The Liz Smith Column | 10/14/2009 4:00 am
Liz Smith: Brooke Astor's Sad Legacy – Money Changes Everything
Also in Our Gossip Girl’s dish: Streisand unclutters her life … Deborah Norville and the Power of Respect.

Anthony Marshall © AP
"Who would want to butcher a cash cow – especially one that produces mystique as well as money!" goes the line from a New York Times editorial.
***
Hmmm, well, let’s consider the sensational trial of Anthony Marshall for the looting of his famous mother’s fortune. This unfortunate episode in New York social history is a stunning example of that well-known and often tragic "Law of Unintended Consequences."
In an attempt to wrest away Tony Marshall’s control of Brooke Astor as she traveled the rocky road from being 100 years old to 105, her grandson and two other good friends were successful.
Philip Marshall, Annette de la Renta and David Rockefeller managed to restore Brooke’s style of living, returning her beloved dogs and servants to her and moving her back to her country house for the final years of her life. But in acting on information from Brooke’s grandson Philip and various Brooke Astor aides, they then set in motion a sequence that ended recently in Tony Marshall’s being found guilty of grand larceny in defrauding his famous philanthropic mother. He is now eligible for 25 years in prison at the age of 85.
I simply can’t believe this was anybody’s ultimate intention. When I saw the photos again of Brooke and Tony under the heading for him, "Guilty!" I flinched. Mrs. Astor would have given up all she owned not to have had this blot on her escutcheon. It’s true, Brooke disapproved of Tony’s wife, Charlene; still, I think she’d have moved heaven and earth to keep this sordid story out of the courts and the newspapers.
Brooke indeed might have been offended had she known of accusations against her only son; but she’d never have wanted this end result.
Brooke was a vivacious, flirtatious charmer of good will and philanthropy. She was nobody’s ideal mother and didn’t much want to be. But no matter the good intentions of those who helped restore her in her final days, she’d have given that rescue up if she’d realized the ultimate consequences.
This is a true tragedy all the way around.
***
Barbra Streisand’s pet charities will benefit on October 17 - 18 when a mighty load of the star’s personal belongings go up for sale during a two-day auction in Beverly Hills at Julien’s. The sale includes art, furniture, clothes and film costumes and it’s a chance to claim a piece of a "living legend."
***
One of New York’s underground over-achievers is Deborah Norville. No, not the Deborah Norville of many years ago who was dropped spectacularly from the "Today Show" without being given half a chance.
This is Deborah as she is now, super mother and super wife to the handsome Karl Wellner, dynamic hostess of TV’s "Inside Edition," and book writer as well. Deborah will kick off her new work tonight in a party at Michael’s popular watering hole. The Power of Respect follows another bestseller Deborah wrote called Thank You Power.

I have always been in Deborah Norville’s corner. She is highly underestimated. "Good Morning America" could do itself a favor and select her to replace Diane Sawyer when the latter goes to "World News Tonight."
I know, I know – Deborah and I both could guess the reception of such a suggestion. We also know the power of respect and the lack of same.
***
Hmmm, well, let’s consider the sensational trial of Anthony Marshall for the looting of his famous mother’s fortune. This unfortunate episode in New York social history is a stunning example of that well-known and often tragic "Law of Unintended Consequences."
In an attempt to wrest away Tony Marshall’s control of Brooke Astor as she traveled the rocky road from being 100 years old to 105, her grandson and two other good friends were successful.
Philip Marshall, Annette de la Renta and David Rockefeller managed to restore Brooke’s style of living, returning her beloved dogs and servants to her and moving her back to her country house for the final years of her life. But in acting on information from Brooke’s grandson Philip and various Brooke Astor aides, they then set in motion a sequence that ended recently in Tony Marshall’s being found guilty of grand larceny in defrauding his famous philanthropic mother. He is now eligible for 25 years in prison at the age of 85.
I simply can’t believe this was anybody’s ultimate intention. When I saw the photos again of Brooke and Tony under the heading for him, "Guilty!" I flinched. Mrs. Astor would have given up all she owned not to have had this blot on her escutcheon. It’s true, Brooke disapproved of Tony’s wife, Charlene; still, I think she’d have moved heaven and earth to keep this sordid story out of the courts and the newspapers.
Brooke indeed might have been offended had she known of accusations against her only son; but she’d never have wanted this end result.
Brooke was a vivacious, flirtatious charmer of good will and philanthropy. She was nobody’s ideal mother and didn’t much want to be. But no matter the good intentions of those who helped restore her in her final days, she’d have given that rescue up if she’d realized the ultimate consequences.
This is a true tragedy all the way around.
***
Barbra Streisand’s pet charities will benefit on October 17 - 18 when a mighty load of the star’s personal belongings go up for sale during a two-day auction in Beverly Hills at Julien’s. The sale includes art, furniture, clothes and film costumes and it’s a chance to claim a piece of a "living legend."
***
One of New York’s underground over-achievers is Deborah Norville. No, not the Deborah Norville of many years ago who was dropped spectacularly from the "Today Show" without being given half a chance.
This is Deborah as she is now, super mother and super wife to the handsome Karl Wellner, dynamic hostess of TV’s "Inside Edition," and book writer as well. Deborah will kick off her new work tonight in a party at Michael’s popular watering hole. The Power of Respect follows another bestseller Deborah wrote called Thank You Power.

I have always been in Deborah Norville’s corner. She is highly underestimated. "Good Morning America" could do itself a favor and select her to replace Diane Sawyer when the latter goes to "World News Tonight."
I know, I know – Deborah and I both could guess the reception of such a suggestion. We also know the power of respect and the lack of same.
Read more about: Ann Blyth, Ann Miller, Annette de la Renta, Anthony Marshall, Barbra Streisand, Brooke Astor, Celebrities, Charity, Connie Stevens, Daniel Radcliffe, David Rockefeller, Debbie Reynolds, Deborah Norville, Diane Sawyer, Frank Loesser, Jan Chamberlin, Judy Garland, Karl Wellner, Liz Smith, Mickey Rooney, Nancy Sinatra, News, Philip Marshall, Robert Morse, Ruta Lee, Shirley Jones, The Thalians Gala
























17 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Brooke Astor is turning in her grave and her "friends" along with her grandsons will face her as well as god at some point. The charities of course will come out the winner because the previous will be most likely be declared valid now. Leaving Anthony Marshall only the income from part of the estate and then passing on to the charities instead of his wife or his sons. Who sort of chopped off their bank account to spite their nose. They will get a pittance and nothing more from the previous will. The charities, as they say, will get it all. And all Brooke’s "friends" look like heroes in this for ensuring the charities got the money "as Brooke intended" which may not be what Brooke intended. For many people who saw through this "charade of friendship" not long after it began they are zeroes.
For those who don’t know, time was when Brooke Astor worried about what she had left. Years of parties and her own philanthropy apart from the foundation and wise investments that turned out not to be so wise. It wasn’t her "friends" who came to the rescue and turned things around for her. It was her son. A little detail the prosecutors, and several gossip columnists, have left out along the way.
That of course paints a different picture, doesn’t it? One no one wanted anyone to see.
Her Grandson "managed to restore Brooke’s style of living, returning her beloved dogs and servants to her and moving her back to her country house for the final years of her life"
This makes it pretty obvious that she was living how and where she never wanted to be before her mind deteriorated. The charities had nothing to do with it. They were going to get most of the money. That’s why her son waited until she was unable to think for herself and that is when he changed her will so he would get everything. How is that any better than the money going to charity? Either way it was no longer hers. But obviously he did take money that he should not have or they wouldn’t have convicted him. Because I don’t see how taking her money and buying himself a boat (among other things) is turning things around for her. That only seemed to happen when her grandson couldn’t stand what his father was doing to her anymore.
Oh and let’s not forget patronage. Not to be nasty but quite a few already have been in this, had Charlene decided she like Oscar de la Renta and had started dropping enough money, Annette de la Renta would have hung up on the grandson. Instead she called David Rockefeller and then as soon as she could she made a beeline to Park Avenue to rescue the jewels. Someone hopefully will ask what happened to the jewels. As for her "friends" and their concern for her welfare, Dominick Dunne dropped a little hint about them when he wrote about the situation. An interesting read. Then and now.
None of the allegations of abuse were ever proven. If anything they were disproven. Most of the subsequent allegations were based on the testimony of a nurse who apparently didn’t like the Marshalls.
Anthony Marshall was just waiting for his mother to go tumbling down stairs she never used. And Leona Helmsley slapped waiters with lettuce leaves. Apparently PT Barnum is the patron saint of prosecutors in Manhattan.
"Endless money forms the sinews of war". - Cicero
It has been reported that Brooke Astor’s grandson is a practicing Buddhist. I do not believe can be true. For if it were he would not have unleashed the lions to tear out his father’s and stepmother’s throats. Where is his mercy, compassion or kindness?
"I think she’d have moved heaven and earth to keep this sordid story out of the courts and the newspapers" - Women continue to hide the shame of the actions of the men in their lives. WHY? We didn’t do it. Let’s stop this stupidity and let their shame be theirs.
This old fashioned idea that a man can do whatever he wants and the women have to suffer in poverty and filth in order to hide the shame of the mans actions is so disgusting and backwards. SHAME ON YOU LIZ SMITH for reinforcing this mentality. You could at least have ended with the opinion that women shouldn’t act like Brooke Astor. We need to stand up for ourselves and stop babying criminals, rapists and peodophiles.
Thank God Brooke Astor’s grandson had the backbone to stand up to his father and refuse to let his grandmother live in squalor. After everything she has done for others, she did not deserve to be left to rot so her son could get his hands on her money. And the fact that her grandson will only get a pittance now from her estate shows he did what he did because he cared about her, not her money. That’s a lesson her son could stand to learn. Maybe he’ll have the time to learn it now.
She was not living in squalor. She was not being abused. Apparently everyone felt that because Anthony and Charlene were not having $250 worth of flowers delivered every day instead of buying them at a flower stand and because she wasn’t wear a new Dior nightgown every day and because they didn’t reupholster the sofa once a week which had been soiled from incontinence, we do get old and keep in mind Brooke Astor was 103, and because the Cordon Bleu chef was no longer being employed cook what she probably wouldn’t have eaten and various other little details of how some believe the rich are supposed to live, even at 103, suddenly she was a victim of elder abuse. There was no evidence of that once it was investigated. But by that point the charges of fraud and violation of fiduciary had been levelled. By Annette de la Renta.
Maybe given the contentious relationship through the years, he may not have been the perfect son but she was also not the perfect mother, maybe in the end she simply wanted to make it all right. After all, much of what she had was what she had because of him. It belies the accusation that he ripped her off. Had he not stepped in 20 years ago she might have indeed ended up living in squalor. The charities just wanted all the money. The charities now have all the money. Which is a good thing. Because many people will never give those charities another dime. And many have tossed their de la Rentas into the trash bins.
What’s really bothersome is how many of these rich people are estranged or not close to their children. Brooke Astor was never close to her only son Anthony and Anthony is not close either of his sons.
Did Anthony’s son Phillip know his grandmother well, or did he just know of her squallor? Seems whether he knew her or not, after reading Dominick Dunne’s article from 2006, all Brooke’s friends knew, but only Phillip came to his grandmother’s rescue.
Even though Philip didn’t know he and his brother would get a guaranteed portion of their father’s estate, the father seemed to be putting things in his wife’s name. So the point is moot that Philip eliminated his inheritance. First, Philip didn’t know about it. Second, his father was giving it to his wife. Third, his grandmother wanted it to go to charities. So the inheritance wasn’t Philip’s and his brother’s in the first place, the father seemed to make sure they weren’t going to get it, and Philip has said it would have been blood money anyway.
Our family problems seem so much smaller than this…we don’t betray each other like this. Of course, we don’t have this kind of money either.
My parents had the same will for years for 5 children. Years later they had a 6th child, and many more years later, that 6th child read the will and noticed it still only had 5 children. It was an amusing oversight in our family and my parents rewrote the will. But I’m sure the 5 children would still have split the money, which wasn’t Astor type money, into 6 equal portions without the need of lawyers. What would an Astor type of family done? Or an MLK family?
Seems whether he knew her or not, after reading Dominick Dunne’s article from 2006, all Brooke’s friends knew, but only Phillip came to his grandmother’s rescue.
______________
Nice to know someone can read. And read between the lines. They didn’t care. They thought she would die soon and everything would eventually go to the charities. After all, how long could Anthony live? Then they found out she had changed her will. Then, suddenly, they all cared.
The only thing Anthony Marshall put in Charlene Marshall’s name was the property in Maine. I don’t believe they could prove that was fraudulent although they attempted ot. They just didn’t and don’t like it.
The one grandson really didn’t like it. One of the houses on the property was supposed to go to him. That’s when he became concerned about her "well-being" interestingly. When the matter of the property came up.
The other grandson isn’t much better. Has never said anything. Silence often is merely an indication of complicity.
Familes get unhinged over money. Don’t assume that your children will be generous with each other. Assume that anyone with a key will be in your house grabbing the good stuff before anyone else gets a chance, that more than one executor will mean way too much of your estate will be spent on lawyers, and that the responsible kids will not "understand" when you leave more money to your needier loser kids. Everyone should find a good lawyer, take the good legal advice you are paying for, and get an effective will that reflects your values and wishes.
I certainly do not have the inside scoop on who the players are and what their motivations were. Thier world is not one of my experience. All I know is what I have read, which is Brooke came from a family with high aspirations but low cash, married a lush and abuser who fathered her son and had high aspirations but lackluster success, and then married into the Astor money after wresting him from his first wife. And, as Astor was a very difficult man she paid the price for her fortune.
I don’t know, but strongly suspect that Tony Marshall accomplished nothing worthwhile in his life other than riding on his mother’s coattails and using her money to gain some fame on the charity circuit. But, be that as it may…IF she was not being properly cared for and they were looting her estate before her death, then I have no sympathy for her son and his wife. I’m sure, as anyone would be, whether they have a vast fortune or not, she would be ashamed to have the world know what a lowlife her son was. On the other hand, if I had the choice of lying in my own urine day after day without proper care and nourishment and exposing my caretakers for abusing me….I think, no matter how proud I was, I would rather die on clean sheets and let the abusers pay the price.
The only two people with the "real" inside scoop in this are Brooke Astor and her son and no matter what "friends" say no one really knows what went on between them. In the beginning or in the end.
We can observe. All we can do. We cannot know. I think that is what has always disturbed me most. Her "friends" hadn’t seen her in almost a year as I recall. Some hadn’t seen her in several years. And yet "knew" what was going on between her and her son. And "knew" how she was supposed to be living. Maybe she wanted to be at Holly Hill. Maybe she was fine in thes tting room on Park Avenue. Maybe Anthony Marshall decided to keep the dogs in the butler’s pantry. Maybe she asked him to unless she asked for them. Who knows? Only she and Anthony Marshall. The "witnesses" of course all suspect. One does not befriend the help. Nor confide in them. Not in that apartment anyway.
We live in an age of misinformation. Incomplete stories and often stories edited for length rather than accuracy. Even autobiographies are suspect. An editor decides to cut a paragraph. And the whole story changes because the context has changed.
We live in an age of manipulation. Both in the media and in our courtrooms. In the end, regardless of anything, her "friends: didn’t care about Brooke Astor. Or they would have left this alone. And left the memory of Brooke Astor intact. It was massacred along with Anthony and Charlene Marshall in that courtroom and in the media.
She died at Holly Hill. Protected from her evil son by friends. Such nonsense. Her friends ensured the end was as unpleasant as possible for her by ensuring that any resolution between her and her son and her grandsons and most importantly her daughter-in-law didn’t occur. Friends like hers she didn’t need.
You of course are correct and in all probability she had "good days" and "bad days" and that is what makes the allegations so hard to prove or disprove. None of us knows what her mental state on any given day was. Despite some saying they did.
One of the things that muddles it all further is she wrote around 30 wills and accompanying codicils from the point Vincent Astor died. So it is hard to define her "intent" since apparently that changed almost every other year.
The grandsons of course got a rude awakening at one point during the trial. In the 1997 will Anthony Marshall got an income from a percentage of the estate with the percentage then being distributed to charities upon his death and the grandsons each got $1 million. In the 2002 will Anthony Marshall got his percentage outright which was his and would have been distributed to his heirs upon his death. No guarantee, of course that the grandsons would see a dime. Particularly with the "wicked stepmother" about. What they didn’t know was when their mother divorced their father she insisted that upon his death they would receive 1/3 of his estate. Which would have been far more under the 2002 will. Some of us cut off our nose to spite our face. They cut off their bank account to spite their nose that they shouldn’t have stuck into the matter.
The 1997 will most likely will be declared valid simply because of the findings of the jury which basically have invalidated the 2002 will. The charities will end up with at least $60 million more. Which she may not have intended them to.