Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

The Liz Smith Column | 08/19/2009 11:00 pm

Liz Smith: A Fish Named … Alimony

Also from Our Gossip Girl, Vogue documentary sizzles … Lars von Trier, ‘Antichrist,’ anti-woman?
John Cleese © Pieter Baert/Flickr

"Never miss a good chance to shut up!" said that wise 1930s Depression-era philosopher Will Rogers.

***

Several years ago I was in London at a cocktail party given by the Blackstone financier John Studzinski. MPs and VIPs were everywhere one looked and I started chatting with a beautiful, serene-looking, ladylike blonde who said her name was Alyce Faye Eichelberger. I inquired what she did. She said, "Oh, I’m nobody. I am married to the actor John Cleese." I expressed my admiration for the man who has been such a Monty Python star for so many years and was unforgettable in the film classic "A Fish Named Wanda." Mrs. Cleese concurred; he was a great talent.

Now I see in the British papers that it pays to marry a successful entertainer. In their divorce, Alyce Faye gets eight million pounds in cash and assets plus 600,000 pounds a year for the next seven years. In U.S. terms, it means this lady is exiting matrimony with the equivalent of about $70,000,000.

If I miscalculated this, somebody correct me.

***

I see that New York City went out on a limb and bought a lot of little tables and chairs and umbrellas for the new city project in Times Square, where traffic stops for tourists and some people just like to sit there in the middle of Broadway while traffic whirls around them. Reports in the New York Post are that the city paid $840 apiece for the Tuuci brand umbrellas.

Hmmm, just this week I paid about $200 for fabulous umbrellas on sale via the Home Furnishings catalogue. The city got gypped! And maybe there shouldn’t be any umbrellas in Times Square anyway.

***

Coming any minute! The film that sizzled at the Edinburgh International Film Festival and is a riveting 88 minutes of life in the fast lane when Vogue magazine was doing its massive 2007 September Issue. In fact, I told you back on July 1 that the documentary "The September Issue" was coming and would be a sensation. This was a high point for Vogue magazine, warts and all, before the economic doldrums arrived.

I still don’t see how editors and publishers can be blamed for the descent of magazine revenues. And I don’t see how the firing or replacements for them can change economic facts. Replacing Anna Wintour or Graydon Carter or Paige Rense won’t solve a thing. None of these depression-era economics is their fault. But some people just can’t rest until these top dogs are led to the guillotine and blamed for what has happened to publishing and print media.

In any case, if you want to see how history was taking place in the great moment before the downturn, don’t miss this documentary, bowing on August 28. It’s all about the excesses of Anna Wintour. (If one can call them that; excesses used to work wonders!)

2008_1124_wikipedia_Anna_Wintour.jpg
Anna Wintour/Image: Wikipedia

As I said before, this film supposedly makes "The Devil Wears Prada" look like an episode of "The Care Bears." Personally, I am all for Anna Wintour as empress, dictator and avenging angel of her own vision. She is one of kind and we need her!

***

Unless director Lars von Trier gives a good explanation as to why his movies – such as the outrageous "Antichrist" – make some kind of point about a woman forced to endure a series of hideous tortured ordeals … then I don’t see any reason for putting up with such anti-female sadomasochistic films.

The plot of "Antichrist"? A husband and wife suffering from the death of their toddler son go to the woods and perpetuate tortures on one another until he strangles her and sets fire to her body. And the point?

There are always misguided sociopaths and psychopaths living among us.

24 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Rachel M
Katie Holmes is a brunette bimbo under the control of the stupid Tom Cruise who likes to be married to a woman for 10 years then dumps her. Are they on year 4 or 5 yet? It is a countdown for Tom to pull his usual tricks. He is the most uninformed person in the world. He is an embrassment for the public who are actually making the wise decision to not see his movies and saving their hard earned money for other more deserving actors and actresses who actually help people. He was in a pointless discussion with Brooke Shield who wisely got doctor’s assistance with her medical problems. It was pointless because he had no reason to get involved in the issue in the first case.
By Rachel M on 08/20/2009 12:43 am
L. C.
Do you know this couple intimately or are your comments the usual tabloid baseless fodder?
By L. C. on 08/20/2009 2:44 am
L. C.
My question was meant for KM.
By L. C. on 08/20/2009 2:46 am
L. C.
Typo Rachel M
By L. C. on 08/20/2009 2:47 am
DeBúrca obj
That is an awful lot of vitriol directed at the guy, isn’t it? You’d think it was personal! I guess people who are really into pop culture and celebrities start to think they know them personally.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/20/2009 7:41 am
O E
Rachel M needs to chill.  The vitriol she pours out reveals a tormented and angry soul.  One wonders: When Rachel M looks in the mirror, does she judge herself as harshly as she does people she doesn’t even know? That would make for a very sad existence.
By O E on 08/20/2009 11:30 am
DeBúrca obj
??
By DeBúrca obj on 08/20/2009 12:06 pm
Heidi W
I have never been a huge Tom Cruise fan (probably because he looks too much like an ex boyfriend I’d like to strangle) but I do remember hearing that he went to Brooke Shields home to personally and sincerely apologize to her for his comments regarding the medication she was taking for depression after she had her baby.   She forgave him.
By Heidi W on 08/20/2009 8:49 am
Baby  Snooks

Sounds like Alyce Faye is a very rich nobody at this point. Wonder if she’ll remain a nobody?  You can buy a good publicist with that kind of money. And still have some change left over.  

As for Anna Wintour I suspect she’s one of those pretentious people who really has little to be pretentious about but loves everyone thinking she does. 

By Baby Snooks on 08/20/2009 8:54 am
Chrome Toe
wow that statement "I’m nobody i’m married to the actor John Cleese" gave me chills. what a horrible way to feel. Yes I suppose it ended up paying well but YUCK. I’d read a couple things over the years by women who were the "nobodies" attached to the somebodies. Just not a way i’d want to live. Not for any amount of money.
By Chrome Toe on 08/20/2009 9:11 am
Laura Orr

Dear Chrome Toe, I heard a comment once from Dr. Phil regarding marrying for money (not that she did), but her feelings made me think of this. He said, "If you are going to marry for money you will have to earn every penny of it!" Sounds like she paid dearly if she feels like  she is a "nobody".

Laura O.

By Laura Orr on 08/20/2009 12:10 pm
KatyDid Wells

I was struck by the same line, Chrome Toe.  It reminded me of a woman I knew many years ago.  She was married to the owner of a large business in town.  I worked for a non-profit at the time and she stopped by one day.  I’d just hired a new assistant and this woman walked up to her to introduce herself, "Hello, I’m Mrs. (using her husband’s first and last name), the owner of ________" . My new assistant took her hand, smiled, and without missing a beat said, "that’s nice, but who are you?" 

 

By KatyDid Wells on 08/22/2009 12:16 pm
Lucinda Herbert

My new assistant took her hand, smiled, and without missing a beat said, "that’s nice, but who are you?" 

That is one the best responses I have ever heard in under those circumstances!  But now I wonder, did Mrs. X make a substantial donation or did she turn on her heel and walk out?

By Lucinda Herbert on 08/26/2009 12:33 pm
KatyDid Wells
You can probably guess.  True to form, she deferred to her husband…
By KatyDid Wells on 08/26/2009 10:51 pm
Peter Riva
The problem with people evaluating Anna Wintour is this: her level of excellence cannot be understood by most and that level of excellence requires discipline, a focus on what is really important and - because life is short - avoiding banalities. I saw her once talking to a nobel winner. She was silent, rapt in her attention and very respectful. 20 minutes later some wanna-be fashionista got the sharp end of her tongue as Anna was off to do something else which required talent and dedication, not fluff. Even if you do not care about fashion as an art or culture-enhancer, it is her area of expertise, one she has (as Marlene would say) the flicht for.
By Peter Riva on 08/20/2009 10:38 am