The Liz Smith Column | 11/11/2009 6:00 am
Liz Smith: The Greatest Change Ever for Nicole Kidman
What else is in Our Gossip Girl’s dish? Bidding on Bernie Madoff’s ‘stuff’ and holding her breath for ‘2012.’

Nicole Kidman© Getty Images
"In the main, and from the beginning of time, mysticism has kept men sane; the thing that has driven them mad is logic," wrote G. K. Chesterton.
***
Nicole Kidman – our Nicole – playing a sex-change person who is at first the husband to Gwyneth Paltrow and then becomes a woman??!! (This is ostensibly for a movie based on David Ebershoff’s novel The Danish Girl.)
Well, Nicole is ever brave and daring in her choices. She’ll try almost anything, even opening a movie portraying a male, which she in no way resembles. The LA Times let these two big stars have it this week, writing: "Two of the coldest and least sexy actresses in Hollywood? (Make that on the planet.)" This will no doubt encourage Nicole and Gwyneth to heat up their images, though the LA Times contends that Gwyneth would make a better male than the porcelain-skinned Nicole.
We can add to all this, Nicole’s newly imagined world-image as she fights the trafficking and selling of women everywhere. For several years, she has backed Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s fight to improve the lot of battered women and children via his Fund to Advance New York. Now she is going international.
***
Lachlan Murdoch, my personal favorite of all the Murdochs worldwide, is the eldest son of Rupert. He has just outbid the ever-changing Nicole Kidman, the never-changing Russell Crowe and six others to buy a famous house in Sydney, Australia, which was the former French Consulate, located in the exclusive eastern suburbs.
Lachlan, who leads an investment group called Illyria Pty, and his beautiful wife, Sarah, are expecting a third child in Australia. He paid a record $23 million for the six-bedroom house with panoramic views of the Pacific Ocean. It has a tennis court, swimming pool, five bathrooms, two studies, guest powder room and three-car garage.
For a while, Lachlan was working in Manhattan running his father’s tabloid The New York Post. In my humble opinion, things have never been the same since he left to go to Australia. Recently, The New York Times carried a headline, "Sober Mood at New York Post As Circulation Spirals Lower." The Times reports that the paper’s circulation is down almost 30 % in 2.5 years. (Hmmm, maybe they shouldn’t have fired that veteran gossip columnist last March; somebody named Liz something.)
But here’s to the Post surviving. I don’t like to see any newspaper go under and we need as many newspapers as we can get. The Post is a vital part of the New York zeitgeist.
***
This Saturday, under the aegis of Gaston & Sheehan Auctioneers and the U.S. Marshals Service, you have the chance to bid on a New York Jets jacket with the name "Madoff" on the back! Yes, some of Bernie’s stuff will go under the hammer, though the Marshal’s service doesn’t assume liability as to the accuracy or value of all the jewelry (seven diamond rings, earrings and bracelets), yacht boat rings, a milking stool, fur coats, three boogie boards, fishing tackle and at least $500,000 worth of various Rolex watches.
***
Nicole Kidman – our Nicole – playing a sex-change person who is at first the husband to Gwyneth Paltrow and then becomes a woman??!! (This is ostensibly for a movie based on David Ebershoff’s novel The Danish Girl.)
Well, Nicole is ever brave and daring in her choices. She’ll try almost anything, even opening a movie portraying a male, which she in no way resembles. The LA Times let these two big stars have it this week, writing: "Two of the coldest and least sexy actresses in Hollywood? (Make that on the planet.)" This will no doubt encourage Nicole and Gwyneth to heat up their images, though the LA Times contends that Gwyneth would make a better male than the porcelain-skinned Nicole.
We can add to all this, Nicole’s newly imagined world-image as she fights the trafficking and selling of women everywhere. For several years, she has backed Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s fight to improve the lot of battered women and children via his Fund to Advance New York. Now she is going international.
***
Lachlan Murdoch, my personal favorite of all the Murdochs worldwide, is the eldest son of Rupert. He has just outbid the ever-changing Nicole Kidman, the never-changing Russell Crowe and six others to buy a famous house in Sydney, Australia, which was the former French Consulate, located in the exclusive eastern suburbs.
Lachlan, who leads an investment group called Illyria Pty, and his beautiful wife, Sarah, are expecting a third child in Australia. He paid a record $23 million for the six-bedroom house with panoramic views of the Pacific Ocean. It has a tennis court, swimming pool, five bathrooms, two studies, guest powder room and three-car garage.
For a while, Lachlan was working in Manhattan running his father’s tabloid The New York Post. In my humble opinion, things have never been the same since he left to go to Australia. Recently, The New York Times carried a headline, "Sober Mood at New York Post As Circulation Spirals Lower." The Times reports that the paper’s circulation is down almost 30 % in 2.5 years. (Hmmm, maybe they shouldn’t have fired that veteran gossip columnist last March; somebody named Liz something.)
But here’s to the Post surviving. I don’t like to see any newspaper go under and we need as many newspapers as we can get. The Post is a vital part of the New York zeitgeist.
***
This Saturday, under the aegis of Gaston & Sheehan Auctioneers and the U.S. Marshals Service, you have the chance to bid on a New York Jets jacket with the name "Madoff" on the back! Yes, some of Bernie’s stuff will go under the hammer, though the Marshal’s service doesn’t assume liability as to the accuracy or value of all the jewelry (seven diamond rings, earrings and bracelets), yacht boat rings, a milking stool, fur coats, three boogie boards, fishing tackle and at least $500,000 worth of various Rolex watches.
Read more about: 2012, Bernard Madoff, Celebrities, David Ebershoff, Entertainment, Film, G. K. Chesterton, Gossip, Illyria Pty, John Hiscock, Jonathan Powell, Lachlan Murdoch, Liz Smith, Michael Bloomberg, News, Nicole Kidman, Roland Emmerich, Russell Crowe, Tony Blair, Woody Allen
























32 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
(Hmmm, maybe they shouldn’t have fired that veteran gossip columnist last March; somebody named Liz something.)
_________________________
Their loss as I like to say. Part of the problem is we all read the newspapers online now. And online advertising isn’t covering the costs of the actual publications. So most of the majors are in the red. And getting redder.
Speaking of cold actresses, I watched Mad Men on the computer last night to see the episode I missed of "The Grown-Ups" and that January Jones is something! (Please! I am always feeling sorry for those kids being told to go to their rooms : ) - but how different children were raised then, not being the center of attention all the time. The parents in control). And yet when she smiles like she did at Henry Francis in that scene where they meet in the parking lot - it startles you, her smile is so bright, so real, not chilly and somehow forced like those other two. Her coolness is more of a fierce control than an arrogance. And, I am so taken with all the clothes and the exact replications of 60’s scenery in that show. That white televisions playing during the news reports of the Kennedy assassination?! Oh, gosh it’s like time travel.
Dang, I hate to see a newspaper fade. Reading online is okay, but I love my actual newspaper and a cup of coffee on the screened porch each morning. Sure, I can take the lap top, but it’s just not the same. Old habits die hard.
Hang tough, Post.
High fives to Mayor Bloomberg and gorgeous Nicole Kidman.
I too hate the loss of newspapers. I grew up in a major city with four papers. Over time that dwindled to one and now that one is a mere shadow of its once mighty self. The city were I live now lost one of its two daily papers early this year and it is missed. I don’t read newspapers on-line. It’s hard on my eyes and wrists and the organization of most of them is poor. It is so much more fun to lay out a paper, sip coffee, pick up a pen and do the crosswards .
As for the Times comment about the two cold non sexy actresses, it hit the nail on the head. I almost want to put on a coat whenver I am forced to watch one of their performances and I remain confounded as to what their appeal is supposed to be.
I always thought Kidman was quite sexy, until—-believe it or not—-"Moulin Rouge." Since then….maybe it’s because she seems determined to take on quirky, dark roles in tiny dark films—-"Birth," "Margot at the Wedding," etc.—she seems to have dried up. At least physically. Perhaps this is nothing more than her aging from the juicy girl of yore. Nobody stays the same. Gaining a pound or fifteen might oomph her up again.
Miss Paltrow annoys me. Something about her voice. She has great legs and I love ColdPlay, but hot gams and a hot husband does not sexy make.
Karleenn…Honey, I was trying to be kind but…yes, to all you say. Still, a few pounds would offset the "work." She was indeed a juicy, sexy thing back in the day.