Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Wall Street Weekly | 07/04/2009 9:40 am

Hot Dogs, History and Hope for the Future, by Liz Peek

By Liz Peek
© Shutterstock

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 6/29) 

Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.

Happy Independence Day! Between the cookouts and bike parades, I always try to sneak in a few minutes over this holiday to contemplate the Declaration of Independence, and to think about the birth of this great nation. Although my imaginings of those gatherings in Philadelphia have undoubtedly been colored by one too many viewings of the musical "1776," reading about the key players of the time leaves no doubt that they were indeed extraordinary men.

Thomas Jefferson and John Adams probably did not frequently break into song. They did, however, possess great learning, idealism and courage. They were also, for the most part, selfless. I wish they walked among us now.

Today, our country is again under siege. We have overcome huge obstacles in the past – the British, World Wars, Depressions and massive shifts in the economy – because we found the leaders and the skills to succeed. What about this time?

As this week’s employment report confirms, we still face major challenges. In June, the country shed another 467,000 jobs – much worse than expected, bringing the unemployment level to 9.5%.

Since the beginning of the recession last year, the U.S. has lost 6.5 million jobs – truly a disaster for so many families, and also for the prospects of a near-term rebound. It continues to be the highest-paying jobs – those in manufacturing – that are hardest hit. Some 136,000 in that field lost work last month, along with 79,000 in construction.

Employment is a lagging indicator, as we all know. Still, the persistent bad news on this front makes the hoped-for second-half recovery less likely. It also casts doubt on the effectiveness of the stimulus program undertaken by President Obama. Though opinion has been split on the potential of that $787 billion initiative, it probably boosted the nation’s confidence at a critical time. That alone was worth something. Ironically, since the administration has attempted recently to ram through a slew of other massive programs such as health-care reform and cap-and-trade, the country’s enthusiasm for deficit spending has vanished. The surprising downturn in consumer sentiment in June, to 49.3 from 54.8 in May, attests to this. Americans are not stupid. They see spending and deficits soaring, and understand the consequences.

As I wrote several weeks ago, the stock market is now weighing the shape of the bounce-back. In the second quarter we enjoyed a nice surge in the market averages, as investors decided that clocks would keep ticking, but for further gains, we need confidence that we will find an engine of growth.

The head of the Council of Economic Advisors, Christina Romer, surprised me this past week by reiterating her forecast of a V-shaped recovery. I really cannot see where that will come from. There are some short-term factors, such as inventory restocking, that will boost the numbers going forward, but it is hard to see a surge in spending by either consumers or by businesses anytime soon. The consumer is simply tapped out. The slow growth in jobs and wages over the past decade meant that consumers funded spending through borrowing. That is over, and instead many people now face debt problems and rising taxes. Businesses are in better shape, but extremely low utilization rates suggest that any surge there is unlikely.

I hope I’m wrong, and that an upturn in China and other emerging markets will fuel exports from the U.S., and that the early-stage (and potentially very damaging) protectionism that we’ve seen from the union-obliged Obama team is abandoned. It’s also possible that businesses find investment opportunities in the tech sector. The bad news is that most of the breakthroughs taking place there seem to do with providing consumers with an ever-greater range of entertainment on their cell phones. That doesn’t seem very productivity-enhancing to me. In fact, I imagine it’s quite the opposite.

48 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Karen R
Tax policy is part of it. Trade agreements are another. Even US based banking and commerce entities haven’t been willing to work closely with US manufacturers in the way banking, commerce, and manufacturers do in other countries.
By Karen R on 07/05/2009 12:44 pm
Kelly In Texas
Well Liz…the demise of small business is essential for the Obama agenda to succeed. In order to have control of the America economy, he must have control of the industries and workforce.  Small business, firms with less than 100 employees create over 97% of all new jobs and employ over 50.2% of the private sector workforce. So why do Obama policies like cap and trade and the health care plan, hurt small business? Why aren’t there  tax breaks and laws that benefit small business instead of harming it? How does that make sense if you want for unemployment to decrease? Just ask Lloyd Chapman of the Small Business League about Obama and he used them and then dumped them after the election. Millions are being funneled into large corporations that were earmarked for small business…why? Obama NEEDS for the unemployment to hit record highs. He needs for the public to fear and to place the government in control, to "fix things."  With more people on the government pay…the middle class is slowly lost. Obama’s agenda ends with those that work for the government and the giant corporations that rule the world economy. He is an authoritarian socialist and the middle class must go. We will be the United States of the New Global Order. Overwhelm the system with welfare dependents and collapse is eminent. Obama wants control of our enormous economy and the power to bring what we produce, what we eat, what we drive….to the chosen few GIANT corporations that have invested in his policies. Our farmers are being put out of business in Ca. The water has been withheld for crops…now those food stuffs will be IMPORTED at higher prices and more safety issues. The ability of America to be self-sufficient is almost gone. We will be dependents on the rest of the world for our existence. We can plant, we can drill, we can manufacture. But not if the government does not allow our crops to be watered, our oil to be drilled and our manufacturing plants to survive. Obama knows that…that is why cap and trade favors the GIANT corporations and will kill the small businesses. Health care favors the GIANT corporations and kills private care. The government gains control and power, while Americans and America loose liberties and choice. So…really Liz? You wonder about education? The government will cap the salaries of CEO’s and thusly kill private enterprise…the only place to go with that education? Government jobs. And that Liz…will kill the desire to succeed that has in the past made America the world leader and the uniquely successful country that we are. But that is the point after all…no more "unique" anything…take the power away from the people by limiting their ability to sway the votes with their economical might…only the government will have that power. You see Liz…the government will decide what is necessary to learn, they will employ what is needed and the rest will be on the government dole. When the government gets into the student loans, it will be like tarp…there will be strings, there will be rules. There will be control over what is learned, what is "needed". Hide and watch. So unless Americans like the idea of an authoritative socialist government that answers to a global entity, run by the money of a few huge corporations and fueled by the work of the governments "people"…they had better wake up now and vote no on cap and trade and Nationalized health care…for our very existence as a free and democratic society is dependant upon it. It is that simple…otherwise…this administration would not be doing what they are doing….it is becoming more obvious and they are pushing that much faster to get things done before Americans can stop it. We as a Nation, are on an edge and our complacency and refusal to believe our lying eyes will ensure that the country we love will be lost. Stop debating the fraudulent premises…call it what it really is. Happy 4th of July ~
By Kelly In Texas on 07/04/2009 3:22 pm
C jay

Great verbiage, KIT. Suggestions???

Do you really believe corporations will or have suffered? You’re experience?

re When the government gets into the student loans, it will be like tarp…there will be strings, there will be rules.

Opps, you picked that one up somewhere … the U.S. has been goverment student loads since day one, save for the those of us who paid for our own educations through the 60s, and had to borrow after 2 successful GPAs only from our local home town banks (regardless of where our university was located). The USGSL = United States Guaranteed Student Loans (with banks, et al being sub-contractors to the feds). tsk tsk … I had several of my children on one, eventually - didn’t qualify for the first 2 though.

KIT, you, male or female, issue some interesting things, but not if you don’t offer some solutions, or experience; without which such become pure verbiage, almost as if from a vocabulary list, or documents. Hope you understnad. If not, don’t fire back, I won’t respond. It’s not worth it, especially on Independence Day.

 

By C jay on 07/04/2009 4:11 pm
Fly O. T. Wall
How many high school graduates (or college graduates, for that matter) could give you 15 minutes on the economics of supply and demand?
By Fly O. T. Wall on 07/04/2009 12:03 pm
Karen R

Here’s the crux of the problem: Nationalism v the economics of supply and demand

There are those who will throw the well-being of the US as a sovereign nation under the bus in pursuit of profit.

There are others who will throw the well-being of the US as a sovereign nation under the bus for ‘moral’ reasons and the perpetuation of the White Man’s Burden mindset of cultural imperialism.

There are those who will use the latter as a cover for the former.

By Karen R on 07/04/2009 1:03 pm
Fly O. T. Wall

Sounds like the choice between horrible and terrible.

I’d like to see more fundamental economics taught in our system.

To me, economic illiteracy is very expensive.

By Fly O. T. Wall on 07/04/2009 3:07 pm
C jay

Fly, any one with a degree in economics, baccalaureate or through Doctorate, will not agree with you. Its a form of puff (I got that from 2 UT PhDs in econ.).

By C jay on 07/04/2009 4:13 pm
Fly O. T. Wall
By Fly O. T. Wall on 07/04/2009 4:49 pm
Fly O. T. Wall

What is a "form of puff?"

Economic illiteracy, or the choice between horrible and terrible?

By Fly O. T. Wall on 07/04/2009 4:52 pm
MK P
Why would anyone need 15 minutes on supply & demand?   It’s a very simple concept — one that anyone who has tried to buy a ticket for a sold out concert or ball game clearly grasps.
By MK P on 07/04/2009 6:43 pm
Karen R
It’s only a simple concept in a simplified situation. When you start adding in real world variables the situation can become unstable and lose its propensity for self-correction.
By Karen R on 07/04/2009 7:25 pm
MK P

I think it’s basically pretty simple regardless — it seems to me there is no "self-correction", the correction has to be forced.   Can you give me an example of what you mean?

By MK P on 07/04/2009 7:47 pm
Karen R

In the theoretical construct a free market is self-correcting due to supply and demand. As supply falls or demand rises prices increase until either the supply grows or the demand slacks (even with high demand an excessively overpriced item might not sell).

In the real world speculation (false demand) and other tactics can drive pricing, which is then passed through to the end consumer, when in reality there is no shortage of supply. The market gets manipulated into a theoretical economically ‘false’ status - this is one way ‘bubbles’ get created - which, if not restrained by regulation, leads to self-corrections that are crashes instead of more natural and gradual market fluctuations.

By Karen R on 07/04/2009 8:17 pm
MK P

Hi Karen……….thanks for taking time to put together the "theoretical" explanation — which is opinion based, not fact based……. what I was really looking for with my question……..was looking for a real world example of something that "self-corrected"……….

By MK P on 07/05/2009 7:40 am
Karen R
Well, a simplistic prime example of ‘self-correction’ would be your ticket buying for a sold out event example - as long as there is demand the ticket prices remain high but once the demand ceases (e.g. after the event has begun or is over, or perhaps an additional show scheduled) the ticket prices will drop.
By Karen R on 07/05/2009 12:33 pm