Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Question of the Day | 10/05/2009 12:30 pm

Should Roman Polanski go to prison?

Candice Bergen, Liz Smith and Joan Ganz Cooney discuss the fate of Roman Polanski.
Wikipedia

Image by Film Servis Festival Karlovy Vary
Candice Bergen

Candice Bergen | 10/05/2009 12:00 am

Candice Bergen: An Alternative Punishment for Roman Polanski

The Roman thing is complicated as we all know. It brings out the dark, avenging side of America, yet it is a crime. It was absolutely a criminal, indecent, amoral act and should be acknowledged and in some way paid for. But he is a brilliant, gifted artist. He is a father. And he is 75. How much time should he serve? And why is he not allowed to be home in Switzerland under house arrest? With his kids? Why in prison? What should not happen is his being made an example of with a harsh sentence. There should be a resolution that factors in his contributions and his age. Prolonged house arrest?
Joan Ganz Cooney

Joan Ganz Cooney | 10/05/2009 12:00 am

Joan Ganz Cooney: Polanski Should Just Face It

I wish he’d come to the States and accept whatever punishment was meted out, do time if that is what was decided and get this behind him and us.
Liz Smith

Liz Smith | 10/05/2009 12:00 am

Liz Smith on Roman Polanski: Formerly the 'Most Detestable Creature Imaginable'

I don’t know what to say about Roman Polanski.

For years I felt he was the most detestable creature imaginable – drugging and having sex with an underage girl, then fleeing the law. Then about a year ago I saw the HBO documentary on him and it seemed he was railroaded by a really crazy judge and a not-so-perfect Los Angeles prosecuting system. But after that, when he was offered a deal by the very law that had convicted him, he still didn’t come back to the U.S. to face the music. Now – I just don’t know. I see nothing served by his going to prison. On the other hand, even if he is an artistic genius, that doesn’t exactly clear him. And the law is the law.

Read more about: crime, Roman Polanski

180 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

C Hardy
Belinda  - I will stand up and clap for you!!!!  I LOVE WHAT YOU SAID!  I AGREE 1000000%.  AMEN - AMEN - AMEN!
By C Hardy on 10/05/2009 12:25 pm
Patricia Sprofera
Yes, he should go to jail.
By Patricia Sprofera on 10/05/2009 12:04 pm
T. BYNUM
He committed a crime was supposed to go to jail and he ran like the no good disgusting coward he is.  I do not care what ggo deeds or movies that have come from him since…he should go to jail.  Others have been arrested and sent to jail after years and then they were caught and he is no better than them..they have families and like other criminals families do his can visit him on visiting day.   If you can evade jail by running to a place that will not send you back and then start a new family and do a few movies or other good things and have a good life and commit no more crimes (that we know of) then a lot of people would be doing it…oh, my I forgot that is the way of the rich isn’t it.  If this would have been a Black man they would have sent the militia for him…send the no good man to jail.  
By T. BYNUM on 10/05/2009 12:17 pm
Mary Quite-Contrary

T. Bynum posted: "…If this would have been a Black man they would have sent the militia for him…"

Correction, TB, not a Black man, a poor man…not connected; not with connected friends in the elite class.  Be he Black, White, Hispanic or Asian…the ethinicity is a non-issue…its the coin (and his friends with same) that matters. 

I guess even the stopped clock, of former Presidential candidate Edwards was correct…there are two Americas.

By Mary Quite-Contrary on 10/05/2009 1:16 pm
S A

I disagree Mary Quite-Contrary. My sister was forcefully and violently raped at knife point at 3pm in the afternoon in Indio, California. She was taken to the ER at Indio Community Hospital. She was able to identify the man who had raped her as one of the gardeners who was pruning the Palm trees in the apartment community where we lived and she had bitten him hard enough on the left shoulder strong enough to draw blood as well. The man was, of course, known to nearly everyone in the community since he owned one of the largest gardening businesses around. Most people knew exactly where he lived. He was Hispanic. So by your evaluation, he should have been sent straight to jail, right?

Wrong! His nephew was the police lieutenant in charge of the investigation. The man disappeared for 3 day, just enough time for my sister to be taken in for questioning where my mother’s right to accompany her was denied. She was released from being questioned by the perpertrator’s nephew 9 hours later. At that time it was decided that she had lied in hopes of seeking to blackmail an upstanding citzen of the community and the investigation was dropped.

The man was never questioned. The reason why he should suddenly leave California to seek medical care on his left shoulder for 3 days was never questioned. Why he had had his car repainted while in Mexico was never questioned. That my sister was slandered as a common slut who got caught sleeping with a bunch of teenage boys in the date fields is a fact. That she quit attending high school just 3 weeks after starting it is also a fact. Why did she do that? Because she was propositioned and demeaned within the school by the male students. That she hid in her room and cried herself to sleep nightly for a very long time is also a fact. That she got a job at age 20, bought a rifle with her first paycheck and then shot herself in the chest is also a fact. That she wrote in her letter that she didn’t deserve to live because she was born a slut is also a fact.

The man. He died a few years later of cancer. He was never even questioned. 

By S A on 10/05/2009 4:47 pm
macwoof woof
S A  this is sad. you didn’t say if your sister survived or not. I hope she did and is now  doing ok.  am sorry she had to go through this. 
By macwoof woof on 10/05/2009 11:24 pm
S A

Thank you for your sympathy, macwoof woof but she died 32 years ago.

By S A on 10/06/2009 4:16 am
T. BYNUM
Look he did something he should not have done with a child…no excuses and she should be in jail and Baby Snooks I do not care what she has said as an adult, if she is blaming herself in anyway she should not, she was the victim not him and he was the adult not her.  He should rot in jail!
By T. BYNUM on 10/05/2009 12:28 pm
Rachel F
Agreed completely, T. There are reasons we have laws to protect children. Because kids can be talked into anything! How many incest victims, rape victims, etc., don’t report what’s going on because they’ve been talked into submitting to the abuser? This girl’s mother clearly put her in a very bad situation where she was doubtless under a lot of pressure to do whatever it took advance. But it doesn’t matter. She was a *child* who was put in that position. He was an *adult* who knew better. He, as the (considerably) older person, with an adult’s awareness of what he was getting into, exploited her, as a child, and committed a crime. Period.
By Rachel F on 10/05/2009 1:33 pm
Mary B
Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:”“; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0in; mso-para-margin-right:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0in; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}

 

This is my first time posting a comment.

First of all, he did commit the crime. It is up to an American judge/jury to decide the rest. Anyone who comes up with extenuating circumstances for the rape of a child (she was willing, maybe she was not a virgin, he is of a higher social class and should not have to obey the law) should be willing to make allowances for any rape under those conditions.  Would they? Of course not. Even prostitutes can be raped. How far back would that take back the women’s movement?

By Mary B on 10/05/2009 1:50 pm
Lila Kuh

He should face justice, whatever that turns out to be.  His age and talent should have no bearing… justice is supposed to be blind.

As to the tragedies in his life - the Holocaust, the Manson murders - they are horrible, but they have no bearing on whether he committed a crime, or what the punishment should be.  Others have tragedies in their lives too: mothers lost to drugs, fathers or siblings gunned down in gang violence… but somehow, growing up with those tragedies seems less worthy of public sympathy, and the justice system grinds on.

To me, the most worthy arguments for dropping the case are:  1) There may have been judicial misconduct in the original proceedings, and  2) The victim herself accepted a civil settlement and wants to drop it after 30-odd years so she can move on with her life.

By Lila Kuh on 10/05/2009 2:04 pm
Terri Grover-Miller
Please — Justice was meted out — he admitted guilt and was sentenced.  He then ran to avoid that sentence or something more.  For those who say he was "railroaded" — he could have stayed and appealed.  Anyone else would have gone to prison and served the sentence.  Let’s not excuse a child rapist because some think him a "genius."  Please…..
By Terri Grover-Miller on 10/05/2009 2:13 pm
Baby  Snooks
There are so many people at this point twisting and turning facts in this to suit their own positions and in some cases their own agenda. Everyone needs to read her 2003 statement. This was a closed matter when they all left court. All that remained was final disposition which did not involve any further sentencing apart from any issues regarding treatment had the psychiatrists found basis for the court to impose such treatment and the court, the judge, then decided it, he, would not abide by the agreement.  There is an issue involved here with regard to double jeopardy. But of course that does not matter to those who wish to burn a witch at the stake. To those who next will demand that they, not courts, be allowed to demand a different sentence than that handed down or agreed to by a court.   With that in mind, I view Roman Polanski as merely having left the country rather than having fled. Are people aware that the judge not only told people that despite the agreement he was going to send Roman Polanski to prison for the rest of his life and framed that with anti-Semitic remarks? If Roman Polanski fled, he merely fled the Nazis for a second time in his life.  I really am so appalled by all of you. 
By Baby Snooks on 10/05/2009 2:36 pm
Karen R
No, absolutely no double jeopardy issue here.
By Karen R on 10/05/2009 4:39 pm
Lena B
Don’t be appalled Baby Snooks.  All of us Americans are taught in our grade school Civics class that justice is black or white.  No gray.  We were taught that there is no double standard imposed in favor of any person over another.  Then we grew up and either encountered the criminal justice system personally, knew someone who did or watched as a media spectator.  We witness variations in the treatment of the accused all the time and yet we still believe that the American criminal justice system is fair.  Why? 
By Lena B on 10/05/2009 2:59 pm