Margo Howard | 10/06/2009 10:45 am
A Stupid Human Trick, by Margo Howard
Editor’s Note: A longtime journalist, Margo Howard went into the
family business (her mother was the fabled Ann Landers) in the 1990s as
Dear Prudence. Her broad experience and understanding of human nature
provide answers for the troubled — and entertainment for everyone else. Margo’s advice column, Dear Margo, appears twice a week — on Thursdays and Fridays — on wowOwow.com.
I know, as I write this, it ain’t gonna win me any friends with some women (OK, feminists) but I honestly feel sorry for David Letterman. I am sympathetic to his situation, which is not to say that I don’t ache for his wife, as well. Can any of us really imagine what it’s like to be such a public person, and on television, at that, having to deal with this stuff so publicly? He did what many married men do: dallied with women from work. I mean, think about it: where would a guy who is locked up with writers all day and taping a show at night meet any women who were not in his workplace? At that deli down the street?
I do not know why people are in such a lather about this. Apparently when Ms. Burkitt was involved with the boss he was unmarried. Although certainly committed to Regina (recently Mrs. Letterman – after God knows how many years together) and overjoyed when they had a child – looking at his history makes this less than a big surprise. Rumor has it that the man had such an unpleasant first marriage and divorce that he decided one was enough. He was in his late 50s when he remarried. In his head I’m guessing he thought single, even when he did marry … which I suspect finally happened so the little boy would have married parents. Fooling around would not be unheard of in show business. Hell, in any business.
Many men are caught out in extramarital and workplace affairs, but their lives aren’t such that they have to inform to millions of people. And apparently keeping the secret wasn’t worth two million bucks to him. There’s a lot of talk in the public prints and of course the blogosphere about workplace harassment, in all its iterations. This is just me guessing, but my hunch is that not one woman he’s done the horizontal mambo with ever felt pressured. (Just as an aside, both I and my daughter would have volunteered. She happens to be 27 years younger than I am, and yet we both find him appealing and smart. Dark in nature, perhaps, but appealing.)
The workplace/HR issues seem to me a red herring. How far could someone rise in that organization from personal affection anyway? He doesn’t have a co-host, and Paul Shaffer seems pretty well-entrenched. Do please note: He never fired anyone when it was over. I also give him props that Ms. Burkitt was an average-looking young woman. He did not go on the hunt (or a hiring spree) with starlet types in mind. I am aware that my stance might seem odd coming from someone whose day job is being an advice columnist, but I am pragmatic and realistic. I think all the hoopla is so much noise, given what we know of Letterman and the way his office is run. Not that he asked, but when he’s through doing penance at home I think a trip to the jewelry store would be in order. So for what it’s worth, Dave, all the dames out there are not steamed at you. While Betty Friedan may be rolling over in her grave, some of us here like you just as much as we did before Assistant Gate.
I know, as I write this, it ain’t gonna win me any friends with some women (OK, feminists) but I honestly feel sorry for David Letterman. I am sympathetic to his situation, which is not to say that I don’t ache for his wife, as well. Can any of us really imagine what it’s like to be such a public person, and on television, at that, having to deal with this stuff so publicly? He did what many married men do: dallied with women from work. I mean, think about it: where would a guy who is locked up with writers all day and taping a show at night meet any women who were not in his workplace? At that deli down the street?
I do not know why people are in such a lather about this. Apparently when Ms. Burkitt was involved with the boss he was unmarried. Although certainly committed to Regina (recently Mrs. Letterman – after God knows how many years together) and overjoyed when they had a child – looking at his history makes this less than a big surprise. Rumor has it that the man had such an unpleasant first marriage and divorce that he decided one was enough. He was in his late 50s when he remarried. In his head I’m guessing he thought single, even when he did marry … which I suspect finally happened so the little boy would have married parents. Fooling around would not be unheard of in show business. Hell, in any business.
Many men are caught out in extramarital and workplace affairs, but their lives aren’t such that they have to inform to millions of people. And apparently keeping the secret wasn’t worth two million bucks to him. There’s a lot of talk in the public prints and of course the blogosphere about workplace harassment, in all its iterations. This is just me guessing, but my hunch is that not one woman he’s done the horizontal mambo with ever felt pressured. (Just as an aside, both I and my daughter would have volunteered. She happens to be 27 years younger than I am, and yet we both find him appealing and smart. Dark in nature, perhaps, but appealing.)
The workplace/HR issues seem to me a red herring. How far could someone rise in that organization from personal affection anyway? He doesn’t have a co-host, and Paul Shaffer seems pretty well-entrenched. Do please note: He never fired anyone when it was over. I also give him props that Ms. Burkitt was an average-looking young woman. He did not go on the hunt (or a hiring spree) with starlet types in mind. I am aware that my stance might seem odd coming from someone whose day job is being an advice columnist, but I am pragmatic and realistic. I think all the hoopla is so much noise, given what we know of Letterman and the way his office is run. Not that he asked, but when he’s through doing penance at home I think a trip to the jewelry store would be in order. So for what it’s worth, Dave, all the dames out there are not steamed at you. While Betty Friedan may be rolling over in her grave, some of us here like you just as much as we did before Assistant Gate.

























421 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
I highly doubt we’re talking about 18 year olds here given the nature of the job. In any case, the age of consent is 18 and most people have had sex by that point. In any case, if a woman doesn’t have backbone it doesn’t matter her age. Nor is there any way to protect her from herself without putting unnecessary and unwanted protections on everyone else.
Your hypothetical example is sadly obvious. Sure. That could’ve happened. And Letterman could like to dress in woman’s pjs and sing show tunes as well. Making up stories is pointless.
You imply that it isn’t fair for a person to have to get another job in a situation like this. Sure, it’s not fair. However, it is reality. Either accept a situation or change it. Changing it involves getting another job if there isn’t going to be a big enough paper trail to have a case.
I don’t know whether Letterman was right or wrong because we do not have enough information about the situation. All I know is that he had sex with some female staffers. That isn’t inherently wrong. Without more information, I’m going to reserve judgement.
"Nor is there any way to protect her from herself without putting unnecessary and unwanted protections on everyone else." YES! THANK YOU! I do enjoy your ever-logical posts. Must be that science thing.
FWIW, I think if the women in this case were victims at all, they’d be crawling out of the woodwork by now for that other national pastime, the lawsuit, soon to be followed by the tell-all book. The fact that this has NOT happened yet may say something about the actual work environment at Letterman’s studio.
In their eagerness to be shocked and offended by the world’s oldest story, folks have lost focus on the blackmailer, Robert Halderman. His live-in girlfriend was allegedly one of those involved with Letterman. She moved out of Halderman’s house; one month later, he’s attempting blackmail. Seems to me like a case of jilted testosterone clawing back at his rival. And not in a real smart way.
I must say, this has been one of the most entertaining columns yet Margo. "She did not get a Lewinski, she gave one." lmao! Priceless! I will be laughing over that one for a few days. hee, hee. People need to lighten up already.
I am smiling b/c I find it funny so many commented on Margo’s opinion about David Letterman….Who cares what DL did or what Margo thinks. So many say we dont care yet they are blogging about it and writing articles about it and giving their opinions….if u dont care - then be quiet. And that is all I have to say on the subject.