Wall Street Weekly | 07/04/2009 9:40 am
Hot Dogs, History and Hope for the Future, by Liz Peek

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 6/29)
Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.
Happy Independence Day! Between the cookouts and bike parades, I always try to sneak in a few minutes over this holiday to contemplate the Declaration of Independence, and to think about the birth of this great nation. Although my imaginings of those gatherings in Philadelphia have undoubtedly been colored by one too many viewings of the musical "1776," reading about the key players of the time leaves no doubt that they were indeed extraordinary men.
Thomas Jefferson and John Adams probably did not frequently break into song. They did, however, possess great learning, idealism and courage. They were also, for the most part, selfless. I wish they walked among us now.
Today, our country is again under siege. We have overcome huge obstacles in the past – the British, World Wars, Depressions and massive shifts in the economy – because we found the leaders and the skills to succeed. What about this time?
As this week’s employment report confirms, we still face major challenges. In June, the country shed another 467,000 jobs – much worse than expected, bringing the unemployment level to 9.5%.
Since the beginning of the recession last year, the U.S. has lost 6.5 million jobs – truly a disaster for so many families, and also for the prospects of a near-term rebound. It continues to be the highest-paying jobs – those in manufacturing – that are hardest hit. Some 136,000 in that field lost work last month, along with 79,000 in construction.
Employment is a lagging indicator, as we all know. Still, the persistent bad news on this front makes the hoped-for second-half recovery less likely. It also casts doubt on the effectiveness of the stimulus program undertaken by President Obama. Though opinion has been split on the potential of that $787 billion initiative, it probably boosted the nation’s confidence at a critical time. That alone was worth something. Ironically, since the administration has attempted recently to ram through a slew of other massive programs such as health-care reform and cap-and-trade, the country’s enthusiasm for deficit spending has vanished. The surprising downturn in consumer sentiment in June, to 49.3 from 54.8 in May, attests to this. Americans are not stupid. They see spending and deficits soaring, and understand the consequences.
As I wrote several weeks ago, the stock market is now weighing the shape of the bounce-back. In the second quarter we enjoyed a nice surge in the market averages, as investors decided that clocks would keep ticking, but for further gains, we need confidence that we will find an engine of growth.
The head of the Council of Economic Advisors, Christina Romer, surprised me this past week by reiterating her forecast of a V-shaped recovery. I really cannot see where that will come from. There are some short-term factors, such as inventory restocking, that will boost the numbers going forward, but it is hard to see a surge in spending by either consumers or by businesses anytime soon. The consumer is simply tapped out. The slow growth in jobs and wages over the past decade meant that consumers funded spending through borrowing. That is over, and instead many people now face debt problems and rising taxes. Businesses are in better shape, but extremely low utilization rates suggest that any surge there is unlikely.
I hope I’m wrong, and that an upturn in China and other emerging markets will fuel exports from the U.S., and that the early-stage (and potentially very damaging) protectionism that we’ve seen from the union-obliged Obama team is abandoned. It’s also possible that businesses find investment opportunities in the tech sector. The bad news is that most of the breakthroughs taking place there seem to do with providing consumers with an ever-greater range of entertainment on their cell phones. That doesn’t seem very productivity-enhancing to me. In fact, I imagine it’s quite the opposite.























48 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Great verbiage, KIT. Suggestions???
Do you really believe corporations will or have suffered? You’re experience?
re When the government gets into the student loans, it will be like tarp…there will be strings, there will be rules.
Opps, you picked that one up somewhere … the U.S. has been goverment student loads since day one, save for the those of us who paid for our own educations through the 60s, and had to borrow after 2 successful GPAs only from our local home town banks (regardless of where our university was located). The USGSL = United States Guaranteed Student Loans (with banks, et al being sub-contractors to the feds). tsk tsk … I had several of my children on one, eventually - didn’t qualify for the first 2 though.
KIT, you, male or female, issue some interesting things, but not if you don’t offer some solutions, or experience; without which such become pure verbiage, almost as if from a vocabulary list, or documents. Hope you understnad. If not, don’t fire back, I won’t respond. It’s not worth it, especially on Independence Day.
Here’s the crux of the problem: Nationalism v the economics of supply and demand
There are those who will throw the well-being of the US as a sovereign nation under the bus in pursuit of profit.
There are others who will throw the well-being of the US as a sovereign nation under the bus for ‘moral’ reasons and the perpetuation of the White Man’s Burden mindset of cultural imperialism.
There are those who will use the latter as a cover for the former.
Sounds like the choice between horrible and terrible.
I’d like to see more fundamental economics taught in our system.
To me, economic illiteracy is very expensive.
Fly, any one with a degree in economics, baccalaureate or through Doctorate, will not agree with you. Its a form of puff (I got that from 2 UT PhDs in econ.).
What is a "form of puff?"
Economic illiteracy, or the choice between horrible and terrible?
I think it’s basically pretty simple regardless — it seems to me there is no "self-correction", the correction has to be forced. Can you give me an example of what you mean?
In the theoretical construct a free market is self-correcting due to supply and demand. As supply falls or demand rises prices increase until either the supply grows or the demand slacks (even with high demand an excessively overpriced item might not sell).
In the real world speculation (false demand) and other tactics can drive pricing, which is then passed through to the end consumer, when in reality there is no shortage of supply. The market gets manipulated into a theoretical economically ‘false’ status - this is one way ‘bubbles’ get created - which, if not restrained by regulation, leads to self-corrections that are crashes instead of more natural and gradual market fluctuations.
Hi Karen……….thanks for taking time to put together the "theoretical" explanation — which is opinion based, not fact based……. what I was really looking for with my question……..was looking for a real world example of something that "self-corrected"……….