Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Entertainment | 10/27/2009 2:00 am

Stupidly Standing By Your Man? (Photos)

Despite the public scandals of their husbands — including extramarital affairs with other women (or men) and illegal business doings — these brilliant, beautiful wives are standing by their men. One woman is breaking the trend: Marni Phillips, the wife of ex-ESPN analyst Steve Phillips, filed for divorce last month.

Photo Essay

We’ve lately been in the midst of some naughty high-profile gents … And instead of their bright, beautiful wives walking away from them, many respected ladies from politics, business and entertainment have remained faithfully wedded to their misbehaving beaus – even standing beside them at press conferences as they confess to extramarital relations and other outrageous acts. The enigma recently sparked a wOw conversation with Judith Martin, Julia Reed and Sheila Nevins as they sought to explain the motives of these women. While we may never understand the mind of a woman who stays committed to her less-than-angelic husband, here’s a look at Silda Spitzer, Elizabeth Edwards, Vanessa Bryant, Gayle Haggard and eight other women who have become the poster wives of “The Good Wife.”

51 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Christi Glaser

Aren’t we assuming that we know the whole story in these cases? How do we know that the wife has been the faithful one?  Like someone said, you don’t know the reasons a spouse stays after infidelity.  It could have evened the playing field.  And about the gayness of Haggard, it’s not about his sexual orientation, it is what he does with it.  Gay people aren’t cheaters simply because they are gay.   Sex is sex, whether it is with a man or a woman.  Whether or not he is gay shouldn’t have anything to do with it.

By Christi Glaser on 10/27/2009 12:21 pm
Brenda Deines
Beautifully said, Christi.  We cannot presume to know the whole story involving the personal and intimate relationship between two people, whether they are celebrities or our neighbor down the street.  And even if we could, why do we feel compelled to sit in judgment?<!—break—>In regard to Haggard being gay, you wrote, "… it’s not about his sexual orientation, it is what he does with it.  Gay people aren’t cheaters simply because they are gay.   Sex is sex, whether it is with a man or a woman.  Whether or not he is gay shouldn’t have anything to do with it."  To that insightful statement I would add this observation:  he is dealing with a double-whammy here — he not only has had to answer to his wife, his former congregation, and the National Association of Evangelicals, for his act of infidelity (okay, fair enough), but he must also repent for and deny his own natural sexual orientation.   He has been conditioned over a lifetime to believe that homosexuality is an abomination, and has preached that message to others.  Haggard appears to care deeply for his wife and children; they are still together, so far as I know, building a new life and a new ministry—and he may still be preaching against the sin of being gay and advising therapy to the ‘afflicted.’  I hope not.  But the fact remains, he is a gay man trying desperately to live his life as a heterosexual.  I cannot begin to imagine how conficted and tormented this man must be.  For all their sakes, I hope they find peace and a way to make it work, if that’s what they desire.  
By Brenda Deines on 10/27/2009 3:17 pm
Brenda Deines
Sorry…I tried to insert a ‘break’ in the text to make it easier to read.  Obviously don’t know what I’m doing.  :-)
By Brenda Deines on 10/27/2009 3:49 pm
Karleen S

That’s okay, Brenda.  This thing isn’t exactly writer-friendly.  As for your comments, I have trouble reconciling the religious "god made everything," which includes people, and even certain animals "abominations."  Coupled with the science that sexual orientation is nature, not nurture, either god is really cruel, or the bible is not the word of god.  At least Leviticus, anyway.  Besides, when you talk to a Christian about the dietary laws, they’ll tell you that Jesus did away with Mosaic law in the New Testament.  That being the case, I should think the rest of the "abominations" from Leviticus are gone, too, like woman wearing pants, for instance.  

I renew my objection to biblical cherry-picking. 

By Karleen S on 10/28/2009 9:06 am
Brenda Deines
Thank you for writing, Karlene.  I agree on all counts.  I was blessed with two gay sons…one of whom died from AIDS years ago long before very much was known about it and the fear and discrimination was rampant.  My oldest son has been in a committed relationship for over 15 years to the most wonderful man, whom I love dearly.  One could say I have been thrice blessed with three gay sons!  :-)   By the way, I delight in reading your posts.  You are a breath of fresh air.   
By Brenda Deines on 10/28/2009 3:39 pm
Brenda Deines
Sorry for the misspelling of your name…I meant, ‘Karleen.’
By Brenda Deines on 10/28/2009 4:44 pm
Cecile Tunstead
One clarification to your comments if I may, he is not living his life as a heterosexual, he is living his life as a homosexual pretending to be a heterosexual.  If you are homosexual, you are homosexual, whether or not you choose to have same sex partners does not change that.  You do not choose to be homosexual, you just are.
By Cecile Tunstead on 10/28/2009 9:34 am
Brenda Deines

Hi, Cecile.  You are absolutely right, and I do appreciate the distinction between what I wrote and how I might have more accurately worded my remark.  Those things do make a difference.  Having gay sons of my own, and a host of treasured gay and lesbian friends, I know better. 

It’s just sad.  It’s not too hard to imagine that Haggard is living a lie and pretending to be what he is not, because maybe he wants (needs) to believe that underneath all that sin—satan’s handiwork!—he surely must be heterosexual, because after all that’s God’s way, isn’t it?  Or…maybe he’s just scared out of his mind because the price for being who he really is—considering how much he has already lost—is simply more than he can bear.  But that’s just my take on it — only Haggard knows what drives him…     

By Brenda Deines on 10/28/2009 4:43 pm
phyllis Doyle Pepe

In the discussion with Judith, Sheila and Julia one of them argued that in these kinds of marriages where the husband has been philandering, the wife has got to be aware of it. "When your husband has lost a tennis match you know it before he tells you from the way he comes in the door." So, they posit, you would know if your husband has been warming someone else’s body. I would tend to agree,  but this is a conjecture that might fit us, but not necessarily others who may not be as sensitive to the signs of infidelity. Christi’s comment about the wives perhaps having their own affairs which may stay hidden since they are not the ones in under discussion that are in the limelight except for Hillary and in her case where on earth would she find the time or the energy. It seems to me part of the problem is accessibility. When successful men have access to cream cakes and cherry tarts, it’s hard to resist. This, of course, does not speak well for the male gender, but when we realize there are thousands of men who remain faithful to their spouses–-be they male or female––then we can rest easy. All is not lost.

One more thing: When wives stay with their husbands after these dalliances, it could very well be that their love is strong enough to overcome and forgive, especially if children are involved. If the marriage survives she is the one who will have the control ––she is the strong one, the one who sits way up high on the moral rung, a comfortable place to be in, I would think.

By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 10/27/2009 1:26 pm
Cindy Marek

Certainly it’s each woman’s decision for whatever reason. And let’s be honest: Some of these gals wouldn’t trade Mr. Ka-Ching! (with all the perks and luxuries and mega-$$) for the local barber (no matter how faithful and in love Mr. Barber might be). Of course I don’t doubt some cases is out of genuine love and devotedness.

Not knowing these people personally, why try and opine further?

By Cindy Marek on 10/27/2009 3:02 pm
Diane Western
I think it depends a great deal on what the crux of a couple’s relationship is.  Perhaps they have some sort of "arrangement" by choice that they abide by.  Maybe fidelity is low on the totem pole of priorities compared to loyalty, etc.  It’s easy for me to stand by and say she should leave him, but who am I to assume they treat their marriage the same as I do?  Granted, it appears to me that the wives in these public scandels have been humiliated, but again it’s their choice. Probably not the one I’d make, but still theirs.
By Diane Western on 10/27/2009 5:01 pm
Rachel M

My father cheated and had the gall to say to my mother as he moved out to be with his mistress "Why are you divorcing me I am coming back?"

Maybe they have heard the most stupid excuses from these men and believe it. One thing that might alert someone who gets married, look at the backround of how the parents have conducted themselves. My paternal grandfather was a serial cheater and married multiple times (maybe as much as 5). My paternal grandmother hated kids which makes wonder why she had 2 of them.

I believe that he cheated thru out my parent’s marriage. So I have a feeling that my father’s mistress was probably the last one that he had after he married her. But I can not be certain that he did not cheat on his second wife too.

By Rachel M on 10/27/2009 6:23 pm
Chrome Toe
I do not propose to know what goes on in anyones marriage… I would like to say that "till death do us part" is a damn long time. hopefully anyway. when we make that commitment we do not know what is in store for us between the day of the vow and the day we "part". My guess is that some of these women went into these marriages knowing exactly what their "bad boys" were up to or might get up to. and maybe they just love them anyway. Maybe they aren’t "cutting deals" for security or money or power. maybe this just happens to be the guy they want in their lives and they take him for what he is. there’s a million ways to live a life. some of them i would choose and some of them i wouldn’t but who am i to judge?
By Chrome Toe on 10/27/2009 8:04 pm
Cecile Tunstead
RJB said it best.  It is better to be a little miserable with the person you love than very miserable without them.
By Cecile Tunstead on 10/28/2009 9:38 am
Marilyn Buchanan
What about Bill Cosby’s wife?
By Marilyn Buchanan on 10/29/2009 1:50 pm