Margo Howard | 10/06/2009 10:45 am
A Stupid Human Trick, by Margo Howard
Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the
family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as
Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature
provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Margo’s advice column, Dear Margo, appears twice a week — on Thursdays and Fridays — on wowOwow.com.
I know, as I write this, it ain’t gonna win me any friends with some women (OK, feminists) but I honestly feel sorry for David Letterman. I am sympathetic to his situation, which is not to say that I don’t ache for his wife, as well. Can any of us really imagine what it’s like to be such a public person, and on television, at that, having to deal with this stuff so publicly? He did what many married men do: dallied with women from work. I mean, think about it: where would a guy who is locked up with writers all day and taping a show at night meet any women who were not in his workplace? At that deli down the street?
I do not know why people are in such a lather about this. Apparently when Ms. Burkitt was involved with the boss he was unmarried. Although certainly committed to Regina (recently Mrs. Letterman – after God knows how many years together) and overjoyed when they had a child – looking at his history makes this less than a big surprise. Rumor has it that the man had such an unpleasant first marriage and divorce that he decided one was enough. He was in his late 50s when he remarried. In his head I’m guessing he thought single, even when he did marry … which I suspect finally happened so the little boy would have married parents. Fooling around would not be unheard of in show business. Hell, in any business.
Many men are caught out in extramarital and workplace affairs, but their lives aren’t such that they have to inform to millions of people. And apparently keeping the secret wasn’t worth two million bucks to him. There’s a lot of talk in the public prints and of course the blogosphere about workplace harassment, in all its iterations. This is just me guessing, but my hunch is that not one woman he’s done the horizontal mambo with ever felt pressured. (Just as an aside, both I and my daughter would have volunteered. She happens to be 27 years younger than I am, and yet we both find him appealing and smart. Dark in nature, perhaps, but appealing.)
The workplace/HR issues seem to me a red herring. How far could someone rise in that organization from personal affection anyway? He doesn’t have a co-host, and Paul Shaffer seems pretty well-entrenched. Do please note: He never fired anyone when it was over. I also give him props that Ms. Burkitt was an average-looking young woman. He did not go on the hunt (or a hiring spree) with starlet types in mind. I am aware that my stance might seem odd coming from someone whose day job is being an advice columnist, but I am pragmatic and realistic. I think all the hoopla is so much noise, given what we know of Letterman and the way his office is run. Not that he asked, but when he’s through doing penance at home I think a trip to the jewelry store would be in order. So for what it’s worth, Dave, all the dames out there are not steamed at you. While Betty Friedan may be rolling over in her grave, some of us here like you just as much as we did before Assistant Gate.
I know, as I write this, it ain’t gonna win me any friends with some women (OK, feminists) but I honestly feel sorry for David Letterman. I am sympathetic to his situation, which is not to say that I don’t ache for his wife, as well. Can any of us really imagine what it’s like to be such a public person, and on television, at that, having to deal with this stuff so publicly? He did what many married men do: dallied with women from work. I mean, think about it: where would a guy who is locked up with writers all day and taping a show at night meet any women who were not in his workplace? At that deli down the street?
I do not know why people are in such a lather about this. Apparently when Ms. Burkitt was involved with the boss he was unmarried. Although certainly committed to Regina (recently Mrs. Letterman – after God knows how many years together) and overjoyed when they had a child – looking at his history makes this less than a big surprise. Rumor has it that the man had such an unpleasant first marriage and divorce that he decided one was enough. He was in his late 50s when he remarried. In his head I’m guessing he thought single, even when he did marry … which I suspect finally happened so the little boy would have married parents. Fooling around would not be unheard of in show business. Hell, in any business.
Many men are caught out in extramarital and workplace affairs, but their lives aren’t such that they have to inform to millions of people. And apparently keeping the secret wasn’t worth two million bucks to him. There’s a lot of talk in the public prints and of course the blogosphere about workplace harassment, in all its iterations. This is just me guessing, but my hunch is that not one woman he’s done the horizontal mambo with ever felt pressured. (Just as an aside, both I and my daughter would have volunteered. She happens to be 27 years younger than I am, and yet we both find him appealing and smart. Dark in nature, perhaps, but appealing.)
The workplace/HR issues seem to me a red herring. How far could someone rise in that organization from personal affection anyway? He doesn’t have a co-host, and Paul Shaffer seems pretty well-entrenched. Do please note: He never fired anyone when it was over. I also give him props that Ms. Burkitt was an average-looking young woman. He did not go on the hunt (or a hiring spree) with starlet types in mind. I am aware that my stance might seem odd coming from someone whose day job is being an advice columnist, but I am pragmatic and realistic. I think all the hoopla is so much noise, given what we know of Letterman and the way his office is run. Not that he asked, but when he’s through doing penance at home I think a trip to the jewelry store would be in order. So for what it’s worth, Dave, all the dames out there are not steamed at you. While Betty Friedan may be rolling over in her grave, some of us here like you just as much as we did before Assistant Gate.

























421 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Sometimes it only takes one to tango. Sometimes it takes two. I think what bothers some is his attitude about it.
We really have not moved beyond our puritanical roots which perhaps is one reason why we get so "fuzzy around the edges" with regard to the subject of sex and sexual taboos and of course the matter of consenting adults which often, depending on the laws, actually is between a consenting adult and a consenting teenager.
It is interesting that with regard to the Lolitas we blame the man and yet with regard to the Loreleis we blame the woman.
I do see your point, Margo, but I do have to wonder if it may turn out that he would have been better off paying the blackmailer instead of paying the "ex-wife."
Quite a few have paid the blackmailer. When they are done in by the blackmailer who proceeds to expose them, of course they then can claim it was all rubbish and they only paid them because they were a nuisance. And so it all becomes a nuisance.
Actually not because the blackmailer will not only be labeled a nuisance but will also expose themselves as a blackmailer and who is going to listen to a blackmailer? Life among the rich. Some of whom know the ways of Machiavelli. And some of whom know the ways of the Borgias. Who didn’t let Machiavelli in on all the secrets. Just some of them.
It’s illegal if it’s reported. Other than that, well, it’s just an expensive book or an expensive collection of photographs. I suspect most blackmailers who succeed then become afraid to go further. After all, at that point, the blackmail IS obvious. Although, really, they are dismissed by most. As both blackmailers and nuisances.
But you never discuss it openly. That’s where I suspect David Letterman really opened up a Pandora’s Box. Some of the women who weren’t blackmailed have decided to discuss it openly. Instead of being just dismissed openly.
I suspect there’s more to this story. Much more.
My friend Marie, I believe the word you were looking for is "moot," meaning irrelevant, as opposed to "mute," which is what I feel, as does Margo, it is appropriate to be on this subject.
Namaste.
OMG, first 3 different threads about the pervert Polanski and now we have to hear how we should feel sorry for that pompous ass David Letterman? And this is a woman’s site?
David Letterman is a cad. He is also a hypocrit. And there are plenty of women that have been turned off to his "humor" after this fiasco. He is a rude individual to boot. I do not believe that this is the end of this little sordid story. No way. There is more to this than meets the eye.
Did Margo suggest a trip to the jewelry store? Maybe I read that one wrong. Surely she did not. Any woman that would sell their trust and personal self esteem for a chunk of twinkling rock is one sick chic.
David Letterman should fade away and spend the rest of his spare time catering to his wife and child. I for one could care less about watching his sad and pathetic attempts to "come clean" about his dishonesty.
Time to go Dave.