Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

FLASH! From Liz Smith | 05/05/2009 3:40 pm

LIZ SMITH FLASH! The National Review Jumps on Madonna Adoption Critics

The National Review defends Madonna’s intent to adopt Mercy James. Tell us what you think.
Liz Smith

The National Review, the most conservative, staid and Republican publication in existence, is on the side of Madonna in the matter of her trying to adopt an orphan from Malawi. (Thus far she has been denied the adoption.)

The magazine educates us, reminding that Madonna is the pop star known as "The Material Girl." But they say she has values other than materialism. They go on to defend the Big M, writing: She wants to adopt – not a spanking new infant but a four-year-old. (The editors point out that the older the child, the less attractive he or she is to adopting parents. They might also have noted that the little girl doesn’t seem to be wanted by anyone else and the grandmother who objects to Madonna’s having her doesn’t seem to want her either, since she is still in the orphanage.)

Now listen to this. The National Review jumps on Madonna’s critics. "Much of the world applauded – the same part of the world that had jeered Madonna’s attempt to adopt little Mercy James." The magazine continues, saying that cries of "colonialism" … "imperialism" … "racism" have been raised. They fault critics who insist Madonna tried to use her fame to "circumvent" the Malawian adoption process.

The National Review’s final verdict? They ask, "What’s wrong with that? Plenty of orphans could use the circumvention of bureaucracy."

I was just amazed by this report. It seemed so unlikely on the National Review’s roundup editorial pages. But I agree with the magazine in this instance even though I am sometimes described as a liberal yellow-dog Democrat. I believe the grandmother is selfish not to want this child to enjoy a better life in Madonna’s care. I believe the Malawi government is just hoping to blackmail Madonna into more money or reacting to cries that they are "selling" their children.

All this takes place in a land where the fate of girl children thrown on their own is either early pregnancy, rape or murder. 

No matter what you think of Madonna as performer, person and mother, having the star adopt her has to be in the best interests of little Mercy James.

WHAT DO YOU THINK? Chime in!

28 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Charles Dance
IF YOU HAVE SEEN THE DOCUMENTARY ON MALAWI  MADONNA PAID FOR AND PRODUCED ON THE VILLAGES OF CHILDREN TAKING CARE OF CHILDREN YOU WOULD BETTER UNDERSTAND ANYONE DOING ANYTHING FOR THOSE UNFORTUNATE ORPHANS.
By Charles Dance on 05/05/2009 8:45 pm
Rose Muindi
The argument that there are plenty of kids in the US does not sit well with me.  We all have our preference in where we give our time and our love.  Some people volunteer on a local level, some national and there are those, like myself that have traveled to Africa and seen REAL poverty.  I could have started a nonprofit here in the US for children, but I chose to focus on a small rural community in Kenya.  No one knows or cares about the thousands of AIDS orphans there…but my organization does.  My heart lies with Africa.  It’s not any different for adoptions!!  If I were to adopt, I would adopt an African child.  It is unfair and cynical to suggest that Madonna would adopt a child for anything other than wanting to provide a child that has a limited future, with a loving home. 
By Rose Muindi on 05/05/2009 9:59 pm
Rose Muindi

One more thing…where does nationalism fit into caring and adopting a child.  As if somehow, children outside the U.S. have less value than a U.S. kid.  We are all Gods children and being poor in the U.S. IS NOT the same as being poor in Africa.  Don’t begrudge an African child a chance to have a better opportunity in life, so few do. 

By Rose Muindi on 05/05/2009 10:13 pm
Maggie W

The natural father wants to care for his child.  Of course, he cannot provide what Madonna can.   With Madonna , she will get limo rides and red carpet treatment.

But what is wrong with people on this forum?  He is the child’s father.  FATHER. He wants to care for her in his country with those traditions he holds dear.  

By Maggie W on 05/05/2009 10:20 pm
Bonnie Oliver
Maggie -  I did not know that the father of the little girl was in the picture.  All I had read was of a grandmother who opposed the adoption but was not able to provide for the child herself.  If the father is there, then you are correct.  The child belongs with her father.  Perhaps, if Madonna has become truly attached to the child, she may be able to help this particular family monetarily.
By Bonnie Oliver on 05/06/2009 12:32 am
Maggie W
I saw the interview on the national news a couple of days back.  It’s a sad siutuation and confusing.   Apparently the child was in an orphanage because no one could care for her.  The father seemed to not know about that( ?) but said he was capable of taking care of her and would.   Good idea about Madonna meeting her monetary needs, at least in the beginning.
By Maggie W on 05/06/2009 8:30 am
Laura Ward
Any child who is in an orphanage should adopted. End of story.
By Laura Ward on 05/05/2009 11:38 pm
beth willis

 

  I agree with the individual who stated that we are all children of God.  Growing up, I was not taught that God’s grace extended only to the geographical limits of the United States.  Simply stated, Madonna, guided by the laws of country and human decency, should adopt Mercy James to join her family of diversity.  And those who are concerned that Madonna embrace a more limited perspective on whom she helps should be sure they check all the labels on their food, clothes, appliances, televisions, iphones to guarantee that all their dollars are kept inside our borders.

Would that we could eliminate all the hardships of children…..God does not care where we start but rather that we start.

Peace and grace

 

By beth willis on 05/06/2009 8:19 pm
ally 28

I think those who support Madonna’s proposed adoption have to consider the wider picture. Could a 50 year old twice divorced woman with 3 children fly into the States on the Saturday and fly out the following weekend with an American child? Would the authorities or public stand for it? Probably not.

Yet there’s this rather patronising idea attitude that wealthy westerners should be able to just waltz in to third world countries and not have to bother with little things like paperwork or assessments or laws.

That they’re ‘entitled’ to these children, simply because they have more money than the families, and they want them.

I don’t doubt that Madonna’s intentions were honourable, but if the Malawian authorities had let this one go through, it would’ve sent a very clear single to every paedophile,  child trafficker and other unscrupulous individuals that all you need to obtain a child was the right amount of money. 

There’s also a rather false choice that’s being offered here - life with Madonna or a life of starvation, when in fact there’s always been a third choice.

The child stays with her extended family, supported by charities, or the likes of Madonna, if she wishes to contribute to her welfare.

Yes, she won’t have Gucci teddy bears, or Versace outfits, but she’ll have something priceless, namely her family, a sense of belonging, and a connection with her culture.

By ally 28 on 05/07/2009 12:28 pm
Jeanne Trippy
Completely disagree with your views, Liz. You are in the minority.
By Jeanne Trippy on 05/08/2009 12:34 pm