Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Abortion Drug, Aging | 07/09/2009 10:55 am

Antibiotic May Help You Live Longer; Oral 'Abortion Pill' Reduces Infection Risk

Can a common drug used to extend the life of mice do the same for people? Planned Parenthood heralds new research showing safer method of taking abortion pill.
By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© Shutterstock

There’s news today that not only may certain antibiotics delay aging, but they may reduce risk of infection and death associated with the so-called "abortion pill."

The antibiotic rapamycin, which has been used to suppress the immune system of transplant patients and for treating some cancers, has been proven to extend the life of mice, reports The New York Times. The research associated with the National Institute of Aging was first reported by Nature. The thought is, if it can do it for mice, chances are it could do the same for people. The difference between rapamycin and other interventions that have caused mice to live longer is that rapamycin is effective on mice even beginning late in life — 600 days, or age 60 for a human. But scientists warn this does not mean anyone should try this at home quite yet.

Meanwhile, on the abortion front, research published in the New England Journal of Medicine shows that taking the "abortion pill" — RU-486, or mifepristone, to stop the pregnancy, and misoprostol to help expel the fetus — orally with antibiotics, instead of vaginally, cuts the risk of serious infection and death by 93 percent. That would make the infection threat 1 in 16,000, instead of 1 in 1,000.

"Our goal was to make a safe procedure even safer," Mary Fjerstad, a lead author of the study who used to work for Planned Parenthood, told Reuters.

Planned Parenthood health centers in the U.S. provided the drug — mifepristone was taken orally, and misoprostol was taken vaginally two days later — since 2001, but after concerns of serious infections surfaced in 2006, they changed administration of the treatment, so that both the mifepristone and misoprostol were taken orally, along with antibiotics. Up until 2006, seven women died from serious infections after taking the pill, including an 18-year-old California woman whose father urged federal regulators to ban the drug, reports The San Francisco Chronicle. These nonsurgical medical abortions now make up nearly 25 percent of early-term abortions in the United States.

20 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

deber B

We need a cure for cancer not drugs that will offset the abortion pill which kills babies and puts women at risk.   We need research so that we can "live" not a drug that makes you safer when you intentionally destroy a life.

By deber B on 07/09/2009 10:38 am
R.J.B. Reed
We need both, and the two are not mutually exclusive.
By R.J.B. Reed on 07/11/2009 1:45 pm
Linda Willis
For what it’s worth, if I thought about it at all I tend to view the ‘morning-after pill’ as late stage contraception, rather than early abortion. In published statistics on abortion, are pharmaceutically induced (non-surgical) abortions included? 
By Linda Willis on 07/09/2009 12:31 pm
F P
I agree. 
By F P on 07/09/2009 12:45 pm
STACY SEARS
"the morning after pill" is vastly different than RU 486.  "The morning after pill" is a high dose of oral contraceptive taken shortly after unprotected sex.  RU 486 + misoprostol is used for abortion, not to prevent the implantation of a fertilized egg.  Please do not confuse the two.
By STACY SEARS on 07/11/2009 6:10 am
Linda Willis
Thanks for the clarification.  So use of Plan B is not included in abortion statistics, but RU486, would be…  To be clear, I am pro-choice (not pro-abortion). If the public policy objective is reduce the number of abortions by reducing the need for abortion (no personal quarrel with that), then it is important to understand what the measurement standard is and what the trends are.
By Linda Willis on 07/11/2009 7:41 am
C Hardy

I dont have an issue w/ the morning after pill but  I wish more research would be done for cancer and other diseases that affects more and more people of all ages every day. 

By C Hardy on 07/09/2009 12:44 pm
Maggie W
C Hardy, I don’t believe Big Pharm wants to find a cure.  They make trillions off chemo and thousands of other drugs associated with cancer.  Why kill the goose that lays the biggest golden egg?
By Maggie W on 07/09/2009 4:37 pm
R.J.B. Reed
I don’t believe a general cure for cancer is possible.
By R.J.B. Reed on 07/11/2009 1:49 pm
Lila Kuh

I am in favor of medical advances that help us live healthier lives into our old age, but NOT artificial extension of our lifespans beyond the normal range.  I’d like to live longer just as much as anyone else, but improved longevity is already one of the major factors contributing to world overpopulation, and the birthrate has not slowed enough yet to balance that.  Enjoy your life, stay healthy as late as you can, then move along… there are a whole bunch of people coming in behind you.

By Lila Kuh on 07/09/2009 2:40 pm
S G
Lila I agree:) To everything there is a season. Our season is now. In 100 years it will belong to someone else:)
By S G on 07/09/2009 3:25 pm
Amanda C
i’m glad they are making these medical procedures safer.
By Amanda C on 07/09/2009 6:42 pm
Andrea Brandon

Regarding RU-486 and infections:

This needs to be put into perspective.  Fatal sepsis caused by Clostridium sordellii occurred in four women who took the abortion pill RU-486 (Mifeprex, mifepristone).

Definitely, more research funding should go to cancer.

By Andrea Brandon on 07/09/2009 10:22 pm
Libra Lady
Andrea…yes…I too heard about this….very scary… this is so very scary!!!  You and Deber are right…"cancer research" is where we need to be spending our dollars to help find a cure.
By Libra Lady on 07/10/2009 6:54 am
Andrea Brandon
And let’s not forget heart disease.
By Andrea Brandon on 07/10/2009 2:34 pm