11/19/2009 4:00 pm

Culture

Queen Martha, by Cynthia McFadden

Cynthia spends two days with Martha Stewart, a 'true original,' and shares their unfiltered conversation.

Image courtesy of ABC

OK, let me just come right out and say it: I had a great time hanging out with Martha Stewart for two days last week for a story on her business empire, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. The company, according to analysts, is at an important moment in its history. The company successfully battled back from steep losses when Stewart was sent to prison for lying to investigators about a stock trade only to be hit hard (like most media companies) by the financial crisis. But Stewart is confident about the future of the company – and points to plenty of evidence of growth, including a new partnership with Home Depot. The company’s headquarters literally buzz with creative activity. There is the scent of success in the air.

That’s not to say being with Stewart is a warm and fuzzy experience. As the old joke goes, if you want the girl next door, go next door. No, Stewart is a hard-charging, demanding, impossibly exacting taskmaster. But she is also a true original. An American master. Creating a brand and a company from scratch. One of the hardest workers I have ever seen. She is also unfiltered. In the two days we spent together it seemed to me she said pretty much whatever she thought about just about everything. From her legal woes ("They should have been investigating Bernie Madoff, not me!") to Rachael Ray’s latest book ( "It’s not good enough for me" ) to the prospects for her company ("We’re going to do very, very well") and even her own finances ("I lost a billion dollars").

To read more about my exclusive interview with Martha Stewart tonight on "Nightline" click here.

2009_1119_abc_stewart_mcfadden2.jpg
Image courtesy of ABC


23 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

BabySnooks
The thing I’ve never figured out is why all the kitchens of the Julia Child Wannabes don’t look like our kitchens while Julia Child’s always did.  Nice and pretty when the pots and pans are brought out and not so nice and pretty once everything in the pots is simmering and everything in the pans is baking and roasting.  And Julia Child had disasters like the rest of us.  Everything the wannabes prepare comes out perfect.  Too perfect at times. To the point you wonder if they’re props from an advertising department.  Painted and polished and perfect. 
By BabySnooks on 11/19/2009 3:43 pm
Lee Harrison
Fabulous interview Cynthia.  Thanks so much for posting it here.  I’m a huge Martha fan, despite her personality gliches;-)  I envy her sense of style; her drive; her fearlessness; her energy and organizational skills.  She seems to be missing a bit in the "class" department.  Dissing Rachael Ray was not a good thing.
By Lee Harrison on 11/19/2009 3:45 pm
CarolynK
I just got through watching the interview. I don’t really think she dissed Rachel Ray, and Rachel didn’t either was Cynthia gave her a chance at a rebuttal. What’s wrong with saying that doing a cookbook that’s just a repackaging past recipes in a new book is "not good enogh for me"? Frankly Martha and I are on the same page. When I have time to watch Rachel its for the entertainment not the food.
By CarolynK on 11/20/2009 12:06 am
MaryaliceChester
I bet that if this article were about a successful businessMAN, there would be no reference whatever to "a warm and fuzzy experience".  Martha Stewart is a wildly successful businessWOMAN and "warm and fuzzy" doesn’t and shouldn’t have anything to do with it. 
By MaryaliceChester on 11/19/2009 3:57 pm
SherrieCrews
Martha and Cynthia are both very smart, talented and classy ladies. Thanks for the interview Cynthia.
By SherrieCrews on 11/19/2009 4:50 pm
LauraWard
When I lived in NYC, my boss’ son worked directly for Martha Stewart at her company before the indictment in the upper levels of the financial department. He had nothing bad to say about working for her. He said she’s dedicated and expects the same from her employees. That’s what any employer-employee relationship should be.
By LauraWard on 11/19/2009 5:06 pm
JHolmes
Loved the interview.  My opinion of Martha Stewart has changed over the years and for the better. I admire her can do attitude and her skills which amaze me.  I think she says it best that she views herself as a teacher and deminds perfection from teachers. We do not have to be exact copies of Martha but there is much to learn from her.  She loves wants she does and that is a good thing.
By JHolmes on 11/19/2009 5:23 pm
JHolmes
Oops- meant to type "demands" instead of deminds.  Martha would notice typo.
By JHolmes on 11/19/2009 5:24 pm
SA4

I have respected Martha Stewart for quite a long time. I have followed her career, purchased some, but not all of her books, and I used to watcher her shows. I think we both have some things in common with the exception that I have never thought I could make what I do into a multi-million or billion dollar company. I don’t know if Martha knits. If she doesn’t then that is the one thing I do that she doesn’t do.

Oh, and my kitchen does get messy during large meals but it is not as messy as Julia Childs televised accidents. I often wondered if they were infact not staged?

By SA4 on 11/19/2009 7:32 pm
macwoofwoof
Martha has very pretty horses. 
By macwoofwoof on 11/19/2009 9:59 pm
BelindaJoy

Martha Stewart like any person who gains celebrity status, is either loved or hated regardless of her faults. And she does have them.  She made millions in her long life, but not all of it honestly. This is something that many who adore her ignore. In my mind that diminishes any accomplishments she has made because they call into question her integrity and honor. For someone who has made a living on not just cooking perfectly, but decorating and presenting all you do perfectly, I find it hypocritical that she herself is so flawed.

However I love her creations and ideas and have applied many to my homes over the years. I love the fact that she stresses to pay attention to even the smallest details, I live by that rule as well. So a lot of what she has to say is of value, but there is something about her that is simply off pudding to me. It’s as if she is attempting to be a snob, above everyone else when in actuality she is not. She’s too controlled - too focused on perfection. I always feel people who are like that are hiding something.

By BelindaJoy on 11/20/2009 3:53 am
keenobserver1

"Stewart was sent to prison for lying to investigators about a stock trade."  This is a media lie…factually, "Stewart was sent to prison" ON CHARGES…  She did no "lying to investigators," and no evidence of this existed.  Not one word spoken by her or any "investigator" was recorded in a transcript or in sworn testimony.  "Stewart was sent to prison" as a direct consequence of grossly incompetent legal representation.  The bogus charge of "lying" would never have come into existence if she had competent legal representation.  Like any serious male investor, her "stock trade" was based on sound investment management principles and perfectly legal.  She sold on no "tip"; only a mere two months earlier, she made the decision to sell ALL of her ImClone stock in a tender offer from Bristol-Myers, which was oversubscribed, leaving her with the remnant "stock trade."   She owed nobody any explanation for this sale; and why she made the "stock trade" was nobody’s business, including "the investigators." 

Martha Stewart dissing Rachel Ray is a media distortion; nothing new with Martha and the media.  "…made millions…not all of it honestly" completely baseless.

By keenobserver1 on 11/20/2009 8:28 am
SueFawcett
Anyone with a brain (re: intelligence) who watched the interview would not term Martha’s evaluation of the difference between herself and Ms. Ray as "dissing".  Why does the media have to reduce everything to discord and rivalry?  On another note, Martha is a strong and successful entrepreneur who was unlucky enough to be born female, which (to many) in America means she is a "dragon lady" who has to be brought down. In other words, self-made, successful female business moguls aren’t tolerated in the U.S. unless they have been punished, ruined, or humbled in some fashion. The exception to the rule consists of heiresses to successful male-created fortunes and businesses who continue the male-defined legacy. Think about it - it’s a sorry, sexist truth in this country. 
By SueFawcett on 11/20/2009 11:22 am
Pdrde
I never felt Martha should have gone to trial OR to jail - she was railroaded.  She’s right - why weren’t THEY watching Bernie Madoff?  I was so impressed and so proud of the way she handled herself while in prison - she did it with courage, grace and charm and didn’t expect nor ask for any special treatment.  Amazing woman! 
By Pdrde on 11/21/2009 6:52 am
SusanCrawford

I spent many years learning many things from Marth Stewart. And I have the hot glue gun scars to prove it! Seriously, I still create my own holiday wreaths of cranberries according to her directions; I still use her recipes for many wonderful treats; I still think of her whenever I open my tidily organized dresser drawers! She truly did become the diva of domesticity. And frankly, she’s right on when she says the "big boys" should have been spending more time on Bernie Madoff than on her own pecadillo, which by contrast looks like pretty darn small pommes de terre at this point, eh?

By SusanCrawford on 11/21/2009 7:22 pm