Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

The Liz Smith Column | 09/14/2009 3:00 am

Liz Smith: Bill Clinton and Obama Star at Walter Cronkite's Celeb-Packed Memorial

Also from Our Gossip Girl, Claus von Bulow’s ex-love – will she tell all?

Walter Cronkite/Image: Wikipedia
"For touching a people who want to forget ugly problems, no politician equals the one who has already forgotten them himself," wrote the late Murray Kempton.

Although the columnist wrote this about Ronald Reagan, I thought of it again after seeing President Obama make his forceful health-care speech.

(And you readers who are writing that this Website has turned into a conservative maelstrom must not be reading your Liz. I am still the yellow-dog Democrat liberal of the Western world. But that doesn’t make me a bad person!)

***

You probably read about or saw parts of the three-hour memorial tribute to the late Walter Cronkite, laid on in Avery Fisher Hall of Lincoln Center last week. This was an orgy of celebrity. The audience was chock-full of VIPs and, though it went on and on, afflicting weak bladders throughout the auditorium, it was a grand occasion.

I loved Walter. He loved me. We were University of Texas pals. So I am happy that two presidents attended and spoke at his good-bye. President Clinton, who was one of the chief speakers, did his unscripted emotional tribute early on. It was marked by his own deep sentiment at Walter’s friendship, offered to him and his family in their time of trouble in the White House. Clinton was simply sensational and if he is ever in need of a "love" fix from the public, all he has to do is appear anywhere in New York City. The audience went wild for him! (This was in sharp contrast to President Obama’s scholarly well-thought-out "importance of journalism" speech, made at the end of the memorial. Obama seemed cold, clinical and chiding by contrast.)

CBS made this event into a CBS spectacular but it was unavoidable that they couldn’t convince the audience that things at that network – and elsewhere – had not deteriorated since they let Cronkite leave the news desk all too early, back in 1981!

***

Here are the speakers who I thought were the very best – Sir Howard Stringer, head of Sony and once the president of CBS News; three people who had actually worked closest with Cronkite – Harry Radliffe, Linda Mason and Rick Kaplan; and, finally, Bob Schieffer, who brought down the house with a hilarious story about how Cronkite had once forced him to effect an "interview" with President Ford in order to best a coming exclusive already won by ABC’s Barbara Walters. (Schieffer got Cronkite in to see Ford before Barbara could air and Walter asked the president one question: "Did you take your flu shot?" When President Ford said "yes … I did," Cronkite then led the evening news with this as his presidential exclusive. It lasted about seven seconds, but it was on air before Barbara could be. Ms. Walters, in the audience, took this in good-natured stride.

And, I say to CBS News, bring back Bob Schieffer for something, anything. He is so great!

Also, one must salute the jazz genius Wynton Marsalis for his New Orleans-type farewell as he paraded his artists around the Hall at the end. They helped turn this good-bye to Walter into a joyous noise.

***

Conspicuous by omission, as the big three networks celebrated, was any mention of their formidable fourth competitor, Fox News. But it made me remember that once upon a time, I urged Fox chief Roger Ailes to try to get Walter Cronkite to come out of "retirement." Roger said to me, "I would take him in a heartbeat if I thought he would say yes."

Good-bye, dear Walter. I am sorry to say that no one at this memorial occasion thought to comment on your great talent as a dancer. You were tops!

17 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Amy Dugan

YES Bill Clinton can give a great speech like the one for Cronkite, but he can also give policy details when needed too, something else Obama lacks

check out my Bill Clinton blog

http://adugan-billclintonblog.blogspot.com/

By Amy Dugan on 09/14/2009 5:35 am
Shera Sutherland
Oh, yes, Walter was wonderful!  But as usual, the networks screwed up by retiring him in favor of Dan Rather. And I agree - Bring back Bob Schiefer.  We had quit watching network news, but when he was doing the interim job, before Katie Couric, we made a point of watching him. 
By Shera Sutherland on 09/14/2009 6:07 am
Lin Cercone
I also agree Bob Scheiffer is great and I’d love to see more of him, but I also think Katie Couric is doing a wonderful job. I doubt ABC would be putting Diane Sawyer in their anchor spot if (a woman) Katie wasn’t working out at CBS.  Actually, Katie is the one I watch now.
By Lin Cercone on 09/14/2009 8:37 am
Sharon McBride
I agree with you that Katie Couric is doing a great job even though many critics predicted that she couldn’t handle the job. My late husband who was an On Air TV and Radio News Director was a great admirer of Walter Cronkite and believed him to be irreplaceable. Although he had great respect for many other News Anchors and Foreign Correspondents, he believed that it would be difficult, if not impossible, to find anyone as well loved and as competent as Walter Cronkite. He may have been right.
By Sharon McBride on 09/26/2009 2:56 pm
Jeannot Kensinger

Loved Walter. Now I no longer watch the news and my blood pressure has gone down. So I celebrate that decision. 

By Jeannot Kensinger on 09/14/2009 9:18 am
David Cuthberr
If the networks live and die by the ratings, why didn’t they keep Bob Schieffer, who actually raised viewerwship levels on the CBS Evening News? His age, perhaps? He’s certainly in the Cronkite tradition of a newsman you can trust and he is head and shoulders above his Sunday peers on "Face the Nation."
By David Cuthberr on 09/14/2009 9:58 am
S G
Walter would have never worked for Fox. He was a liberal and a real reporter.
By S G on 09/14/2009 10:47 am
Norma Grooms

Walter was the news back then.  I agree Bob Schieffer would raise viewership for a good newscast, I also like Brian Williams.

I can’t wait to read Ms Plunkett’s story of the trial.

I just got my copy of "Vanity Fair" magazine. I will miss Mr. Dunne’s columns.

By Norma Grooms on 09/14/2009 12:22 pm
Roger from Ohio

(This was in sharp contrast to President Obama’s scholarly well-thought-out "importance of journalism" speech, made at the end of the memorial. Obama seemed cold, clinical and chiding by contrast.)

 Maybe Liz, this is one reason why you have never been allowed to interview President Obama. At the start of the speech, President Obama said he didnt know Walter personally. If he would have given a sentimental speech, Im sure you would have pointed out how hypocritical he would have looked.

The importance of journalism was a very appropriate topic at that time, especially since the integrity which was so important to Mr Cronkite is lacking in today’s press. One could even be able to say that true journalism is dying.

By Roger from Ohio on 09/14/2009 4:02 pm
Sharon McBride
I liked both the Clinton and the Obama speeches for completely different reasons. They each have their own merit and did justice to the memory of Walter Cronkite.
By Sharon McBride on 09/26/2009 2:59 pm
Frank Somsel

Obama gave a speech for his own image, not Cronkites. He didn’t know Cronkite. I grew up on Cronkite. He was a liberal, but never allowed that to interfere with him reporting the truth. He was the last true journalist.

Now everybody is an Obama fanatic. Pathetic.

By Frank Somsel on 09/14/2009 11:33 pm
SURA B

Obama is 46, remember? He did not grow up listening to Walter Cronkite, and Obama is not a hypocrite; how could he do the Clinton song and dance? Comparing the former president with the present one is ridiculous. Clinton meshes emotion, personality, and brainpower, and he’s a Southern boy,  full of molasses and lots of sweet talk. And, Clinton’s ego is large, don’t forget that! He loves an audience.

As for Obama’s clinching his speech with the importance of authentic journalism, BRAVO, because nowadays it’s not that any more, except for a few, and they are being put out to pasture.  

P.S. Is there a chance that on this website the dialogue could be rational instead of accusative? Using liberal as though it’s a 4-letter word is juvenile! How about expanding one’s vocabulary so that there isn’t that ever-present dichotomy?  

By SURA B on 09/15/2009 8:49 am
Roger from Ohio

Im 47, and I grew up listening to Walter Cronkite. I remember sitting in front of the TV before/during dinner and listening to his broadcast of the news.

Oh…. one other thing….. President Obama is 48…. He was born Aug 4th, 1961  (I saw his Hawaiian birth certificate) *wink*

By Roger from Ohio on 09/15/2009 2:09 pm
SURA B
Good for you!
By SURA B on 09/15/2009 2:37 pm
starry Nite

I hope that a reminder  of what good journalism was all about will somehow give a wake up call to present day journalists. 

One thing for sure . It seem there is always something to bash President Obama and Liberals about.

I am sorry that we as a country can no longer tell the difference between a right winger and a conservative.  A true conservative is almost viewed as a left winger.  Those of of us in the center are viewed as a left winger. 

Unity is much needed.

By starry Nite on 09/15/2009 2:27 pm