Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

The Liz Smith Column | 03/08/2009 11:00 pm

Liz Smith on the Arms of Michelle: Is the Issue More Than Flesh? … Candy and Tori, Spelling 'Dysfunction' in a Battle of Memoirs

Candy and Tori © Getty Images
“Brother, where is thy broadbrim?” asked First Lady Dolley Madison of an old Quaker friend, who was no longer wearing the familiar Quaker chapeau.

“Sister,” he replied, looking at Dolley’s well-exposed bosom and shoulders, “where is thy kerchief?”

I found this delicious anecdote on The Huffington Post, in a story by Carl Sferrazza Anthony. It was about Michelle Obama’s “right to bare arms,” and the history of exposed flesh at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

In the matter of going sleeveless, the issue seems to be driving people crazy. Many First Ladies were brave enough to show off this oft-troublesome area – and not just the famously toned Mrs. Kennedy. The more matronly Mamie Eisenhower went peekaboo as did Ladybird Johnson and even, on occasion, Nancy Reagan.

So what’s the big deal? Though the author of the piece doesn’t broach the subject of racism, some who commented to the website did. And now I ask – would this even be discussed if the arms in question were the long, milky-white limbs of Cindy McCain?

I leave it to you to ponder.

——————————-

Spelling Bee: Sometimes – as Blanche DuBois remarked – there’s God, so quickly. Or at least wacky manna from heaven.

The other day I was sitting more or less innocently at my desk when two books appeared. One was the advance copy of Candy Spelling’s Stories from Candy-land. (Candy is the widow of TV mogul Aaron Spelling and often held up as the prime example of a certain species of Hollywood wife.)

The other book was the paperback version of Tori Spelling’s sTORI Telling. (Tori is Candy’s sometimes-estranged daughter, and is often held up as a prime example of a certain species of Hollywood children.)

I didn’t know if I could take reading either book cover to cover. Life’s minutes are precious, after all. So I flipped open Tori’s book and my eye immediately fell to this sentence: “I don’t think my father had to die so soon. Yes, he had a stroke, but for two years before that – years when he could have recovered from throat cancer – he gave up on life. He never saw daylight. He rarely got out of bed … and his wife was going out every night without him.” The “wife,” let us make clear, was Tori’s mom, Candy.

Then I opened up Stories from Candy-land and instantly found this: “It’s fine if she [Tori] wants her own reality show or wants to write books about her childhood,  I just wish she’d leave me out of it … Each of us has our own perception of reality. When Tori says the word ‘mother,’ the focus of my life changes temporarily.”

Candy then goes on to tell a genuinely funny story of being in the hospital, having surgery. She doesn’t quite understand why she is being fussed over so much – she is, after all, just a famous filthy rich widow.

“The mystery of my sudden popularity was solved. ‘Mrs. Spelling, look!’ The nurse said. ‘Isn’t that your daughter on TV? Mrs. Spelling, she says your relationship is complicated. What does that mean?’

"’I’m not sure,’ I said ‘But I don’t think she is being complimentary. Just a guess.’”

When the nurse won’t turn the damn set off, and starts saying how pretty Tori’s dress is, Candy writes, “I wanted to know when the anesthesiologist would be arriving.”

53 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Woody McBreairty

From personal experience, I say that Candy Spelling is the rudest and most arrogant person ever. As an usher for an American Ballet Theatre Benefit, Candy Spelling had her female companion ask me questions about what time the ballet ended, when the reception room would be open, etc.  She looked past me and never once acknowleged my presence.  On another occassion when I worked for an Interior Design Showroom, Candy Spelling came in with her decorator and her behavior was identical.  She said "Ask him if it is available",  "Ask him if we can send someone to pick it up today", etc., refusing to speak directly to me.  She stared into her decorator’s eyes as I was answering and, once again, refused to acknowlege my presence.  I think she looks down on people who don’t own $150 million houses or $50 million condominiums. She is also very ugly in spite of the plastic surgery.  (Goes to show that money and plastic surgery cannot make you a beautiful person.) 

By Woody McBreairty on 03/09/2009 12:46 am
beth willis

Actually, Woody, you may have come out ahead of the game here since you actually received dialogue; otherwise, Ms. Spelling may have just been humming. 

I laughed out loud at your telling of this experience, Liz Smith.  Your opening remarks reminded me of what Henry David Thoreau said to Ralph Waldo Emerson when Thoreau was jailed for refusing to pay taxes for the war.  Shocked, I say Shocked, Emerson said,"Henry David, what are you doing here?"  Just as shocked, I say shocked, Thoreau asked, ‘Ralph (Thoreau was much less formal, plus ’Where’s Waldo’ had not yet been invented) Ralph, why are you not here?"

Actually, that story is not like yours  at all except for its involving two people with one attempting to one-up the other.  I’ve just finished watching ‘A Night at the Opera’ and am channeling Otis B. Driftwood.

Peace and grace

 

Actually, that story is nothing like the one you told except for the involvement of two people with one seeking to upbraid the other.  I just watched ‘A Night at the Opera’ and I’m channeling Otis B. Driftwood.

Peace and grace

By beth willis on 03/09/2009 5:23 pm
beth willis
HMMMMMMMMMM  that last part must have been Harpo humming
By beth willis on 03/09/2009 5:25 pm
Jill Bright
I remember reading Candy didn’t know the name of her grandchildren.  As far as her kids these days, Tori seems anorexic to me, and the other kid Randy, is puffy and bloated looking from too much partying.  Neither look healthy to me. 
By Jill Bright on 03/09/2009 8:21 pm
Lizzie R.

Thanks for the small preview of the Spelling ladies’ books. Now I know I will never ever read them…as if I was going to anyway, but they do sound good for a few laughs.

 As for Michelle’s arms/shoulders…much ado about nothing, yet it generated more comments than anything else lately… even Maureen Dowd’s column about it. I have a feeling that anything she wears will be subject to the same sort of scrutiny

By Lizzie R. on 03/09/2009 12:53 am
Pat M
According to Candy Spelling, she is the one who suggested to Aaron Spelling that Joan Collins would be the ideal casting choice for the Alexis character on ‘Dynasty’…for that and that alone…I cannot dislike Candy Spelling.

Overall, I think both Spelling woman competed for the affections of the same man: Aaron. Candy may have received her husband’s money but I truly feel that Tori is the one who received her father’s undying love.
By Pat M on 03/09/2009 2:23 am
Ms. Dee
Maybe both of these women have trouble differentiating between love and money.  Maybe money is the closest thing to a genuine expression of love either one of them has ever known.  It’s possible.
By Ms. Dee on 03/09/2009 5:04 am
Kay Sara
I just think it looks odd to be sleeveless in the winter. 
By Kay Sara on 03/09/2009 6:11 am
Murphy Mac
Liz, I don’t know whether the issue of Michelle Obama’s wearing sleeveless dresses or blouses is an issue "more than flesh". I would hope it’s not because she looks very stylish and healthy. If she’s comfortable in an indoor or outdoor climate where she’s not chilled by wearing sleeveless ensembles, then what’s the fuss? Nobody should be worried about what she wears. There are much more important issues for all of us to be dealing with right now. Mrs. Obama wears what she wears and if she wants advice, she has plenty of people around her to give her the adequate answers.
By Murphy Mac on 03/09/2009 7:07 am
joan larsen
Amen.  . let the woman alone.  I also wore sleeveless dresses all year - sometimes with jackets in winter - but for those of you who "don’t get it", Michelle and I have very broad shoulders — and that is the key.  Thin arms look like thin arms without the shoulders.  We are able to wear clothes better because of the shoulders that then make the waist look much smaller — and only then are your arms really smashing!!!  And why NOT show off your good parts — as the Lord gave us only so many as we pass 40.  I find that all of this stems from just plain jealousy — for good reason.  But let’s enjoy her "look" and let it go at that. 
By joan larsen on 03/09/2009 7:37 am
A Amedee
Well said my dear!!
By A Amedee on 03/13/2009 2:26 pm
Murphy Mac

Dear A Amedee,

Thank you. Love those puppies in your avatar!

By Murphy Mac on 03/13/2009 3:27 pm
Lila Kuh

On Michelle Obama’s "Right to Bare Arms," the issue must be more than just flesh, because in this country it has been generally acceptable for women to bare the entire arm since at least the 1920s, and most of the arm (for formal occasions) since the early 19th century.  But the issue lies with public perception and not with Obama herself.

There has been some comparison - from various media sources - between Jackie Kennedy’s and Michelle Obama’s fashion choices.  Obama herself has never expressly compared herself to any other First Lady, but many seem to infer that she is implicitly doing so through her choice of fashion.  For those who have that perception, they may feel that it is presumptuous, given the Kennedys’ larger-than-life "Camelot" White House (this applies to others as well: remember "I knew Jack Kennedy, and you, sir, are no Jack Kennedy."?).

I think it is important to keep in mind that our perception is highly subjective.

Occam’s Razor:  She might simply be choosing clothing that looks good on her! 

By Lila Kuh on 03/09/2009 7:55 am
C Hardy

Once again there is an article about Michelle’s arms…haven’t we been over this already.  Some like it, some dont.  Please do we have to keep hearing about it? 

Tori and Cathy, are both spoiled but I think Cathy was jealous of Tori’s relationship with her father. Some Mothers get very jealous when their little girls are Daddy’s girls.  I feel bad that he didnt leave his children more of his fortune but I think Tori and Dean are doing just fine.

By C Hardy on 03/09/2009 8:22 am
christine w
I think it’s jealousy - if I had Michelle Obama’s arms, I’d be going sleeveless all year, and I live in Canada!  She’s lovely and her dress is very appropriate, never suggestive and never too pompous.
By christine w on 03/09/2009 8:24 am