhood. And until THIS is settled the whole middle east is in jeopardy, with nuclear weapons.
By EKA - on 02/13/2009 11:36 am
Rain in Minneapolis
The only “true Palestinian State” that would suffice for the Palestinian radicals would be the land currently called Israel. How is peace then possible?
By Rain in Minneapolis on 02/13/2009 1:31 pm
f p
YOu obviously have no grasp of history and are merely parroting repub FOsNews speak.
By f p on 02/13/2009 2:02 pm