Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Wall Street Weekly | 07/04/2009 9:40 am

Hot Dogs, History and Hope for the Future, by Liz Peek

By Liz Peek
© Shutterstock

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly with Liz Peek (Week of 6/29) 

Editor’s Note: Liz Peek is a financial columnist and the author of wOw’s SHEconomics.

Happy Independence Day! Between the cookouts and bike parades, I always try to sneak in a few minutes over this holiday to contemplate the Declaration of Independence, and to think about the birth of this great nation. Although my imaginings of those gatherings in Philadelphia have undoubtedly been colored by one too many viewings of the musical "1776," reading about the key players of the time leaves no doubt that they were indeed extraordinary men.

Thomas Jefferson and John Adams probably did not frequently break into song. They did, however, possess great learning, idealism and courage. They were also, for the most part, selfless. I wish they walked among us now.

Today, our country is again under siege. We have overcome huge obstacles in the past – the British, World Wars, Depressions and massive shifts in the economy – because we found the leaders and the skills to succeed. What about this time?

As this week’s employment report confirms, we still face major challenges. In June, the country shed another 467,000 jobs – much worse than expected, bringing the unemployment level to 9.5%.

Since the beginning of the recession last year, the U.S. has lost 6.5 million jobs – truly a disaster for so many families, and also for the prospects of a near-term rebound. It continues to be the highest-paying jobs – those in manufacturing – that are hardest hit. Some 136,000 in that field lost work last month, along with 79,000 in construction.

Employment is a lagging indicator, as we all know. Still, the persistent bad news on this front makes the hoped-for second-half recovery less likely. It also casts doubt on the effectiveness of the stimulus program undertaken by President Obama. Though opinion has been split on the potential of that $787 billion initiative, it probably boosted the nation’s confidence at a critical time. That alone was worth something. Ironically, since the administration has attempted recently to ram through a slew of other massive programs such as health-care reform and cap-and-trade, the country’s enthusiasm for deficit spending has vanished. The surprising downturn in consumer sentiment in June, to 49.3 from 54.8 in May, attests to this. Americans are not stupid. They see spending and deficits soaring, and understand the consequences.

As I wrote several weeks ago, the stock market is now weighing the shape of the bounce-back. In the second quarter we enjoyed a nice surge in the market averages, as investors decided that clocks would keep ticking, but for further gains, we need confidence that we will find an engine of growth.

The head of the Council of Economic Advisors, Christina Romer, surprised me this past week by reiterating her forecast of a V-shaped recovery. I really cannot see where that will come from. There are some short-term factors, such as inventory restocking, that will boost the numbers going forward, but it is hard to see a surge in spending by either consumers or by businesses anytime soon. The consumer is simply tapped out. The slow growth in jobs and wages over the past decade meant that consumers funded spending through borrowing. That is over, and instead many people now face debt problems and rising taxes. Businesses are in better shape, but extremely low utilization rates suggest that any surge there is unlikely.

I hope I’m wrong, and that an upturn in China and other emerging markets will fuel exports from the U.S., and that the early-stage (and potentially very damaging) protectionism that we’ve seen from the union-obliged Obama team is abandoned. It’s also possible that businesses find investment opportunities in the tech sector. The bad news is that most of the breakthroughs taking place there seem to do with providing consumers with an ever-greater range of entertainment on their cell phones. That doesn’t seem very productivity-enhancing to me. In fact, I imagine it’s quite the opposite.

48 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

MK P

Hi Karen………the after the even is over isn’t a valid example.   And if there is an additional show schedule — then that’s not self correction, that’s forced (by scheduling an additional show).

By MK P on 07/05/2009 1:03 pm
Karen R

It’s a supply and demand driven correction of the market - that’s exactly what ‘self-correcting’ means - when supply is low and prices rise then there’s an expectation of the supply shortage to be eased either via 1) pricing up to the maximum value point 2) introduction of a new, additional supplier with the same OR competing product, or, 3) in the case of ticket scalping, by releasing more supply into the market so that the original supplier collects the money instead of the scalpers.

Any time there is a huge scalpers market for an event it’s because the event was priced too low at the outset. That’s the challenge of price points - maximizing take - price to high people don’t buy - price too low and the scalpers make money that could have gone to the original ticketseller.

The after event scenario is certainly a valid example - the tickets become relatively worthless (although a few might sell as collectors’ items or keepsakes) after the event because the demand has disappeared.

By Karen R on 07/05/2009 2:10 pm
MK P

The target market for scalpers is entirely different than the target market for the event — scalpers are targeting people who either did not plan ahead and buy tickets themselves or who for some other reason were not able to buy tickets themselves.

By MK P on 07/05/2009 2:37 pm
Karen R
Not true at all. The market is anyone who wants to attend the event. Where they get the ticket from really doesn’t change that except to weed out some who are more ambivalent about paying an excessive price to a scalper. If the production is properly priced any reasonably late ticket buyers could still get tickets from the venue instead of resorting to scalpers. Anyone who can purchase from a scalper should have no trouble purchasing from an original ticketseller or authorized broker.
By Karen R on 07/05/2009 2:55 pm
MK P
Scallpers make money when the tickets are no longer available through "normal" channels — that’s the whole point of scalping.
By MK P on 07/05/2009 3:11 pm
Karen R
Correct, scalpers benefit when demand exceeds supply - if the original supply was better managed in terms of pricing (e.g. at the optimal price point) and/or availability (e.g. the best number of dates scheduled when possible) there would be virtually no market for scalpers. Scalpers represent lost opportunities for the production/venue - the scalpers get money the production/venue could have gotten if they had originally priced/managed better.
By Karen R on 07/05/2009 3:39 pm
MK P
You are assuming everyone would pay the scalper’s price and that is not true — the scalper’s market is much narrow than the original market for the game/show.   
By MK P on 07/05/2009 4:43 pm
Karen R
No, I’m not assuming that at all.
By Karen R on 07/05/2009 6:02 pm
MK P

Then…….how do you justify your premise that:  "Scalpers represent lost opportunities for the production/venue - the scalpers get money the production/venue could have gotten if they had originally priced/managed better"?  =)

By MK P on 07/06/2009 6:16 am
Karen R

I suspect at this point you’re just looking to argue. If you reread these posts it should be obvious, but in a nutshell:

If the venue/production prices tickets ideally for the demand market all customers would be able to get tickets from the venue, the venue would be very near or at sellout, the venue/production would have maximized their possible take from ticket sales, and there would be no scalpers market for the event because the original ticketseller satisfied all demand.

If the venue underprices tickets for the demand market and doesn’t increase ticket supply by adding an additional show, it opens a following market for scalpers who benefit from the venue/production pricing mistake by reselling tickets at the higher price people are willing to pay. (One might say that this is a small example of a ‘self-correcting’ market situation in that the presence of scalpers allows ticket prices to correct to what the top end of the demand market is willing to pay.)

By Karen R on 07/06/2009 12:44 pm
MK P
I’m not looking to argue, Karen — I’m was merely looking to make my original point — which is basically, supply and demand is a very simple concept.   However, it seems you prefer to make it more complicated than it actually is.   =)    If that floats your boat, so be it.
By MK P on 07/06/2009 12:48 pm
L. C.

There are a number of things that need to be to put Americans back to work and to improve the education system.

Where are the jobs going? Jobs are leaving the country through outsourcing. Corporations and manufacturers are motivated by money. They’re going to countrys where labor and materials are cheap. For example, in India they can produce a pair of sneakers for $5.00 and sell them in America for $200.00. The cost of labor is way below Americas minimum wage. They’re not concerned with exploitation of workers nor  abuse of children. Many children are going blind working under horrific conditions. Their only concern is the or the fatting of their pockets!

If these greed masters thought less of profit and more of their country and he citizens we would see our economy growing. We would see Americans getting back to work.

There needs to be an end to partisanhip and political rhetoric and a focus on economic recovery!  What each of us do as citizens and employees to get Americas workers back on their feet?

Before I retired I would hear many employees complaining about having to do mandatory overtime. Overtime  meant having to work another tour(eight hours.)  Employees suggested that people were hired to work these hours. There was always a busy period of about six monthes. Th salary and benefits were good. This  would give some out of work person a job for atleast six months and benefits. It would also solve the problem of parents who could not find childcare for double shifts. The suggestion was never implemented and the percentage of persons calling in sick escalated. Perhaps, this suggestion is simplistic to some but it seemed logical at the time.

America needs to start producing her own products again. When was the last time you read a label that said made in the USA?

We accept China’s inferior imported goods because we’re in debt to China up the ying yang. Yet, this dispicable regime refuses to import Americas goods at an equal rate.

The educational system is antiquated. This is the year 2009 and 1950s ideas and being used. The educational system refuses to grow with the times. There ar too many persons locked in jobs lacking imagination and innovative ideas! Can you blame students for not liking school and for being bored? You have people in the school administration who are doing nothing but taking up space.

There’re teachers with innovative ideas whose ideas are shot down and they’re told to stick to the 1950s curriculum and way of doing things. Teachers are frustrated watching their students minds atrophy. Many of these schools are nothing more than warehouses.

Not all students are interested in attending college. Many students are interested in vocational training. Offer students a curriculum that incorporates subjects they’re interested in. Perhaps they’ll come to school.

You do not have to bus children if equality and not politics  is being practiced. You do not need to bus children if qualified teachers are hired. There’re rich school districts where each student enrolling gets a laptop. Schools with every modern technology. Schools in wealthy districts that refused the monies being given to them. They suggested giving it to the schools in need. Of course, this suggestion was squashed. There’re schools where the only computer is in  administrative office. Schools where the ceilings are caving in, no running water, no supplies and books.

There needs to be stronger PTAs and more involvement by parents. Parents need to have more say in the schools curriculum. However, too often parents are treated with hostility,

By L. C. on 07/04/2009 7:30 pm
Bill Lee
A lot of good points there, L. C.
By Bill Lee on 07/05/2009 8:23 pm
Dianne Legro

I educate people on speaking in public to grow their business, their influence and promote their good causes.

If you are interested in getting started speaking to grow yourself and your business you may listen to this great interview full of ideas and tips  from top speaking coach Dianne Legro.

 http://www.blogtalkradio.com/userfriendlythinking/2009/07/10/The-New-Rules-of-Public-Speaking-New-Opportunities-Social-Media-has-Created-for-Beginner-Speakers

 

By Dianne Legro on 07/06/2009 6:01 pm
starry Nite

I don’t think enough people really understand economics are the hell of an economic mess we are in.

If we did Liz Peek could not get away with these talking points.  

By starry Nite on 07/08/2009 12:35 am