Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Liz Smith | 10/05/2009 12:00 am

Liz Smith on Roman Polanski: Formerly the 'Most Detestable Creature Imaginable'

Liz Smith

I don’t know what to say about Roman Polanski.

For years I felt he was the most detestable creature imaginable – drugging and having sex with an underage girl, then fleeing the law. Then about a year ago I saw the HBO documentary on him and it seemed he was railroaded by a really crazy judge and a not-so-perfect Los Angeles prosecuting system. But after that, when he was offered a deal by the very law that had convicted him, he still didn’t come back to the U.S. to face the music. Now – I just don’t know. I see nothing served by his going to prison. On the other hand, even if he is an artistic genius, that doesn’t exactly clear him. And the law is the law.

Read more about: crime, Roman Polanski

42 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Lin Cercone
Oh Liz:  I think this is a "no brainer", a child doesn’t have the right to consent, so he raped her.  Yes, he’s an old man now, boo hoo.  He became an old man while avoiding facing the music all these years. He knew exactly what he was doing proven by his not returning to the US.  If his name was Leroy Jones, he’d be in prison, without the benefit of high priced lawyers and celebrity pals signing petitions to try to get him off.  I think if there was any doubt about a class system in this country, the support this man is getting makes it clear it exists.  Our legal system should not be swayed by Hollywood money and celebs.  My God, he’s just a movie director, he didn’t cure aids or cancer.  Of course he should be punished.  I am not sorry for him.  I’m sorry there are rich, influential people who "just don’t get it".
By Lin Cercone on 10/05/2009 2:28 am
sybil denney
bring the bas—— home put in a cell with big Al who gets off on rape and let him feel the pain
By sybil denney on 10/05/2009 3:29 pm
Alexis Poulos
First, what class system or for that matter, what class? Second, I had a stepsister, during this time, she and her friends, slept with everybody, she was 13, and they were her age or a little older. She even dyed her hair brown and went into court, as me. Please spare me the "poor young girl", she knew what was happening….it was the time we lived in, if she can "forgive", why can’t the law? Let’s not forget this is the "law", that breaks the law, everyday, all day, 7 days a week, where’s their punishment? 
By Alexis Poulos on 10/05/2009 2:45 am
KatyDid Wells

AP, Are you for real?  It’s bad enough when they tried to blame me when I was raped at 19 many years ago - Why was I there alone?  What was I wearing, what did I say that provoked them? - but you actually think you can put a 13 year-old in an adult situation and expect them to not only understand all that is going on around them, but to have the ability to empower themselves against a 44 year old man?

Rape isn’t about sex. It isn’t even about the girl/woman or her clothes or her make-up.  It’s about power… period.  A 13-year old simply isn’t equipped.

And this bit about "it was the time we lived in…" is getting to be a tired argument for me.  Believe me, there was a cross-section of folks overlooking this type of behavior, but it was not the norm.  Besides, these people were products of the 40s and 50s, you can’t tell me that something in the back of their minds still wasn’t setting off bells, telling them that they were doing something that society wouldn’t condone. 

The woman has now "forgiven", but she has not forgotten - I have no problem with letting the woman move on.  However, the law can not forgive because there are criminals of every kind out there, hiding from the law, right now.  If we forgive and forget once, how about doing it again?  Why not forgiving and forgetting for a man who savagely beat his wife?  And then, why not a man who raped his daughter?  Or a woman who ran over her husband with a car?  Maybe forgive all crimes as long as they weren’t murders?  Well, if we’ve done that, why not forgive anyone who’s committed a crime and has managed to evade police for 30 years or more?  20 years or more?  Where would it end?  It’s a slippery slope, AP…  We have laws for reasons - to protect all of us.  In a society, we must all follow the laws or it all falls apart… Our system isn’t perfect, Jeez, it’s  not even close, but it’s a perpetual work in progress and it’s all we’ve got.

As for your last sentence… I got nothing… sorry the life you know and the things you’ve seen have evidently led you to such a cynical view of justice and law enforcement.  I’ve seen the other side and let me offer you a bit of hope - there really are more good cops out there than bad… really…

By KatyDid Wells on 10/05/2009 2:34 pm
Lin Cercone
Hey AP:  I don’t believe I’ve ever met a teenager who didn’t think, she knew it all.  I too believed I had all the answers at that age.  I shudder to think of some of the situations I got myself into by thinking I knew everything.  Obviously, I was not mature enough to know that some day I’d regret some of my teen decisions.  That’s why we have laws to protect children, because they really don’t have the maturity to make these decisions for themselves and an adult who takes advantage of their youth and inexperience is WRONG and should be punished if they break the law.
By Lin Cercone on 10/05/2009 3:24 am
Carrie Auger

Exactly! 13 year old girls are also bulletproof and indestructible (or so they think!). No girl that young makes great decisions. But the reason I didn’t get myself into bad situations was not because of the laws that are there to protect me, it was because of my Mom. And there is no way in hell she would have just dropped me off at some mansion for a "photo shoot". He should be held accountable for what he did, but then so should her Mom.

By Carrie Auger on 10/05/2009 10:33 am
Marilyn Michaels
This was the clearest and most cogent argument yet. You are absolutely right. And that is why, as you say, that children need protection. They are children! I  remember all too well thinking I knew everything there was to know…I grew up in NYC, very sophisticated environment but I knew nothing and I’m eternally grateful that nothing serious happened to me. I wish others would just get this picture that you so clearly painted. Thank you.
By Marilyn Michaels on 10/05/2009 10:38 am
Lindy Finestein
What was this kid doing at the house with Jack Nicoloson anyway.  Not that I am blaming her but I wonder why she was there in the first place.
By Lindy Finestein on 10/05/2009 6:35 am
Lin Cercone

Hey Lindy: 

I believe she was there for a photo shoot with RP as the photographer.  Well, apparently RP decided he’d "get a better shot", if he gave her alcohol and drugs.  The question is "A better shot at what"?  But although he got what amounted to a slap on the wrist (considering the crime was stat. rape) he decided to flee the country.  Nice guy.  Oh by the way, he also NEVER paid the compensation he agreed to - to the victim.  But what the hey, he’s a talented director, why shouldn’t we condone stat. rape, God knows Hollywood is in dire need of directors.  Also, you must remember, in those days the "bad boys" of Hollywood were considered kind of cute and sexy, after all: "boys will be boys".  The fact that this bad boy drugged and raped a child apparently was not so significant.

By Lin Cercone on 10/05/2009 7:10 am
Anais P
Nicholson wasn’t there, from every news account I’ve ever read. The girl was at the home alone with Polanski, who drugged her. Not sure why she was there; maybe Polanski had spoken about putting her in the movies — who knows? I agree with Liz and Joan Ganz Cooney: Polanski should just face the music at this point and get it over with. True, at this time the victim herself wants it to be over, but the justice system has not closed the case.
By Anais P on 10/05/2009 7:30 am
Shera Sutherland

I agree that 13 year olds know it all.  Also, that they way these things were looked at, were different then.  A lot of men and underage girls had sex; it just wasn’t prosecuted. Yes, it was wrong.  But what is the point of punishing him now?  Doesn’t the California prison system need room for people who are really dangerous to society? 

I read the "Vanity Fair" article.  I don’t think RP was treated fairly.  I think any celebrity accused of a crime should automatically get a change of venue, and away from publicity seeking prosecutors and judges.

By Shera Sutherland on 10/05/2009 7:42 am
Johnette Helms-Buzzell

BTW, Shera, I don’t know what world you were living in back three decades ago, or what moral values were instilled in your head and heart, but 13 year-olds were still children and minors back then. IT WAS NOT acceptable for them - girls or boys to be lured via drugs or whatever means to have sex with older men or women, who all knew better!  Anyone who has ever raised children know that teenagers "think" they know everything, but that is when in society, adults are suppose to step-up to society’s laws and standards, live by example, protect our youth by being bound by the very laws written to protect the underage - even as the children are growing and starting to look more like an adult!

Roman Polanski was not above the law then nor is he now.  Justice must be served; he owes it to his victim and to society.  Otherwise, the world will have lost it’s value of our youngest members of society.  This case will certainly echo the message loud and clear to the value we place on our youth and the enforcement of law to those devious enough to commit such criminal acts. It must be is acted upon accordingly! Shame on anyone who doesn’t want to protect the world’s youth against such crimes by ANYONE especially the so-called elite group, who often feels they are members of "priviledge".

By Johnette Helms-Buzzell on 10/05/2009 10:02 am
Barbara B
Lin you said exactly what I would of typed so good post and thanks for saving me the time to type exactly that.
By Barbara B on 10/05/2009 8:54 am
Johnette Helms-Buzzell
  By all means, bring Polanski back to the States. In the eyes of all, artists or not, let him face the music to which he danced three decades ago, fleeing to foreign places to avoid prosecution. Now, it’s time to pay his debt to society for the criminal acts he committed by drugging and raping a thirteen-year old girl. Shame on Hollywood for their basic lack of moral judgement as well, by supporting him! Let him service prison time! Justice will be served for the victim of his dirty deeds. Furthermore, it will show other devious perpetrators around the world that regardless of social standing, wealth, artistry or nationality, they are not above the law.  After all, a crime is a crime and the law is the law! Roman Polanksi commented one of the most detestable crimes of all - one against a child for his sheer pleasure.  Nothing more, nothing less; let him pay his time not with money, but with HIS TIME away from society’s freedom!Read More
By Johnette Helms-Buzzell on 10/05/2009 9:27 am
Nik Parks

I’m split about it. On the one hand, he committed the crime. He pled guilty to a lesser charge. He should be punished.  On the other hand, the victim has said she feels she’s been living a life sentence, because this will NOT go away. She wants him to be let go, so they BOTH can move on with their lives.

Out of sympathy for the victim, the child she was and the adult she is now, I’m more inclined to say - let’s move on.

By Nik Parks on 10/05/2009 9:49 am