The Liz Smith Column | 03/26/2009 11:00 pm
Liz Smith: Africa Disses Madonna

“I love children, especially when they cry, for then somebody takes them away,” said Nancy Mitford, the famous British writer.
I was agog reading that Madonna’s divorce from Guy Ritchie and her subsequent “flings” with Alex Rodriguez and Jesus Luz have become impediments to her adopting a second impoverished child in Malawi.
The government there seems to frown on Madonna’s change of status and her “lifestyle.” She was wed to director Ritchie when her adoption of little David Banda happened.
Maybe Malawi should get over itself! Africa — rife with civil unrest, corruption, genocide, disease and the rape and mutilation of children — is having a problem with Madonna’s morals!?
From the outside looking in, I suppose Madonna’s recent love conquests seem a bit – lurid. That said, I have yet to see one paparazzi picture of Madonna in disarray, out of control or engaging in a “public display of affection” with her assumed lovers. What I’ve seen is Madonna bringing little David out of a kabbala service. Wicked woman! Burn her at the stake!
I say – let Madonna and other rich celebrities adopt as many poor children as they want. She is, for instance, pouring millions into Malawi. And if you’ve seen her documentary on that blighted spot, you know they need all the help they can get. Her motives? Madonna’s motives? I don’t really care if she — or anybody else who is doing “a good deed in a naughty world” — is sincere or not. Sincerity won’t buy food or medicine. So, in that spirit of healthy cynicism, let’s have even more phonies who are intent on helping the world! The rest of us can sit around, cluck, tsk, point and complain.
——————————
Saturday at the legendary Viper Room on Sunset Boulevard, my pal Perez Hilton will celebrate getting a bit older. He calls himself “The Original Gossip Girl” but I notice in his birthday invite his beard is showing. Happy Birthday, Gossip Girl! … Saturday in NYC at the Marriott Marquis, GLAAD will be saluting Tyra Banks, Suze Orman and Phil Donahue, and boy, oh boy, the celebs turn out for this 25th anniversary event. To name a few who say they’ll be there — Judith Light, Clay Aiken, Stockard Channing, Cherry Jones, Vanessa Williams, Chris Noth, Keith Olbermann and liberal freethinkers like that!

Perez Hilton © AP
——————————
Mary Tyler Moore! She has won Emmys, she has been Oscar-nominated (for “Ordinary People”). She has, without fail, turned the world on with her smile ever since her days as TV’s sexiest, Capri-clad, suburban wife and mom on “The Dick Van Dyke Show.”
So, if you love MTM, grab tickets now for her 92nd St. Y appearance April 2. Mary will talk about her long career and her new memoir, Growing Up Again: Life, Loves, and Oh Yeah, Diabetes.
Call 212-415-5500 or log on to 92Y.org.

Amazon
——————————-
Can we remark on something unusual in the matter of the death of Natasha Richardson? It is the incredible graciousness, patience and understanding of her famous family. Not once have we seen these people fleeing from, haranguing or outwardly despising the media while their private misery was invaded. They’ve waved sadly at the intrusive cameras; they’ve said nothing when words failed them.
Maybe it’s a British thing. Maybe it harks back to the theatrical history of this family. The Redgrave/Richardson/Neeson brood seems to realize that, like it or not, they are public property. Somehow, in this ordeal, they drew the curtain on their grief while still leaving it open for those who wanted to look in.

Actress Vanessa Redgrave, Micheal Neeson (3rd L), Joely Richardson (6th L), Daisy Bevan (7th L), Daniel Neeson (2nd L) and actor Liam Neeson (R) © Film Magic/Getty
























52 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Oof. Then they should not venture into Europe, where sex shops display their toys right in the windows; where people of all ages and both genders routinely sunbathe nude at certain beaches, lakes and parks (not to mention the coed spas!); where the skin magazines do NOT have black plastic covers on them, and are displayed even at child’s-eye level in gas stations and other mainstream places; and where porn movies come on the free TV channels after 10 PM.
We are a little silly about sex; we are indeed "exhibitionist" to some extent but we still see it as "naughty" and so we have restrictions against everything in my first paragraph here. Europeans just see it as part of life, and it has its place with no embarrassment.
As for Indian and African family values - those are actually the LAST two places on earth that I would want to be a female citizen. Bride burnings, acid attacks, genital mutilations, child marriages, etc etc. I’d much rather have a wacky rock star as my mom than experience any of those things. Hey, there’s always therapy…
Just because Madonna is in a position to throw money at the situation does not mean that she should basically be allowed to buy a child. I actually do believe her motives for wanting to adopt are important. This is a child we are talking about, not a souvenir. Madonna needs to get over herself, too. Having said that, I’m sure she will get what she wants - again.
Liz: Back when the Beetles were Fab My best And I went to Isreal to live on a kibbutz. We were not flaming jews but
it did get us out of the country.
Isreali men and women are an interesting lot. I won’t comment any further.
After our 4month stint My friend went on an adventure to India, Russia and
a few more countries, I did not feel aventurious so I returned to New York.
When Marilyn returened she had a five year old child named Raju with her.
He was adorable and his enlglish was better then mine.
I spent some time in Oshawa where they lived I noticed she would leave
his cerael in the bedroom over night so she did’nt have to get up.
She also at this time had a child of her own.
I was concerned for him she was a selfish person as long as I’ve known her.
to N.Y. I found out that she gave hime up to Toronto Auhorities.
She said she said she could not handel him.
After taking him from his country to a strange city with people that did’nt
look like him.
I wonder where he is today?
I share your sentiments.
This isn’t just a Madonna problem, I’d like to see a wider discussion on the roadblocks put in place for prospective adoptive parents. I have a close friend, with a good job, flexible hours, great all around, who has limited adoption options because many countries won’t consider single parent adoption. I think we need to look more at the needs of the children, not the moral strictures of the society—which is better, a single parent or growing up in an orphanage? Seems a simple answer to me.
And an "Amen" to the cable noisemakers. Thanks for the reminder that not all that many folks are listening to their loud, often trivializing, analysis of politics.
Having spent time in Malawi this past summer, I must say how hurt I am by your comments (and I am a big fan of your column in general). Malawi is an incredibly peaceful country and has been since it’s founding. It is also one of the most conservative countries (having strict dress and behavior codes for both men and women into the 1990s) - and one of the most respectful. The hateful comments and assumptions that I’ve read in these comments are completely out of line with every experience I had in Malawi.
Why should we say that Madonna’s millions are worth more than their convictions? Should the poor of America have to give up their children the famous, because money automatically translates into a better life?
I agree that money is not better than the love and the moral convictions of poor parents - but young David lost his mother and was in an orphanage. His father, who put David in the orphanage because he was unable to care for him, agreed to the adoption and so far as I know, received nothing in exchange - just the assurance of a more comfortable life and better opportunities for his son. It has been controversial though.
I’ve never been to Malawi, but I am glad to hear it is so "peaceful." Maybe all the attention and money Madonna has brought in is helping! With so many children orphaned by the scourge of AIDS, and poverty a given in almost ALL African countries, I’d imagine anything helps.
Many say Madonna is doing this for publicity—like she needs more publicity?! Well, it hasn’t brought her any good publicity, that’s for sure. When she adopted David, she had to defend herself like she was on trial for murder. And now it seems she is ready to go through all of that again. If all she wanted was publicity, she could stick to having dinner with young Jesus Luz.
I know Madonna. I’ve seen her with her children. I’ve spoken to her off-the-record about what Malawi means to her. Those feelings aren’t fake, put on, an act. She is not—as film critics around the world will agree—that good an actress.
Liz Smith, please don’t hold back; let us know exactly what you think. Hey, you might offer a thougt or two about, say Madonna. What appears to be fundamentally clear here is you know Madonna, Madona is a friend of yours, and Madonna is no John Kennedy…to paraphrase with clarity but totally lacking in relevance the words of our distinguished Senator Lloyd Bentsen.
I love you, Liz Smith.
Peace and grace
I see little David’s photo in the print media all the time; he is a beautiful and healthy little boy. She is obviously taking good care of him. He is always with her and don’t even tell me it’s a photo-up! If he was in his birth country; I doubt he would look like he looks today. Madonna is a serious mother to these children as much as she is a performer and a business woman. I have a lot of respect for Madonna. In fact she is one of the very few celebrities I respect. She knows what she wants; she goes after it and she lives up to her expectations. If she did not want to be a mother she would not have any of these children.
Liz, you let them have a peice of your mind all the way!! Don’t hold back!! We hope they are reading!