The Liz Smith Column | 08/16/2009 11:00 pm
Liz Smith: Jennifer Aniston, Fresh at 40 and Still the Girl Next Door
Also from Our Gossip Girl: The Jackson family, making money from the dead … Love letter to Chita Rivera … Kim Novak’s art and intuition.

Jennifer Aniston/Image: Wikipedia
"We don’t know what the economic policies of a McCain-Palin administration would have been. We do know, however, what Republicans in opposition have been saying – and it boils down to demanding that the government stop standing in the way of a possible depression," wrote Paul Krugman in The New York Times.
This leads me to another quote from that noble Roman and famous Stoic – Marcus Aurelius. He wrote: "The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
***
I just love Jennifer Aniston. She is one of our most appealing young leading women. (Yes, I know she’s 40. That’s young! And anyway, she looks a fresh 30.)
And I enjoy reading about her. She always comes across as much more than the sum of her over-publicized, made-up tabloid persona. She is real and accessible. The latter word is at the core of her appeal. She’s what the girl next door would be if you lived in a totally perfect world. (I interviewed her once over the phone and she was delightful. Even though I’d been warned on pain of death: "No personal questions!" I had the feeling she really wouldn’t have minded.)
So here is Jennifer profiled again, this time in Elle, interviewed by her old friend Kristin Hahn. She is photographed in evocative – and provocative! – black and white by Alexei Hay. This long article reveals, again, the thoughtful girl behind the hair, the smile and the inevitable, constant attention to her romantic life. (But unlike other stars, similarly hounded, I think the feeling is that most everybody wants Jennifer to find the right guy and live happily ever after. She generates a lot of plain old good will.)
Jennifer talks about her upcoming movies, "The Bounty" and "The Baster," forming a production company and what making films and entertaining or enlightening people means to her. She says she doesn’t take what she inspires in others for granted.
Most amusing to me was the revelation that, as a child, the star was not allowed to watch TV, and if allowed, it was only "60 Minutes" and documentary medical programs. So Jennifer saw a lot of surgeries over dinner. So many in fact that she came to feel she’d grow up to be … a microsurgeon!
I’m so glad she passed on failing arteries and went straight for the heart of America.
***
The Jackson family is doing themselves no favors, public relations-wise with their plans to stage a big "tribute" to brother, Michael – a ten-city "reunion" tour.
There’s lots of in-fighting over billing, money, all the usual Jackson issues. Boy, you didn’t have to be a seer to have predicted that the Jacksons were going to unite over Michael’s body and try to dredge up a few more millions. (What the hell did they do with all the money Michael poured into the family for 30-plus years?)
Janet Jackson seems to find the tour a bit distasteful, and is not eager to headline. Well, she is the only Jackson besides Michael who went out and made her own money from her talent.
I’ve said it before. Michael was the super-star engine who drove the Jackson Five to success. Jermaine Jackson – who gets creepier with every "Larry King" TV appearance – didn’t have the stuff. Nor did Tito, Marlon or Jackie. The entire Jackson clan lived off Michael from day one.
You know what? I kind of hope this tour tanks, big time. It would serve them all right.
This leads me to another quote from that noble Roman and famous Stoic – Marcus Aurelius. He wrote: "The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
***
I just love Jennifer Aniston. She is one of our most appealing young leading women. (Yes, I know she’s 40. That’s young! And anyway, she looks a fresh 30.)
And I enjoy reading about her. She always comes across as much more than the sum of her over-publicized, made-up tabloid persona. She is real and accessible. The latter word is at the core of her appeal. She’s what the girl next door would be if you lived in a totally perfect world. (I interviewed her once over the phone and she was delightful. Even though I’d been warned on pain of death: "No personal questions!" I had the feeling she really wouldn’t have minded.)
So here is Jennifer profiled again, this time in Elle, interviewed by her old friend Kristin Hahn. She is photographed in evocative – and provocative! – black and white by Alexei Hay. This long article reveals, again, the thoughtful girl behind the hair, the smile and the inevitable, constant attention to her romantic life. (But unlike other stars, similarly hounded, I think the feeling is that most everybody wants Jennifer to find the right guy and live happily ever after. She generates a lot of plain old good will.)
Jennifer talks about her upcoming movies, "The Bounty" and "The Baster," forming a production company and what making films and entertaining or enlightening people means to her. She says she doesn’t take what she inspires in others for granted.
Most amusing to me was the revelation that, as a child, the star was not allowed to watch TV, and if allowed, it was only "60 Minutes" and documentary medical programs. So Jennifer saw a lot of surgeries over dinner. So many in fact that she came to feel she’d grow up to be … a microsurgeon!
I’m so glad she passed on failing arteries and went straight for the heart of America.
***
The Jackson family is doing themselves no favors, public relations-wise with their plans to stage a big "tribute" to brother, Michael – a ten-city "reunion" tour.
There’s lots of in-fighting over billing, money, all the usual Jackson issues. Boy, you didn’t have to be a seer to have predicted that the Jacksons were going to unite over Michael’s body and try to dredge up a few more millions. (What the hell did they do with all the money Michael poured into the family for 30-plus years?)
Janet Jackson seems to find the tour a bit distasteful, and is not eager to headline. Well, she is the only Jackson besides Michael who went out and made her own money from her talent.
I’ve said it before. Michael was the super-star engine who drove the Jackson Five to success. Jermaine Jackson – who gets creepier with every "Larry King" TV appearance – didn’t have the stuff. Nor did Tito, Marlon or Jackie. The entire Jackson clan lived off Michael from day one.
You know what? I kind of hope this tour tanks, big time. It would serve them all right.
Read more about: Alexander Cohen, Alexei Hay, Barack Obama, Celebrities, Chita Rivera, Elaine Stritch, Gossip, Jackie Jackson, Jackson 5, Janet Jackson, Jennifer Aniston, Jermaine Jackson, Kim Novak, Kristin Hahn, Liz Smith, Marcus Aurelius, Marlon Jackson, Michael Jackson, News, Paul Krugman, The Liz Smith Column, The New York Times, Tito Jackson
























19 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
I’d like to see Jennifer Aniston do something drastic and different acting wise. Like the rest of the world I "like" her for some inexplicable reason. seeing as I don’t know her. But her movies have become "jennifer aniston" movies. they are all pretty much the same. she dresses and looks in them just like she does in any photograph you see of her out to dinner in. I’d like to see her do something like Farrah Fawcett did when she did the burning bed or small sacrifices. Something totally NOT Jennifer Aniston. Something where you can quit looking at the screen and wondering "so whose Jennifer dating these days"? lol. I think she has it in her. She was great in "the good girl". truly great. the movie was flawed. They kept her looking to fresh and cute to be THAT girl that she portrayed in the film. the cast was overall to clean and pretty. but her acting was great.
I remember Sandra Bullock doing some movie where the director and her had a signal he would give her if she was "doing the Sandra Bullock thing". Jennifer needs that. There are characteristics and facial expressions, hair and makeup that just ARE Jennifer Aniston. She needs a movie where every one of those are totally absent.