The Liz Smith Column | 08/20/2009 11:00 pm
Liz Smith: Casting About for Kate Winslet's 'Mildred Pierce'

"You think just because you’ve made a little money you can get a new hairdo and turn into a lady. But you can’t, because you’ll never be anything but a common frump whose father lived over a grocery store and whose mother took in laundry!"
That was Ann Blyth at her malicious peak in 1945’s "Mildred Pierce,’ ripping into anguished mom, Joan Crawford. (Ms. Blyth spent most of her screen career chirping prettily in musicals, but her amoral Veda Pierce is unforgettable.)
***
It is unlikely that anything can truly surpass the classic movie version of "Mildred Pierce," based on the bestseller by James M. Cain. Crawford won an Oscar and resurrected her career with this grim noir about mother’s love gone awry. (As Eve Arden wisecracks to Mildred, "Alligators have the right idea, they eat their young.")
But how fascinating is the news that Kate Winslet is set to reprise ambitious-but-put-upon Mildred, in a six-part miniseries that will include all that could not go into the big-screen version? (Cain’s heroine was considerably grittier than 1940’s movie censors allowed.)
This new "Mildred" will be made for cable, because the lush miniseries genre – which peaked in the 1980s/’90s – is pretty much dead on network TV. No room for glamorous drama when reality-show garbage dominates.
Oscar-winner Winslet will probably be terrif – what a role to sink one’s teeth into! (Entertainment Weekly, in reporting on this, said flatly, "Just give her the Emmy now.") But director Todd Haynes is going to be hard-pressed to find the right supporting actors to flesh out Mildred’s story. The above-mentioned Eve Arden, the great Jack Carson as Mildred’s smarmy would-be beau and the suave sophisticate Zachary Scott as the man between Mildred and Veda. But most of all, the role of Veda, the daughter from hell, is a challenge. Christina Ricci has the right nasty edge, and though she is about 30, still looks teen-age.
But if you want a young beauty who will be convincing slapping her mother around, sleeping with mom’s lovers, blackmailing and putting bullets in those who irk her … I vote for the talented Lindsay Lohan.
***
Received an e-mail this week from one of Hollywood’s rare professionals, the PR man Dale Olson. He was congratulating the column for writing about the Jackson family making hay on Michael.
Dale offered some interesting insider background info: "You are the only person who has come right out and said that with the exception of Janet, the Jacksons would not have had a career without Michael.
"I was there in the beginning when, at the Rogers & Cowan PR firm, Warren Cowan, Paul Bloch and I introduced the then-five-year-old Michael at a party for the press in The Daisy in Beverly Hills. It was hosted by Diana Ross. He was the cutest and most talented child I have ever seen. The next night, Diana introduced him to the public in his first public performance at her gala concert at the Forum. In those days it was the major venue for a musical act in Los Angeles.
"All the media has talked about is how he started with The Jackson Five, but this was his own start and a solo. The Jackson Five would never have worked without Michael and they used him throughout his entire life and now, with Joe, are trying to capitalize on his death."
























33 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
OH LIZ:
Lindsey Lohan? NEVER. She already looks burned out and certainly not young enough to play Kate’s daughter. Even if they could clean her up, she doesn’t have the chops to convey the superciliousness required for the role. Ann Blyth had that snooty, haughty air down to tee. I agree about the supporting cast. No one could play the caustice friend better then Eve Arden (other than Thelma Ritter). There was no better heel than Zachary Scott. But Bruce Campbell (from Burn Notice, a terrific tv show co-starring Sharon Gless), would be great in the Jack Carson role. Just the right combo of charm, loser and manipulator. Let’s face it, its like trying to re-cast "All About Eve" or "Gone With The Wind" - they’ll never be another Davis, Gable or Leigh but I do think Kate or Cate Blanchard are the only two actresses who could be believable as Mildred. But Lindsey Lohan - NEVER.
The original was superb. It’s a masterpiece. They just don’t make actors like the original cast members. They were all casted to perfection.
Lindsay Lohan? You’ve got to be kidding me!
Liz, do you have a crush on Lindsay Lohan? Come on, tell the truth. :-)
I think it’s a shame that Lindsay went so nuts with her celebrity because she is a great actor. It’s just hard to remember that when she’s all over the tabloids looking gaunt and acting like a typical young Hollywood celebrity. I thought she was amazing in Parent Trap, Mean Girls, and that one movie with Jamie Lee Curtis.
Not to mention she was so beautiful as a red-head! I was disappointed to see her go blonde like everyone else.
I think it’s rather hypocritical of everyone to single out his family when the reality is everyone used Michael Jackson for the "fame and fortune" their association with him imparted. Probably the only person who didn’t was Diana Ross. And I doubt his mother used him. She was merely manipulated the way they all were and is still being manipulated. And not just by his father. There was something telling, as they say, in his stating he wanted his children raised by either his mother or Diana Ross. The only two people he trusted. And he left the money to his mother and his children. In trust. So when his mother dies, his children get it all. That will, in a way, was perhaps his revenge over having everyone use him. Quite a few expected something. All of whom got absolutely nothing.
I suspect the magic of Michael Jackson is already beginning to wear off and I also suspect the tour along with the "memoirs" will not be as lucrative as everyone thinks they will be. He fell off the pedestal a long time ago. Had he merely died I doubt the media would have spent the time they have and he would have been nothing more than a 30 second mention on the networks news. And maybe a 24 hour event on cable. You think about someone like Paul Newman who never embroiled himself in controversy let alone scandal and did so much for so many with his philanthropy and it is actually quite appalling to watch this ongoing circus over someone who it seems couldn’t avoid controversy and scandal for most of his life when so many others are just quickly disposed of by the media. "Paul Newman died today." That was about it. Says a lot, none of it particularly good, about our gods and goddesses of late. Seems the worse they are, the more we love them.
It was rather symbolic that the circus moved into Staples Center as Michael Jackson departed. This time, however, the "pooper scoopers" were scooping up the poop before the circus moved in instead of after.
I agree with Liz and with you about Lindsay Lohan. She still has an innocence about her on screen the way Ann Blyth did and of course that innocence, at least the look of innocence, is what fools us. And she probably can deliver the lines better than anyone. Not to comment on her family situation, but part of the part of Veda may seem vaguely familiar to her.
Mr. Wow
You are always a delight to read. Now that Michael’s death has been declared murder what do you think is going to happen with that family? Even more books and more money. I think, except for Janet, most of them lived off of Michael’s good graces. I don’t know about his father, but what do any of them do besides Janet?