Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Margo Howard | 10/06/2009 10:45 am

A Stupid Human Trick, by Margo Howard

Margo Howard
Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Margo’s advice column, Dear Margo, appears twice a week — on Thursdays and Fridays — on wowOwow.com.

I know, as I write this, it ain’t gonna win me any friends with some women (OK, feminists) but I honestly feel sorry for David Letterman. I am sympathetic to his situation, which is not to say that I don’t ache for his wife, as well. Can any of us really imagine what it’s like to be such a public person, and on television, at that, having to deal with this stuff so publicly? He did what many married men do: dallied with women from work. I mean, think about it: where would a guy who is locked up with writers all day and taping a show at night meet any women who were not in his workplace? At that deli down the street?

I do not know why people are in such a lather about this. Apparently when Ms. Burkitt was involved with the boss he was unmarried. Although certainly committed to Regina (recently Mrs. Letterman – after God knows how many years together) and overjoyed when they had a child – looking at his history makes this less than a big surprise. Rumor has it that the man had such an unpleasant first marriage and divorce that he decided one was enough. He was in his late 50s when he remarried. In his head I’m guessing he thought single, even when he did marry … which I suspect finally happened so the little boy would have married parents. Fooling around would not be unheard of in show business. Hell, in any business.

Many men are caught out in extramarital and workplace affairs, but their lives aren’t such that they have to inform to millions of people. And apparently keeping the secret wasn’t worth two million bucks to him. There’s a lot of talk in the public prints and of course the blogosphere about workplace harassment, in all its iterations. This is just me guessing, but my hunch is that not one woman he’s done the horizontal mambo with ever felt pressured. (Just as an aside, both I and my daughter would have volunteered. She happens to be 27 years younger than I am, and yet we both find him appealing and smart. Dark in nature, perhaps, but appealing.)

The workplace/HR issues seem to me a red herring. How far could someone rise in that organization from personal affection anyway? He doesn’t have a co-host, and Paul Shaffer seems pretty well-entrenched. Do please note: He never fired anyone when it was over. I also give him props that Ms. Burkitt was an average-looking young woman. He did not go on the hunt (or a hiring spree) with starlet types in mind. I am aware that my stance might seem odd coming from someone whose day job is being an advice columnist, but I am pragmatic and realistic. I think all the hoopla is so much noise, given what we know of Letterman and the way his office is run. Not that he asked, but when he’s through doing penance at home I think a trip to the jewelry store would be in order. So for what it’s worth, Dave, all the dames out there are not steamed at you. While Betty Friedan may be rolling over in her grave, some of us here like you just as much as we did before Assistant Gate.

421 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

R.J.B. Reed

I highly doubt we’re talking about 18 year olds here given the nature of the job.  In any case, the age of consent is 18 and most people have had sex by that point.  In any case, if a woman doesn’t have backbone it doesn’t matter her age.  Nor is there any way to protect her from herself without putting unnecessary and unwanted protections on everyone else.

Your hypothetical example is sadly obvious.  Sure.  That could’ve happened.  And Letterman could like to dress in woman’s pjs and sing show tunes as well.  Making up stories is pointless.

You imply that it isn’t fair for a person to have to get another job in a situation like this.  Sure, it’s not fair.  However, it is reality.  Either accept a situation or change it.  Changing it involves getting another job if there isn’t going to be a big enough paper trail to have a case.

I don’t know whether Letterman was right or wrong because we do not have enough information about the situation.  All I know is that he had sex with some female staffers.  That isn’t inherently wrong.  Without more information, I’m going to reserve judgement.

By R.J.B. Reed on 10/08/2009 10:01 am
Lila Kuh

"Nor is there any way to protect her from herself without putting unnecessary and unwanted protections on everyone else."  YESTHANK YOU!  I do enjoy your ever-logical posts.  Must be that science thing.

FWIW, I think if the women in this case were victims at all, they’d be crawling out of the woodwork by now for that other national pastime, the lawsuit, soon to be followed by the tell-all book. The fact that this has NOT happened yet may say something about the actual work environment at Letterman’s studio.

In their eagerness to be shocked and offended by the world’s oldest story, folks have lost focus on the blackmailer, Robert Halderman.  His live-in girlfriend was allegedly one of those involved with Letterman.  She moved out of Halderman’s house; one month later, he’s attempting blackmail.  Seems to me like a case of jilted testosterone  clawing back at his rival.  And not in a real smart way.

By Lila Kuh on 10/08/2009 1:03 pm
LuckyLady n/a
I am at the bottom of page three of the blog.  Can’t stand anymore.  Why should any of us care about Letterman’s personal life?  Stick it to the blackmailer and have done with it! The morning blog has become a coffee klatch of right and wrong in "who is to blame".  Blame the blackmailer.  He has done something illegal.
By LuckyLady n/a on 10/07/2009 10:35 am
Heidi W

I must say, this has been one of the most entertaining columns yet Margo.  "She did not get a Lewinski, she gave one."  lmao! Priceless!  I will be laughing over that one for a few days. hee, hee.  People need to lighten up already. 

By Heidi W on 10/07/2009 11:48 am
sybil denney
who really cares what David did or didn’t do, are there not more important things going on that is more important to talk about????
By sybil denney on 10/07/2009 11:48 am
C Hardy

I am smiling b/c I find it funny so many commented on Margo’s opinion about David Letterman….Who cares what DL did or what Margo thinks.  So many say we dont care yet they are blogging about it and writing articles about it and giving their opinions….if u dont care - then be quiet.  And that is all I have to say on the subject. 

By C Hardy on 10/07/2009 12:42 pm
Michelle R
I don’t care who David Letterman has sex with. That is his wife’s concern until he has sex with a woman in the workplace. Unfortunately his behavior now has the option to be harrassment, discrimination, and affects not only the woman he had the relationships with but those who chose not to have sex with the boss. He should have to meet the same requirements as any other CBS employee.  If not then it changes the standard for all of the men that work there. I was delighted that NOW took the stand that he should be accountable like any other employee of CBS. Again, if his last name was not Letterman this would not be a discussion. How sad for all of us.
By Michelle R on 10/07/2009 1:11 pm
judith marchant
Wow…it took 15 pages of posts to find something that made sense…thank you so much for the recap Lila…you summed it up perfectly.  So the guy had a consentual relationship with a grown woman perfectly capable of making up her own mind.  WHO CARES?  The blackmailer should be tried and judged in a court of law, because what he did is really the crux of this whole thing.  HE BROKE THE LAW…Letterman didn’t.  BTW Margo..you learned the use of metaphors from the best…I read shades of your mother!! 
By judith marchant on 10/07/2009 2:25 pm
Margo Howard
:~)
By Margo Howard on 10/07/2009 2:28 pm
Baby  Snooks
Reading all of this leaves me wondering who is the most puritanical - liberated women or unliberated women. 
By Baby Snooks on 10/07/2009 3:36 pm
elaine s
As a long time fan, and assuming there was no harassment, it isn’t about being puritanical, but it is about being disappointed in someone some of us thought we "knew".  He was like a charming, hilarious, naughty guy.  Not a threat, but someone you could see yourself dating and having fun with.  I know this is a little nuts, since he is a TV character, but now he just seems like a serial cheater to me.  Someone who never really committed to anyone enough to not try to nail the next one.  Regina is included in all this.  Who knows who he cheated on  to romance her 20 or so years ago.  I had wanted to think he had certainly played the field, but then matured and honored his new role as father by straightening up then and being a real family and a faithful partner.  Now, I don’t even know why he got married.  He seems more screwed up than I am.  That’s disillusioning!
By elaine s on 10/07/2009 4:21 pm
Margo Howard
He got married for the little boy, I am quite sure. And they married when Harry started school. A man with a rotten divorce behind him who plays the field into his 50s is really not the marrying kind.
By Margo Howard on 10/07/2009 4:37 pm
Heidi W
Margo, for years and years he (David Letterman) has said he is not the marrying kind.  So I would agree with you on this, it WAS most likely for the boy.  Can you imagine if this was Bill Maher?  (He has also said he is not the marrying kind, now or ever.)   OMG fur would be a-flying in more ways than one.  lol
By Heidi W on 10/08/2009 12:21 pm
jenny o
These realtionships were several years ago, as I understand it.  These were before his heart attack, before his son was born.  I think he did mature and honor his new role as a father and become a family man.
By jenny o on 10/08/2009 9:06 am
Rose Red
He cheated on his committed partner. As someone who has just had this happen recently — we hadn’t even been married a year - I have no sympathy for him whatsoever. Did Letterman’s wife’s heart break in her chest like mine did? Did she feel it go like I did? I bet she did. Everyone seems to want to excuse Letterman because he’s oh-so-creative and gee, what pressure he must be under, and well, gosh, he wasn’t married at the time. Sexual harrassment doesn’t enter into it, because every one of the skanks he cheated with knew he was in a committed relationship and were looking to maybe break that up and trade up. There are man-climbing bitches in every workplace who try it on married/committed men every day. The one who tried to destroy my marriage failed - I won. I hope Letterman’s wife does too.
By Rose Red on 10/07/2009 4:38 pm