04/29/2010 12:00 am

Culture

Liz Smith: Keeping Up With Elaine Stritch

Also from Our Liz: Bette Midler takes it off … And the latest in thrills.

Elaine Stritch © Robin Platzer/Twin Images

I ALREADY told you about a fantastic play about gay history, "TheTemperamentals" at New World Stages on West 50th Street. It’s the story of the creators of the Mattachine Society.

Well, on May 3, the influential and controversial U.S. Congressman Barney Frank will be the play’s honored guest in a "Talk Out Mondays" performance after the show.

I know and admire Congressman Frank, a guy who has overcome every obstacle to be "out" and gay and yet instrumental and humane in making the nation’s laws. He is just great!

Maybe you don’t care but "The Temperamentals" has won two Lortel award nominations, a Drama League Award for actor Michael Urie, and two Outer Critics Circle awards, plus being named the outstanding new off-Broadway play.

***

MOST OF us have in our libraries exciting novels from the Fort Worth fiction maven Sandra Brown. Come May 4, Sandra’s handsome son, Ryan Brown, will bring out his own novel, Play Dead.

2010_0428_play_dead.jpg

This one is a refreshing take on the Texas "national" sport, football, and the sinister underworld of vampires and zombies. When I first read it, I thought, "What a combo idea for a movie," and sure enough, there’s big LaLa Land interest in Ryan’s first fiction.

It has received a starred review in Publishers Weekly and Ryan will be taking part in a zombie-themed book signing in May with the multi-Bram Stoker Award winner, Jonathan Maberry. He also has two short stories being published – one in an anthology titled First Thrills and in another called Fear: 13 Stories of Suspense and Horror.

I’ll be greeting both Sandra and Ryan at the Literacy Partners black-tie gala in Lincoln Center on May 10.

22 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

LauraWard
Wow, lots of outs I think. Can’t say them outright until "after." Yet still, it’s fascinating to those of us "not in the know." Someday, we’ll know how to read between the lines…!!!!
By LauraWard on 04/29/2010 1:46 am
BelindaJoy
Off topic completely, but I hate seeing women in suits with ties, how inappropriate. Would it be okay if George Clooney walked around in a sequenced dress? I think not. :-D
By BelindaJoy on 04/29/2010 9:40 am
OE

Contrary to popular belief,  clothes does not make a man, or a woman.  Often, some sequined women could benefit from a less flashy touch, while men with a pink tie or shirt could be just as manly as if they wore a starched white tie.  As for Miss Stritch, her attire fits the stage persona when she sings the lyrics of Noel Coward and others.  I recently watched a gorgeous Spanish singer, Pasion Vega, interpret tangos wearing white tie.  It was for the lyrics; later she changed to various gowns, also for the lyrics. The tangos would not have had the same effect as art, had she performed them wearing gowns. 

I can see why you could be turned off by someone who  crossdresses offstage, as Diane Keaton does.  To me, she looks ridiculous, a parody; and that could diminish any appreciation I may have for her talent.  As for Miss Stritch, I’m sorry to hear she doesn’t want to sing on stage anymore.  Some composers and performers are inseparable.  She’s inseparable from Coward and Cole Porter. 

By OE on 04/29/2010 1:21 pm
BelindaJoy
Women should not wear suits with ties and I don’t want to see a man walking around in high heels. The reality is there are clothing options that are gender specific. Ties and suits are for men, heels and dresses are for women.  You may not have a problem seeing a man dressed in feminine garb, but I do.
By BelindaJoy on 04/29/2010 1:43 pm
OE

First, let me make one thing clear: I’m not trying to influence your opinion; you speak with such conviction.  On the other hand, I’ve never seen a male flamenco or tap dancer, wearing heels, who looked like a sissy while dancing.  As for female skirts, should the Catholic Pope and his underlings change their dresses for pants? By the way, I may be with you on that one; it is so medieval and pretentious.  In desert countries, men wear loose white gowns because they are practical; they keep away the heat and reflect the sun. Also, it’s a cultural thing; as such, I believe it merits respect.

 When I consider that we’re living in the 21st Century, what people wear is so irrelevant and not a factor in their personal worth, as long as decorum is observed.  By "decorum" I don’t mean "gender specific ", but "decent cover of the private parts of the human body, as not to offend society."

By OE on 04/29/2010 2:42 pm
BelindaJoy

You’re parsing words. You are reaching in terms of coming up with examples to counter my opinion, when I made it very clear from my first post what I was referring to. I am not talking about religious sects who wear gowns, ethnic groups who may have clothing options that run counter to what we "Americans" are use to. I am talking specifically about women wearing shirts and ties as a man does, I find that inappropriate and not feminine. Just as a man who would choose to wear high heels or a dress (as women do) is likewise inappropriate and not masculine.

I’m all for political correctness, but not when it runs amok. It should be okay to define aspects of life as feminine or masculine and not constantly have to view the world as a combination of the two. For indeed they are separate.

By BelindaJoy on 04/29/2010 2:57 pm
phyllisDoylePepe

There are some men that walk around in sequin dresses and look gorgeous. Clooney would make a dandy female impersonator––he’s got that doe-like look about him–-sometimes. Dietrich made a name for herself in a suit, tie and top hat to boot; "Strichie" looks great in same.

Message to whomever is in charge of the radio segments. When you click on play, you get last week’s segment. 

By phyllisDoylePepe on 04/29/2010 11:07 am
PaulSmith
George Clooney as female impersonator for laughs I suppose, or laughs and unease mixed.  Men do not, in general, look gorgeous in drag, and those who do have an uncanny female likeness when not sequined.  An interesting subject may be why men who cross dress induce laughter but women as men rarely do.
By PaulSmith on 04/29/2010 11:53 am
phyllisDoylePepe
In the eye of the beholder, my friend. Your query as to why men who cross dress induce laughter, but women rarely do: I would think in the cross-gender segment it is not laughter that prevails, but how gorgeous one can look (you may not use that word, but they do). Since women wear pants, their donning a more male attire doesn’t have the startling effect you would expect if the other way round. Scotsmen take pride in their kilts and would probably punch your lights out if you hooted. As I said, it’s all in the eyes of all those beholders.
By phyllisDoylePepe on 04/29/2010 1:43 pm
SandraWickett

I wonder why we care what Elaine is wearing. She excels in what she does. Katherine Hepburn apparently didn’t own a dress  and it was ok. She made pants for women totally acceptable. I think we tend to get caught up in triviality way too much.  Let people wear what they want unless their dress habits become unacceptable in terms of  too much nudity.

By SandraWickett on 04/29/2010 2:11 pm
PaulSmith

Eye of the beholder explains much, and avoiding light of day.

By PaulSmith on 04/29/2010 2:26 pm
phyllisDoylePepe
Avoiding the light of day––sunglasses, otherwise known as shades–-the dead that walk among us––always a good hide-behind.
By phyllisDoylePepe on 04/29/2010 6:45 pm
PatriceBaldwin
Judy Garland with a black fedora, white shirt and black suit coat wasn’t bad either… it was the legs that did it!
By PatriceBaldwin on 04/29/2010 8:23 pm
LuckyLadyna
I doubt that Ms. Stritch realizes what a difference her "Here’s to the Ladies that Lunch" made to me—but somehow, someway after playing it over and over I decided I didn’t belong with the "ladies who lunch" and I was sick of them, i.e.(in my case), no more anything with acquaintances who gossipped, criticized, "did in" and tore down people who were not there.  That said, I stuck with true friends (I still have them) and when we get together (yes, at lunch) we have a great time. Hooray, Ms. Stritch—you gave me back the life I needed and wanted!
By LuckyLadyna on 04/29/2010 2:48 pm
Mr. Wow

Wow…there is such a difference between a woman wearing a suit (and tie) and a man in drag.  Who was more sexy and divine  than Dietrich in her tux?  If anything, a woman in somewhat masculine attire often becomes a stronger feminine object. 

 

 A lovely lady in a suit can be hot.  A man in a dress is a drag queen.  That can be hot, too, if you want a drag queen.  But the woman/suit thing is more interesting.

By Mr. Wow on 04/29/2010 3:37 pm