Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

The Liz Smith Column | 07/02/2009 11:00 pm

Liz Smith: The Beginning of the Jackson Afterlife Saga – But Leave the Kids out of It!

From fans and non-fans, the pleading question is already being asked: ‘Will there be no end to this?’
"Fame is the mask that eats the face," wrote John Updike. Updike was not referring to Michael Jackson, though a more apt quote I cannot imagine.

***

From fans and non-fans, the pleading question is already being asked: "Will there be no end to this?" "This" being the wall-to-wall coverage of every little Michael Jackson-related bit of "news."

The answer is no. Whatever Jackson’s oddities, he was a worldwide star, iconic figure and groundbreaking artist. He died suddenly and still mysteriously. He joins Marilyn and Elvis as a tragic figure whose life after death becomes endless fodder for the media. (Now, I’m asking: When do the conspiracy theories that he’s not really dead begin?!)

I’ll only say – again – leave the children out of it. No matter how they were conceived or by whom, Michael Jackson was their legal father, and so far we have no evidence that he wasn’t a loving parent, despite his strange ways in dealing with his fame, his own unsatisfactory youth and his issues about race.

Rake through his medicine cabinets, drag out every sordid detail of his intimate relations, publish his will. But leave those three beautiful children alone to now live a totally different and perhaps frightening life – they have been so shrouded and cosseted by Michael. I’d like to say that now they’ll live a "normal" life, but being any part of the Jackson family doesn’t seem to encourage stability. (I think the Diana Ross idea, if mom Katherine Jackson won’t or can’t raise them, is very smart. She has been an exemplary mother to her own family of five.)

Let the kids off the hook, and then Michael, Marilyn and Elvis can sit around up there laughing over our foolish obsessing. Fame is a circus and we, the media, not the stars, end up as its primary clowns

***

Of course not everybody agrees that Michael will join the immortal pantheon. Filmmaker and author Charles Casillo, while giving due credit to Michael’s genius says: "I’m going to call this one, perhaps wrongly … but I don’t think Michael Jackson will be in the league of Elvis or Marilyn five years from now. No one can come close to the level of the stars that died before, say, 1990. When they went, they took tons of mystique and unanswered questions with them. Because they weren’t scrutinized and analyzed daily in such a way; 24 hours of talking heads … blog blasts … Twitter commentary. After this feasting frenzy of Michael, in six months – after the shocking revelations, the shocking books, the shocking documentaries – he will be laid quietly to rest along with his legacy. Not because he is any less stellar, but I think the 21st century burnout factor is – you should pardon the expression – an icon killer."

Hmm … I’m not sure I agree that Michael’s legend will be cast aside so swiftly. He was involvingly unique.

***

So, how terrible was Michael Jackson’s childhood?

Well, to have heard him tell it, there was not one moment of happiness. He was an abused and overworked "golden child" – as he self-reverentially referred to himself.

But there are some who grew up in Encino, CA, where the Jacksons settled after fame hit, who remember a happy Michael Jackson, going to pizza and ice cream parlors with his four brothers, and acting just like any other kid. People even remember him stopping in at the local Sunshine Records Shop in Encino and thrilling over the Jackson Five albums.

106 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Karen R

There is a local news anchor here who has vitiligo and uses make-up to cover it when he goes on air. A short while ago he  released a book about his experience with the condition and has become a spokesperson for the National Vitiligo Foundation:

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/12/18/1197740254314.html

http://www.amazon.com/Turning-White-Memoir-Lee-Thomas/dp/1879094819/

By Karen R on 07/04/2009 2:08 pm
A Amedee
Thanks Karen, that is hard for anyone suffering from the disorder. Those individuals who choose not to go white and allow the disorder to take its course are very brave, because it is not a pretty site to watch. He must spent a lot of time putting on make-up. Well, each individual choose a treatment that works for them. In Michael’s case, he choose to go white, but he was accused for wanting to be white. Furthermore, he had the money and he could afford the treatment. Those who cannot afford these treatment or has issues with identity, the social suffering will always be a struggle.
By A Amedee on 07/04/2009 7:32 pm
Deena B.
Thank you so much for posting that link, Karen.  I think I saw this gentleman on TV awhile back.  This is exactly my reason for asking why MJ might not have chosen this route to deal with the problem.  As a high profile person, it would seem to have been the method least likely to draw attention to the problem, and cause him a lot less grief.  Perhaps it was not an option in MJ’s case but I did wonder.  I think my question was misunderstood.  Perhaps this will make it clearer. 
By Deena B. on 07/05/2009 10:20 am
Jan Becker
Some patients with vitiligo choose to use a drug that shuts down their pigment production rather than have to wear makeup to cover the blotchy skin. MJ may have done this.
By Jan Becker on 07/04/2009 10:54 pm
Victoria J

Deena B…Your ignorance raised its head when you asked the ridiculous "why would he not choose to darken the light patches rather than lighten the dark patches"  And Deena just how would you suggest he do that?  go to a tanning shop? Go back to Michael’s early pictures and look at the color of his skin…you cannot fake black skin honey…your response is beyond ignorant.

I never heard the term. Is it something white people called blacks?????

By Victoria J on 07/05/2009 8:54 am
Deena B.

Ah Victoria, a pleasure as always!  How would he darken the light patches?  With a little something I like to call make-up maybe?  But, hey, it was just a question.

The term to which you refer?  I’ve never heard of it either.  So, no, to my knowledge it is not something white people call blacks (!!!!!).  I was inquiring that very question of A Amedee, who used the term, so you might ask her/him, though.  

Thanks so very much for your delightful response, Victoria!  You really are a ray of sunshine on an otherwise cloudy day - and don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.  So don’t go changing….  You have a lovely day now.

By Deena B. on 07/05/2009 9:54 am
C Hardy

I think we can all agree that these 3 kids are to be left alone.  If MJ’s Mother is best for them right now so be it, she isnt with Joe and hasnt been for a very long time.  She got away from him years ago when MJ could afford to keep her safe from him…

There are people here at my work who are making money off of MJ, selling t-shirts and making cd’s of his…its just discusting to me that people do this but not surprised considering the same is going on with the Obama shirts and anything else you can think of being sold using his name and face. 

As far as the news media, I watch the news until they start to talk about MJ and then I change the channel.  We all have our opinions of him and have for some time now will anything the media says really change that at this point?  Even if the boys who accused him came out and said they lied, would it really change anyone’s view of him?  Im sure it wouldnt.

By C Hardy on 07/03/2009 7:53 am
Paul Smith
Charles Casillo makes a very good point.  Add to this the likelihood of future biographies that shall unearth additional information about the ¨alleged¨ pedaphilia.  This idolatry of him will likely diminish.  We should all remember that Mr. Jackson made us very uncomfortable in the last decade or so, and for very good reasons
By Paul Smith on 07/03/2009 8:15 am
Victoria J
Michael wasn’t a pedophile. Truth be known, he was a homosexual and it seems he had plenty of adult (albeit it closer to 20 years old rather than 50 years of age) male companionship. Rumor has it that in his late teens, Michael was warned about his homosexuality by the Mafia who owned Barry Gordy and others that if his fans found out he was Gay, that his fame, the money everything would be gone over night. So it was at that time, he joined Jehovah’s Witness, his mother’s religion and left homosexuality behind him. But the reality is if you’re Gay you’re Gay and you can’t talk or pray it away. Gays will tell you they have no sexual interest in children. I think Michael  hadso many traumas…with few people around to recognize his problems and begin helping him. What I think Michael missed was a childhood and a feeling of being loved. Children don’t judge and they didn’t demand things of him.  The idolatry won’t diminish the man was a brilliant talent, as the last video of his rehearsal showed. There is no doubt that the longer he lived with his demons, without any psychological help, the less MJ was able to manage his own life. That does not mean he did not work hard to treat his children well. We must also remember that money and fame are not substitutes for a full academic education and the normal socialization that kids obtain living a normal life. I think Janet is also a brilliant talent, but hell, she just stopped whispering a couple of years ago. Did any of the boys even go to high school…did they complete grade school? I think he did not have a fundamental understanding of many things we take for granted. Thus he was unable to reason out complicated issues. He had to depend on others to have his best interest at heart, and because of his fame and wealth they didn’t!
By Victoria J on 07/05/2009 9:12 am
Deena B.
Oh yes, the gloves will come off soon.  I think it is going to get pretty ugly.  But, if anyone has a shred of decency, they will try to do the right thing for these beautiful children (and they truly are beautiful).  Unfortunately, I don’t think we can count on that. 
By Deena B. on 07/03/2009 8:24 am
Dee T
Neverland is going to become this century’s Graceland. The place will be revitalized, become a museum like shrine to Michael Jackson and the whole family along with investors will reap the rewards for years to come. This, I believe is what Debbie Rowe is hanging her hat on… money. Either through actual custody of the kids, thus their money, or getting a big pay off by the Jackson family to fade away again.
By Dee T on 07/03/2009 8:30 am
A Amedee
Dee T, Oh yes! That’s for sure. Just wait and see what her actions will be. If I was a judge, I would not give the children back to that woman. She signed her rights away in exchange for money. She has no rights to those children. I don’t know what kind of woman would do that. I don’t think any amount of money would buy me away from my children come hell or high waters. She is a looser and should not have her hands on the children or their money.
By A Amedee on 07/03/2009 9:04 pm
Maggie W

Michael Jackson was the ultimate entertainer.  His first moonwalk was only seven steps, but the world went nuts over it.  He had practiced it endlessly and for hours at a time.  He was also a very savvy business man, having been around the entertainment business world from a very young age.  There is much to admire and remember about Michael Jackson.

But a loving father?  I imagine he believed he was.  But what kind of life is it for children who are sequestered away and when they did appear in public, they were in Halloween masks. One of Jackson’s body guards said that he was so strung out on pills that it was often difficult to awaken him for performances… and that required pills of another type. 

What part of all that is a loving father?  He was a deeply tormented man who should never have been a father.

These children not only need a stable home but much needed child counseling.  Michael’s mom is in her 70’s.  I  hope she is up to it.

By Maggie W on 07/03/2009 9:24 am
A Amedee
Where were all those bugs when he was alive and need help? I suppose they were busy making money off of him or trying to keep their jobs. If they cared they would have organized an intervention his friends, family and staff included. Michael is dead now and there are many would will want their 15 minutes of fame in the spotlight. I really don’t care about anything they have to about MJ. Michael is gone and the only thing that matters are his children. furthermore, just because he was on PX pills doesn’t mean he was not a loving father. It just means he was battling the demond call drug addiction. He was not the first to celeb to have a drug addiction and die and he won’t be the last. Too often, we as a society tends judge the whole person by their weaknesses or faults, but failing to recognized any strength they might have.
By A Amedee on 07/03/2009 9:16 pm
A Amedee
Ooop!!!!!!!! so many errors. Please ignore
By A Amedee on 07/03/2009 9:21 pm