Bernard Madoff Ponzi Scheme | 06/17/2009 9:00 am
Madoff Sons Sued for $1.7 Million, Ex-Employees Claim They Knew About Dad's Scheme

It seems Bernard Madoff isn’t the only one in the family under fire.
Two proprietary traders of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Richard I. Stahl and Reed Abend, have sued Madoff sons Mark and Andrew for $1.7 million, saying they "had long known" their dad’s business was illegal and a scam, reports Dow Jones. We told you yesterday that the latest issue of Vanity Fair asks how the sons couldn’t have known about dad’s dealings, but no far, no charges have been filed against them or mom Ruth. The lawsuits, filed in New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan, claim the Madoff sons helped to "perpetuate their father’s lawless conduct" and his $65 billion Ponzi scheme by making false statements and failing to disclose dad’s dirty deeds, just so they could keep profiting.
"The lawsuit is totally without merit. Andrew and Mark had no knowledge of their father’s fraudulent conduct," said Mark and Andrew’s attorney, Martin Flumenbaum.
Meanwhile, the Securities and Exchange Commission on Tuesday officially banned Bernie Madoff from the securities business — for life. Took them long enough! The ban is part of a deal between Madoff and the SEC to settle a civil complaint — separate from the criminal complaint over the Ponzi scheme — against the jailed investment adviser without him having to admit any wrongdoing. That has some crying foul.
"You can only mock this," Columbia Law School professor John Coffee told Reuters. "I don’t think the SEC will be able to declare a victory in this case."Madoff will be sentenced June 29 for his role in the the nation’s biggest investment fraud ever. The 71-year-old could face life in prison.























14 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
and… the SEC is CYAing all the way to their banks. We are not getting 1/10 of this in the news, not 1/10. The ladder of guilt goes right to the top (you know where to find him).
But, once again, the Made Offs are hedging the bet they will not be prosecuted, because no one else has been prosecuted, again, from the top down for 40 years. How many of us reported questions, and losses to the SEC and our state SEC boards? I did - "they are high on our radar" said the Tx securities board right to my face.
Where there is money like that, they is collusion. Many of those investors were also in the "know." Count on it.
People aren’t that stupid. Of course, they had something to do with it!
and, let’s look at all the other brokerage houses, and "personal money managers" carefully. Case in point: I had TIAA CREF and none of my statements added up. Hec, it was an NGO, so I wondered why would they do anything wrong, they don’t have to show a profit, merely serve their mission. NOT. I had a wise investor I know look at my statements and he agreed - they don’t add up.
After a blooming fight, I got my money back, and very soon thereafter, that group lost it’s non-profit status. I would not use them for investing a penny.
When you work for corrupt companies, you always know when there’s something fishy going on. Examples 1) the commercial real estate company who evicted Asians (and kept the assests in the property) as soon as they were legally late but gave their Caucasian tenants a lot more leniency, 2) an oil company who ordered us to use higher priced vendors who were friends of the CEO, 3) the oil company who told us to overprice our product to certain customers.
…and so on, and so on…
One problem is: Who do you report this to? Second problem is: There goes your job.
The Madoff sons should have quit the company if they couldn’t turn their father in. But they knew.
I agree, $1.7M seems like a paltry sum. Why gee, the attorney expenses could easily go that high.
No one’s talking because of the fear of implication, I’ll bet.