The Liz Smith Column | 03/11/2009 11:00 pm
Liz Smith: What Is It About Rachel Maddow's TV Success?
From Maddow to Jane Fonda, Our Gossip Girl covers news, theater, film and food …

Rachel Maddow © AP
“To my mind, what really makes ‘The Rachel Maddow Show’ special is how it embodies the rise of what I think of as sarcasm news. More and more news programs are likely to go absurdist,” writes Alissa Quart in an examination of the MSNBC broadcasting trend. This is in the Columbia Journalism Review.
Quart traces this kind of skeptical, humorous TV examination back to “Saturday Night Live,” to politicians making fun of themselves on “Leno” and “Letterman” and then up to the present with Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, making fun of everything.
Writer Quart obviously believes that even more ironic anchors and absurdity will be serious stuff for viewers who increasingly seek opinion instead of straight news.
——————————
"La Cage aux Folles” has just won the famed Olivier Award as the best musical revival in London. When this Jerry Herman, Arthur Laurents, Harvey Fierstein musical of men in drag, men in love, men pretending to be “straight” was brought to Broadway in 1983, it was a hit. It was nominated for eight Tonys; it won six, with “best musical” included.
The French film from which it was adapted was a sheer masterpiece, and I thought the movie Mike Nichols made from it, titled “Birdcage,” was also first-rate. (Every time it comes on TV, I sit down and watch Robin Williams, Nathan Lane, Gene Hackman, Calista Flockhart, Dianne Wiest, Hank Azaria and Christine Baranski all over again.) Now we will surely get the English, musical, stage version back on these shores.
Oh, and not so incidentally, it was America’s “Jersey Boys” that won the Olivier’s best musical award.
——————————-
Speaking of all this, there is an intellectual smash hit on the boards at the Eugene O’Neill theater and it boasts two major stars – Ludwig van Beethoven and Jane Fonda! He is incomparable and incomparably acted by Zach Grenier, with the wonderful Diane Walsh at the piano, playing the music created in Beethoven’s deaf head.
And Jane is glittering, stylish, glamorous, sardonic, cold and stunningly competent in her role as the musicologist out to determine why Beethoven wrote 33 variations on the minor music of history’s Anton Diabelli. (The play ranges from 1819 and 1823 to the present. It is, in part, a mystery.)
Miss Fonda and Mr. Grenier are joined by a superb, totally appealing cast: Don Amendolia as Diabelli, Erik Steele as Beethoven’s aide, Susan Kellermann as a meticulous German records keeper with an insight into sexual satisfaction, an attractive Samantha Mathis as Jane’s daughter and Colin Hanks as the girl’s lover – who happens to be a male nurse. Yes, there is illness in this play but I don’t want to give away any plot. It hardly matters. Miss Fonda’s progression in the story is amazing and deft. She appears before us now completed as a truly fine actress, a position she seems to have been seeking since she was a teen and through all her various changing and even Oscar-winning selves. (Her own 33 variations?)
But it is Moisés Kaufman’s book and brilliant direction and staging, plus a dazzling set by Derek McLane that are the true stars of this drama. This is an evening like nothing I remember since Jack O’Brien’s staging of Tom Stoppard’s astonishing “Coast of Utopia.” This was a compelling night in the theater.
It is risky to call a play by a number because the audience may dread progressing from one to 33. But this time, it worked. It seems, however, that I am alone in my excellent review. Generally, the New York critics were less impressed with “33 Variations” than I was. I just never understand these guys. They always moan about quality theater, but when they get it, as in “ever so rarely,” they turn their backs on it.
Quart traces this kind of skeptical, humorous TV examination back to “Saturday Night Live,” to politicians making fun of themselves on “Leno” and “Letterman” and then up to the present with Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, making fun of everything.
Writer Quart obviously believes that even more ironic anchors and absurdity will be serious stuff for viewers who increasingly seek opinion instead of straight news.
——————————
"La Cage aux Folles” has just won the famed Olivier Award as the best musical revival in London. When this Jerry Herman, Arthur Laurents, Harvey Fierstein musical of men in drag, men in love, men pretending to be “straight” was brought to Broadway in 1983, it was a hit. It was nominated for eight Tonys; it won six, with “best musical” included.
The French film from which it was adapted was a sheer masterpiece, and I thought the movie Mike Nichols made from it, titled “Birdcage,” was also first-rate. (Every time it comes on TV, I sit down and watch Robin Williams, Nathan Lane, Gene Hackman, Calista Flockhart, Dianne Wiest, Hank Azaria and Christine Baranski all over again.) Now we will surely get the English, musical, stage version back on these shores.
Oh, and not so incidentally, it was America’s “Jersey Boys” that won the Olivier’s best musical award.
——————————-
Speaking of all this, there is an intellectual smash hit on the boards at the Eugene O’Neill theater and it boasts two major stars – Ludwig van Beethoven and Jane Fonda! He is incomparable and incomparably acted by Zach Grenier, with the wonderful Diane Walsh at the piano, playing the music created in Beethoven’s deaf head.
And Jane is glittering, stylish, glamorous, sardonic, cold and stunningly competent in her role as the musicologist out to determine why Beethoven wrote 33 variations on the minor music of history’s Anton Diabelli. (The play ranges from 1819 and 1823 to the present. It is, in part, a mystery.)
Miss Fonda and Mr. Grenier are joined by a superb, totally appealing cast: Don Amendolia as Diabelli, Erik Steele as Beethoven’s aide, Susan Kellermann as a meticulous German records keeper with an insight into sexual satisfaction, an attractive Samantha Mathis as Jane’s daughter and Colin Hanks as the girl’s lover – who happens to be a male nurse. Yes, there is illness in this play but I don’t want to give away any plot. It hardly matters. Miss Fonda’s progression in the story is amazing and deft. She appears before us now completed as a truly fine actress, a position she seems to have been seeking since she was a teen and through all her various changing and even Oscar-winning selves. (Her own 33 variations?)
But it is Moisés Kaufman’s book and brilliant direction and staging, plus a dazzling set by Derek McLane that are the true stars of this drama. This is an evening like nothing I remember since Jack O’Brien’s staging of Tom Stoppard’s astonishing “Coast of Utopia.” This was a compelling night in the theater.
It is risky to call a play by a number because the audience may dread progressing from one to 33. But this time, it worked. It seems, however, that I am alone in my excellent review. Generally, the New York critics were less impressed with “33 Variations” than I was. I just never understand these guys. They always moan about quality theater, but when they get it, as in “ever so rarely,” they turn their backs on it.
Read more about: 33 Variations, Alissa Quart, Arthur Laurents, Arts, Calista Flockhart, Christine Baranski, Columbia Journalism Review, Dianne Wiest, Emily Blunt, Entertainment, Erik Steele, Gene Hackman, Gossip, Hank Azaria, Harvey Fierstein, Jack O'Brien, Jane Fonda, Jerry Herman, Jersey Boys, Julian Fellowes, La Grenouille, Liz Smith, Michael Buble, Moises Kaufman, Nathan Lane, New York City, News, Olivier Awards, Rachel Maddow, Robin Williams, Samantha Mathis, Susan Kellermann, The Liz Smith Column, Theater, Tom Stoppard, Zack Grenier
























227 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
DeBurca,
I just discovered Rachel Maddow……….I programmed her on my TEVO…..Now I can watch her when I want.
I think she’s great.
I agree with both Maggie and Diana. I’m just about to turn 65 and at my age I DO realize how hateful women can be to each other. Therefore, I rarely read the comments section on this site anymore and haven’t posted a comment in a few months.
I like Rachel Maddow, and I too TiVo her show so I can watch without all the commercials. She’s respectful of people, even those she does not agree with, and she responds to criticisms without a lot of screaming. (I think Lori F. has been drinking the Fox News Kool-aide for too long.)
But didn’t you just say people are watching too much TV?
How odd!
She seems very genuine. she cannot stop talking about Bush. Howard Stern is magna cum laude, do you like his show?
Tell me about it…was at my monthly board of directors meeting of the UofKy. Friends of Music, and our scholarships are having a terrible time. You know how they invest the endowments. And, the heartbreaking thing is that they have a waiting list for graduate students wanting to be here because of the outstanding faculty.
You are right about Rachel’s civility. And, she doesn’t panic and scream over every little thing.
That is precisely Rachel’s secret to success.
My comment was in regard to this post as well:
Rachel Maddow has a PhD in Political Science, never yells at people, is always polite, always equipped with facts, information and ready for intelligent discussion. THAT is what makes her so admired by people who want intelligence and civility from their political commentators.
By DeBúrca obj on 03/12/2009 12:15 am