Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Entertainment | 07/23/2009 9:30 am

ESPN Bans NY Post for Showing Naked Erin Andrews Photos; Female Sportscaster Finds Allies Everywhere

As the investigation into who the peeping Tom was violating Andrews’s privacy, reports and blogs pop up everywhere blasting sexism, voyeurism.
By The Staff at wowOwow.com
The disgusting ordeal ESPN reporter Erin Andrews has had to face — being the victim of a peeping Tom while she was walking around naked in her hotel room, then having the video surface on the Internet — has brought together men and women of all stripes, as people everywhere come to her defense. Many admit that women in such high-profile positions don’t have the luxury of just being able to do their jobs and be respected for it.

KING 5 sports reporter Lisa Gangel in Seattle is also a beautiful blonde hoping to be respected rather than drooled over. The whole incident affected her, as well.

"It deflated me," Gangel told The Seattle Times. "You never know what can happen, and in our profession, being so visible, you never know who’s watching you … I’ve always thought that, despite Erin Andrews’s smokin’ hot looks, she’s very good at what she does. You only hope that people recognize your work first. It hurts to know what she’s going through."

Viv Bernstein of TrueSlant writes:
So Andrews is punished for being pretty. But somehow she deserves it, because everyone assumes the only reason she was hired by ESPN was her appearance. What people don’t realize is that puts Andrews in a position no male reporter faces on a daily basis: She has to prove herself on every assignment to demonstrate that she is more than a beautiful stand-in for a real reporter.
A blog post on Feministing.com said the voyeurism "is simply an escalation of the barrage of sexism and objectification that constantly surrounds her [Andrews] as she attempts to construct a career in a ‘man’s sphere,’" and notes that female sideline reporters are often selected for what they look like — oh, and maybe their broadcast skills. "They are, in short, exploited for their sex appeal to straight, male audiences and rarely, if ever, asked to provide opinions or analysis (presumably because the networks are not interested in the sports opinions of women, and certainly not these women). Female sideline reporters generally do not graduate to the broadcast booth or other high-level on-camera positions. More often, they are phased out as they age and replaced by younger women."

As the investigation into who violated Andrews continues, ESPN has banned staffers from the New York Post from appearing on any of its TV or radio programs. That’s payback after the Post published photos of Andrews from the video in its paper and on its website for all to see. Andrews’s lawyer has vowed legal action against any media outlet that publishes the explicit photos.

"In light of the New York Post’s decision to run graphic photos of ESPN reporter Erin Andrews, we have decided to stop utilizing Post reporters on any of our outlets," said ESPN spokesman Chris LaPlaca. "Erin was grievously wronged here, and while we understand the Post’s decision to cover this as a news story, their running photos obtained in such a fashion went well beyond the boundaries of common decency in the interest of sensationalism. This is not a decision we undertook lightly, but we feel it is an appropriate one."

11 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Barbara B
As great as the internet is there are some horrible down sides to this as well.  I hope they find the pervert and prosicute them.  The penalty for this  should be very severe and not just a slap on the wrist.  This could really ruin a persons life.  Also this poor woman must have a stalker in the mist which is more disturbing then ever.  She may become a basket case wondering who is doing this to her.  The punishment for this crime should be a flat out 25 years no parole.  Oh wait I forgot sometimes murder does not get that much.  This is how broken our judicial system has become.  People hurt people & they get out on parole to do their dirty deed all over again.  Internet crime needs to be addressed ASAP
By Barbara B on 07/23/2009 9:51 am
Maggie W

Of course, she was hired because of her looks.  She is also very good at what she does and has a large audience.  What is sad is that in a few years, she will be phased out for a younger woman while her male counter parts will continue in the profession and even move on to that desk job on the evening news.

A silver haired, tanned, pearly white toothed sports anchor is just great, as long as it is a man. That is the real travesty.

By Maggie W on 07/23/2009 9:53 am
Belinda Joy

The circumstances behind her peeping tom violation are truly disturbing and I think will be a cautionary tale for all women, not just the beautiful blonds who appear on T.V.  All women have the real opportunity to be violated in this manner when staying in a hotel or changing clothes in a gym shower/locker room….you never know.

It’s the not knowing that I find the most insidious because it makes you paranoid.

By Belinda Joy on 07/23/2009 10:40 am
Jonathan D

I don’t think ANYONE should be put in this position, so then why does the media in general reward paparazzi who go around sticking their cameras everywhere, at all times, in all situations?? 

 

WHY has the traditional statement always been by the media, that such invasion is a protected 1st amendment right, and that celebrities have less right to privacy than others less in the public eye?? 

 

NOW… their own celebrity, has been paparazzi’d, and they are screaming bloody murder?

 

So… will ESPN ban ANY media source that invades people’s privacy?  Will media that shows upskirt views of Spears and Hilton be banned also?? 

 

I THINK NOT!!   We’ll see won’t we.

By Jonathan D on 07/23/2009 2:34 pm
DeBúrca obj
There is no excuse for what was done to this woman but let’s not fool ourselves about why "smokin’ hot" reporters are not respected. What ever happened to professional women dressing in a professional manner? If they are going to allow themselves to be exploited by the media then they will never be taken as seriously as the men.
By DeBúrca obj on 07/23/2009 4:15 pm
KatyDid Wells

DeBúrca obj, I’m aware that you prefaced your comment by finding the offense inexcusable, and yet the rest of your comment immediately brought to mind the attitudes I faced 25+ years ago after I was raped - I was continually asked what I was wearing that night - as if it could possibly explain or excuse the men’s behavior. 

First, I’ll have to plead ignorance to Erin Andrews and what she wears on a daily basis, but I’ve yet to see her in any pictures wearing suggestive clothing. In the pictures I’ve seen on this site alone, she was wearing nothing that I would consider inappropriate.  If a woman is dressed like a playboy playmate and expecting to get plum assignments as a result, then I agree, she can’t expect to be taken serious - our society likes to categorize people and manner of dress is just one of the many ways to put people in a little box, easily dismissed.   

But I’m sorry, but there’s no reason for a woman to forgo her feminity just because she’s working in a typically male dominated profession - as long as it is considered appropriate by her employer, what she wears should have no bearing on the respect she garners as she does her job.  No one cares about how her male peers are dressed, the point is that this is just another place where women still have an uphill battle when it comes to equality.   

 

By KatyDid Wells on 07/24/2009 1:28 pm
DeBúrca obj
Listen, I wasn’t commenting on her appearance regarding being peeped on and videos taken of her. I was commenting on the fact that these women commentators dress like they’re going out clubbing and then complain about not being taken seriously. It is about dressing professionally if you want to be taken as seriously as the men in your field, nothing more.
By DeBúrca obj on 07/28/2009 9:50 am
S G
I hope they find who did this and throw them in jail and throw away the key!
By S G on 07/23/2009 4:33 pm
K M

I’m surprised and delighted that ESPN took such a strong stance against the New York Post for publishing those pictures that were obtained criminally.  It might be soley based on the fear of a law suit, but at least it’s something.

Unfortunately, the only half-hearted respect I see for women sports reporters is when I watch the WNBA and see Cheryl Miller giving her enlightened commentary.

By K M on 07/24/2009 2:29 pm
Sandbee (FB) 54
If and when the person who did this is put in prison, they should have a camera watching them 24/7.
By Sandbee (FB) 54 on 07/26/2009 5:54 pm