Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

The Liz Smith Column | 07/02/2009 11:00 pm

Liz Smith: The Beginning of the Jackson Afterlife Saga – But Leave the Kids out of It!

From fans and non-fans, the pleading question is already being asked: ‘Will there be no end to this?’
"Fame is the mask that eats the face," wrote John Updike. Updike was not referring to Michael Jackson, though a more apt quote I cannot imagine.

***

From fans and non-fans, the pleading question is already being asked: "Will there be no end to this?" "This" being the wall-to-wall coverage of every little Michael Jackson-related bit of "news."

The answer is no. Whatever Jackson’s oddities, he was a worldwide star, iconic figure and groundbreaking artist. He died suddenly and still mysteriously. He joins Marilyn and Elvis as a tragic figure whose life after death becomes endless fodder for the media. (Now, I’m asking: When do the conspiracy theories that he’s not really dead begin?!)

I’ll only say – again – leave the children out of it. No matter how they were conceived or by whom, Michael Jackson was their legal father, and so far we have no evidence that he wasn’t a loving parent, despite his strange ways in dealing with his fame, his own unsatisfactory youth and his issues about race.

Rake through his medicine cabinets, drag out every sordid detail of his intimate relations, publish his will. But leave those three beautiful children alone to now live a totally different and perhaps frightening life – they have been so shrouded and cosseted by Michael. I’d like to say that now they’ll live a "normal" life, but being any part of the Jackson family doesn’t seem to encourage stability. (I think the Diana Ross idea, if mom Katherine Jackson won’t or can’t raise them, is very smart. She has been an exemplary mother to her own family of five.)

Let the kids off the hook, and then Michael, Marilyn and Elvis can sit around up there laughing over our foolish obsessing. Fame is a circus and we, the media, not the stars, end up as its primary clowns

***

Of course not everybody agrees that Michael will join the immortal pantheon. Filmmaker and author Charles Casillo, while giving due credit to Michael’s genius says: "I’m going to call this one, perhaps wrongly … but I don’t think Michael Jackson will be in the league of Elvis or Marilyn five years from now. No one can come close to the level of the stars that died before, say, 1990. When they went, they took tons of mystique and unanswered questions with them. Because they weren’t scrutinized and analyzed daily in such a way; 24 hours of talking heads … blog blasts … Twitter commentary. After this feasting frenzy of Michael, in six months – after the shocking revelations, the shocking books, the shocking documentaries – he will be laid quietly to rest along with his legacy. Not because he is any less stellar, but I think the 21st century burnout factor is – you should pardon the expression – an icon killer."

Hmm … I’m not sure I agree that Michael’s legend will be cast aside so swiftly. He was involvingly unique.

***

So, how terrible was Michael Jackson’s childhood?

Well, to have heard him tell it, there was not one moment of happiness. He was an abused and overworked "golden child" – as he self-reverentially referred to himself.

But there are some who grew up in Encino, CA, where the Jacksons settled after fame hit, who remember a happy Michael Jackson, going to pizza and ice cream parlors with his four brothers, and acting just like any other kid. People even remember him stopping in at the local Sunshine Records Shop in Encino and thrilling over the Jackson Five albums.

106 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

A Amedee
I was referring to your comment about Debbie Row. What kind of mother turns her back on her children since infancy and never look back. Obviously money was more important to her than the children. As a mother, I don’t believe any amount of strong arm tactics or money would make me not have some role in my children’s live. Now that Michael is dead, the children are pure gold, she wants them. Oh my! I wonder what her motives are now, but I can tell you. MORE MONEY!!!!!!!!! As for naming the children, George Foreman and a long list of private citizens did it before Michael Jackson. So WHAT IS WRONG WITH THAT!!!!! It is amazing how hatred towards other clouds our judgement on many issues including the ones that aren’t true. I do understand that you do not like MJ, but at least let your criticism be factual.
By A Amedee on 07/05/2009 9:58 am
Merrie M

A Amadee: perhaps you should look into this matter more - you might get a few facts into your mind. Firstly, Debbie did not turn her back on her children, she tried to have access but Michael made it extremely difficult for her - humiliating her by insisting that it be in a room full of his watching minders. Also, I do not think that it is money she is after; she has asked for a stay of the custody arrangements so she can decide whether she will make a claim for custody. During this time she will most likely ask her children whether they would like to live with her. 

If you look at my latest post you will have a link to some photos showing she was a loving mother.

Neither you nor I can decide what reasons made her decide to have the family arrangements made with Michael, but I do know that 1. he made access extremely difficult; 2. he told his children that "they did not have a mother".

Finally, she was his wife and as such in the case of divorce she was **entitled** to receive money from him. I think what she said about surrogacy, etc. was to make Michael look better, and she cared for him a lot. She was, after all, his friend for more than a decade before they married.

There’s nothing wrong with naming each of your children after you. In Michael’s case it is just another indication of his self-obsession. My children. Mine. Mine. Mine. Note that none of Debbie’s names appear in the children’s names - she has been written out again.

By Merrie M on 07/05/2009 10:26 am
A Amedee
The situation is what it is! She should have never sign these children away. Only a surrogate does that and as far as Michael is concern, she was a surrogate. I think she should have visitation rights, considering Cathrine is not young and children can never have too many people in their lives who cares for them. After all, they are her children too, but NOT custody!! She was irresponsible from the beginning. As far as what you consider excessive self-love where Michael is concerning, who does not think of me first! So Michael loves himself and his children to the point of selfishness according to you. What parent dosen’t! As far as naming the children goes, the same can be said to others who have done the same thing before him. The difference is that they are not in the spotlight. 
By A Amedee on 07/05/2009 12:21 pm
Merrie M
T-shirts from Target sell in their millions too, dahling, but that does not make them unique designs.
By Merrie M on 07/04/2009 8:44 am
Diamond In The Rough
He also meant nothing to a whole lost of somebodies, dahlling
By Diamond In The Rough on 07/04/2009 8:59 am
Eve Fulton
Ok Ok I’ve about had it.  The mother for many reasons stood by and let her husband abuse her children.  And now people say it would be a good idea to have his mother raise the grand children.  When her husbnad is an abuser…what is wrong with people!  Someone please save these children.  Wake up and smell the burned coffee…those children need a safe heaven from their grandfather and the media.  My heart goes out to them!
By Eve Fulton on 07/04/2009 9:20 am
Libra Lady
Eve….excellently put!!!  I think the children needs to be raised by a family that is not of celebrity status.  They need a normal upbringing because I can’t believe anyone would think anything was normal at all in their upbringing.  They have been secluded from schools and I wonder how many friends they ever developed….which is so important for growing children to have.  Their father was a child to them instead of a father figure…jmo….I think the children should be adopted by a loving family and to help them on their way back into society that they know nothing about.  This circus of a funeral will only make them more confused about the death of their father….it’s not a normal way to grieve…if there ever is such a thing.
By Libra Lady on 07/04/2009 12:23 pm
Victoria J
You people especially Libra lady are nutso…my gosh it is great, that we have never had one regular old none celebrity family do anything awful to their children. Oops, who was that mother who killed her five boys? Or that other mother who drowned her two children in the local river. I wonder if Michael had been white, if the whole adoption option would be offered up….Libra lady back under the rock
By Victoria J on 07/05/2009 9:46 am
A Amedee

The Jackson family are not needy and very capable of raising the children. There are lots of mess-up wealthy white families in the entertainment industry and all lips are shut tight about them. Why do you get off making a stupid suggestion like this. Well all know that Joe Jackson was a creep, but Cathrine has not been with this man for God know how long. He spend most of his time in Los vagas. Those sort of comments only goes to proves how much people know by the air bubbles they let out of their mouths. Are you any better than these the Jackson family in terms of values, love, respect etc? The children are surrounded by caring aunts and uncles and cousins who they have known from day one. Elvis Presley died of drugs too; we he better than Michael Jackson. His daughter was raised by her own mother, and she did not turn out to be the greatest person. She seem to be a serial bride among her many destructive behavior. So really, Is Michael Jackson’s life any different from other celebrities, I don’t think so! He was not the first to abuse drugs and died; he most certainly won’t be the last. So give the man a @#$% break and so that he can rest in peace.

By A Amedee on 07/05/2009 10:22 am
A Amedee
Oops! errors
By A Amedee on 07/05/2009 10:27 am
A Amedee
They don’t live together!
By A Amedee on 07/04/2009 7:38 pm
Kelvin Dale
I’m just not watching any news right now.  Charles is right - Michael Jackson’s legacy is certain, but his iconic status is not.  He hadn’t made an album in years - there’s 1/2 a generation he missed. 
By Kelvin Dale on 07/04/2009 12:53 pm
jacqueline  michelle
Kelvin,you are right…MJ hadn’t made a cd in a long time-he relied way too much on his ‘past’! I bet many of the younger generation worldwide don’t even know who MJ even is…
By jacqueline michelle on 07/04/2009 1:44 pm
Barbara B
Eve you are so correct.  The mother sat back and watched as Joe the bully held a strap to them during rechersals.  Then on top of that Al Sharpton is in the picture worried about how Michael is potrayed.  My god when will black people realize that Sharpton does not give to s###s about blacks only his pocket book.  He choose Diana Ross for a reason and I hope the child authorities in California get involved with placing those three innocent children with her and let Grandma come visit without Joe.  There should be a restraining order that Joe & Al can not go 10 feet near those kids or their money.  Michael hated his father why should he now benefit from his death.  One more thing I use to think he did those things to the children but after seeing his interview in London I can say that with over 1,000 people trying to pin law suits for his money and that family taking  the money, I’m not so sure he did those things.  He mentioned in the interview how he hated the pressure of watching the OJ trial and although he knows he was innocent he told his lawyers to just make this media circus go away.  Also because he was so screwed up by childhooh I bet he really wanted to relive a more innocent time and enjoy childrens company where he was most comfortable.  Again if he wa guilty he has to face his maker, but I still believe in innocent until proven guilty and not by the media.
By Barbara B on 07/04/2009 1:19 pm
Victoria J
Barbara B, What a broad brush you use to paint the black community. We neither own nor control Al Sharpton and by the way most of us could care less about him. How he inserts himself into these situations is often controlled by whether the media joins him in his charade. They photograph and quote him…silly people like you behave as though all black people are lemmings and believe or even like Al Sharpton.  He is an ambulance chaser. Joe Jackson does not reside in the same house as Katherine. And the fact that he is out front, is because he is still Michael’s father and nobody can really tell him to shut up except Michael. So Joe gets to continue to make a fool of himself. But he has no power, Michael did not include him in the will.
By Victoria J on 07/05/2009 9:52 am