Bernie Madoff | 03/10/2009 11:40 am
Bernie Madoff Heads to Court Today to Deal With Potential Attorney Conflict

Before entering his expected guilty plea later this week, accused Ponzi schemer Bernie Madoff heads to court today, where Judge Denny Chin will determine whether his lawyers have a conflict of interest.
According to Newsday, Madoff’s attorney, Ira Sorkin, has personal connections with the Wall Street crook. Sorkin’s parents invested with Madoff but Sorkin says he never gave the Wall Street crook a dime. Interesting … We suppose his parents didn’t lose their life savings — or how in the world could Sorkin defend this man?
Meanwhile, Madoff’s wife Ruth hired her own lawyers and is being represented by the same law firm, Dickstein Shapiro LLP in New York.
This past Friday, a court document was signed by prosecutors that showed Madoff would waive an indictment by a grand jury and also showed that he pleads guilty to criminal charges. The court papers also indicated that Madoff’s victims may be heard in court. And with famous celebrity victims including Steven Spielberg, Kevin Bacon and Zsa Zsa Gabor, this may become the biggest media spectacle in history.























18 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Great Op-Ed in the NYT, mostly about Madoff (but not in this excerpt, see link at bottom):
"The simplest explanation for why America’s reality got so distorted is the economic imbalance that Barack Obama now wants to remedy with policies that his critics deride as “socialist” (“fascist” can’t be far behind): the obscene widening of income inequality between the very rich and everyone else since the 1970s. “There is something wrong when we allow the playing field to be tilted so far in the favor of so few,” the president said in his budget message. He was calling for fundamental fairness, not class warfare. America hasn’t seen such gaping inequality since the Gilded Age and 1920s boom that preceded the Great Depression…
Last week Jon Stewart whipped up a well-earned frenzy with an eight-minute “Daily Show” takedown of the stars of CNBC, the business network that venerated our financial gods, plugged their stocks and hyped the bubble’s reckless delusions. (Just as it had in the dot-com bubble.) Stewart’s horrifying clip reel featured Jim Cramer reassuring viewersthat Bear Stearns was “not in trouble” just six days before its March 2008 collapse; Charlie Gasparino lip-syncing A.I.G.’s claim that its subprime losses were “very manageable” in December 2007; and Larry Kudlow declaring last April that “the worst of this subprime business is over.” The coup de grâce was a CNBC interviewer fawning over the lordly Robert Allen Stanford. Stewart spoke for many when he concluded, “Between the two of them I can’t decide which one of those guys I’d rather see in jail.”
Led by Cramer and Kudlow, the CNBC carnival barkers are now, without any irony whatsoever, assailing the president as a radical saboteur of capitalism. It’s particularly rich to hear Cramer tar Obama (or anyone else) for “wealth destruction” when he followed up his bum steer to viewers on Bear Stearns with oleaginous on-camera salesmanship for Wachovia and its brilliant chief executive, a Cramer friend and former boss, just two weeks before it, too, collapsed. "
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/08/opinion/08rich.html?em
DeB—you should watch thin one with Stewart—In Cramer We Trust. lololol
http://www.thedailyshow.com/index.jhtml
"The Wall Street Journal has reported the charges are expected to include securities fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud and money laundering, citing a person familiar with the case."
These charges, if proven, will certainly result in Mrs. Madoff losing her penthouse and many years in jail for Mr. M.
By the way, anybody want to make me an offer for my mint-condition cookbook by Mrs. M.?