The Liz Smith Column | 05/19/2009 11:00 pm
Liz Smith: Is The New York Times Sinking?

“Death and taxes and childbirth! There’s never a convenient time for any of them!” wrote Gone with the Wind
author Margaret Mitchell.
***
Critics of older women having babies are having quite a good time with Great Britain’s oldest pregnant woman – one Elizabeth Adeney – who at 67 come July, will become a statistic unwelcome to many.
Ms. Adeney is a childless divorcee who has a business in Lidgate near Newmarket. She traveled to the Ukraine for IVF treatment and plans to give birth at a clinic in Cambridge next month. The British press and public boast many who are outraged that she will be nearing 80 when her child becomes a teenager.
“I feel half my age,” says a vivacious Ms. Adeney. “I feel 39 and fitter than women who are a third my age.” Ms. Adeney is fit, swims regularly and does not smoke. But reporter Sarah Knapton quotes Professor Severino Antinori who says the coming child will suffer psychological problems. (He helped another British woman, Patricia Rashbrook, at age 62 give birth three years ago. While respecting these women’s freedom of choice, he still doesn’t approve.) And, generally, the NHS does not recommend fertility treatments for women over 40. One consideration is that when the child reaches his or her 20s, the mother would be verging on elderly and perhaps need care. So is this fair to the young person?
***
The theater, booming in these recession times, is bracing itself for what happens when Mayor Bloomberg’s new traffic rules at the end of this month prevent cars in certain areas of Times Square.
Older citizens, who make up the theater crowd, are complaining about being unable to enter certain theaters directly from taxis and private cars. Everybody in New York isn’t limber, alert and able to walk. And what about the hotels affected; tourists with luggage? Will they be expected to walk in and carry?
***
But it’s still fun to be a theater fan these days because business is booming and there is so much of interest going on. Sardi’s last week unveiled a new caricature. It’s of “Exit the King’s” Geoffrey Rush, just in time to meld with his Tony nomination.

Geoffrey Rush/Image: Wikipedia
If you can’t place the talented Mr. Rush, he is the Australian who won an Oscar for “Shine” back in 1997. He has been nominated twice since then.
***
I went to the City University of New York Grad School of Journalism salute to Barbara Walters the other night. She was presented CUNY’s Lifetime Achievement Award.

Barbara Walters © Getty Images
This was an inspiring night with only one small quibble. The mayor of New York, emcee Elizabeth Vargas of ABC, Miss Walters and the students who were also being honored all rose up to speak in The New York Times’s new adjunct downstairs assembly room. Every one of them spoke standing in the dark. Whoever runs this perfectly charmless Times room never heard of a spotlight, a key light or even a lightbulb, I guess. Amazing dereliction.
Sometimes in public gatherings, you hear people murmuring or yelling, “Louder; we can’t hear you!” In this case, it should have been, “Light! Let there be light! We can’t see you!” But none of the media high rollers who were sponsoring – the Basses, the Lauders, the Marrons, the Rattners, Barry Diller, Pete Peterson, David Westin or Mort Zuckerman said a single word.
***
Speaking of the saintly Times! David Carr is one of media’s chief and most perspicacious observers and I want to recommend to those worried about the future of The New York Times, a column David wrote on Monday, May 18. He covered this very subject.
He turns out to be both reassuring about the fate of this important newspaper in America’s future and he cites and examines the opposites – chiefly, how Web advertising so far seems unable to come up to Web needs when a site is publishing reams of content.
In other words, how can those putting the Times – or anything else – on the Web give everything away for free to the reader with inadequate revenue to keep it all going? This is the big, unholy question for our moment.
























15 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
I never know why people are afraid to speak up when they are at a public gathering and cannot hear or in this case (see) the speaker. But, they are afraid to do it, including me. Once I was at a church where a prominent person was speaking and the microphone was off and no-one heard a thing the man said in a speech that lasted over an hour! No-one, not any of the organizers, not one person said or did a thing to remedy the situation. We all just sat there! It was crazy. What would be nice is if someone made a rather general announcement at the beginning of a presentation such as: "Please turn off all cell phones and if you cannot hear or see anything from the stage please do not hesitate to speak up and tell us." Give your audience the permission they obviously need. (Of course, you can’t do this in the middle of a play! but, hopefully, they have rehearsed somewhat more extensively. ; )
For years, the New York Times has been my bible. I certainly have not agreed with everything I read there, particularly in the Editorial and Op-Ed sections. I admit to being head-strong and terribly loyal about my feelings towards this excellent newspaper. I have not the adequate words to accurately express my strong positive feelings favoring this giant of the world’s news reporting publications. To even think of it “sinking” fills me with heavy remorse and with such a discouraging feeling that of course, anytime anyone mentions the possibility, I shut down my sense of hearing and pretend I am not listening. However, within the past ten years, I have observed steady and undeniable signs of deterioration in their performance, causing me to secretly admit to myself that the unsinkable NYT has been losing it’s iron grip on positive and unfailing supremacy for dependable news reporting. My observations regrettably found tangible substance in 2003 when one of their reporters, James Blair, mislead readers and the Times, with serious false news reports and dispatches which he unceremoniously fabricated. Somehow, the Times let this pass by them. It should never have happened. They should have caught it and there is no acceptable excuse that they failed in this regard. To me, it spelled a definite sign of deterioration in their standards, their image and their pristine reputation. They slipped, because they let slip the stringently high standards they themselves had set, and rigidly kept, since the day the paper was founded. I pray that they can find new and positive paths towards renewing the unfailing and completely dependable reputation they once enjoyed for so many years.. However, in spite of their obvious failings I still cannot accept that the New York Times is sinking…or will ever sink.
It occurs to me that a lot of grandparents are raising their grandchildren these days anyway. So I don’t suppose this is that much different. There are pros and cons to having an older mom, just as there are with a younger mom. I do get the impression (and I may be mistaken) that there is not a father, or much other family, in the picture. If that is the case, that would concern me a bit. But hopefully she is prepared for any eventuality.
Oh, how I miss Paul Newman!
Oh, my, I had not considered that possibility. I hope not. That would make for a very unhappy situation.
Andrea, you are so adept at seeing things from a slightly different perspective.
Please accept my apology ladies, for being so serious. Looks like I’m on the wrong thread here. I read the subject title as: Liz Smith: Is The New York Times Sinking? - - - Sorry !