Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

The Liz Smith Column | 07/13/2009 11:00 pm

Liz Smith: Angie and Brad's Bonanza of Birthdays

Also from Our Gossip Girl: Lena Horne’s life story a hit! … Liz Taylor vs. the Jacksons? … Barbara Walters honored.
The Jolie-Pitts © Getty Images

"The real religion of the world comes from women much more than from men – from mothers most of all, who carry the key to our souls in their bosom" – Oliver Wendell Holmes.

***

Now let’s say you are one of the most beautiful women in the world and live with one of the sexiest guys in the world and you are a busy bee. You have been making a movie down in Washington and you have also been pushing your various charity projects worldwide. At the same time you are the mother of six children.

Spring and summer signal a marathon of kids’ birthday parties. You have to celebrate Shiloh and the twins, Vivienne and Knox, and Maddox. (You do actually have two children who weren’t born in the spring and summer.)

So who are you? Why, you are the beleaguered Angelina Jolie and you’ve been supervising one birthday after another – in May, Shiloh; on July 12 there’s Vivienne and Knox; come August, one for Maddox. (Zahara was born in January and Pax in November, so this gives a bit of breathing room between blowing out candles.)

Says Angelina: "Now the older kids can help plan the birthdays for the younger kids. Birthdays are one of the great pleasures of life! … With so many children, it feels like we just have year-round birthdays."

2009_0714_getty_angelina_jolie_brad_pitt_children_family84488078.jpg
The Jolie-Pitts © Getty Images
***

The fabled but reclusive Lena Horne was 92 years old recently so we still don’t know how this legendary star feels about James Gavin’s new book on her life, Stormy Weather. But I did give the incredibly frank and straightforward biography a big thumbs-up when it came out a couple of weeks ago.

2009_0415_getty_lena_horne.jpg
Lena Horne © Getty Images

On its first day of publication, the book made Amazon’s Top 100. Splashy reviews have been everywhere and it made Oprah’s list of "Top 25 Summer Reads." Gayle King also touted it on "Good Morning America."

There is, of course, word whizzing about for a movie. In late 2007, Oprah announced her plan to star Alicia Keys as Lena in a biopic. But we haven’t heard anything on that front since. I frankly don’t see how they could produce such a movie without generous use of Mr. Gavin’s work, which is a gem of its kind. Click here to read my review of the book on wOw.

While Mr. Gavin is traveling to promote Stormy Weather, he is also busy with his documentary based on Intimate Nights: The Golden Age of New York Cabaret. They have interviewed yours truly, Lily Tomlin, Joan Rivers and Professor Irwin Corey. (He is 94 and undiminished in the slightest!) They are trying to see Carol Burnett, Jonathan Winters and Hal Holbrook. (All have said yes.) Phyllis Diller is being cagey but I hope she’ll come around.

Meanwhile, I urge you in this summer weather to pick up a copy of Stormy Weather, which may just be one of the best biographies about show business, race, love, sex and music ever written.

***

Lindsay Lohan’s movie "Labor Pains" will have a TV airing before it heads for DVD. You can catch the comedy on ABC Family Network on July 19. Please don’t be tiresome and e-mail me, "Who cares?" I’ll start writing about Michael Jackson again.

44 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Woody McBreairty
This picture of the Brangelina Family reminds me of how ridiculous these people are.  They live their lives like a traveling circus, exploiting their children along with themselves.  To most people, their private lives are personal and sacred….but not to these folks….The show must go on. 
By Woody McBreairty on 07/14/2009 12:27 am
C Hardy
Woody, what is so ridiculous about them?  They dont parade their children around - they dont exploit their kids…they have never made money that they have kept off their children?  Any money made due to pictures of their kids is donated to charity…
By C Hardy on 07/14/2009 8:08 am
Victoria J
Oh Woody, what a sad sack you are…they don’t make their lives a circus the PAPS and those who buy celebrity magazines drive the circus. And clearly you know little about children. Children prefer to be with their parents and this couple understand parenting. As for exploiting their children…our culture exploits children …not these guys. Show me personal and sacred when the bulk of the hit shows on TV in the U.S. are reality shows?   There is no privacy for anybody anymore much less famous movie stars. I admire the two tremendously and think given the circumstances they have served their children and themselves very well.
By Victoria J on 07/25/2009 1:02 pm
Andrea Brandon
Woody, isn’t that the truth! Traveling circus, indeed.
By Andrea Brandon on 07/14/2009 2:25 am
Chrissy Smith
I agree with the above posts, Andrea and Woody.  I also question the "older ones looking after the younger ones" idea that I have seen them talking about - who are the parents here?
By Chrissy Smith on 07/14/2009 3:05 am
Lila Kuh

I’m against just dumping all the child-care on the oldest siblings - which is what happened in my father’s family -but I don’t think that’s what’s going on here.

BUT, I kind of like the idea of the older ones helping to plan birthdays for the younger ones.  It would foster a sense of participating in the family, and it’s that kind of participation that bonds siblings and helps teach caring, selflessness, and good parenting skills for their own future families.  If kids are never asked to do anything to contribute to family life, then all they do is take, and never give.  That fosters cluelessness and a misplaced sense of entitlement.

By Lila Kuh on 07/14/2009 8:04 am
Victoria J
Ok, if you’re pissed that Brad left the Friends’ woman for Angelina…get over it! People,  it’s six children later. However your rather nasty asides about these children show you to be rather small minded.  None of you have the cajones or the heart to adopt anything except perhaps a dog with a red bow. You haven’t the heart or the balls to engage children from a different culture and move them out of harms’ way into an extraordinary life as this pair has chosen to do. Yes the older ones do try to look after the younger ones in a limited way(shows you haven’t a clue about siblings). But as parents and in my case, as a grandparent, you honor their effort no matter how circumscribed it may be. I know I do with my grandchildren. Clearly Brad and Angelina are the parents and darn good ones.  The incessant whine by those who do nothing but complain is so tedious and boring!
By Victoria J on 07/25/2009 1:16 pm
C Hardy

Oh wow, what is wrong with having that many kids if you have the means to take care of them and Brad & Angelina DO without having to exploit their kids.  They dont have a reality show or books about raising 6 kids, and when they allow magazines to take pictures all the money is donated.  Maybe you should read up on B&A before you make assumptions.

If they traveled without their kids you would be screaming "where are their kids"…I think its great they take their kids with them where they go as long as they arent missing school but most celebrity kids have personal tutors that come along. 

If I made the kind of money B&A made I would have that many kids if not more, naturally & by adoption.  I think B&A is one of the best Hollywood parents around.

By C Hardy on 07/14/2009 6:54 am
Jeannot Kensinger
Agreed!
By Jeannot Kensinger on 07/14/2009 7:40 am
Mary Utrup
C Hardy GOD BLESS! Absolutely everything you posted about B&A is absolutely correct. What I continue to be amazed at and grateful for, is the positive transformation of Angelina Jolie! Not only is she one of the most beautiful women in the world, but she has taken that beauty and that talent and done as much good with it as she can find to do. Fifteen years ago I never would have thought it possible. While I’d be glad to see a real reconciliation between Angelina and her dad, John Voight has a great deal to be proud of.
By Mary Utrup on 07/14/2009 7:56 am
Lauri Anderson
Add me as a supporter of C Hardy’s post, and of this one.  From the first photos taken of Angelina with little Maddox, ie, from the time she became a mother, you could even see in her face a transformation.  This is when, imho, she became one of the most beautiful women of the world. Once she was responsible for another human being, her whole outlook on life changed.  She made herself aware of what was going on in the world around her, instead of focusing on her own self-being.  She has even admitted herself that she motherhood has completely changed her.
By Lauri Anderson on 07/16/2009 10:45 pm
Mary Utrup
I was raised in a household where the mantra, of sorts, was: "There is nothing like a baby". It was said with the deepest sort of respect. Both of my grandmothers had six chiildren, my mother, on the other hand, miscarried two before I was born and one after my youngest sister. Those children were always thought of with regret, because they were not able to be a part of the family. This is not to say (and I’ve had seven myself) that there were not challenges among all of these surviving "children". But the message I got and beleived and still believe is that each child is irreplaceable and should be loved. So Angelina Jolie’s "transformation" is well understood by me. Nothing makes ones life more miserable than concentrating only on yourself. I remain very glad for her happiness and her success. I believe she deserves all of it.
By Mary Utrup on 07/17/2009 5:18 am
Irish Eyes NY
Yes, c hardy: Just like on the other foot, everyone screamed "why does Sarah Palin have to take their children every where" I guess your damned if you do and damned if you don’t.
By Irish Eyes NY on 07/18/2009 8:10 am
Victoria J
Sorry Irish, but Sarah Barbie Palin had the State of Alaska paying for her kids to travel when it wasn’t necessary. And NO, the President’s kids don’t get a free ride. He pays for certain travel for his children. And taking her 6 month old son, Trig, disagnosed with Downs Syndrome on the campaign trail was such a poor poor choice. Given his challenges, he should like most new babies be at home on a structured eat and sleep schedule and any other special instructions that might begin to help him early to deal with his limitations.  A new baby in a new hotel room every night, sleeping on someone’s shoulder out on a stage in bright lights, being handed around to his small sister to strangers was not a good experience for a new born especially one suffering from a congenital disorder.  I think Trig was damned because She did!
By Victoria J on 07/25/2009 1:25 pm
Irish Eyes NY

Victoria, Please let me know where it is printed that BO pays for his childrens travel expenses, would love to see it.

 How typical of you & so many other bloggers on her, Sarah Barbie Palin. Pleeeeeze, get over her would ya? If I wrote about Michelle O with the same disrespect I would be tarred and feathered.

let’s have some respect here, huh?

By Irish Eyes NY on 07/29/2009 5:14 pm