Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

The Liz Smith Column | 05/24/2009 11:00 pm

Liz Smith Presents: Celebrity Culture, Part One

Our Gossip Girl sits down with filmmaker Hart Perry to talk about the history and evolution of celeb culture and gossip … and shares the highlights with wowOwow. Read on for Liz Taylor, Marilyn Monroe, the Kennedys and more.
Image: Wikipedia

“History is gossip but scandal is gossip made tedious by morality” said Oscar Wilde. Oscar wrote this before his own life was ruined by gossip, scandal and morality.

So this remark is applicable to Wilde’s era and onward (downward?) to our own time of Internet fire-flashes of snark.

And don’t we all always get up on our high horse when somebody is caught with their hand in the cookie jar – wicked, wicked! This is the thing all gossip columnists have to try hard to avoid – becoming a moralist. It’s so easy, you have the bully pulpit of a column, and suddenly you’re forgetting your own life and errors.

It’s hard to give a balanced view. I’ve tried and most of the time succeeded (I think!) but the temptation to go with the flow – Angelina Jolie is a black-widow spider, stealing hapless Brad from poor little Jennifer Aniston! – looms large. Of course, in my case it helps that I’ve been around a long time. I have tried to take the historical perspective. It’s just Liz-Eddie-Debbie dressed up for the new millennium.

***

The other day, filmmaker Hart Perry asked me to participate in a coming documentary on the changing face of fame and celebrity culture, from the 1950s to the 2000s.

It will eventually air on VHI, the youth-oriented music channel. Naturally, being an icon of “youth,” I jumped at the opportunity to enlighten my fans.

Mr. Hart and his researchers are an intelligent bunch. Their questions were dauntingly long and full of literary allusions and references to psychologists, college studies, etc. And here I thought it was all going to be, “So, what’s Mariah Carey really like?”

Still, I thought it might amuse you if I told you some of Mr. Perry’s questions – the ones that didn’t require me to relive my college education! – and then my answers, as well as I remember them.

***

“Why didn’t gossip columnists print that Rock Hudson was gay?”

Because it was the 1950s, children. Nobody “outed” anybody back then. The short-lived but sensational Confidential magazine hinted luridly at things, but that was as far as it went. Homosexuality was simply not to be written about unless you were a figure of antiquity. Generally, reporters and the media were not out to destroy people. You had to go into the street and frighten the horses before a real scandal occurred. In Rock’s case, Confidential “settled” on an innuendo-laced story about another actor, instead of writing about Rock. Hudson then married to calm the waters, divorced when he’d had enough of that and remained Hollywood’s most eligible “bachelor” from then on until he contracted AIDS in the 1980s.

2009_0525_hudson_photoplay_gasolinealleyantiques.<span class="caps">JPG</span>
———

“Do you know the movie ‘Ace in the Hole’ with Kirk Douglas, in which he plays a tabloid reporter milking a pseudo-event? Wouldn’t he be a hero today?”

No, he wouldn’t be a “hero” today. He’d be a network. He’d be no different than anybody else in mass media today. (Kirk’s character actually causes the death of the poor guy caught in the “event” – a cave collapse. No way a hero – even today.)

———

The short version of the next question was, "How has the Internet changed celebrity culture?"

Drastically. But it has drastically altered ALL aspects of our lives. The instant nature of the net, of cell phones with cameras, of 24-hour cable news; these have drained our lives of the pleasure of anticipation on the one hand, while creating a frantic and stressful atmosphere on the other. In terms of celebrity, stars are now stripped totally of any mystery or glamour. And the newer ones don’t even know any different – constant intrusion, the expectation of exhibitionism is all they know. I can’t even begin to express the horror of reality shows and those people who are “stars” from that medium – Heidi and Spencer! I still don’t really know who they are, but I can’t escape the names.

———

“Why didn’t the press report on Marilyn Monroe and John F. Kennedy?”

12 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Richard Bassett
Elizabeth Taylor’s scandals may have been shocking to the public but they certainly didn’t hurt her screen career. People flocked to see the famous lovers in "Cleopatra" in 1963 due to the press reporting on Richard and Elizabeth for the previous two years. In 1962, one newspapers article even stated, " Hot off the press. There is no news about Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor today". It is speculated that 20th Century Fox actually endorsed the affair as they knew it would generate such interest. The fact that everyone involved sued everyone else is besides the point. Due to the scandal, Elizabeth Taylor was seven million dollars richer, in total so things didn’t work out so badly for her. Some say the Jennifer/Bratt/ Angelina situation is a modern day Debbie/Eddie/Elizabeth but I believe the morals of todays society are not as harsh as they were in 1958. Elizabeth was raked over the coals for that, yet, her film, "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof" (released in the midst of the scandal) was a box office hit. I guess everything that Elizabeth Taylor touches ultimately turns to gold and now she is twittering away, giving away bits and pieces of what she is presently involved in. I think that the public does revel in the imperfections of the famous but, now, it only makes the famous MORE famous and there are so many more imperfections these days to revel about. But feeling superior? No, maybe more identifiable.
By Richard Bassett on 05/25/2009 1:10 am
S G
They were not outed because back then the studios ran a well oiled machine. The stars were studio property. Not that tons of people didn’t want to be studio property,they did. What they wore, how they walked everything was a studio production. They were polished. There were as many alchoholics and problem kids but the studios held a firm grip. Today with the 15 minutes of fame the illusion created by the studios is gone. I believe they were taught style and they had grace years ago. I think a little of that is lacking today. Movie sets are boring for actors when not shooting. Were I someones spouse I would be on set with that person. Just my opinion. But instant sound bites are obviously quite popular because people want distractions from their lives as always. They love to see the rise of stars and they truly love to see people fall.
By S G on 05/25/2009 7:38 am
Chrome Toe
you know… I think the biggest problem with the whole celebrity culture in this era is that is’ ruined movies! Seriously. I really wanted to see the "Changeling"… then when i did I couldn’t ever get away from seeing Angelina Jolie. She never became the character to me and i don’t think that’s the fault of her acting. I can’t see a Tom Cruise movie anymore or a Brad Pitt movie… Then on the other hand I saw Meryl Streep in a movie and did NOT see Meryl Streep. I was able to enjoy the movie as fantasy not an extension of a tabloid story.
By Chrome Toe on 05/25/2009 9:41 am
Lisa B
Exactly…!!!  It is so hard to become engrossed in the story the film is trying to convey because all I can think about is the various actors’ politics, religion, pet charities, opinions, antics, drug abuse, alcoholism, blah, blah, blah…  Not that they shouldn’t have a life, but it is so ‘in your face’ due to media oversaturation of the ‘celebrity’ that it’s hard to separate the real person from the character.  I haven’t bothered with any Tom Cruise movies since his Oprah couch-jumping moment, his rant against Brooke Shields and interview with Matt Lauer…  Not that I dislike him - I really don’t care - but it’s spoiled his talent for me.  And, there are many more examples that come to mind.  But, you are right Meryl is a class act - or at least seems to be - or maybe she’s just smart and keeps her dirty laundry to herself and out of the gossip columns!
By Lisa B on 05/25/2009 5:52 pm
Beth Cornell
Where are Louella Parsons and Hedder Hopper  when you need them. These ladies were Queens when it came to gossip. Granted  we have our  Liz Smith. :) But  we need more.
By Beth Cornell on 05/25/2009 11:47 am
Mary Utrup
I think it’s become pretty clear that Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have found their soul mate in one another. It wasn’t the best way to go about it, but it’s obvious they have each other’s love and respect. I think Jennifer Aniston was more interested in her own career than broadening it by including motherhood. I may be mistaken, but it appears that way.
By Mary Utrup on 05/25/2009 12:03 pm
Patricia Sprofera
The press showed its graceful side during President F.D. Roosevelt’s administration.  The president’s bout with polio and his romantic involvement with other women, were artfully and supremely kept from the public.  Secrets were better kept then - because they could be
By Patricia Sprofera on 05/25/2009 1:56 pm
beth willis

First, Liz Smith, I would like to know if you will be compiling your columns into a book?  What a marvelous way to share the history of the changes in our culture as reflected in ‘celebrity’ news throughout the years.  I would buy that book.

Now, I have a question about the alleged infidilities of the Kennedys, the sexual orientation of Hudson and others.  Montgomery Clift comes to mind.  Were these situations well known among Hollywood types and the media, but simply not reported, or was knowledge of such activities not even known, except to the closest confidants?

The public remains hungry for some personal connection to celebrity.  Those individuals who covet their privacy, it seems to me, do create the mystique of, perhaps not the Golden Age, but of what standard we have today. Streep, Dame Dench, Mirren, Sarandon, Keaton, Roberts, Thompson…these talented women and more do not need to live their lives on the sidewalks of New York or the hangouts of Hollywood.  Thus, they’re respected for their talent rather than their tantrums.

In an earlier interview, you stated, Liz Smith, that politicians are the new celebrities.  I agree, but I do hope we don’t shred all sense of dignity from leadership .  I want to know their decisions for a united global peace, not their choice of restaurants, sports teams or salad dressing.

I look forward to reading your next installment.

Peace and grace

By beth willis on 05/25/2009 11:48 pm
Paul Smith
Liz, you’re so predictable: Marilyn was a joke, in your opinion, and Madonna is so iconic.  Madonna is a pop star, whose music is already fading, and she is 50, a devastating number in the pop world.  Marlene Dietrich was the origninal; Madonna a funkier imitation.  As you say, Liz, p-l-u-z-e.
By Paul Smith on 05/27/2009 3:02 pm
albert miller
In days of yore, stars (old fashioned meaning) did not appear on talk shows or give interviews the public would see. They were smart in making themselves available only to a paying public. Suppose you saw a favorite actor/actress, and found you didn’t like their real personality? Why take a chance?
By albert miller on 05/29/2009 2:31 am
Slinky Binx

Liz, it really is terrific that you share your stories of "old" and "new" gossip. And I am shocked to hear that Liz’s Cleo escapades were even bigger news than Lana Turner/Johnny S.  

Looking fwd to part 2.  

By Slinky Binx on 05/29/2009 6:53 pm