Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

The Liz Smith Column | 07/02/2009 11:00 pm

Liz Smith: The Beginning of the Jackson Afterlife Saga – But Leave the Kids out of It!

From fans and non-fans, the pleading question is already being asked: ‘Will there be no end to this?’
"Fame is the mask that eats the face," wrote John Updike. Updike was not referring to Michael Jackson, though a more apt quote I cannot imagine.

***

From fans and non-fans, the pleading question is already being asked: "Will there be no end to this?" "This" being the wall-to-wall coverage of every little Michael Jackson-related bit of "news."

The answer is no. Whatever Jackson’s oddities, he was a worldwide star, iconic figure and groundbreaking artist. He died suddenly and still mysteriously. He joins Marilyn and Elvis as a tragic figure whose life after death becomes endless fodder for the media. (Now, I’m asking: When do the conspiracy theories that he’s not really dead begin?!)

I’ll only say – again – leave the children out of it. No matter how they were conceived or by whom, Michael Jackson was their legal father, and so far we have no evidence that he wasn’t a loving parent, despite his strange ways in dealing with his fame, his own unsatisfactory youth and his issues about race.

Rake through his medicine cabinets, drag out every sordid detail of his intimate relations, publish his will. But leave those three beautiful children alone to now live a totally different and perhaps frightening life – they have been so shrouded and cosseted by Michael. I’d like to say that now they’ll live a "normal" life, but being any part of the Jackson family doesn’t seem to encourage stability. (I think the Diana Ross idea, if mom Katherine Jackson won’t or can’t raise them, is very smart. She has been an exemplary mother to her own family of five.)

Let the kids off the hook, and then Michael, Marilyn and Elvis can sit around up there laughing over our foolish obsessing. Fame is a circus and we, the media, not the stars, end up as its primary clowns

***

Of course not everybody agrees that Michael will join the immortal pantheon. Filmmaker and author Charles Casillo, while giving due credit to Michael’s genius says: "I’m going to call this one, perhaps wrongly … but I don’t think Michael Jackson will be in the league of Elvis or Marilyn five years from now. No one can come close to the level of the stars that died before, say, 1990. When they went, they took tons of mystique and unanswered questions with them. Because they weren’t scrutinized and analyzed daily in such a way; 24 hours of talking heads … blog blasts … Twitter commentary. After this feasting frenzy of Michael, in six months – after the shocking revelations, the shocking books, the shocking documentaries – he will be laid quietly to rest along with his legacy. Not because he is any less stellar, but I think the 21st century burnout factor is – you should pardon the expression – an icon killer."

Hmm … I’m not sure I agree that Michael’s legend will be cast aside so swiftly. He was involvingly unique.

***

So, how terrible was Michael Jackson’s childhood?

Well, to have heard him tell it, there was not one moment of happiness. He was an abused and overworked "golden child" – as he self-reverentially referred to himself.

But there are some who grew up in Encino, CA, where the Jacksons settled after fame hit, who remember a happy Michael Jackson, going to pizza and ice cream parlors with his four brothers, and acting just like any other kid. People even remember him stopping in at the local Sunshine Records Shop in Encino and thrilling over the Jackson Five albums.

106 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Victoria J

people please…if no one was watching this drivel, it wouldn’t be on the air. How do you know about it?  You watched it until you were sick of it…but you watched it.  The media is responsible for this junk. No one but the media. Blame them and the American public who laps this stuff up like milk in a bowl…remember demand and supply?

By Victoria J on 07/05/2009 8:00 am
Jakiesha White
Wait, has there been a barrage of media over his death??  Oh yeah, that’s right, we have not had broadcast TV in our house for over 20 years.  I think I saw a magazine cover at our local mini-mart once.  I guess I’m not listening to the correct radio stations (I actually listen to the right ones).  Personally, promoting pedophiles precludes perspicacity.  Alliteration aside, kill your TV!
By Jakiesha White on 07/05/2009 9:18 pm
S G
Especially Debie Rowe Leave The Kids Alone. She obviously didn’t want them when he was alive,took money for them twice. All she wants now is all the money she can get her hands on. They are better off with a grandmother who they know and love. Find a hole Debbie and jump into it. The three kids need each other. They do not need to be seperated or given to someone they don’t even know.
By S G on 07/03/2009 7:28 am
Victoria J

The children are old enough to be asked by the judge hearing this case where they want to live. Particularly since this their biological mother has had no significant interaction with them since birth. Their preference is just one of the factors taken into consideration by the court when making the decision.

By Victoria J on 07/05/2009 8:09 am
A Amedee
“I’ll only say – again – leave the children out of it. No matter how they were conceived or by whom, Michael Jackson was their legal father, and so far we have no evidence that he wasn’t a loving parent, despite his strange ways in dealing with his fame, his own unsatisfactory youth and his issues about race.”

Liz thank you for having to courage to ask people to stop the endless assumption about the children’s parent. The children are his children regardless fo parenting gene.

 

People fail to realize that Michael Jackson was a very sensitive person from the beginning of his youth to adulthood who was traumatize by his fathers actions. He became self-conscious and reclusive as a result; never wanting to grow up as a result of the childhood he never had. Of course no one see that coming until he had lost himself inside his mind, by then it was too late to help him.

When I hear people accuse Michael of having issues with his race, I often realize how these people grossly misunderstood Michael Jackson’s intentions to cope with his father’s abuse. Having told throughout his childhood by his father he had a big noise, Michael was obsessed with plastic surgery to make is noise smaller and thinner. Then comes the skin condition which many thinks was a theory, and an excuses to bleach his skin because he did not want to be black, but if people see a dark skin person with vitiligo and what it does to the pigmentation of the skin; them one understand why he bleached his skin. He was fortunate to have the money to have the option of bleaching his skin or living with it until he looks like a patch cow.

 Michael Jackson wanted kids, so he enlisted the help of a white woman to bore his children. Ok, we all can see that the children are not his biological children, but nonetheless they are his children! He was their father hot from the oven (From the minute they were born) I am sure he loved his children to death, but the length Michael Jackson having these children is another example of the trauma he suffer by his father; of being told he was not cute, he had a big noise, the acne etc. Michael did not want the children to be a reflection of him because he believes that he was ugly and the children would inherit his gene; so he came up with his own way of to have children no matter what the consequences.  So he had the children and no one should question his love for his children and the media should stop entice the mother to fight for the children. She gave up her rights and she should not have any rights to claim them now. The Jackson families minus Joe Jackson are very capable of raising the kids.

So for the people who say Michael Jackson hated being black and hated black people that could not be further from the truth.

·      Michael Jackson spent a lot to time raising funds for Africa and giving money to Africa.  

·      From the day his children were born, the nanny who took care of them was black.

·      Many of his closes friends were black.

·      There are now images of his home surrounded with pictures of his family who are geese “Black”

I can go on and on to dispel the theory that Michael Jackson did not want to be black. This is a theory that was manufactured by people who wanted to Michael Jackson’s fame destroyed. When that did not happen, the accuse him of child molestation.

Jealousy is not a good thing people! What Michael Jackson has, he worked very hard for it and in the process it destroyed him. R.I.P Michael.
By A Amedee on 07/03/2009 7:49 am
C Hardy

A…also I heard a good analogy of why Michael changed his appearance, he was starting to look like his Father, a man who abused him so he changed his appearance so he would not have to look in the mirror and see his Father in his own face. 

I feel for Mj and all that he went through, no one can understand what MJ or any of the Jackson kids had to deal with growing up under Joe Jackson…and even in his death Joe Jackson see’s nothing but $$$ signs where Michael is concerned.

By C Hardy on 07/03/2009 8:07 am
A Amedee
C Hardy, although, the lyrics to the song Man In the Mirror does not reflect his trials and tribulations, It may have as well wrote a song about how much he dislike his father. The fact that he changed his whole face is a clear indication that he hated Michael Jackson. I think Michael Jackson was totally misunderstood.

His childhood trauma totally paralyzed him socially. If he did not have this amazing and gifted talent, no one would have known about him or notice him. If I were Catherine, knowing how much Michael hate his father, I would keep him far away from his children. Divorce the S.O.B!!

By A Amedee on 07/03/2009 6:32 pm
Victoria J
C Hardy…that observation cannot be correctly defined as an analogy…it’s merely a rumor. Jackson never started to look like his father, he looks like his mother.  Michael changed his appearance because of the disease Vitiligo…it removes a person natural skin pigmentation. The disease left Michael with large white (pink) blotches all over his skin. People who have this disease can have a extreme case or much less extreme cases with small blotches occurring in less obvious places on the body. Michael was a superstar and with all of this other emotional problems particularly the lack of self-esteem, I am sure he could not stay the possibility that he would be ridiculed about changes in his physical appearance, so he tried to find a remedy. You cannot darken the skin to his original skin color…plus the vitiligo skin is very sensitive…I suspect given the enormous change of his skin color that he had a very extreme case of vitiligo and it made it impossible for him NOT to bleach the rest of his dark skin lighter to look even less as a freak. We can pontificate about Jackson, but let any one of us wake up one day with an irreversible partial change of our skin color.
By Victoria J on 07/05/2009 8:49 am
C Hardy
Victoria you responded to my post as if you were angry at what I said.  I was not putting MJ down…If he bleached his skin b/c of his disease, great for him for having the money to do so, others that I know, people in my family, dont have the same money to do so…I know all about the disease MJ had. 
By C Hardy on 07/06/2009 6:48 am
Deena B.
Then comes the skin condition which many thinks was a theory, and an excuses to bleach his skin because he did not want to be black, but if people see a dark skin person with vitiligo and what it does to the pigmentation of the skin; them one understand why he bleached his skin. He was fortunate to have the money to have the option of bleaching his skin or living with it until he looks like a patch cow.

A, I don’t presume to argue your point.  I don’t know what his motivations were.  But, assuming he did in fact have vitiligo, why would he not choose to darken the light patches rather than lighten the dark patches?  That way he would have maintained his natural appearance.

Also, and I don’t mean to show my ignorance, but what are "geese blacks"?

By Deena B. on 07/03/2009 3:07 pm
A Amedee

Deena B. once the pigmentation is destroyed, it cannot be reverse. Vitiligo is one of those disorders that progresses; so to make the skin darker would not help. It is a very ugly site. Usually people with vitiligo are often stared by others and given the fact that Michael Jackson had developed such a complex about his physical appearance as a result of his father constant taunting; it is only natural he would look to bleaching as a solutions. I don’t think he was strong enough to deal with that.

What I meant was that, if he hated black people so much that he change the colour of his sink, then why did his piano was proudly decorated with photos of his entire family who is black, the place he sit to make beautiful music. The were many assumption that Michael hated black people based on the fact that he change the colour of his skin, but these people were just letting air out of their mouths in my opinion.

By A Amedee on 07/03/2009 6:45 pm
Deena B.

Well, I agree that his father was likely the source of many of his issues.  Which is a real pity, because he was a very nice looking young man.  I did realize, though, that he could not reverse the damage and make his skin permanantly darker all over if he did have vitiligo.  But then, if I understand correctly, you can’t permanently bleach skin either (can you?).  So either way would be strictly a temporary cosmetic procedure.   I wondered why he opted to cosmetically go lighter rather than darker.  Whatever the reason, I don’t think it means he hated black people.    

 

By Deena B. on 07/03/2009 8:36 pm
A Amedee
I don’t think he would have been able to restore his skin back to its natural colour with the re-pigmentation. People from all races can be affected by Vitiligo, but it is harder to treat in darker skin people due to the colour contrast between the natural skin colour and the affected skin. "There is no known way to prevent or cure vitiligo. However, several methods, including cosmetics, re-pigmentation using UV light therapy, steroid creams, depigmentation of unaffected skin areas, and skin grafting, can be used to improve the appearance of skin severely affected by vitiligo." http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=47420 I suppose he choose the method that he thought would work best for him.
By A Amedee on 07/03/2009 8:56 pm
Deena B.
I suppose he choose the method that he thought would work best for him.

Yes, in the end, I suppose that is what it comes down to. 

By Deena B. on 07/03/2009 9:05 pm
A Amedee
Yap! May he R.I.P
By A Amedee on 07/03/2009 9:18 pm