Entertainment | 03/06/2009 2:50 pm
Michelle Obama Teaches Oprah to Share (Photo)
For the first time ever, Oprah has shared the cover of O magazine with another woman.
Oprah Winfrey revealed on her eponymous show on Friday that another famous woman will grace the O magazine cover with her … Who is this woman? She must be important, for Oprah has never shared the cover image with anyone else in the publication’s nine years. Why, the gorgeous gal is none other than glamorous First Lady Michelle Obama!
In the edition, Mrs. Obama opens up to Oprah about being mom-in-chief to Sasha and Malia, decorating tips and feeling "fortunate" for where she wakes up every morning.
An excerpt of the upcoming cover interview is available on Oprah.com.
Oprah: So after the Inauguration, what was your first weekend in the White House like?
Michelle Obama: Well, we still had family here, so it was almost like a wedding. A huge, very complicated wedding. The last visitors didn’t leave until Sunday. And then the first Monday was kind of weird. You know: Now we live here, and Barack is getting up and going to work, and it’s just us. This is our home now.
Oprah: I had heart palpitations coming through the White House gate, recognizing that this really is now your home. It’s the White House, and it’s your home.
Michelle Obama: And it’s a beautiful home. When you go out and come back, especially at night, with all the white lights on — it’s just beautiful. We feel privileged, and we feel a responsibility to make it feel like the people’s house. We have the good fortune of being able to sleep here, but this house belongs to America.
The April issue hits newsstands March 17.
Read more about: Celebrity, Entertainment, magazines, Michelle Obama, News, O Magazine, Oprah Winfrey, The Oprah Show
























79 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Lou, one of the pillars of what passes for ‘conservatism’ (little ‘c’) today is fake ‘christianity’ (little ‘c’). This is the christianity of little minds, christianity used to put down others, justify bad behavior, an attempt to control the lives of other people. The ‘conservatism’ is just a bunch of people brainwashed to vote against their best interests for the interests of the top 2% who they will never be. It’s the conservatism of sheep, the haters, the don’t want to pay taxes bunch who wouldn’t turn the fireman or policeman away… but calls a government that works for the PEOPLE as opposed to just the Corporations…. Socialism.
It is is twisted version of conservatism married to a twisted version of christianity.
DeBurca
Our government is making moves to get the tax cheaters money out of Switzerland, much to the chagrin of the Swiss, so hopefully, many tax cheats will be caught up with. But what are we going to do about the ones in the Obama administraton that believe they are above the law and don’t have to pay taxes? I agree, the tax code should be re-written, make it more fair for everyone. Right now the lower 40% of the population pay very little federal income taxes. The upper 5% pay close to 40% of the taxes in the US. The way it would change would be 50% of the people in our country would not have to pay income tax, yet still, even if we raise the taxes on the upper 2%, it will not pay for all of these programs, nor do that much to lower the deficit. Once the deficit gets going, just the interest, which accrues to more debt, will keep this country in hock for a long time.
We are not a country that builds and manufactures like we did after WW2, we invest more in paper and ideas, so now there is a vast deficit of jobs that can support a family and create wealth for them. To me, more than infrastructure jobs have to be created by businesses, that build things that we export to other markets. In other words, the 2% of top income earners will not be able to support the bottom 50% of earners. I know something has to be done, but I don’t think we have hit on the right answer yet.
DeBurca, I’ve been in the Florida Keys for two months without good access to the Internet. I was stunned by the insults aimed at Oprah and Michelle when I read the responses to this article. Thank you for continuing to speak for civilization. Maybe all these mean spirited women are all just Rush L. in disguise.
I live in Cordova, TN, which is a suburb of Memphis. The Bible belt I am referring to is the one where if you have an original thought or question the validity of traditional Christianity or try to discuss the religion of wealth and all of that hypocrisy you might just be labeled a heretic or worse…. a democrat. Yes, I found Wow closer to the elections and "talked" quite a bit. But the negative tenor and right leanings have turned me off a bit. Also, this is really tacky and terrible, but I really wish the men would leave the site. It just seems that many of them just want to stir the pot and see the reaction. Also, the way they process thoughts is so "male". Since menopause, men just don’t fascinate me anymore. I have always been one of those people who enjoyed that little bit of friction between the sexes even when completely innocent. Maybe, I need to up my hormones just a wee bit!
I must admit, I was not familiar with Joseph Campbell. I did a little research and he seems to have a different perspective. Around here, anything but fundamentalist Christianity is an odd duck. I may try to read one of his books. Which one do you recommend for the novice?
I am piqued by your alias….. my grandmother was named Georgia. Is that your name or does it have a deep meaning?
I enjoy your posts, Thank you.