The Liz Smith Column | 07/02/2009 11:00 pm
Liz Smith: The Beginning of the Jackson Afterlife Saga – But Leave the Kids out of It!
From fans and non-fans, the pleading question is already being asked: ‘Will there be no end to this?’

Image: Fabio Ikezaki/Flickr
"Fame is the mask that eats the face," wrote John Updike. Updike was not referring to Michael Jackson, though a more apt quote I cannot imagine.
***
From fans and non-fans, the pleading question is already being asked: "Will there be no end to this?" "This" being the wall-to-wall coverage of every little Michael Jackson-related bit of "news."
The answer is no. Whatever Jackson’s oddities, he was a worldwide star, iconic figure and groundbreaking artist. He died suddenly and still mysteriously. He joins Marilyn and Elvis as a tragic figure whose life after death becomes endless fodder for the media. (Now, I’m asking: When do the conspiracy theories that he’s not really dead begin?!)
I’ll only say – again – leave the children out of it. No matter how they were conceived or by whom, Michael Jackson was their legal father, and so far we have no evidence that he wasn’t a loving parent, despite his strange ways in dealing with his fame, his own unsatisfactory youth and his issues about race.
Rake through his medicine cabinets, drag out every sordid detail of his intimate relations, publish his will. But leave those three beautiful children alone to now live a totally different and perhaps frightening life – they have been so shrouded and cosseted by Michael. I’d like to say that now they’ll live a "normal" life, but being any part of the Jackson family doesn’t seem to encourage stability. (I think the Diana Ross idea, if mom Katherine Jackson won’t or can’t raise them, is very smart. She has been an exemplary mother to her own family of five.)
Let the kids off the hook, and then Michael, Marilyn and Elvis can sit around up there laughing over our foolish obsessing. Fame is a circus and we, the media, not the stars, end up as its primary clowns
***
Of course not everybody agrees that Michael will join the immortal pantheon. Filmmaker and author Charles Casillo, while giving due credit to Michael’s genius says: "I’m going to call this one, perhaps wrongly … but I don’t think Michael Jackson will be in the league of Elvis or Marilyn five years from now. No one can come close to the level of the stars that died before, say, 1990. When they went, they took tons of mystique and unanswered questions with them. Because they weren’t scrutinized and analyzed daily in such a way; 24 hours of talking heads … blog blasts … Twitter commentary. After this feasting frenzy of Michael, in six months – after the shocking revelations, the shocking books, the shocking documentaries – he will be laid quietly to rest along with his legacy. Not because he is any less stellar, but I think the 21st century burnout factor is – you should pardon the expression – an icon killer."
Hmm … I’m not sure I agree that Michael’s legend will be cast aside so swiftly. He was involvingly unique.
***
So, how terrible was Michael Jackson’s childhood?
Well, to have heard him tell it, there was not one moment of happiness. He was an abused and overworked "golden child" – as he self-reverentially referred to himself.
But there are some who grew up in Encino, CA, where the Jacksons settled after fame hit, who remember a happy Michael Jackson, going to pizza and ice cream parlors with his four brothers, and acting just like any other kid. People even remember him stopping in at the local Sunshine Records Shop in Encino and thrilling over the Jackson Five albums.
***
From fans and non-fans, the pleading question is already being asked: "Will there be no end to this?" "This" being the wall-to-wall coverage of every little Michael Jackson-related bit of "news."
The answer is no. Whatever Jackson’s oddities, he was a worldwide star, iconic figure and groundbreaking artist. He died suddenly and still mysteriously. He joins Marilyn and Elvis as a tragic figure whose life after death becomes endless fodder for the media. (Now, I’m asking: When do the conspiracy theories that he’s not really dead begin?!)
I’ll only say – again – leave the children out of it. No matter how they were conceived or by whom, Michael Jackson was their legal father, and so far we have no evidence that he wasn’t a loving parent, despite his strange ways in dealing with his fame, his own unsatisfactory youth and his issues about race.
Rake through his medicine cabinets, drag out every sordid detail of his intimate relations, publish his will. But leave those three beautiful children alone to now live a totally different and perhaps frightening life – they have been so shrouded and cosseted by Michael. I’d like to say that now they’ll live a "normal" life, but being any part of the Jackson family doesn’t seem to encourage stability. (I think the Diana Ross idea, if mom Katherine Jackson won’t or can’t raise them, is very smart. She has been an exemplary mother to her own family of five.)
Let the kids off the hook, and then Michael, Marilyn and Elvis can sit around up there laughing over our foolish obsessing. Fame is a circus and we, the media, not the stars, end up as its primary clowns
***
Of course not everybody agrees that Michael will join the immortal pantheon. Filmmaker and author Charles Casillo, while giving due credit to Michael’s genius says: "I’m going to call this one, perhaps wrongly … but I don’t think Michael Jackson will be in the league of Elvis or Marilyn five years from now. No one can come close to the level of the stars that died before, say, 1990. When they went, they took tons of mystique and unanswered questions with them. Because they weren’t scrutinized and analyzed daily in such a way; 24 hours of talking heads … blog blasts … Twitter commentary. After this feasting frenzy of Michael, in six months – after the shocking revelations, the shocking books, the shocking documentaries – he will be laid quietly to rest along with his legacy. Not because he is any less stellar, but I think the 21st century burnout factor is – you should pardon the expression – an icon killer."
Hmm … I’m not sure I agree that Michael’s legend will be cast aside so swiftly. He was involvingly unique.
***
So, how terrible was Michael Jackson’s childhood?
Well, to have heard him tell it, there was not one moment of happiness. He was an abused and overworked "golden child" – as he self-reverentially referred to himself.
But there are some who grew up in Encino, CA, where the Jacksons settled after fame hit, who remember a happy Michael Jackson, going to pizza and ice cream parlors with his four brothers, and acting just like any other kid. People even remember him stopping in at the local Sunshine Records Shop in Encino and thrilling over the Jackson Five albums.
Read more about: Charles Casillo, Children, Diana Ross, Elvis Presley, Entertainment, Ethel Gumm, Family, Gerold Frank, Gossip, Joe Jackson, John Updike, Judy Garland, Katherine Jackson, Liz Smith, Liza Minnelli, Marilyn Monroe, Michael Jackson, News, Relationships, The Liz Smith Column
























106 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
The media remind me of nothing more than vultures, ugly vile creatures picking over the bones in the middle of the road. They look at us as if to say "what, this is what you want, we ONLY give you what you want". No, you blood sucking, life draining creatures, you shove down our throats what MAKES you money! Let the dead stay dead, and rest in peace.
And his so called family should be ashamed of themselves, once again they are making money off of his back as they wipe away a tear from the corner of their eye. To see the "Rev Al" show on television is enough to make me vomit. Back to the Home and Garden Channel for me.
With so much media coverage, it is difficult to know who to believe. At least, we know that authors like Charles Casillo and J. Randy Taraborrelli have established themselves as doing it the old fashioned way..it’s called research and honesty.
If it could be done legally, I would wish those children an anonymous life with some loving parents..far away from maddening glare of fame!
Diamond…how do you know this for sure. He’s never been convicted. It is rumor and silly behavior by Michael. I don’t know much about Uri geller, but I saw him being interviewed by one of the entertainment tV mags and he confessed that one time when Michael allowed him to hypnotize him for a moment, that he took the opportunity to ask Michael if he had ever sexually abused a child and Michael said no and he asked him if he had ever touched a child inappropriately and Michael said no. Geller says it was not an ethical thing to do, but he wanted to know. He says today that he and Michael had an up and down relationship, and sometimes went a long time not speaking. But that session assured him that Michael is not a pedophile.
Even Michael’s dearest friends many of whom had children of their own, did not believe he was a pedophile. And let me tell you if you have children, you do not take those accusations lightly, no matter who that friend is. The still allowed him in their homes with their children. Deepak Chopra allowed his 17 year old son to travel on tour with Michael… I tend to believe Michael’s friends rather than the media and the people who tried to bilk him out of millions. By the way, when Uri asked Michael why he paid off those who accused him of pedophilia? Uri says Michael said, he was just tired of the circus. I can understand a man who spent money like water…if money would make this go away, he would do it. If someone abused your child, would you take money and go away? Hell no, you would want that guy put under the jail…so why didn’t those parents feel the same?
I’ll just let you wonder……. however, don’t loose any sleep over it! I would hate to see you wake up angrier than you already are.
OK, leave the kids out of it - but let’s not get blinded by the limelight.
You can see Michael’s neediness in his stage performance: The music backup is hidden, there is just him alone on the stage performing before cheering 1000s. Look at me! Look at me!
That’s how his children had to see him too. (sorry, Liz, had to say this even though it is blindingly obvious, after you have switched off the limelights.)
Michael Jackson may have had a cruel father, but Michael was very cruel to Debbie Rowe, who imho debased herself by her comments in order to make Michael look better. She was his wife, and what she received upon her divorce from him was far, far less than the US$25 million paid out to one of his accusers. Shouldn’t she have had at least half of his earnings over 3 years?
He brought his children up to see him as the only parent ("We have no mother") made her access to them really difficult, in a room crowded with his minders. (I wonder what he told his children about Debbie?)
And as a performer, I do not think he was all *that* great. Sure he could sing in a squeaky voice, he had rhythm, he could slide backwards, he could grab and wiggle his crotch. So can lots of other people.
Merrie, dahling, ALL performers want people to "look at me!", dear.
And, like him or not, "Thriller" sold more copie than any other album, so he meant something to a whole lot of somebodies, my dear.
Not sure what you mean. Can you be more explicit?
However, I’d like to mention, dahlings, that I cannot think of any other performer who has named ALL his kids after himself as MJ has: Michael Jr I, Paris Michael, Michael Jr II.