Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

The Liz Smith Column | 03/11/2009 11:00 pm

Liz Smith: What Is It About Rachel Maddow's TV Success?

From Maddow to Jane Fonda, Our Gossip Girl covers news, theater, film and food …
Rachel Maddow © AP
“To my mind, what really makes ‘The Rachel Maddow Show’ special is how it embodies the rise of what I think of as sarcasm news. More and more news programs are likely to go absurdist,” writes Alissa Quart in an examination of the MSNBC broadcasting trend. This is in the Columbia Journalism Review.

Quart traces this kind of skeptical, humorous TV examination back to “Saturday Night Live,” to politicians making fun of themselves on “Leno” and “Letterman” and then up to the present with Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, making fun of everything. 

Writer Quart obviously believes that even more ironic anchors and absurdity will be serious stuff for viewers who increasingly seek opinion instead of straight news.

——————————

"La Cage aux Folles” has just won the famed Olivier Award as the best musical revival in London. When this Jerry Herman, Arthur Laurents, Harvey Fierstein musical of men in drag, men in love, men pretending to be “straight” was brought to Broadway in 1983, it was a hit. It was nominated for eight Tonys; it won six, with “best musical” included.       

The French film from which it was adapted was a sheer masterpiece, and I thought the movie Mike Nichols made from it, titled “Birdcage,” was also first-rate. (Every time it comes on TV, I sit down and watch Robin Williams, Nathan Lane, Gene Hackman, Calista Flockhart, Dianne Wiest, Hank Azaria and Christine Baranski all over again.) Now we will surely get the English, musical, stage version back on these shores.

Oh, and not so incidentally, it was America’s “Jersey Boys” that won the Olivier’s best musical award.

——————————-

Speaking of all this, there is an intellectual smash hit on the boards at the Eugene O’Neill theater and it boasts two major stars – Ludwig van Beethoven and Jane Fonda! He is incomparable and incomparably acted by Zach Grenier, with the wonderful Diane Walsh at the piano, playing the music created in Beethoven’s deaf head.     

And Jane is glittering, stylish, glamorous, sardonic, cold and stunningly competent in her role as the musicologist out to determine why Beethoven wrote 33 variations on the minor music of history’s Anton Diabelli. (The play ranges from 1819 and 1823 to the present. It is, in part, a mystery.)

Miss Fonda and Mr. Grenier are joined by a superb, totally appealing cast: Don Amendolia as Diabelli, Erik Steele as Beethoven’s aide, Susan Kellermann as a meticulous German records keeper with an insight into sexual satisfaction, an attractive Samantha Mathis as Jane’s daughter and Colin Hanks as the girl’s lover – who happens to be a male nurse. Yes, there is illness in this play but I don’t want to give away any plot. It hardly matters. Miss Fonda’s progression in the story is amazing and deft. She appears before us now completed as a truly fine actress, a position she seems to have been seeking since she was a teen and through all her various changing and even Oscar-winning selves. (Her own 33 variations?)  

But it is Moisés Kaufman’s book and brilliant direction and staging, plus a dazzling set by Derek McLane that are the true stars of this drama. This is an evening like nothing I remember since Jack O’Brien’s staging of Tom Stoppard’s astonishing “Coast of Utopia.” This was a compelling night in the theater.

It is risky to call a play by a number because the audience may dread progressing from one to 33. But this time, it worked. It seems, however, that I am alone in my excellent review. Generally, the New York critics were less impressed with “33 Variations” than I was. I just never understand these guys. They always moan about quality theater, but when they get it, as in “ever so rarely,” they turn their backs on it.   

227 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Dona Howlett

DeBurca,

I just discovered Rachel Maddow……….I programmed her on my TEVO…..Now I can watch her when I want.

I think she’s great.

By Dona Howlett on 03/12/2009 6:23 am
Diana T
I knew she was a Rhodes Scholar, DeB.  I didnt’ watch her very much at first, but if I do watch any of those shows, she has a good sense of humor.  Also, she seems very accessible and genuine.
By Diana T on 03/12/2009 9:39 am
DeBúrca obj
She keeps it interesting while staying informative. And she can hold her own in any debate. She disarms Pat Buchanan… it’s a thing of beauty to watch!
By DeBúrca obj on 03/12/2009 10:34 am
Diana T
I like the fact that she is not trying to instill fear and loathing into every sentence like so many of the others.  When you read some of these posts—perhaps it’s because I am so much older than most of you— all I see is abject, unmitigated fear of the unknown.  Fear, anger, fear, anger…gets boring after awhile.  Onward and upward, and that is the attitude Rachel seems to display…
By Diana T on 03/12/2009 11:16 am
Maggi D
Diana - you hit the nail right on the head.  I was very excited about this website at first.  But the election b.s. and as you say - ‘fear, anger, fear, anger’ - really turned me off.  Now I just skim the pages every so often to see what’s going on but rarely participate.  I didn’t realize women could be so hateful to each other (which I chalk up to the fear, anger attitude).  But to the subject - I think that Rachel is a breath of fresh air.  Young, intelligent, and kinder hearted than most.  I watch her as often as I can.
By Maggi D on 03/12/2009 11:34 am
Marcia L.

I agree with both Maggie and Diana. I’m just about to turn 65 and at my age I DO realize how hateful women can be to each other. Therefore, I rarely read the comments section on this site anymore and haven’t posted a comment in a few months.

I like Rachel Maddow, and I too TiVo her show so I can watch without all the commercials. She’s respectful of people, even those she does not agree with, and she responds to criticisms without a lot of screaming. (I think Lori F. has been drinking the Fox News Kool-aide for too long.)

By Marcia L. on 03/12/2009 1:42 pm
Lori F.

But didn’t you just say people are watching too much TV?

How odd!

By Lori F. on 03/13/2009 12:17 am
Mike Hunt

She seems very genuine. she cannot stop talking about Bush. Howard Stern is magna cum laude, do you like his show?

By Mike Hunt on 03/12/2009 2:43 pm
georgia fatwood
Hi Bluegrass….and absolutely, unfailingly polite to her guests, no matter their slant……She does speak a little faster than I can hear a lot of the time……which I choose to see as an admirable trait instead of some tragic moral flaw…..Will look for you over the weekend on the Mona Lisa thread….Trying to boil down my thoughts on that to a mere two or three thousand paragraphs….and I just got a bulletin from KY Arts agencies to write the legislature about more cuts in the arts budget(S)
By georgia fatwood on 03/13/2009 11:44 am
Diana T

Tell me about it…was at my monthly board of directors meeting of the UofKy. Friends of Music, and our scholarships are having a terrible time.  You know how they invest the endowments.  And, the heartbreaking thing is that they have a waiting list for graduate students wanting to be here because of the outstanding faculty.

You are right about Rachel’s civility.  And, she doesn’t panic and scream over every little thing.

By Diana T on 03/13/2009 1:26 pm
Agyness O
Hi Georgia….."she does speak a little faster than I can hear a lot of the time"…lol…no worries, that is just the southener in us. As you know "our hearing" eventually catches up. I think Dr. Maddow is a breath of fresh air, always on point and with  facts as backup. And, with 24/7 news, it has to have an entertainment quaility to survive and she has it in spades with her quick wit.
By Agyness O on 03/13/2009 11:15 pm
Rain in Minneapolis

That is precisely Rachel’s secret to success.

By Rain in Minneapolis on 03/12/2009 11:49 pm
Liz Zie
Hello! Thank you for saying what I was thinking but more effectively!
By Liz Zie on 03/13/2009 11:44 am
Liz Zie
The initial comment on this article, by DeBurca obj, said what I was thinking but more effectively!
By Liz Zie on 03/13/2009 11:47 am
Rain in Minneapolis

My comment was in regard to this post as well:

Rachel Maddow has a PhD in Political Science, never yells at people, is always polite, always equipped with facts, information and ready for intelligent discussion. THAT is what makes her so admired by people who want intelligence and civility from their political commentators.

By DeBúrca obj on 03/12/2009 12:15 am
By Rain in Minneapolis on 03/13/2009 6:03 pm