Mr. wOw | 11/21/2009 7:00 am
Mr. wOw: Falling in Love Again With 'Marlene'

"You should go back to Austria and learn some manners! Learn what Mama Schell didn’t teach you! Nobody has ever walked out on me, like a prima donna!"
That was Marlene Dietrich, raging at her documentarian Maximilian Schell toward the conclusion of Schell’s brilliant, nasty, mesmerizing 1984 film "Marlene" (now just out on DVD).
Schell, who had also appeared in one of Dietrich’s last films, "Judgment at Nuremberg," had come to Paris, where Marlene was holed up, a recluse, to talk to the great star. But more than anything, he wanted her on camera.
Dietrich was having none of that. The very reason she was a recluse was to prevent the world from seeing her in old age, infirm, stripped of her glamour (the polar opposite of Miss Elizabeth Taylor, who has gone where no great beauty has gone before, almost merciless in her advocacy of the attitude, "This is it, this is life, this is aging and illness, get over it!").
| She was going to tell her story the way she wanted to: 'This is a documentary on my career, baby; it's about my work.' |
And so began a fierce battle of wills between the temperamental pair of divas, Dietrich and Schell. Mr. wOw loves a good bitch-fight.
Perhaps even more galling to Schell than the star’s refusal to be filmed was Marlene’s maddening unelaborate yes-and-no answers, her denial of certain aspects of her career that were indisputable facts. She was going to tell her story the way she wanted to: "This is a documentary on my career, baby; it’s about my work." Often, when Schell would compliment a certain movie, Dietrich would dismiss him — "Eh, kitsch!" Or she would deflect a question with, "It’s in my book; read it." The documentary is studded with fabulous clips of Dietrich, the fantasy figure of movies, Josef von Sternberg’s creation who left her creator in the dust, forging a spectacular 40-year career in movies and on stage.
Throughout the film, Dietrich is pragmatic, practical, unsentimental. "When you’re dead, you’re dead. That’s it." (She is hardboiled until the powerful conclusion.)
Marlene was in this only for the money, and she reminds Schell he is there for the same reason — and that he is in her presence to do it her way. This is "only a documentary," and Schell should not kid himself that he could compare with any kind of director that she had ever dealt with.
When she can get away from battling the nettlesome Mr. Schell, Marlene speaks of her work during the war years and her burning hatred for Hitler. (Dietrich entertained the troops in WW II close to the battle lines. Had she been captured by the Germans — her own people — she would surely have been put to death as a traitor.)
It behooves every fan of Dietrich, and every student of film and stardom, to watch "Marlene." She’s Norma Desmond with Prussian discipline and good sense! She’s not looking to make a comeback; she wants to make some cash!
And what a blessing for Schell that he was unable to capture Dietrich. It led him to fashion a far more fascinating glimpse of the icon in twilight than any revelation her 80-something face would have provided.
Mr. wOw’s one complaint? The DVD box cover. They use a shot of Dietrich from one of her early films, "Morocco," perhaps. It’s beautiful, but doesn’t compare to the original art — a sketch of Dietrich in her famous top hat and men’s tuxedo, holding a mask of her own face. It’s a perfect image; rarely has a movie poster conveyed so accurately what the film delivers.























52 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Blau Engel
A Scene: The two of us running crazily out into a light drizzle
Of an early evening in late August from a stifling reception
Given in honor of some university provost for something or other—
We were filled with absolute gaiety and giddiness, propelled by
The sheer joy of escaping the claustrophobic confines of the wine-sipping
Propers left behind—
Our dresses, as I remember, were both of a gossamer silky material,
Sheer, flowered, and because of the rain clung to our bodies
Like a second skin.
What, I shouted, was the name of that song Marlene Dietrich made
So famous?
And then she sang it—just like Dietrich—in a perfect German accent
And I joined her—falling in love again…I just can’t help it—
Twice we sang it and afterwards, out of breath, hand in hand
Walked a narrow gravel path that led down to the pond.
I feel life so worthwhile—right now—right here in this blessed rain—
I could fly right off this earth and just soar forever—
She turned to me then, amused, I think, at what I had just called out,
Her face wet and shiny, and still holding my hand very quietly
Whispered, I’ll go with you.
2001
I will have to defer to her grandson if he comments on this but my impression was that she didn’t become a recluse so much as she reached a point where the "illusion" of "Dietrich" could no longer be maintained and preferred that people remembered her was she was.
Dear Baby…no matter the reason, that’s called being a recluse. She refused to see her oldest friends. I mean it’s one thing not to want "the world" to see you…
And she lived on, quite fiesty, reading, sending off letters, and—cooperating with this film. As I said, what a good thing she didn’t give in, and allow herself to be photographed. Not because it would have been such a terrible thing to see, I doubt it was. But it did compell Schell to come up with an intriguing compensation.
The other great Dietrich documentary is a Turner Classic Movies offering, which deals with her war work. Very impressive.
I’d heard she did see some. Just not all. Perhaps she only saw those she knew wouldn’t later reflect on the recollection of her latter years? And she ventured out. As did Greta Garbo.
She’d also led a rather private life so it was easier for her to "retire" than many others like Elizabeth Taylor although there was a period in which the term "recluse" was applied to her as well. She decided finally to "emerge" in the wheelchair. Which probably wasn’t an easy thing to do. But probably a good thing to do. It appears to have given her a "second w" as they say.
Marlene Dietrich was simply beautiful. With that kind of beauty, old age is not just an enemy but is almost like a disease. There is a William Wyler documentary wherein he states that while in Paris he tried to visit with Marlene (she appeared in his film Witness For The Prosecution), but she told him over the telephone that she was about to leave town, and when he said he could stay over a couple more days, she said something like, "no, no, you have your plans; keep to them". When he telephoned later, she pretended to be her maid and when said he knew it was her, she refused to talk further. Very sad.
One of Miss Dietrich’s films that I have always enjoyed is an early one in the 1930s; she plays Catherine the Great, when young and being brought to Russia to marry the mad soon-to-be czar. Of course, in Destry she sings and dances atop the bar. My favorite is Witness for the Prosecution; she is magnifique.
There was a problem with her daughter, Maria; whom I believe revealed in an interview a few family secrets….though not as bad as Mommy Dearest.
Bonnie…it is sad. However, Dietrich was well into 70’s by the time she withdrew. She surely felt she had given enough by that time, and it was an effort, if not an agony, to "become Dietrich" after a certain point. And maybe, she felt she’d given enough, period. She had survived many of her friends and contemporaries. It’s a toss-up to which is preferable—the Dietrich way, or Elizabeth Taylor’s way.
Of course, Elizabeth was only in her early 60’s when her health began to truly fail; she probably expected to recover. And so continued her public life as much as possible, as she had since the age of 12. Now, one is torn between admiration for her courage, and the selfish wish not to see an idol’s mortality so brutally exposed. Maybe Marlene had the right idea?
Ah, Maria Riva’s book. Massive, brilliant, bitter. One wonders at her memory for detail and conversations as a little girl, and it is most assuredly her point of view. Marlene might have a few things to say about Maria’s rememberances of things past. Maria Riva herself, in an interview some years ago, said, "I have the greatest admiration for Dietrich (as she referred to her mother) as an artist and a professional. As a human being….?" Maria made it clear she drew the line of admiration there. Well, it’s her right to remember her own life as she wishes to remember it.
Yes, I agree it is Maria’s right to remember her mother as she wishes. Must be extremely difficult to be a child of a superstar when the mother/father might, in public and at a moments notice, turn on the star power and suddenly…. is not just mommy or daddy.
Elizabeth or Marlene? Though every aspect of Elizabeth’s life, except for her children, has been lived in the spotlight, she seems to be the healthier for it because she has not tried to be a la Garbo "I want to be alone". She couldn’t be; the press and especially the paparazzi would not allow her that privacy. Remember in Switzerland when she wanted to visit Burton’s grave and the paparazzi refused to leave her alone so sadly she left the cemetery without giving the press the opportunity to photograph her kneeling next to Richard Burton’s grave? Publicly she accepted their role but she may very well have been tearful and angry in private. She has always lived a somewhat private life … in a public arena. Marlene, apparently, preferred to move to Paris and drift out of the spotlight… and keep her weaknesses and tears private. That would be my choice, too.