The Liz Smith Column | 10/12/2009 3:00 am
Liz Smith: Roman Polanski and Hollywood's Big 'Oops!'
Also from Our Gossip Girl, no surprises in the sad saga of Anna Nicole Smith. And did we help Barbra hit No. 1?

"Every great mistake has a halfway moment, a split second when it can be recalled and perhaps remedied," said Pearl S. Buck.
***
I wonder if Hollywood’s liberal elite is pondering its great mistake? I do mean the ill-considered drumbeat of outrage that immediately followed the arrest of Roman Polanski in Switzerland on a 1977 charge of having unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor.
If given the chance to do it again, would they re-assess, and – in the words of Barack Obama – "calibrate" their protests in a more reasoned manner? Would Debra Winger, even if she believed it, openly refer to the forces behind Polanski’s arrest as "philistine"?
Even New York magazine’s celebrity-crazed "Approval Matrix" remarked on "the weird outpouring of Hollywood support for a guy who drugged and raped a 13-year old."
Over the past two weeks a palpable – and rare! – sense of embarrassment has fallen over the entertainment community, a collective, "oops!" It’s not so much that minds have been changed, but there is a realization that eagerness to help a colleague may have actually assured him U.S. jail time. Public and media backlash was instant, and served to seemingly define the worst of what some people feel about "Hollywood types."
That broad brushstroke is unfair. Nobody who signed the petition to release Polanski from his Swiss jail cell approves of child rape. But emotion and entitlement momentarily swept aside measured response.
If Polanski himself had a shred of sense, he would have immediately demanded to be returned to the U.S. to face the music, with appropriate remarks of long-held remorse and guilt. At 76, respectably married with children, having survived the Nazis and the butchering of his wife and unborn son, and with not the slightest indication he has ever re-offended, I don’t think he would have had it too hard. Now?
Sometimes it’s best for friends to just shut up.
***
As you probably already know, Barbra Streisand has topped the Billboard chart yet again. Her "Love Is the Answer" CD is No. 1. She beat out Mariah Carey and someone or something called Paramore.
Now, just because we wrote a glowing review of Streisand’s recent stint at the Village Vanguard, we’d never dream of taking any credit for Barbra’s success. But her rep did send a sweet note – along with all the staggering stats on Barbra’s album – "Couldn’t have done it without you." He probably sent a similar missive to everybody who worshipped Barbra in print over the past week or so. Still, with civilized thank-yous an almost forgotten art, we will accept that compliment.
***
Some years ago, before the death of Anna Nicole Smith, while she was free-falling into drugs and sad exhibitionism, I said to a friend, "She is the kind of girl who, if she hadn’t become famous, would have ended up in prison for murder." My friend was shocked. I said I didn’t think Anna had many moral boundaries, and her abuse of substances lowered whatever boundaries she did have. And, she was dumb. No crime in that, but she was.
I had been the recipient of some inside info on her, too sad and sordid to print, but giving me a terrible glimpse into her life. Often, I would call a press rep who stuck it out with her for more years than I thought possible. I’d always say, "Forget about her, she’s a lost cause, what about her son?!" He’d reply, "Oh, but she really loves him," which was not the point I was trying to make.
So, does it come as a surprise that the late Anna is now being accused of once having wanted the son of her late billionaire husband dead? Nope. She was not smart or calculating enough to have planned anything, but in the grip of her addictions, her fear that she’d lose her lawsuit against the estate – could she have said it, and more than once? I think so. Luckily, she was surrounded by people as spacey and dim as she, so nothing came of it.
In a way, it’s too bad the FBI couldn’t have jailed Anna for conspiracy. She’d be alive today, clean and sober and with good behavior, out of prison before she was 45. And her son would probably be alive too.
***
I wonder if Hollywood’s liberal elite is pondering its great mistake? I do mean the ill-considered drumbeat of outrage that immediately followed the arrest of Roman Polanski in Switzerland on a 1977 charge of having unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor.
If given the chance to do it again, would they re-assess, and – in the words of Barack Obama – "calibrate" their protests in a more reasoned manner? Would Debra Winger, even if she believed it, openly refer to the forces behind Polanski’s arrest as "philistine"?
Even New York magazine’s celebrity-crazed "Approval Matrix" remarked on "the weird outpouring of Hollywood support for a guy who drugged and raped a 13-year old."
Over the past two weeks a palpable – and rare! – sense of embarrassment has fallen over the entertainment community, a collective, "oops!" It’s not so much that minds have been changed, but there is a realization that eagerness to help a colleague may have actually assured him U.S. jail time. Public and media backlash was instant, and served to seemingly define the worst of what some people feel about "Hollywood types."
That broad brushstroke is unfair. Nobody who signed the petition to release Polanski from his Swiss jail cell approves of child rape. But emotion and entitlement momentarily swept aside measured response.
If Polanski himself had a shred of sense, he would have immediately demanded to be returned to the U.S. to face the music, with appropriate remarks of long-held remorse and guilt. At 76, respectably married with children, having survived the Nazis and the butchering of his wife and unborn son, and with not the slightest indication he has ever re-offended, I don’t think he would have had it too hard. Now?
Sometimes it’s best for friends to just shut up.
***
As you probably already know, Barbra Streisand has topped the Billboard chart yet again. Her "Love Is the Answer" CD is No. 1. She beat out Mariah Carey and someone or something called Paramore.
Now, just because we wrote a glowing review of Streisand’s recent stint at the Village Vanguard, we’d never dream of taking any credit for Barbra’s success. But her rep did send a sweet note – along with all the staggering stats on Barbra’s album – "Couldn’t have done it without you." He probably sent a similar missive to everybody who worshipped Barbra in print over the past week or so. Still, with civilized thank-yous an almost forgotten art, we will accept that compliment.
***
Some years ago, before the death of Anna Nicole Smith, while she was free-falling into drugs and sad exhibitionism, I said to a friend, "She is the kind of girl who, if she hadn’t become famous, would have ended up in prison for murder." My friend was shocked. I said I didn’t think Anna had many moral boundaries, and her abuse of substances lowered whatever boundaries she did have. And, she was dumb. No crime in that, but she was.
I had been the recipient of some inside info on her, too sad and sordid to print, but giving me a terrible glimpse into her life. Often, I would call a press rep who stuck it out with her for more years than I thought possible. I’d always say, "Forget about her, she’s a lost cause, what about her son?!" He’d reply, "Oh, but she really loves him," which was not the point I was trying to make.
So, does it come as a surprise that the late Anna is now being accused of once having wanted the son of her late billionaire husband dead? Nope. She was not smart or calculating enough to have planned anything, but in the grip of her addictions, her fear that she’d lose her lawsuit against the estate – could she have said it, and more than once? I think so. Luckily, she was surrounded by people as spacey and dim as she, so nothing came of it.
In a way, it’s too bad the FBI couldn’t have jailed Anna for conspiracy. She’d be alive today, clean and sober and with good behavior, out of prison before she was 45. And her son would probably be alive too.
Read more about: Anna Nicole Smith, Barbra Streisand, Bob B. Sox and the Blue Jeans, Celebrities, crime, Darlene Love, Debra Winger, Entertainment, Gossip, Lana Clarkson, Liz Smith, Mariah Carey, Music, News, Pearl S. Buck, Phil Spector, Roman Polanski, The Crystals, The Ronettes
























63 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
She had consensual sex, like many 13 year olds do.
__________________________
I think what bothers me most is no one wants to talk about it. Everyone including the Los Angeles district attorney seems to be saying our "mores" have changed and so we must view this in terms of our "mores" today instead of our "mores" of yesterday.
I wonder if anyone has the courage to look at the problem of teenage pregnancy in this country. Or the numbers. Then or now. So much for our "mores" having changed.
If he had slipped the quaalude into her champagne, I could see your point. But then, of course, the point would be made with regard to the champagne. He didn’t tell her it was sparkling grape juice, now did he?
Hopefully the Swiss courts will look solely at the legal issues involved in this and refuse the exradition request. Personally I would rather they turn over the names of the thousands and thousands of Americans who have used the Swiss banking laws to evade income taxes and that the IRS prosecute them all instead of offering them amnesty. Let’s talk about people who really are above the law.
I have seen court cases where a minor does damage to the person’s house while having alcohol and they can not collect any money for this since they provided the drink to the minor. He knew that he should not have given her the wine. It is easy to ask for ID to verify her age and if she can not provide then do not provide the champagne. But what made it worse is that he drugged her and she could not object to the rape. We need to treat all people equally rather then because they are considered a star in Hollyweird. I am a survivor of child sex abuse and did not ask for an adult who knew how old I was to abuse me. I was lucky because they did prosecute him and he served his time. He did not flee to a different country that has no extradition policy rather then serving a sentence. If he felt that the court decision was unfair he could of appealed like others in the California criminal justice system. There are others who do this and are out on bail going about their business.
As to the income tax issue that is whole different story and does not involve state criminal justice system it is on the federal system. I believe that all the people who have hidden money will be revealed and have to pay the country and others hurt by their actions such as ex-wives and the children, creditors etc.
1)Ms Smith, you apparently do not understand the US judicial system. These DAs are trying to make mincemeat of Polanski with a case that has a really tenuous legal underpinning; however they could tie him up for an unknown period of time in very bad litigation if not being held without bail if he returned to the States. The point is, Ms Smith, that it is not all "fair" or even simple on either side. He would be a fool to come back and a fool he is not.
2)Anna Nicole, a sad story and I am not going to speak ill of the dead. However, again Ms Smith, how is it that you can predict homicide? Even professional forensic psychologists cannot necessarily do that with pinpoint accuracy. I’d say it is over the top for you to drag her name through the mud on a supposition.
My take on the response by some of Hollywood’s elite (and the lessers) - projection of their sense of teflon-coated entitlement. No Liz - not a single one of them supports child rape - but of course they play fast and loose defining "acts" committed by anyone in their inner circle. I doubt anyone is embarrassed - more likely they are concerned about their own bankability and nothing more. If only Polanski would at some point act like an adult, face up to his crime and stop attracting so much attention. Certainly he has a tragic history - now he is piling on. He’s trussed himself up as a victim and can not see beyond his self pity. It is a shame all the way around.
Anna Nicole Smith - she surrounded herself with bloodsuckers. Odd that this comes to light so long after she is dead. I wonder what is in it for the original source of this report. Surely she spoke badly about the man who was making her look oh so bad suing her, freezing her assets, and threatening the wealth she married into. She wouldn’t be the first person to make such statements under those circumstances. A lot is said about people when they are off the scene - much of it malarkey. Who is to say if she did more than wish him dead in casual conversation. ANS was frighteningly incoherent much of the time - that seems clear. Wasn’t she magnetic though? It was remarkable how she drew people in. There are big time talents who can not manipulate the attention she commanded. Here was this ridiculous, high, not so bright broad who managed to effortlessly draw all the light, oxygen and focus to herself.
We have several topics in the last week or so regarding Polanski and whether he is truly guilty of rape. He is; he confessed and the sentence took into account the girl’s complicity.
This topic is about the outcry in defense of Polanski from Hollywood. I agree that there should be a huge cry of OOPS! from that community though I am not certain that is happening. I see it as an outrage and I cannot separate the belief that those who signed the Petition did so because of their outrage at LA justice and not because they thought Polanski was innocent. Unfortunately, by signing that petition, the general consensus will be that those Hollywood folks thought either the 13 year old girl lied when she said "no" to Polanski or that because of her sexual history she could not claim rape. Either case is an anathema to the general public.