Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

The Liz Smith Column | 05/05/2009 11:00 pm

Liz Smith: Remembering Audrey

Also from Our Gossip Girl: Resurrecting Michael Jackson … and waiting for ‘Godot.’
© Getty Images

Audrey Hepburn would have been 80 years old on May 4, if you can imagine such a thing!” writes Pamela Keogh, the author of What Would Audrey Do? (It’s just out in paperback. This one is a bestseller in Great Britain.) Let me think. When I first met Audrey, she was enacting a sprite in the play “Ondine” and we were in Chicago back in the early ’50s. She was totally adorable and in love with her leading man, Mel Ferrer. She went on to become one of the world’s biggest stars in spite of this marriage.

And the last time I saw Audrey, she was on the arm of Ralph Lauren in the Metropolitan Museum at some fashion evening. Glamorous and serene, by then she was a distinguished representative for UNICEF. Her early death in 1993 has always been a heartbreak.

——————————

Hundreds of workers are toiling in Burbank on the sets for Michael Jackson’s coming stage concerts to be seen this July in London. And “MJ” – as everyone refers to him instead of saying his whole name – is omnipresent, personally on hand overseeing the hundreds of workers. 

After the sets are done, they’ll be shipped to England and reassembled for the already-sold-out concerts. Do you wonder how Michael Jackson can make a “comeback” after all he’s been through and all that has happened since he beat the rap at a much-publicized pedophile trial?

Well, he has Philip Anschutz, a Denver billionaire, as a producer. Mr. A. once owned the Southern Pacific Railroad. His company, AEG, also owns the Staples Center in Los Angeles.

——————————

To give Mel Gibson his due, he and his wife of 28 years, Robyn, have been estranged since his August 2006 drunk-driving arrest in Los Angeles. So it’s a free country for adults and I suppose he is entitled to a little female companionship after three or four years as a separated male. But it’s slightly surprising as he surges into his multimillion-dollar divorce.

At least Mel always has the courage of his convictions and is now out in public, holding hands with his new love – Russian singer Oksana Grigorieva.  

2009_0429_Getty_Mel_Gibson.jpg
© Getty Images

The British press is presenting this beauty as something of an “opportunist.” The Richard Eden column notes she once lived with American businessman Alan Bergman for two years. “We were practically married,” says he, describing her as “exceptionally beautiful and very talented.” Evidently she was married when she met Bergman and left her husband. But while with Bergman, he says, “She got a better offer from Timothy Dalton … If she is with Mel, he is more famous than Timothy Dalton and who knows what that will mean. Maybe she will get into a film and that will thrill her.”

——————————

If you are one of those people who can sit through Samuel Beckett’s  “Waiting for Godot” and still say to one and all, “But what does it mean?” be prepared for the new version, after 50 years, on Broadway at Studio 54 Theater.

The inventive director, Anthony Page, has presented his four super, super-talented grand actors – Nathan Lane, Bill Irwin, John Goodman and John Glover – in a brilliant outing where this quartet outdoes itself in blazing outbursts of not just talent – maybe genius. I have seldom seen such matched performances. They bring Beckett back to comic and tragic life in a manner I can hardly believe.

And John Goodman is larger than anybody’s life, fabulously costumed and unforgettable as the whip-snapping oligarch, Pozzo. Meanwhile, his slave, John Glover, who is known as a fine character actor, deserved something special for his turn as a shivering packhorse being urged on by the perils of despotic pseudo-aristocracy. (He won a Tony nomination. His big speech, which sounds like something out of James Joyce, is punctuated by various inspired droolings and nosebleeds.)

37 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Bonnie Oliver

Interesting column, Liz.  But did Michael Jackson really "beat the rap"?

 

By Bonnie Oliver on 05/06/2009 12:35 am
Andrea Brandon

The idea of including Michael Jackson in a column that starts off about the classic Audrey Hepburn seems totally out of place, almost disrespectuful.

 Regarding Letterman’s use of the word disinterested: is it possible that he really meant to use that word, Liz? Merriam-Websiter defines disinterest as not having the mind or feelings engaged.  It’s indifference.

By Andrea Brandon on 05/06/2009 12:54 am
Laura Ward
The British Press doesn’t seem to realize that Oksana Grigorieva is not a very good opportunist. She’s only been married once and Timothy Dalton and Mel Gibson are not marriage material. Child support from Timothy Dalton doesn’t rank as opportunistic in my book. Getting millions from a short marriage does (Heather Mills, separated before 4 years got $52 million). Getting millions from a long marriage doesn’t (Robin Gibson separating after 28 years deserves half of what he’s got even if it’s $500 million).
By Laura Ward on 05/06/2009 2:15 am
Suzanne de Cornelia
There never was nor will ever be anyone again like Audrey Hepburn. She and Jackie were both born in 1929 and both died too young. Jackie died the year after Audrey. Both experienced the best and the worst of everything.
By Suzanne de Cornelia on 05/06/2009 3:31 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe

Or as someone said years ago, "The Audrey Hepburn effect is, by definition, unrepeatable; you might as well fill an old Krug bottle with sparkling Chardonnay and spend two hours trying to get the cork back in. 

Bill Irwin––when I was watching " Rachel Getting Married" ( he plays the father) I kept thinking, where do I know this man from? And then it hit me––he was Mr. Noodles on Sesame Street. From then on I couldn’t get his Mr. Noodles out of MY noodle.  "Waiting for Godot"–––aren’t we all?

By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 05/06/2009 7:49 am
f p
Ah yes Audrey—now there was a true star.
By f p on 05/06/2009 5:49 am
Deena B.

I’m still strying to figure out how many Russian singers named Oksana there are.  When the Mel Gibson divorce story first broke, it was reported that his new love was Oksana Kolesnikova.  Then someone named Oksana Pochepa allegedly came forward and said, no, she was the one.  Now we are seeing him with Oksana Grigorieva.  All three are described as Russian singers.  Does he have ties to all three women??  Talk about having a very definite "type"….

Isn’t it intriguing how "MJ" can be so very frail when it suits him to be so?  When he arrived daily during the trial he was barely able to put one foot in front of the other.  There have been other such instances when he has been felled by debilitating illness when faced with circumstances not to his liking.  And then he can completely rebound and moonwalk all over the place when that suits him.  It will be interesting to see his condition during these new concerts.  

    

By Deena B. on 05/06/2009 8:15 am
Melanie Waldrop
Audrey Hepburn was beautiful inside and out. She was a singular combination of beauty, grace, and charm…truly one of a kind!
By Melanie Waldrop on 05/06/2009 8:17 am
Melanie Waldrop
Oh…(I hate to even think about ’MJ’ after reminiscing of  the exquisite Audrey Hepburn)…Michael Jackson may sell out shows in Europe or other places, but he will NEVER have a comeback in the U.S.!
By Melanie Waldrop on 05/06/2009 8:27 am
monkey boy

Melanie,

a couple of months ago you probably would have said that it would be impossible for Michael Jackson to sell out 10 nights at one of Europe’s premiere music arenas. I doubted it myself and thought it a little ambitious, but look what happened. I was amazed as additional date after additional date was added due to public demand and within hours of the tickets going on general sale, 50 dates had been added and all tickets (almost 1 million!) were sold out at the box office. AEG have said they would have extended the run even further but Michael Jackson called them and told them to stop adding dates. He is rumoured to have told a female fan (who managed to speak to him in Chritian Audigier’s shop) who asked him to do shows in the US that they "will be coming". So, perhaps it’s only a matter of time before he performs again in the US. The last time he did shows there (Madisson Square Garden - 2001), the TV screening received the biggest viewing figures for a TV special.

Michael Jackson will never be as big as he was in the past (who could be?!), but only a fool would count out a comeback after the success of his ‘This Is It’ shows in the UK.

By monkey boy on 05/06/2009 9:00 am
Melanie Waldrop
Then I am a fool. I believe he may TRY for a comeback here, but  its success is doubtful. I also wonder if he still has the physical capability to be the kind of showman he once was, and that his fanbase expects him to be. America is not such a forgiving (or forgetting) place as the UK/other countries. I still say he will be sorely dissapointed if he expects the welcome in the U.S. that he gets abroad. He’s become a buffoonish caricature here…The punchline to a plethora of jokes. No. This fool wouldn’t place a bet on a ‘comeback’ here!
By Melanie Waldrop on 05/06/2009 9:16 am
monkey boy

"Then I am a fool".

Yes. Yes you are.

 "I also wonder if he still has the physical capability to be the kind of showman he once was".

You and me both. He’s 50 years old now and so it’s inevitable that he won’t be able to do what he could throughout the 60s to 90s. Other acts of a similar age - such as Prince or Madonna  - or even older are still performing and receiving acclaim for their concerts. The fact they’re older is not often used as a weapon to beat them with, but for Michael Jackson I anticipate that it may become a recurring theme in his concert reviews. Double standards at play.

"America is not such a forgiving (or forgetting) place as the UK/other countries."

He hasn’t done anything to forgive or forget. He hasn’t been convicted of any crime, unlike many successful singers/actors etc popular in the US. The US does seem to forgive or forget their crimes. Even more double standards.

 "He’s become a buffoonish caricature here…The punchline to a plethora of jokes".

The same is true in Europe, but we are able to separate the guy’s private life, the ridiculous stories printed about it, and the jokes from the immense talent that he showed over the years and the astronomical success that he enjoyed for so long. It must be sad to live in a country where the population are incapable of differentiating fact from fiction.

People want to see a living legend and they are now being given a chance to do that.

By monkey boy on 05/06/2009 10:06 am
Melanie Waldrop
Oh…and Monkey…I was NEVER suprised that Jackson sold shows out in Europe. I daresay the VAST majority of his blinded-by-the-light-die-hard-"wouldn’t believe Michael Jackson is a pedophile even if he had been filmed in the act of child molestation" fans live outside the U.S. As far as the first allegations of molestation went, Jackson’s American fanbase largely stood by him. As the accusations kept coming forward, however, the public took a "Fool me once-shame on you, fool me twice-shame on me" attitude. Also, let’s not forget that Jackson moved to Bahrain (where he can carry on with his activities away from the prying eyes of the western media), and that he also converted to Islam. I am not slamming the Islamic religion, per se, but this conversion does not improve any outside (WAY outside) chances of Jackson’s ‘comeback’ here. This is just one fool’s opinion!
By Melanie Waldrop on 05/06/2009 10:08 am
monkey boy

Jackson did not move to Bahrain to carry on criminal acts - it’s not legal there either. By saying it is, you are either lying or being incredibly naive. Did you read that in the press? Do you really know much about religion? Islam whole heartedly condemns homosexuality and despite Bahrain being one of the more liberal Islamic nations, it is still a crime there. Even more illegal is performing those acts on boys. Michael Jackson was living in one of the Prince of Bahrain’s palaces as his guest. Your so far off the mark by saying he moved there to carry on his activities it’s laughable and it seriously detracts from any credibility you had. Nor did moving there keep the western media away. Let’s not forget the world is not as big as it was and the media - western or otherwise - are more than capable of flying to foreign countries, as was obvious during the trial and during the recent press conference.

He also did not convert to islam. Did you read that in the press too? You hinted that you think he is gay and then you say he converted to islam. Don’t you see the stupidity in that?

As for your suggesting that I am a blinded fan, I am not. I only became a supporter of Jackson after reading the actual transcripts from the court case. I was studying at the time and this case was part of my studies. From my readings I concluded that Michael Jackson did not commit any crimes and I was wasn’t surprised when he was acquitted of every charge. But that’s not what the press wanted you to believe. Some members of the press even announced after the trial that they were told to report only the negative aspects of the case to make it more sensational (Aphrodite Jones - from FOX is a good example). They reported allegations made by the prosecution without the counter arguments from the defence. They alleged things that not even the prosecution had mentioned. They described items found during the police searches that did not exist and certainly were not entered as evidence. To be honest, the press have a lot to answer for. Unfortunately though, as long as a newspaper/magazine has "a source" or "an insider" then they can say pretty much what they want without question.

Let’s not forget that thanks to the MJ trial:

The mother of the accused went to jail for fraud.

That she had previously coached her kids to lie on the stand during a trial against JC Pennet.

That the accuser’s sister admitted to lying on the stand.

That Michael Jackson wasn’t even in the country when some of the alledged crimes were committed.

That the family defrauded several charities.

That the mother had contacted people about suing Michael Jackson before she (or any member of her family) had even met him.

Chris Tucker warned Michael Jackson about the family and it was only when he withdrew from them that they began making these accusations and trying to extort money from him.

Also, The prosecutions made allegations of prior events, but none were proven. The prosecution alleged people such as Macauley Culkin, Wade Robson and others were also abused, but they testified (for the defence) that the prosecution hadn’t even asked them if they had been abused. They also testified that they hadn’t.

 

Just a few examples, but you get the point.

By monkey boy on 05/06/2009 10:47 am
Melanie Waldrop
I didn’t say he was gay…I said he has been accused of being a PEDOPHILE. And YES it has been reported that Jackson converted in November of 2008. Do the research. I didn’t say Jackson was committing criminal acts…I said he moved so his ‘activities’ would go unnoticed. My original response was that Jackson will not be able to execute a career comeback here. The rest you seem to be reading into. As for a pedophile being equivalent to being gay, I would NEVER infer that! I AM GAY! Did you realize that statisticcs show most pedophiles are STRAIGHT? As for religion, apparently you don’t realize the extent of homosexual male prostitution which goes on in many predominantly MUSLIM countries . Lastly, as to whether or not Jackson is guilty of the offenses he was accused of, the fact remains that Michael Jackson is still seen as a pariah in the U.S. I did not say Jackson was guilty in the instances you reccount. As a matter of fact, if the parents who accused him of improprieties even had an inkling that Jackson might be a pedophile, they, in effect, were pimping out their own children. That is my opinion of them. As far as Jackson is concerned, my take is that he has some serious mental issues and that his past and his questionable stability have made him an ‘unprofitable venture’ for record companies, concert promoters, etc. To think that MJ is bankable in the U.S. naive. I am sorry, but you seen to be be somwhat caught up your obvious admiration of this man. While I have to admit I enjoy some of his music ("One Day in Your Life" is one of my favorite songs), I can see the larger public perception: Michael Jackson is still villified in America.
By Melanie Waldrop on 05/06/2009 11:59 am