Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

The Liz Smith Column | 07/02/2009 11:00 pm

Liz Smith: The Beginning of the Jackson Afterlife Saga – But Leave the Kids out of It!

From fans and non-fans, the pleading question is already being asked: ‘Will there be no end to this?’
"Fame is the mask that eats the face," wrote John Updike. Updike was not referring to Michael Jackson, though a more apt quote I cannot imagine.

***

From fans and non-fans, the pleading question is already being asked: "Will there be no end to this?" "This" being the wall-to-wall coverage of every little Michael Jackson-related bit of "news."

The answer is no. Whatever Jackson’s oddities, he was a worldwide star, iconic figure and groundbreaking artist. He died suddenly and still mysteriously. He joins Marilyn and Elvis as a tragic figure whose life after death becomes endless fodder for the media. (Now, I’m asking: When do the conspiracy theories that he’s not really dead begin?!)

I’ll only say – again – leave the children out of it. No matter how they were conceived or by whom, Michael Jackson was their legal father, and so far we have no evidence that he wasn’t a loving parent, despite his strange ways in dealing with his fame, his own unsatisfactory youth and his issues about race.

Rake through his medicine cabinets, drag out every sordid detail of his intimate relations, publish his will. But leave those three beautiful children alone to now live a totally different and perhaps frightening life – they have been so shrouded and cosseted by Michael. I’d like to say that now they’ll live a "normal" life, but being any part of the Jackson family doesn’t seem to encourage stability. (I think the Diana Ross idea, if mom Katherine Jackson won’t or can’t raise them, is very smart. She has been an exemplary mother to her own family of five.)

Let the kids off the hook, and then Michael, Marilyn and Elvis can sit around up there laughing over our foolish obsessing. Fame is a circus and we, the media, not the stars, end up as its primary clowns

***

Of course not everybody agrees that Michael will join the immortal pantheon. Filmmaker and author Charles Casillo, while giving due credit to Michael’s genius says: "I’m going to call this one, perhaps wrongly … but I don’t think Michael Jackson will be in the league of Elvis or Marilyn five years from now. No one can come close to the level of the stars that died before, say, 1990. When they went, they took tons of mystique and unanswered questions with them. Because they weren’t scrutinized and analyzed daily in such a way; 24 hours of talking heads … blog blasts … Twitter commentary. After this feasting frenzy of Michael, in six months – after the shocking revelations, the shocking books, the shocking documentaries – he will be laid quietly to rest along with his legacy. Not because he is any less stellar, but I think the 21st century burnout factor is – you should pardon the expression – an icon killer."

Hmm … I’m not sure I agree that Michael’s legend will be cast aside so swiftly. He was involvingly unique.

***

So, how terrible was Michael Jackson’s childhood?

Well, to have heard him tell it, there was not one moment of happiness. He was an abused and overworked "golden child" – as he self-reverentially referred to himself.

But there are some who grew up in Encino, CA, where the Jacksons settled after fame hit, who remember a happy Michael Jackson, going to pizza and ice cream parlors with his four brothers, and acting just like any other kid. People even remember him stopping in at the local Sunshine Records Shop in Encino and thrilling over the Jackson Five albums.

106 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Mary Utrup
This has been one unholy MARATHON of news and speculation. The worst part of it, is all the revelations, more than 90% of which all of us could have lived without. It’s a tragic death that followed a tragic life. Think of all the money, the attention, the noterity Michael Jackson had in the course of his relatively short life and how unhappy most of it was. Joe Jackson has a great deal to be sorry about, but he obviously doesn’t care one way or the other. He’s the saddest figure of them all. The rest of the family is actually mourning and he’s out there promoting some new record label! It’s pretty unbelievable start to finish (whenever that might happen) and those three kids have a great deal to deal with in the months and years ahead.
By Mary Utrup on 07/03/2009 4:27 pm
Willow K
Well, the media talked a lot of Anna Nicole Smith for the 1st year after her death, and she was a minor twinkle in the sky compared to Michael.  Think we’ll be hearing about this for a long while.
By Willow K on 07/03/2009 4:39 pm
Susan Thomas

The media remind me of nothing more than vultures, ugly vile creatures picking over the bones in the middle of the road. They look at us as if to say "what, this is what you want, we ONLY give you what you want". No, you blood sucking, life draining creatures, you shove down our throats what MAKES you money! Let the dead stay dead, and rest in peace.

And his so called family should be ashamed of themselves, once again they are making money off of his back as they wipe away a tear from the corner of their eye.  To see the "Rev Al" show on television is enough to make me vomit. Back to the Home and Garden Channel for me.

By Susan Thomas on 07/03/2009 7:22 pm
Victoria J
But you did stop and look and listen Susan. That’s all they want is for you, me and millions to spend a few moments watching the circus. It provides ratings and dollars…We have to be complicit in this giant craziness for it to make money and guess what we are there. So stop blaming the media until we walk away they will continue.
By Victoria J on 07/05/2009 9:25 am
victoria tryon

With so much media coverage, it is difficult to know who to believe. At least, we know that authors like Charles Casillo and J. Randy Taraborrelli have established themselves as doing it the old fashioned way..it’s called research and honesty.

 

If it could be done legally, I would wish those children an anonymous life with some loving parents..far away from maddening glare of fame!

By victoria tryon on 07/03/2009 8:19 pm
A Amedee
Oh for sure! That’s the one thing Michael struggle to do and that was protect his children. That’s why he covered their faces to avoid their photos taken and puublish in magazines. Even by doing so he was accuse of being crazy. People label MJ with nasty names whatever he did. The one thing they can’t take away from him and from his children is the love he shared with those kids. You can tell he loves his children.
By A Amedee on 07/03/2009 8:32 pm
Diamond In The Rough
Especially, little boys!!!!!!!!!!
By Diamond In The Rough on 07/03/2009 8:46 pm
Victoria J

Diamond…how do you know this for sure. He’s never been convicted. It is rumor and silly behavior by Michael.  I don’t know much about Uri geller, but I saw him being interviewed by one of the entertainment tV mags and he confessed that one time when Michael allowed him to hypnotize him for a moment, that he took the opportunity to ask Michael if he had ever sexually abused a child and Michael said no and he asked him if he had ever touched a child inappropriately and Michael said no. Geller says it was not an ethical thing to do, but he wanted to know. He says today that he and Michael had an up and down relationship, and sometimes went a long time not speaking. But that session assured him that Michael is not a pedophile.

Even Michael’s dearest friends many of whom had children of their own, did not believe he was a pedophile. And let me tell you if you have children, you do not take those accusations lightly, no matter who that friend is.  The still allowed him in their homes with their children. Deepak Chopra allowed his 17 year old son to travel on tour with Michael… I tend to believe Michael’s friends rather than the media and the people who tried to bilk him out of millions.  By the way, when Uri asked Michael why he paid off those who accused him of pedophilia? Uri says Michael said, he was just tired of the circus.  I can understand a man who spent money like water…if money would make this go away, he would do it. If someone abused your child, would you take money and go away? Hell no, you would want that guy put under the jail…so why didn’t those parents feel the same?

 

 

By Victoria J on 07/05/2009 9:41 am
A Amedee
Victoria, That was exactly my sentiments. "If someone abused your child, would you take money and go away? Hell no, you would want that guy put under the jail…so why didn’t those parents feel the same?" Which is why I never believe Michael did anything wrong and I defended him then and I will defend him now.
By A Amedee on 07/05/2009 4:43 pm
A Amedee
I wonder what you love! What are your faults? Do not tell me none becasue all human beings have faults regardles of the scope.
By A Amedee on 07/05/2009 10:29 am
Diamond In The Rough

I’ll just let you wonder……. however, don’t loose any sleep over it! I would hate to see you wake up angrier than you already are.

By Diamond In The Rough on 07/05/2009 11:22 am
Merrie M

OK, leave the kids out of it - but let’s not get blinded by the limelight.

You can see Michael’s neediness in his stage performance: The music backup is hidden, there is just him alone on the stage performing before cheering 1000s. Look at me! Look at me!

That’s how his children had to see him too. (sorry, Liz, had to say this even though it is blindingly obvious, after you have switched off the limelights.) 

Michael Jackson may have had a cruel father, but Michael was very cruel to Debbie Rowe, who imho debased herself by her comments in order to make Michael look better. She was his wife, and what she received upon her divorce from him was far, far less than the US$25 million paid out to one of his accusers. Shouldn’t she have had at least half of his earnings over 3 years?

He brought his children up to see him as the only parent ("We have no mother") made her access to them really difficult, in a room crowded with his minders. (I wonder what he told his children about Debbie?)

And as a performer, I do not think he was all *that* great. Sure he could sing in a squeaky voice, he had rhythm, he could slide backwards, he could grab and wiggle his crotch. So can lots of other people. 

By Merrie M on 07/04/2009 6:34 am
Mommy Dearest

Merrie, dahling, ALL performers want people to "look at me!", dear. 

And, like him or not, "Thriller" sold more copie than any other album, so he meant something to a whole lot of somebodies, my dear. 

By Mommy Dearest on 07/04/2009 8:20 am
A Amedee
Hello! Are for real?
By A Amedee on 07/04/2009 7:36 pm
Merrie M

Not sure what you mean. Can you be more explicit? 

However, I’d like to mention, dahlings, that I cannot think of any other performer who has named ALL his kids after himself as MJ has: Michael Jr I, Paris Michael, Michael Jr II

By Merrie M on 07/05/2009 6:01 am