The Liz Smith Column | 06/25/2009 11:00 pm
Liz Smith: Studly Bear Hunter Levi Johnston Done Wrong?

© AP
"Levi Johnston (the father of Bristol Palin’s baby boy Tripp) is a very interesting person who has been thrown under the bus," says Rex Lamont Butler, the Anchorage attorney who has befriended the young Alaskan, so much in the news.
Levi, ousted from the Palin inner circle, barely allowed to see his baby boy and unable to work at anything but bear hunting because of his Palin post-election notoriety, is presented as a nice guy by writer John Jeremiah Sullivan in the July issue of GQ magazine. He is depicted as a diamond in the rough, seriously homophobic, but a young stud done wrong by circumstance.
***
If you don’t have access to GQ and if the Palin story is still fascinating to you, just try a few of reporter Sullivan’s quotes herein. He describes Wasilla like so:
It is a shithole surrounded by such loveliness … You can feel the Palins. From my budget hotel on Lake Lucille, I can see the big wooden wall that surrounds their house and a roof beyond it. They are of this place, they belong here, but their power has disturbed an equilibrium. At the gun shop, where the owners have known the family forever, the men at the counter say they believe deep down that when she puts her head on her pillow at night, she (Sarah Palin) wishes she had never said yes to McCain. It’s a remark made with some sadness, sure … She is a great American frontier story. Maybe that was as hard for you as it was for me to see, when we were so busy hoping she would win or lose. But the historical demi-urge that spoke through Sarah Palin is one that has cyclically made and remade this country … Levi is a mushroom growing in the shadow of that story.
Reporter Sullivan is a patient, good reporter who can really write. And GQ’s editors gave him his head in creating the various ideas and details of this amazing article, written while he toughed it out waiting for an interview in Alaska. I urge you to put your hands on the entire thing and read it from the beginning.
Sullivan writes that there are two takes on the Bristol-Levi story in Alaska: "One was the ‘under the bus narrative,’ held by the Levi camp … Levi loves girl, she gets pregnant, he gives up high school and hockey so he can provide for her and the baby. When it suits their political purposes, the family embraces him and essentially puts him forward as a son-in-law. When his meager political value is spent, they do what most normal parents would do and discourage the daughter from marrying him, in hopes she can get back on with her future. He’s frozen out of the family."
***
Sullivan also implies that the drug bust of Levi’s mother simply "follows a recognizable course of small-town values." Was she set up by the Secret Service and busted for selling "a handful of OxyContin?" Your sympathy shifts to Levi and his mom. But you need to read the entire article in GQ and draw your own conclusion. The reporter asks Levi if it pisses him off that he changed his whole life and now they’ve shut him out. "He put down his glass of Coca-Cola and said, ‘Yes.’"
***
Looking at the July GQ, which boasts what the magazine calls "our first nude cover," one is struck by the beauty of a nakedly posed Sacha Baron Cohen. He has been polished, powdered, shaved and made up to resemble the gay Austrian fashionista who is his own latest satirical invention, Bruno. (Serious gay people won’t appreciate this absurd character but others will relish the joke being played on a subculture.)

Image: GQ
If Levi Johnston of the Sarah Palin story is as homophobic as his reporter says he is, this cover couldn’t make the brave young bear hunter happy, because there he is, between the same covers with a swishy Sacha.
























157 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
I can’t believe you people. It just ceases to amaze me!! How do the same posters continue to post the hatered over and over again. Get over it, for gods sake, move on you people. It use to make me mad and very sad, now I just laugh at you, it is a hoot that just her name in print gets you in a tizzy! There is life after Sarah Palin, try it, you might like it!!
Before I even read any of the posts, my first thought was, what is wrong with you people at WOW???? Like LL said, it sure and the heck is not a slow news day. How you continue to pound her in these ridiculous mannners are so unprofessional. We get it, you obviously DONOT like Sarah Palin. Please get to the news that really matters and affects our lives! Who cares about Levi? Just ridiculous!
One more thing- I would NEVER NEVER buy GQ now, before, and definitely not in the future!
The Palin family used him because it was convenient at the time to make the situation with their daughter look better. We know they are an odd ball family anyway and use media when it suits them. Levi is better off being out of it apart from not having much access to his son.
caj, all politicians and celebrities use the media when they need them. that is nothing new the palin family invented. Yes Levi was used, oh well, he let himself be used. He could have said NO I am staying in school b/c it would look better for my unborn child but NO he allowed himself to be dragged around the country b/c to a boy his age, it was fun, im sure. Being on camera and getting media attention.
I do not like that he can’t see his son, that is wrong, but if he takes them to court he can get supervised visits.
caj, i agree that her kids should have been left home more often then they were; however, if she didnt bring them, she would have been put down for staying away from her kids too long and blah, blah, blah, she was dammed from the get go b/c noone really knew who she was. It was a bad pick for this election, for me it sealed McCain’s fate.
I am sure Bristol didnt want to be there anymore then Levi did…she was newely pregnant and probably tired off her rear end, Levi was there to get some media attention, what boy his age wouldnt want it?
I do agree that he should have visitation with his son unless he has done something that shows he is not fit to take care of the baby….but Im sure if that was the case it would have been brought out.
Caj P,
Not at all [was it a mistake to bring the family out en mass, front and center]. Had they NOT done that the entire media would have put an even worse spin on the situation, swallowed them up, and spit them out. The family was better off coming forth and showing themselves for what they are. No harm in honesty.
caj p,
Had Palin NOT brought out the entire family, the news media would have gone on the "what is she hiding" stalk and prey game.
One bad move from a family member and a voter could decide to chuck the candidate from his ballot.
After all, Obama brought out his family long before that. Why shouldn’t she?
Let’s agree to disagree.
Andrea….you are so right. Gee, did I not see joey biden and all his family out on the stage? obama and his family out on the stage? Bushes, McCains, clintons, gores (and that God awful long kiss with his wife) edwards, need I go on….that’s how politicians work it to get elected…show off their families…show they are the family man/woman….voters want to see a politician interacting with his family….look at all the photo ops obama is getting with the girls and the new dog "Bo". I mean, we might as well get to know what the wife looks like when she is happyily standing by her man instead of a few years later standing next to him filled with disgust and tears in her eyes!!!!
That camera sure gets an eyeful, LL. No reason why the public domain shouldn’t as well.