Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Q & A | 07/08/2008 12:00 am

The Unhappy Would-Be First Ladies

© Shutterstock

Get the Flash Player to view this video.
Editor’s Note: Gail Collins is a columnist for The New York Times. To listen in on her conversation with Lesley Stahl, click the play button above.

LESLEY: Can we talk about First Ladies? I’ve covered the White House for so many years, and I have had just nothing but sympathy for these women who take on this strange, unelected role. And they live in terror of making a mistake. And if any of them ever tried to influence policy they got smacked around. If one hair is out of place, my God the world was coming to an end. And now you have Cindy McCain and Michelle Obama as candidates, both running as First Lady candidates. If you were to write a column giving them advice, what would you tell each of them?

It's really only been since Jackie Kennedy that there's been this idea that the family life of the president is such a central thing.

GAIL: Oh, they know what they’ve gotten into by now. They don’t need my help. But I did wonder, during the primaries when everyone was getting so bent out of shape about Bill Clinton, this running amok, this must be that his heart surgery made him a new, strange, crazy person. There was just all this kind of speculation about why he was behaving in such an erratic fashion. I think it was just an alpha guy trying to deal with the role of First Lady, which as you said is a horrible role that requires so much self-control and so much humility and stomping on your own personality. It’s a very, very difficult thing to do. And clearly he’s not really a person that’s going to be able to do it all that well.

LESLEY: Both Cindy and Michelle are very strong women. Both have their own successful careers. Both have basically raised their children by themselves, because their husbands have come to Washington and the family didn’t move here, in both cases. So I can imagine both of them being used to running offices, and in Cindy’s case, running a company, that it’s especially difficult and closer to Bill Clinton than, say, Nancy Reagan was.

GAIL: I can’t think of them as Michelle and Cindy. I’m sorry. I saw Mrs. McCain in 2000, and she looked very, very, very unhappy. I mean, not in a sulking way.

Click here to read Nobody, Including Barack Obama Himself, Expected It, with Lesley Stahl and Gail Collins.

LESLEY: Even before South Carolina?

GAIL: Yeah. Sort of – not necessarily scared but just clearly a person who did not feel that this was the place that she wanted to be in the world, but trying very hard to do it. And Michelle Obama is clearly doing an amazing job of just trying to deal with this. But she doesn’t seem to be happy either. And we’ve heard a lot about how she’s told him that she won’t do this again. That this is the one time – if he doesn’t win this time they have to go back and have a saner life. But it’s a very, very difficult job.

LESLEY: Cindy McCain said exactly that last time.

GAIL: It’s true. That does tend to get washed away with the waves of time. But this is a very modern thing. Until Eleanor Roosevelt, there were only one or two First Ladies in all of American history who made an impact, who people could even have recognized or identified. And it’s really only been since Jackie Kennedy that there’s been this idea that the family life of the president is such a central thing. But I still don’t think that there’s … that when it comes down to it, people vote on the basis of a First Lady. I think sometimes they take the things that they like or don’t like about the candidate and kind of push that into or pull that out of, you know, the First Lady candidate. But I just don’t think that it’s going to be a big deal.

299 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

James the Game
I wonder what it will be like one day when a woman is elected president and her husband is the First Gentleman. Unfortunately, as we saw in the Democratic presidential campaign, there is still a lack of faith or downright prejudice against women holding the top-drawer position. Not to say that Hillary Clinton’s campaign strategists didn’t drop the ball - they did - but the cynicism was still quite evident.
By James the Game on 07/08/2008 12:07 am
DeBúrca obj
I don’t think people had a problem with a woman being elected, I think they had a problem with Hillary… and have had a problem with her for years. That along with the failures within her campaign and perhaps a bit too much overconfidence at the beginning which gave her no strategy after “super” Tuesday.
By DeBúrca obj on 07/08/2008 12:37 am
Marjorie C.
JC, the problem is with the DNC. They (so far) have selected Obama. Hillary captured half the popular vote despite being overspent by enormous amounts. Hillary has no problem but with the DNC. She would make an excellent president.
By Marjorie C. on 07/08/2008 6:23 am
DeBúrca obj
Actually, the DNC had Hillary crowned as the Democratic nominee for several years before the Primary even started and definitely at the beginning of the Primary. That, in fact, turned a lot of people off Hillary Clinton along with her own aura of inevitability along with a flawed campaign. Obama came from a much less lofty position within the DNC but his enthusiastic, grassroots support and well runned, flexible campaign earned the nomination. The DNC at the end of the day had to back the person who was winning the nomination, but Obama was definitely not their first choice, Hillary was the one they had selected, she just didn’t win.
By DeBúrca obj on 07/08/2008 8:59 am
DeBúrca obj
TYPO correction: change “well runned” to “well run”. I really should preview before I submit!
By DeBúrca obj on 07/08/2008 9:01 am
Star Lawrence
There was way more to it than that…in my opinion. Obama did not just appear—he was groomed for this by someone and I still don’t know who.
By Star Lawrence on 07/08/2008 10:26 am
DeBúrca obj
He was groomed by the circumstances of his life and his DNA.
By DeBúrca obj on 07/08/2008 11:40 am
beth willis
I totally agree with you, Star. I have a name in mind, but I’m keepin’ to myself….due to caution, not paranoia. Peace and grace
By beth willis on 07/08/2008 12:56 pm
Lady Gator
Hello Star —-I almost fell over when I read your post. I’ve been saying this for a long time. When you look at where his money is coming from it’s a bit scary!
By Lady Gator on 07/08/2008 1:34 pm
Star Lawrence
There is a lot to this we don’t know yet…or most of us don’t.
By Star Lawrence on 07/08/2008 1:38 pm
DeBúrca obj
We have now raised 90 percent of our donations from small donors, $25, $50. We average — our average donation is $109 so we have built the kind of organization that is funded by the American people that is exactly the goal and the aim of everybody who’s interested in good government and politics supports.” - Obama campaign
By DeBúrca obj on 07/08/2008 1:51 pm
Marjorie C.
JC B, that is one swig of Kool-Aid that won’t go down.
By Marjorie C. on 07/08/2008 2:09 pm
DeBúrca obj
I am very dismayed, shocked and frankly, very frustrated by the number of Hillary Clinton supporters who repeatedly use every opportunity in their posts here to bash and discredit Barack Obama. The Primary is over. The GOP is counting on Democrats to form the usual “circular firing squad” against their own best interests and lose this election. Any Clinton supporter who wants Obama to lose this November, was obviously NOT voting for Clinton based upon issues. Because the fact is, Obama and Clinton are extremely close on all the issues and McCain is quite the opposite of either of them. Any Democrat, who cares about issues, would be a fool to not enthusiastically support any one of the extremely high quality candidates whom we were lucky enough to choose from at the onset of this election. Obama happened to win. The Primary is over. Clinton supporters need to grow up and quit all the moaning and Obama bashing or else be willing to accept responsibility when McCain gets in and gets to finish off the job Bush began with his eight years of imperialism, war, ignoring of the healthcare crisis AND the environment, aiding the Oil Companies in their greed for record breaking profits, running the country on a huge deficit… and worse of all, selling our Supreme Court to Corporate Interests and the anti-choice movement.
By DeBúrca obj on 07/08/2008 3:21 pm
No Way-No How -No McCain
Great post JC B.
By No Way-No How -No McCain on 07/08/2008 4:20 pm
No Way-No How -No McCain
Though, actually 95% of his donations under $200.
By No Way-No How -No McCain on 07/08/2008 4:23 pm