Liz Smith | 10/05/2009 12:00 am
Liz Smith on Roman Polanski: Formerly the 'Most Detestable Creature Imaginable'
In response to: Should Roman Polanski go to prison?
I don’t know what to say about Roman Polanski.
For years I felt he was the most detestable creature imaginable – drugging and having sex with an underage girl, then fleeing the law. Then about a year ago I saw the HBO documentary on him and it seemed he was railroaded by a really crazy judge and a not-so-perfect Los Angeles prosecuting system. But after that, when he was offered a deal by the very law that had convicted him, he still didn’t come back to the U.S. to face the music. Now – I just don’t know. I see nothing served by his going to prison. On the other hand, even if he is an artistic genius, that doesn’t exactly clear him. And the law is the law.

























42 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Send his wrinkled butt to prison. He avoided it by his own choice then, but that doesn’t absolve him now. He could have served his time when he was young, but he chose to take the risk that he’d get caught later.
The liberal left’s hypocrisies are everywhere evident. The priests and Catholic church have been run out of town for doing the same as Mr. Polanski. And the courts and prosecuters have been vilified for attacking rape victims for bringing injury upon themselves, e.g. for being where she souldn’t have been, etc. Now, on this site, there are women who are of two minds about Mr. Polanski’s overwhelming a little girl, aged thirteen, by drugging her, and having his way with her. What woman with a daughter would be of two minds about this crime ?
The law is the law is the law. Yes he did the crime but two major features:
1) the victim wants to forget about it and will not testify, so they do not have a very viable case
2) he was screwed over by the lquestionably competent judge and really the first conviction should be thrown out
and probably the case should be thrown out
Also, he has already served time. So leave the guy alone. His wife and infant were massacred, his victim is now in her 40s and can make up her own mind about forgiveness.
The US has a very vindictive streak toward celebrities. I think everyone should drop it.
Let it go. Let him go. My girlfriend got pregnant at fourteen, and no one went to jail for that.
I read somewhere that a month or so before Sharon Tate was murdered she and Roman paid a man to be whipped - as an entertainment. I think their lifestyle and attitudes were very strange. Maybe immoral and decadent are better descriptions.
I think he should face the music back in California for the rape he admitted to. And also pay the money he promised to the victim. Very lousy of him not to.
Hi Baby Snooks
So you think that anyone who gets murdered is automatically a saint, she did nothing in her life which was wrong?
People who knew her are so offended by this just as they were offended by it 40 years ago - no one is perfect. No one said she was perfect. Or that Roman was perfect. But they know they were not "immoral and decadent."
People who knew him are so offended by this simply because they know that much of what he himself has said, and done, through the years, particularly with regard to Samantha Geimer, were the result of his having "gone a little nuts" after that phone rang in London. She has just recently left London to return to Los Angeles. He was preparing to join her - she was just a week or two away from giving birth to their child. And then suddenly it was all gone. With a phone call. That doesn’;t excuse his lack of judgement. But it does put it in proper perspective.
With regard to all of this everyone would do well to read what was written then about the situation instead of what is being written now so to speak. Some really should not speak at all although that of course is their right.
It is up to the Judge, and God. I would put an ankle bracelet on him so he cannot go anywhere for the rest of his life. Since he has been living it up all these years.
In those days, he was involved with the High Priest Anton LaVey who founded The Church of Satan in 1966 the day he declared God Dead. When Polanski made Rosemary’s Baby he used LaVey as the Devil, but his name was not in the credits, and, or he was angry that he made public secret rituals only satanist was supposed to know about. Well they had a falling out to the worst degree. LaVey cursed him, and said he would pay ten fold. LaVey was also involved with the Manson girl Sadie (susan atkins) who was a topless dancer, putting her in a movie which she played a vampire with pictures showing her licking a bloody knife which later Susan Atkins admitted in court that she licked the bloody knife that killed poor pregnant Sharon Tate. The book I got that from is Sunrise Over Santa Susana, a mind blowing brand new book by Adam Gorightly which I am still reading. It is very disturbing and he names big stars also involved in the whole scene.
Back then it was usual for drugs and perverted sex parties were the norm. Our morals were not what they are now. We got better I think. Plus he did pay emotionally. Only i don’t know if he is still into the dark side of movies. Rosemary’s baby was the first of movies that delved into rituals and devil worship, and if you remember she had the devils child in that movie.
This is so ridiculous! Everyone’s acting as if it were just plain statutory rape, consensual on the part of the minor (as if that would be okay). But first of all, he drugged her. Secondly, even in her drugged state, she tried to push him away and told him no, multiple times. So basically what it was was completely non consensual rape of a child.
Should he go to prison? Yeah! I hope he’s locked up for the rest of his life, the scumbag!