Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the username or e-mail address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

The Liz Smith Column | 06/26/2009 12:00 am

Liz Smith: Studly Bear Hunter Levi Johnston Done Wrong?

Also from Our Gossip Girl, Sacha Baron Cohen’s ‘Bruno’ – Austria’s not neutral on this one.
Levi with Bristol, from their days on the campaign trail

© AP

"Levi Johnston (the father of Bristol Palin’s baby boy Tripp) is a very interesting person who has been thrown under the bus," says Rex Lamont Butler, the Anchorage attorney who has befriended the young Alaskan, so much in the news.

Levi, ousted from the Palin inner circle, barely allowed to see his baby boy and unable to work at anything but bear hunting because of his Palin post-election notoriety, is presented as a nice guy by writer John Jeremiah Sullivan in the July issue of GQ magazine. He is depicted as a diamond in the rough, seriously homophobic, but a young stud done wrong by circumstance.

***

If you don’t have access to GQ and if the Palin story is still fascinating to you, just try a few of reporter Sullivan’s quotes herein. He describes Wasilla like so:

It is a shithole surrounded by such loveliness … You can feel the Palins. From my budget hotel on Lake Lucille, I can see the big wooden wall that surrounds their house and a roof beyond it. They are of this place, they belong here, but their power has disturbed an equilibrium. At the gun shop, where the owners have known the family forever, the men at the counter say they believe deep down that when she puts her head on her pillow at night, she (Sarah Palin) wishes she had never said yes to McCain. It’s a remark made with some sadness, sure … She is a great American frontier story. Maybe that was as hard for you as it was for me to see, when we were so busy hoping she would win or lose. But the historical demi-urge that spoke through Sarah Palin is one that has cyclically made and remade this country … Levi is a mushroom growing in the shadow of that story.

Reporter Sullivan is a patient, good reporter who can really write. And GQ’s editors gave him his head in creating the various ideas and details of this amazing article, written while he toughed it out waiting for an interview in Alaska. I urge you to put your hands on the entire thing and read it from the beginning.

Sullivan writes that there are two takes on the Bristol-Levi story in Alaska: "One was the ‘under the bus narrative,’ held by the Levi camp … Levi loves girl, she gets pregnant, he gives up high school and hockey so he can provide for her and the baby. When it suits their political purposes, the family embraces him and essentially puts him forward as a son-in-law. When his meager political value is spent, they do what most normal parents would do and discourage the daughter from marrying him, in hopes she can get back on with her future. He’s frozen out of the family."

***

Sullivan also implies that the drug bust of Levi’s mother simply "follows a recognizable course of small-town values." Was she set up by the Secret Service and busted for selling "a handful of OxyContin?" Your sympathy shifts to Levi and his mom. But you need to read the entire article in GQ and draw your own conclusion. The reporter asks Levi if it pisses him off that he changed his whole life and now they’ve shut him out. "He put down his glass of Coca-Cola and said, ‘Yes.’"

***

Looking at the July GQ, which boasts what the magazine calls "our first nude cover," one is struck by the beauty of a nakedly posed Sacha Baron Cohen. He has been polished, powdered, shaved and made up to resemble the gay Austrian fashionista who is his own latest satirical invention, Bruno. (Serious gay people won’t appreciate this absurd character but others will relish the joke being played on a subculture.)

2009_0626_gq_sacha_baron_cohen_bruno.jpg
Image: GQ

If Levi Johnston of the Sarah Palin story is as homophobic as his reporter says he is, this cover couldn’t make the brave young bear hunter happy, because there he is, between the same covers with a swishy Sacha.

157 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

DeniseannTaylor

In my opinion Levi is gettting the bumbs rush from the Palins.  Now that she’s not running for Vice Pres, and they lost, he’s no longer needed.

the fact he can’t be a part of his child life is going to bite them in the butt.  That child is going to ask questions and want to know it’s father and what are they going to say "we didn’t need him anymore so we excused him from our lives?"

From friends of mine who live in Alaska they tell me things are so expensive that they go without Milk, butter, eggs, you can get bear meat, elk, deer, but beef is harder to come by.  If it weren’t for pasta many of my friends say they would waste away.

I didn’t want her for my Vice Pres and I"m a Rep., because of Mcains age there would have been a chance she’d be Pres.  I’d move to Cananda where my grandparents are first.

Nope they have done wrong by that young man and they need to do the right thing.

Levi, get back into hockey and get your H.S. degree, take care of you, no one else is going to.

By DeniseannTaylor on 06/26/2009 2:26 am
IrishEyesNY

"they need to do the right thing", what exactly do THEY need to do?? denisenn?

By IrishEyesNY on 06/26/2009 9:33 am
DeniseannTaylor

"THEY" need to give him access to his child.  "THEY" need to let him be in regards to the failed relationship, it’s been reported that the split was agreed on by both sides.  "THEY" pulled him into the lime lite after the announcement of the pregnancy.

NO child should be kept from either parent, especially when the parent shows and interest and wants to be a part of that childs life.  He is more then willing to pay child support (reported by the news, print and TV).

"THEY" being the Pailns and there control over their daughter and granddaughter.

By DeniseannTaylor on 06/26/2009 10:32 am
AliBell

Brava Deniseann.

I couldn’t agree with you more!

By AliBell on 06/30/2009 4:40 pm
kermieb
I read that title three times and I still don’t understand the question.  Is it supposed to be "gone" wrong?  Je ne comprends pas.
By kermieb on 06/26/2009 2:27 am
AndreaBrandon
Me neither, Kermie.
By AndreaBrandon on 06/27/2009 12:08 am
rockyrocky
Kermie b, how are you? Health? Job hunting? About your question: I can’t quickly find an etymology, but have you ever heard the song "Frankie and Johnnie"? its famous refrain is "He was her man, but he done her wrong" I think the use of "done wrong" in the headline is similar to that.
By rockyrocky on 06/27/2009 10:35 am
SteveR

You are right, Kermie, it just does not parse unambiguously.

Did Levi do wrong? Was wrong done to him? I think that the title was clear within Liz Smith’s mindset at the time, but this is part of what the late, lamented proofreaders were for. Spell-checking just does not cover it.

Somebody Done Somebody Wrong Song
By SteveR on 06/27/2009 7:19 pm
TemyThomas

Hi, all

The title is asking whether wrong was done to Levi.  To use the vernacular, one could say "they done him wrong," or "he’s been done wrong." 

By TemyThomas on 06/27/2009 8:33 pm
kermieb
My point is that it is badly written—did he do wrong or was he "done wrong"—I honestly don’t care anymore.  I lost interest when I coudn’t understand the title. 
By kermieb on 06/28/2009 12:41 am
SteveR

Hi, Temy. Welcome to Wowowow.

Here is a somewhat simplistic parsing:
“Liz Smith: Studly Bear Hunter Levi Johnston Done Wrong?”
Strip out the byline - ‘Studly Bear Hunter Levi Johnston Done Wrong?’
Strip out the adjectives - ‘Levi Johnston Done Wrong?’
Substitute a pronoun for a proper name - ‘He Done Wrong?’

You can see how easy it is to interpret it the other way, though I have no doubt that your interpretation was the intended one.

By SteveR on 06/28/2009 3:57 pm
AAmedee

The article is self-explanatory of the title, Liz Smith: “Studly Bear Hunter Levi Johnston Done Wrong?” also, I did not have to read the article to understand the heading.

Liz’s post is simply analyzing the treatment of the Palin family towards Levi Johnston and questioning whether the Palin family use Levi Johnston to show stability to their unwed daughter’s situation during the elections; then dump him once the election was done and over with? Our response was to agree or disagree with her article. Here goes the variations and command of the English language.
By AAmedee on 06/28/2009 12:23 pm
MimiJones
GEt off the Levi stories.  this staff does nothing to support women.  Never a word abt Letterman’s constant abuse.  I see nothing abt Kerry running his ignorant mouth.  You do not deserve to be called "Women of the whatever". Pitiful and disgusting.
By MimiJones on 06/26/2009 2:38 am
LibraLady
Mimi….exactly right!!!  Leave the Palins alone….my God….enough!!!  Senator kerry….what a piece of crap…..that was so very professional of him!!!
By LibraLady on 06/26/2009 7:55 am
MimiJones
Even the Boston Herald is telling him to shut up and go away!!
By MimiJones on 06/26/2009 10:34 am