Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

The Liz Smith Column | 09/04/2009 12:15 am

Liz Smith: Sarah Palin's Ex-Almost-Son-in-Law From Hell

Also from Our Gossip Girl: Everybody ‘Precious’ in the Hamptons … And can there be ‘Prime Suspect’ with prime Helen Mirren?
Levi and Bristol © AP

"I will not enter into a public feud with Madame Callas, since I am aware she has a far greater competence at that sort of thing than I have," said opera’s Rudolf Bing of the combative diva many years ago.

Levi Johnston – are you listening?

***

Don’t kill me here on this eve of the Labor Day weekend, but I am actually beginning to feel a bit sorry for Sarah Palin. At least in the matter of her estranged, almost-son-in-law Levi Johnston. This kid just can’t keep his mouth shut. He is now bent on his future career in public and considering taking his pants off for Playgirl.

As you probably know, Levi has given a big interview to Vanity Fair, in which he says – among other things – that the ex-governor of Alaska wanted to keep her daughter Bristol’s pregnancy a secret. And, after the baby was born, adopt it as her own.

This tale, of course, plays negatively for Sarah Palin’s public image, her immediate legend, if you will. All of which is a mix of fact and fiction, propagated by her, her champions and her enemies. She is pal-ing around with the bitch goddess, Fame.

But people will believe what they want to believe. Like a big movie star, Sarah now inhabits a world both cosseted and brutally exposed, removed from reality in many basic ways. She is a creature of her handlers and of us – we who compulsively still look in on her.

That said, Sarah wouldn’t have been the first mother in history to hope to protect a teenage daughter. This happens in lots of towns, big and little. And rumor goes that it has happened a few times in Hollywood, to famous stars and offspring. I just don’t see the wish to protect a teenage child as terribly evil or Machiavellian. Sarah Palin could play her well-worn "Good Mom" card and even I would buy it. It’s very "Peyton Place.

***

Levi keeps talking about how he loves his child and all that, but he is on the fast track to not seeing the kid at all if he continues as of now. He complains he doesn’t see enough of his baby boy. (Pose for Playgirl, you guy, and find out how much more daddy-time you get.)

Honestly, we can’t thank Sen. John McCain enough for introducing us to this snow-bound, low-rent version of "God’s Little Acre." It’s been fun.

That said, Levi Johnston looked totally out of his element out on the town with comic Kathy Griffin a few weeks ago. Then he was interviewed by Larry King and it turned into an hour of Larry’s trying to get blood from a stone.

This boy is attractive in a soon-to-be-doughy way and he has a sweet manner, but I don’t think Bristol tossed away endless nights of effervescent conversation when she broke up with him.

Now, her mother is nobody to mess with. There is a Medusa behind those Foster Grants; an atmosphere of Faye Dunaway barking in "Mommie Dearest" – "Don’t fuck with me, fellas. This ain’t my first time at the rodeo!"

218 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

DeBúrca obj
What goes around comes around.
By DeBúrca obj on 09/04/2009 11:12 am
Frank Somsel

Can anybody tell me exactly why they have a problem with Sarah Palin? Not Katie Couric asking her about newspapers, or Charlie Gibson looking for that gotcha question. Say, didn’t Charlie Gibson just get the boot from ABC? A woman is replacing him. Any problem with her?

If I’m not mistaken Obama brought his kids onto the stage when he was elected president. No problem with that? I guess thats OK since Obama said in one of his debates that Warren Buffet, Dick Luger, and General Jim Jones are the people, Democrats and Republicans, who have shaped his ideas and who will be surrounding him in the White House.

Of course Obamas close adviser and green jobs czar Van Jones said the U.S. was responsible for the 9/11 attacks., and is an admitted communist. He said he’s a communist, not Fox news. Science czar John Holdren is an advocate of compulsory abortions or other repressive measures to limit fertility. Another czar wants to completely ban hunting.

Sarah Palin still believes in our traditional values. Seeing that she is more powerful that Obama at the moment, she would make an ideal president.

 

By Frank Somsel on 09/04/2009 12:27 pm
F P

Read the following and you’ll possibly understand why many of "us" have a problem with this ditz:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124716984620819351.html

Oh Yes and would you care to elucidate how Palin is more powerful than the president? As a sidelight you are a definite representative of the idiocracy in this country.

By F P on 09/04/2009 12:47 pm
Marjorie C.

Frank:  …didn’t Charlie Gibson just get the boot from ABC?

Hmm.  Retiring is what the media is saying.  No reason given.  We’ll see what Diane Sawyer can do with the job.

As for Obama’s close advisers, they really have to go.  A law should be passed allowing a president maybe a dozen czars, but 37 is way over the limit.  All he does is go on vacay and play golf while these hooligans set the agenda.

As for Sarah Palin in the WH, I think she would accomplish more.   

By Marjorie C. on 09/04/2009 2:31 pm
Bonnie D-Z
It’s time for President Obama to roll up his sleeves and get to work.  Our ship is sinking fast. 
By Bonnie D-Z on 09/04/2009 3:02 pm
deber B
Bonnie, his ship is sinking like the Titanic….and he really never had any work to do.   I don’t believe he has had an original idea since he sat down in the Oval Office.   Obama is a mere salesman….and he has lost his ability to sell.   Radical Dems hadn’t counted on that….but nonetheless…it is here…only 7 months later.   God Bless America!
By deber B on 09/04/2009 6:30 pm
Marjorie C.

deber:   God Bless America!

Amen.  God Bless Conservative America. 

I like fantasy as much as the next guy, but I don’t like it in my government.  Too dangerous.

By Marjorie C. on 09/05/2009 7:37 am
deber B
Marjorie C, Obama has boxed himself in a corner….if he doesn’t go with the public option he’ll lose his left leaning voters.   If he does go with it, he will lose the majority of Americans who are against it to include all republicans, some democrats and all of the independents.   Because he handed the bill over to his czars, the country knows he is not in the game.   He just wanted "the win" and now he loses either way.
By deber B on 09/05/2009 8:39 am
deber B
"boxed himself into a corner."
By deber B on 09/05/2009 8:39 am
Maggie W

There is no reason to believe Charley got the boot.  He talked about retirement in 2007.

GWB had 35 czars and 45 appointees.  You may find some of BO czars interesting, but then consider some of GWB’s:  bird flu czar,  Katrina czar ( "Heck of a job, Brownie!"), domestic policy czar ( Karl Rove), AIDS czar,  a manufacturing czar ( what then is the job of the Sec.of Labor?), a food safety czar ( hmmm… what then is the job of the FDA Commissioner?), WMD czar ( what was the job then of the 9/11 Commission? ),  a faith based czar, a  copyright czar….etc.  The list goes on.

 At least three retired four-star generals were approached by the White House about the "war czar" job, and all declined — including retired Army General Jack Keane, who directly helped shape the current policy in Iraq. "The very fundamental issue is, they don’t know where the hell they’re going," said retired Marine General John J. "Jack" Sheehan, a former top NATO commander who was approached about the position.

 These czars have been described as people who have been directed to look at a problem from several directions and come up with a recommended solution or action.  We already have people in cabinet positions and above for that purpose.  Whether it was President Bush or President Obama, they should be eliminated.  All it amounts to is rearranging the chairs on the deck of the Titanic. 

By Maggie W on 09/04/2009 3:58 pm
Elle Troy
I agree - Sarah would DEFINITELY accomplish more.  Especially when it comes to continuing the damage that the Bush Administration has done to our country over the last 8 years.  Margie, you’re DEFINITELY right on with this one!  Have a nice day@!
By Elle Troy on 09/05/2009 9:24 am
Mary Utrup
Charlie Gibson, according to what I’ve heard, is actually retiring. But replacing him with Diane Sawyer is a very smart move on the part of ABC. As regards, Mr. Obama bringing his kids on stage with him, you may recall that absolutely EVERYTHING Mr. Obama said or did during the campaingn was milk out of heaven to the American Press. This is why none of us should allow the same mistake to be made in the next Presidential election. One trip through hypnosis-land is enough!
By Mary Utrup on 09/07/2009 8:01 pm
Frank Somsel
I heard Charlie Gibson got the boot. Nobody retires from a kicked back job like that. Not a 66. I can’t wait to hear Obama tomorrow. Will we hear truth, or will we hear him impersonating Dr. King again? I’m guessing the latter.
By Frank Somsel on 09/08/2009 11:35 pm
Mary Utrup
God only knows who he’s going to TRY and sound like! I just know that, for me, everyday with him in Washington is another day I hold my breath. There have been several and some justified complaints made about the Bush administration. But the one thing no one can take away from him is that the awful and unexpecteded tradgedy of 9/11 was never repeated. I shudder to think what would become of us if it happened again now.
By Mary Utrup on 09/09/2009 6:12 am
Beth Cornell
Ok are we talking about the baby Bristol just had, or the baby with Cerebral Palsy?

By Beth Cornell on 09/04/2009 12:19 pm