Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Oldest Bible | 07/06/2009 9:35 am

Oldest Christian Bible Goes Online for All to See

Text was written 1,600 years ago in the 4th century on animal skin; experts say it’s ‘a window into the development of early Christianity.’
By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Image: Wikipedia

Due to the powers of the Internet, parts of the oldest living Christian bible in the world are now available for viewing online.

The text of the Codex Sinaiticus will be displayed in its entirety for the first time in 150 years today after researchers brought together and digitized its four sections kept in cities thousands of miles apart. The pages include the whole of the New Testament and the earliest surviving copy of the Gospels written at different times after Christ’s death by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, notes Reuters. The bible, which was written about 1,600 years ago in the 4th century on more than 800 pages of animal-skin parchment, is available to everyone, thanks to a collaboration between Britain, Egypt, Germany and Russia. Each country has held different parts of the ancient book after it was bought on behalf of the Russian Tsar in the mid-19th century. The text was written in Greek by four scribes during the time of Roman emperor Constantine the Great, who embraced Christianity. 

"The significance of Codex Sinaiticus for the reconstruction of the Christian Bible’s original text, the history of the Bible and the history of Western bookmaking is immense," says the website. And experts say it is "a window into the development of early Christianity."

Although you may not believe in it, this may be one way to look at reincarnation!

24 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

S G

I truly wish Christians would research their belief. There are ones who cling only to the King James version. What is the problem with that you may say well its one mans version. There are several other books that were left out and frankly who knows what the Vatican hides beneath its splendor.My point is there is so much more if you open your mind and research. You may find you still believe and you may find another path.

By S G on 07/06/2009 9:46 am
Kristy B

SG,

You’re correct.  Christians need to research the events taking place as the Bible was being written.  People will take certain scriptures and use them for their own advantage.  To give you an example, until recent years, there were very few women in leadership roles in the church.  There’s a scripture in The Bible that says women are supposed to be quiet in the church and talk to their husbands when they get home regarding the service.  Well, at one time during the early church, men sat on one side of the church and women sat on the other.  The spouses would yell at each other during service.  Preachers (at least in my neck of the woods) took that to mean that women shouldn’t hold any type of leadership position. 

I’m also a believer that may have been some "doctoring" taking place while the Bible was being translated.  That’s just me. 

By Kristy B on 07/06/2009 11:00 am
Maggie W

Kristy, I agree with that " doctoring".  There is indeed much lost in translation, and much of the Bible was translated in a language that would no longer be identifiable to us.  Also, it was written over several hundred years and many ideas were abandoned and new ones took their place.   That continues to this day. 

I would love to have been a fly on the wall during those services when spouses were yelling at each other.  What a visual!  :)

By Maggie W on 07/06/2009 11:53 am
Kristy B
Can you imagine it?  WHAT DID HE SAY??!!!! LOL
By Kristy B on 07/06/2009 12:37 pm
Rachel F

"Preachers (at least in my neck of the woods) took that to mean that women shouldn’t hold any type of leadership position. "

Same here. In fact, my neighbor’s girlfriend is going to school to be a lay pastor — she will research and write/help to write the sermons for the pastor, but she is not allowed to do anything more because she’s a woman (so she can do all the work, but has to remain in the shadows all the time). And she is choosing to do this! (There’s a somewhat cruder form of "you can kiss my butt!" that I would use to respond to such an offer, but that’s just me … you know, considering myself to be equal to men in all respects… I can’t imagine choosing to do it…)

By Rachel F on 07/06/2009 3:32 pm
Kristy B

Rachel,

That’s how it was in my church back home.  The women would do a lot of the ground work, and the minister at the time would take the credit.  I used to complain to my mother and tell her that it wasn’t right.  She said the Bible says that women are supposed to be quiet in the church…After I left home and attended Bible studies at another church, and the minister explained the history behind those verses.  I then told her.  We’ll just say that she wasn’t too pleased with me.

By Kristy B on 07/06/2009 4:36 pm
Rachel F
Kristy, it’s always sad when women accept a subservient role, and fight attempts to break the chains because it’s "God’s will" that they remain chained. The sad thing is, it happens across all religions.
By Rachel F on 07/06/2009 4:50 pm
Jennifer Michaels
Many Christians cling to King James Versions because of the subject of this article.  The older the text the less interpretation and morphing. Unfortunately, we cannot go back to the era when Jesus Christ was teaching.  Even the constraints of the Bible allow an "escape hatch" of sorts, telling us that He taught so much there would not be enough books in the world to contain his teachings (paraphrased…reference on request) The oldest book online??? I don’t know, but with the translations available as with all literature different people interpret different messages different ways. I just wish christians would ban the children’s song, "I wish I had a little white box to put my Jesus in"!  Any song is cute when a five year old sings it, but for goodness sake, please let the Lord out of the box :)
By Jennifer Michaels on 07/06/2009 8:42 pm
C Hardy

I believe Jesus was GOD’s son but I also feel he was more man then what we have been taught.  Why wouldnt he be married?  Why wouldnt he have kids?  Why would it surprise so many if it comes out that Jesus did marry and have kids?  If there are parts written about Jesus that is being kept from us, why? 

By C Hardy on 07/06/2009 9:58 am
S G

History shows why C, CONTROL:(

By S G on 07/06/2009 11:35 am
STACY SEARS
I agree that there are parts of the Bible being hidden from us.  Why do you think the Catholic Church had such a hissey fit when The Davinci Code came out?  I’m of the opinion that..so what if Jesus was married, etc.  It in no way makes Him less important.  I think that in today’s society, that might make a huge difference in the prevention of so many churches dying.  It would show more humaness (if thats even a word). As far as women’s role in church, I’m very glad that I’ve never had the misfortune of being involved with a church that put down women.  My pastor actually has done complete sermons trying to correct the misconceptions…such as women being subservient to men in marraige, etc.  If more churches moved in this direction, more young people would attend. Jesus did not teach that men and women were unequal.
By STACY SEARS on 07/12/2009 2:04 am
C Hardy
Stacy my Pastor is the same when it comes to women.  He told us in one sermon that women were made from Adams rib b/c it was on the side of his body b/c women were to stand beside their man, not behind them or in front of them but with them, together as 1 unit…I thought that was great.
By C Hardy on 07/13/2009 5:47 pm
STACY SEARS
C Hardy, what an awesome interpretation!  I love it! 
By STACY SEARS on 07/15/2009 1:17 am
phyllis Doyle Pepe
If this is in Greek, then it’s a translation from the original and unless we can read Greek–––oh, well. S.G., you say you wish Christians would research their religion. That would be super duper, but I find most people don’t want to delve too deeply into this field of inquiry. Religious myths from all different beliefs are a fascinating study and to think today these ancient writings still play such an important part in people’s lives–-it’s truly amazing.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 07/06/2009 10:23 am
S G
Phyllis I agree:)
By S G on 07/06/2009 11:33 am