Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Question of the Day | 07/30/2009 11:00 pm

When talking about enhancing athletic performance, is there really such a difference between human and equipment enhancement?

The Michael Phelps Speedo controversy has us wondering: What’s the difference between human enhancement such as steroids, supplements and vitamins, and equipment enhancement such as the new LZR Racer or Arena X-Glide? Join Joan Ganz Cooney, Liz Smith, Sheila Nevins and Marlo Thomas in the conversation.
© AP
Joan Ganz Cooney

Joan Ganz Cooney | 08/02/2009 10:40 am

Joan Ganz Cooney on 'Meaningless' Records

I wish all enhancements were prohibited. The records in sports are becoming more and more meaningless and I think that’s a shame.


Marlo Thomas

Marlo Thomas | 08/02/2009 4:00 pm

The Only Way to See Who's Fastest, by Marlo Thomas

When a miracle swimmer like Michael Phelps gets beaten by a full-body length (which is like a mile in professional swimming) by a guy who can’t carry his water (chlorinated or otherwise) – and then the guy admits, “The suit makes all the difference” – isn’t it time to suspect a little polyurethane hanky-panky here? Yes, I think that equipment enhancement is as shady as chemical enhancement. And if we REALLY want to see who’s the fastest – I say we make these guys swim in the nude.


Liz Smith

Liz Smith | 08/03/2009 11:55 am

Liz Smith Gets 'Behind' Sports

I can’t get all heated up about anything to do with sports except when a horse like Barbaro breaks a leg running. I don’t care who takes steroids. I am just not interested, though I do enjoy looking at athletes like Michael Phelps in the almost altogether. And I like watching pro football the same way I watch ballet. All those male behinds to be patted.


Sheila Nevins

Sheila Nevins | 08/03/2009 12:15 pm

Sheila Nevins: Let Them Swim Naked!

Cheating is cheating. Advantage should be skill and wit alone. Let the swimmers swim again – naked.


26 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Andrea Brandon

Get rid of all enhancements and make them all wear the same swimsuits.

By Andrea Brandon on 07/31/2009 12:30 am
Judy K.
Andrea, that says it all. Athletics should be based on physical performance period.
By Judy K. on 07/31/2009 1:58 am
Lizzie R.
What it real about athletics anymore if there are enhancements of any sort? That does not prove the merit of any athlete if they are not performing at their own level naturally. Steroids, doping etc. etc - it makes a sham out of competition.
By Lizzie R. on 07/31/2009 1:07 am
Chris Glass`
Competitive swimmers are a tough lot. They practice daily giving up just about every other activity to advance. If they think that a particular suit will help their performance why shoiuld the public object? It isn’t a drug it is an article of clothing made of fabric with less drag in the water. We need to keep in mind that this could be a case of mind over matter. If you think something will help you get ahead you will have the confidence to do your best. Half of winning is what is in the mind of the person performing.
By Chris Glass` on 07/31/2009 4:56 am
James the Game

The one thing about enhanced fabric compared to steroids, though, is that the latter is bad for your health. Theoretically, if everyone wore the same type of fabric, that would neutralize the advantages one swimmer might have over another. Whereas there is no way to heathily level the playing field with steroids. Having said that, I agree that no enhancements whatsoever would be the best way to go.

A timely discussion, as it was just reported Thursday that baseball sluggers David Ortiz and Manny Ramirez tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs (PED’s) in 2003. Both starred on the Boston Red Sox’ 2004 & 2007 World Series championship teams (Ramirez is now with the L.A. Dodgers). They’re on a list of 100 baseball players who allegedly tested positive for the PED’s in ‘03. Their names were supposed to be sequestered, but they continually to gradually trickle out to the media.

Not to be flustered, Ortiz belted the game-winning homer last night in Boston’s 8-5 win over the Oakland A’s.

Hammerin’ Hank Aaron, whose all-time homerun mark was bested by alleged steroid-user Barry Bonds a few years ago, remarked recently that an asterisk should be placed next to the names of all of these tarnished athletes’ names in the baseball record books during the steroid era (circa 1994-2004). That’s when Roger Maris’s single-season home run record of 61 dingers in 1961 was shattered (for a 162-game season; Babe Ruth held the record of 60 HR’s in 1927 for a 154-game slate). It’s also when dozens of players were routinely walloping 50 or more homeruns a year, whereas it used to be an extremely difficult feat.

For example, when Cecil Fielder of the Tigers hit 51 in 1990, that was the first time in 13 years that anyone had hit as many as 50 in a single season (George Foster of the Reds hit 52 in 1977). Yet, more than a dozen did so in the steroid era (before random drug testing was implemented): http://www.baseball-almanac.com/hitting/hihr4.shtml

The integrity of the game was compromised, and the record book - a sacred thing in baseball - was shredded by inflated numbers produced by inflated athletes. My belief is that the powers-that-be in baseball deliberately ignored the obvious ‘roids rage, because the homerun-bashing was filling the seats and helping the TV ratings following the infamous baseball strike in 1994 that forced postponement of the World Series for the first time ever. Now, the chickens have come home to roost.

The swimming czars ought not to go down the same road.

 

 

 

 

By James the Game on 07/31/2009 5:50 am
Patricia Sprofera
James - Just responding, my computer was down on Friday, 7.31.09.  Yes, Bud Selig, et al, played chicken with the game and its fans and many of the fans are no longer rooting for MLB.  Scroll through the comments and you’ll see/read what I think about enhancements; it may be on Page 2 of this thread.  Be well.  Patty
By Patricia Sprofera on 08/01/2009 10:26 am
B Clark
All they need is a return to the classics.  In all swimming events the swimmers should swim naked.  End of problem.
By B Clark on 07/31/2009 7:58 am
Laura Ward
No, they still don’t have the same "equipment" size.
By Laura Ward on 07/31/2009 9:59 am
B Clark
They’d still be competing with what nature gave them.  Endurance, strength, and whatever else they got.
By B Clark on 07/31/2009 5:46 pm
Lisa M

Is WoW not up on the news that these suits are now banned for international competion? Take a look at recent rulings by FINA. This meet is the last that these will be seen and there is already talk of putting an asterisk next to every single one of these records.

Do you honestly think that runners wouldn’t want to run in the most technologically advanced running shoe they could get their hands on? Of course swimmers jumped at the chance to wear a new suit where a fraction of a second makes the difference between olympic gold and silver. 

By Lisa M on 07/31/2009 7:59 am
Community Manager
The ban by FINA doesn’t begin until "sometime next year".
By Community Manager on 07/31/2009 10:37 am
Zera Lee

In time for the Winter Olympics?

By Zera Lee on 07/31/2009 9:01 pm
Chris Glass`
You have a good point Lisa.
By Chris Glass` on 07/31/2009 11:37 am
Belinda Joy

What a great question WoW staffers.

I agree with others on this topic, it should be about physical endurance and expertise and nothing else. Athletes should not be allowed to get an upper hand whether it be drugs, clothing or sports equipment.  It’s unfair…period.

And P.S. Thanks for the hot picture to start my day….whoa baby!!!!!!!!!

By Belinda Joy on 07/31/2009 8:55 am
Lauriate Roly

Easy now Belinda Joy. Try to stay on topic. You’re distracting the others.

By Lauriate Roly on 07/31/2009 11:40 am